Who does and who doesn't meet the 'Afrikaner' criteria for Trump's resettlement offer?
Image: GCIS
With the second batch of white Afrikaners having quietly arrived in the United States last week, as part of President Donald Trump's offer to resettle them amidst false claims of white genocide and persecution in South Africa, a discussion has been raised around who exactly can meet the criteria.
The second batch is part of a larger group that applied to be resettled within the US, according to the Head of Public Relations for trade union Solidarity, Jaco Kleynhans.
Kleynhans further shared that there have been 70,000 enquiries and so far there have been about 8,000 formal applications.
'How many people will be resettled will be determined by many factors – how many people apply in future, (and) how many applications are successful?'
Explaining their role in the process, Kleynhans said: 'We are not involved at all. We only help people with enquiries and refer them to the right people at the embassy.'
A US Mission to South Africa spokesperson said: 'The U.S. Embassy in Pretoria continues to review inquiries from individuals who have expressed interest to the Embassy in resettling to the United States and is reaching out to eligible individuals for refugee interviews and processing.'
'Refugees continue to arrive in the United States from South Africa on commercial flights as part of the Afrikaner resettlement program's ongoing operations.'
In their records, the spokesperson said they have received almost 50,000 inquiries regarding refugee resettlement to the United States from South Africa.
Afrikaners waiting to be briefed by US government officials in a hangar at Dulles International Airport, Washington on May 12, 2025.
Image: AFP
According to the criteria, to be eligible for US resettlement consideration (USRAP), individuals must meet all of the following criteria: Must be of South African nationality; and
Must be of Afrikaner ethnicity or be a member of a racial minority in South Africa; and
Must be able to articulate a past experience of persecution or fear of future persecution.
In his IOL opinion piece this week, Clyde N.S. Ramalaine argued that the criteria used, has opened an unexpected opportunity to examine how it could inadvertently apply to other historically marginalised South African groups, 'particularly the KhoeSan and Coloured communities'.
'The original purpose of the USRAP criteria appears to have been the protection of white South Africans fearing political and land displacement. However, its language is broad enough to permit reinterpretation.
'A literal application of its three criteria—nationality, minority status, and persecution—clearly allows for KhoeSan and Coloured inclusion,' Ramalaine said.
Pan South African Language Board (PanSALB) CEO, Lance Schultz, explained that the word "Afrikaner" derives from the Dutch word Afrikaan, meaning "African," combined with the suffix -er, which denotes a person associated with a place or characteristic.
'Thus, 'Afrikaner' literally means 'one from Africa' or 'African' in Dutch.'
Schultz explained that initially, "Afrikaner" was a broad term that could apply to anyone born in Africa, including people of mixed descent or even enslaved individuals, but over time, it became more narrowly associated with the white, Dutch-speaking settler population who developed a distinct cultural and linguistic identity separate from their European origins.
'Many views or schools of thought may exist regarding the historical origin of the word 'Afrikaner'; two of these can be explored. Firstly, the term 'Afrikaner' is regarded as having its roots in the Dutch colonial history of South Africa, and it refers to white Afrikaans-speaking persons.
'The term was initially used to describe people of European descent, primarily Dutch, who settled in southern Africa and identified with the continent as their home. This reflects the complex interplay of language, culture, and identity in the region,' Schultz said.
He explained that the term "Afrikaner" has undergone significant changes in meaning, usage, and connotation since its emergence in the 17th century, reflecting shifts in historical, social, and political contexts in South Africa.
'After the end of apartheid in 1994, the term 'Afrikaner' became more contested. It remains primarily associated with white, Afrikaans-speaking South Africans, but is increasingly debated in terms of inclusivity. Some advocate for a broader definition that includes all Afrikaans speakers, regardless of race, such as Coloured and Black Afrikaans-speaking communities,' Schultz said.
'The legacy of apartheid has made 'Afrikaner' a polarising term for some, associated with historical oppression, while others view it as a cultural or linguistic identity divorced from political connotations. In modern South Africa, Afrikaner identity is diverse, with some embracing globalised or progressive values and others holding onto conservative or nationalist sentiments.'
Head of Public Relations for trade union Solidarity, Jaco Kleynhans said that there have been 70,000 enquiries about US President Donald Trump's resettlement offer and so far there have been about 8,000 formal applications.
Image: Graphic
He explained that the categorising of who does and doesn't count as part of a specific ethnic group, such as "Afrikaner" in the context of Trump's 2025 executive order, involves navigating complex linguistic, cultural, and political terrain.
'This policy has spotlighted the term 'Afrikaner' and raised questions about its definition, revealing language pitfalls that can lead to exclusion, misrepresentation, or manipulation of ethnic identity.'
He added that ethnic categories like "Afrikaner" often blend linguistic, cultural, ancestral, and racial elements, but vague or inconsistent definitions can lead to misinterpretation or exclusion.
'The executive order appears to define 'Afrikaner' narrowly as white, Afrikaans-speaking South Africans, aligning with historical apartheid-era usage that excluded non-white Afrikaans speakers, such as the Coloured community, who form a significant portion of Afrikaans speakers. This exclusionary framing ignores the linguistic diversity of Afrikaans speakers and reinforces a racialised interpretation of the term.'
Director at the Centre for Education Rights and Transformation from the University of Johannesburg, Professor June Bam-Hutchison, added that the Trump administration is instrumentalising an apartheid white racist notion of 'Afrikaner' as 'embedded within Afrikaner nationalism which mutated into the ethnic foundations of the 'chosen people' (white Afrikaners)'.
'Of course, indigenous people and Africans have never been at the heart of Trump's interests. Since 1994, we have embraced a South African inclusivity, rejecting 'Colouredism' as it has a nasty Apartheid history of imposed dislocation from Africa.
'It would be foolish to believe that Trump's presidency, in this gesture from its embassy, includes indigenous people from anywhere in the world, although opportunistic ethnic nationalists would want to claim refugee status to further Apartheid ideals of divide and rule. Such claims are questionable within this context,' Bam-Hutchison said.
Bam-Hutchison said Trump's actions are about entrenching global white supremacy, and the strategic positioning politically and economically on the continent.
'Should 'Coloureds' claim refugee status on the grounds stated, it would be merely opportunistic in a country which brutally dispossessed the Native American people and in which the Black Lives Matter movement has major unsettled business with the Trump administration.
'Definitely, a highly suspicious gesture peppered with significant and glaring contradictions for the world to see at a time of live genocide in Gaza,' Bam-Hutchison said.
When asked if even people from the Cape Flats, who see themselves as 'Afrikaners', could also apply, Kleynhans said, 'Yes'.
'The entire process has been discredited by many in the mainstream media, as well as in the South African government. We find this despicable. The US government has the right to offer refugee status to anyone they wish.
'Furthermore, many Afrikaners experience serious discrimination and persecution. Many Afrikaners feel completely alienated from the country they love so much. This is a tragedy. Furthermore, our main focus as Solidarity has always been and is to ensure that Afrikaners can remain in South Africa,' Kleynhans said.
'We do not want Afrikaners to feel that they have lost all hope for a future in South Africa. We will therefore continue to fight for a future for Afrikaners in South Africa.'
Head of Public Relations for trade union Solidarity, Jaco Kleynhans said that there have been 70,000 enquiries, so far there have been about 8,000 formal applications.
Image: Graphic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
16 minutes ago
- The South African
Malema urges Zimbabweans to seek jobs at home
Julius Malema, leader of South Africa's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), has urged Zimbabweans to seek employment in their own country rather than competing for jobs in South Africa. Malema made the remarks on Saturday during the Siyabonga rally in Seshego, Polokwane, Limpopo, where the EFF celebrated its by-election victory in July. This marks a shift from his 2022 stance, when he encouraged Zimbabweans to work in South Africa, emphasising that it was their home. Malema stressed that Zimbabweans should pursue jobs in their municipalities instead of taking positions in South Africa. 'We are not saying Zimbabweans should not be given jobs, but they must get jobs from their own municipalities,' Malema said, pointing to Harare and other Zimbabwean cities as places where employment opportunities should be sought. He cited South Africa's youth unemployment rate as alarming and unsustainable. He said this is one reason the EFF prioritises policies directing municipal tenders and other local job opportunities to South African workers. The EFF now prioritises employment for South African citizens, regardless of language skills or connections. Historically, Malema has supported African unity and encouraged Zimbabweans to participate in their national elections. His recent statements signal a more protectionist approach to employment, focusing on South African citizens' rights and opportunities. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa not likely to act as Motshekga defends SANDF chief's Iran trip
No disciplinary action will be taken against either Maphwanya or Motshekga. Defence and Military Veterans Minister Angie Motshekga has come to the defence of South African National Defence Force (SANDF) chief Rudzani Maphwanya following backlash over his recent remarks during a visit to Iran. This week, Maphwanya sparked a diplomatic stir after claiming South Africa and Iran had 'common goals.' His comments drew criticism from International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola and the Presidency, as they felt the SANDF chief had stepped into foreign policy matters. ALSO READ: Ministries distance themselves from SANDF chief's comments in Iran President Cyril Ramaphosa's office clarified that he had not been informed of or approved Maphwanya's visit to Iran, but highlighted that the authorisation came from Motshekga, which falls under her ministerial responsibility. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya explained that Maphwanya's remarks were unhelpful, particularly as the South African government is engaged in a 'very delicate exercise' to reset diplomatic relations with the United States (US), which has ongoing disputes with Iran. Maphwanya to meet Ramaphosa as Motshekga back SANDF chief Amid calls from the Democratic Alliance (DA) for a court martial against the SANDF general, Ramaphosa is scheduled to meet Maphwanya next week. According to the Sunday Times, no disciplinary action will be taken against either Maphwanya or Motshekga. Motshekga defended the SANDF chief, insisting that his visit to Iran was entirely appropriate. 'It's a coincidence that it [the trip] coincides with the tensions between Iran and the US and that we are negotiating on tariffs. READ MORE: Ramaphosa unaware of 'ill-advised' Iran trip by SANDF chief – Magwenya 'This invitation is from last year. I sanctioned it last year. The event was postponed, and they then communicated back to say let's continue,' she told the publication. The minister also told News24 that Maphwanya's comments had been misinterpreted. 'Is it because Iran is in conflict with America that we are now also not allowed to touch Iran. We have our own bilateral relations with countries,' she said. SACP reacts The South African Communist Party (SACP) similarly defended Maphwanya, arguing that his statements accurately reflected South Africa's foreign policy. The party further asserted that his comments should not be compared to the actions of DA MP Andrew Whitfield, who was dismissed for travelling to the US on an unapproved trip while serving as deputy minister of trade, industry, and competition. 'This comparison is incorrect, as Maphwanya's visit took place within the framework of military regulations with the full knowledge of the minister of defence whereas Whitfield's visit was unauthorised,' the SACP said in a statement. SACP denounces the manufactured public controversy following the visit of the Chief of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) to Iran. The visit was part of South Africa's long-standing bilateral relations with Iran. August 16, 2025 Maphwanya, appointed by Ramaphosa in 2021, is reportedly set to retire on 1 December this year. Although the standard army retirement age is 60, he was requested to remain in service until the age of 65. He will reach this age in November. NOW READ: Explicit, obscene videos in uniform are unacceptable, SANDF warns members

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Rhodes University honours Justice Lex Mpati with law building naming
The law faculty of Rhodes University will be named after Justice Lex Mpati. Image: Christelle du Toit Rhodes University's Faculty of Law will officially name its iconic law building in honour of one of its most distinguished alumni and the revered outgoing Chancellor, Justice Lex Mpati. This forms part of its 120th anniversary, marking more than a century of academic excellence and profound contributions to the South African legal landscape. As a testament to this enduring legacy and its pivotal role in shaping the nation's jurisprudence, it will honour Justice Lex Mpati by naming the faculty after him. 'This occasion signifies a commitment to recognising visionary leaders and inspiring future generations who will uphold the rule of law across South Africa,' Judge Gerald Bloem, Council Chairperson of Rhodes University said. He added that Justice Mpati's life and career embody the core values our institution promotes, which includes integrity, excellence, and social justice. 'His jurisprudence consistently demonstrates a deep commitment to constitutional values, like equality and human dignity,' said Judge Bloem. Rhodes University Vice-Chancellor, Professor Sizwe Mabizela said: 'Justice Mpati was a father figure to me and someone who was a source of wisdom. He is an integrity personified – a quintessential gentleman and the embodiment of humility.' Justice Mpati was the first African to be Chancellor of Rhodes University. Dean of Law, Professor Michelle Karels, meanwhile said coming from a background where he experienced the injustices of apartheid firsthand, Justice Mpati's rise to prominence represents the transformation the university seeks to inspire in their students – using law as a tool for positive social change. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'Justice Mpati's leadership has demonstrated his commitment to accountability, transparency, and ethical governance – principles we aim to instill in our future legal professionals,' he said. The naming ceremony, set to take place on August 26 at the Rhodes University Law Building in Makhanda, marks a pivotal moment in the 120-year celebrations and will convene an esteemed assembly of South Africa's most prominent legal figures, judicial leaders, and valued alumni. It is said that this gathering serves not only to celebrate Justice Mpati's extraordinary legacy but also to ensure that the Lex Mpati name will stand as a daily reminder of what can be achieved through dedication to legal principles, commitment to education, and unwavering integrity. Justice Mpati was born in Durban in 1949 and he obtained his BA in 1982 and LLB in 1984 from Rhodes University. He rose from a legal clerk to becoming President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. He was a former Judge of the Eastern Cape Division and later President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. He was also an acting judge in the Constitutional Court in 2007. Beyond his judicial work, Justice Mpati chaired the Commission of Inquiry into allegations of impropriety at the Public Investment Corporation (PIC). He served as Chancellor of Rhodes University for 13 years, bridging the world of academic legal education and judicial practice. His lectures, mentorship, and guidance have inspired generations of law students, many of whom have served in various capacities in our legal system. He has consistently advocated for access to justice and legal education for all South Africans.