Islamabad, Tehran discuss regional security, defense ties during Pezeshkian's Pakistan visit
Pakistan and Iran have remained at odds over instability along their shared, porous border that led to a missile exchange between them last year. Both countries, however, were quick to move to ease tensions.
Iran was among several countries that attempted to de-escalate tensions between India and Pakistan during their May armed conflict, while Islamabad categorically condemned Israel for carrying out strikes against Iran that triggered a 12-day conflict between the two countries in June.
Pakistan's Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif met Brig. Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh, his Iranian counterpart, on Saturday. Nasirzadeh is part of a high-level delegation led by Pezeshkian, who arrived on a two-day state visit to Pakistan on Saturday to increase bilateral trade to $10 billion and strengthen relations between the two countries.
'During the meeting, both sides discussed matters of mutual interest, including regional security, counter-terrorism efforts, and avenues to enhance defense cooperation between the two neighboring countries,' the Pakistani defense ministry said in a statement on Saturday.
'The ministers reaffirmed their commitment to strengthen bilateral ties and promote peace and stability in the region,' it added.
Asif expressed appreciation for Iran's continued engagement and emphasized the importance of 'defense diplomacy' in addressing shared security challenges, the ministry said.
In response, Nasirzadeh thanked Pakistan for extending the Iranian delegation a warm welcome and reiterated Iran's desire to build stronger defense ties based on mutual respect, shared values and trust, the Pakistani defense ministry added.
'The meeting concluded on a positive note, with both leaders expressing optimism about the future of Pakistan-Iran defense relations and pledging to continue working together for the prosperity and security of the region,' the statement added.
This is Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan as the Iranian president, according to the Pakistani foreign office. His high-level delegation includes Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, senior ministers and other high-ranking officials.
Prior to arriving in Islamabad, the Iranian president made a brief stay in Lahore on Saturday, Pakistan's cultural capital, where he also visited the mausoleum of Dr. Muhammad Iqbal, Pakistan's national poet, who wrote in both Urdu and Persian and is widely revered in Iran and Persian-speaking communities across the world.
He then arrived in Islamabad and was received by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. During his stay, Pezeshkian will meet President Asif Ali Zardari and hold delegation-level talks with Sharif, the Pakistani foreign office said in an earlier statement.
Last year, Iran's late president, Ebrahim Raisi, traveled to Pakistan on a three-day visit during which both sides signed memoranda of understanding in the fields of trade, technology, agriculture, health, culture and judicial matters.
This year, ties between the two countries warmed up after Islamabad voiced its support for Tehran during the Iran-Israel war in June, which began after Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Pakistan remained engaged in talks with regional partners like Saudi Arabia, Iran, China and Qatar to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East after Iran conducted retaliatory strikes on Israel and a US base in Qatar, raising fears the conflict could draw in other regional states.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
16 minutes ago
- Arab News
Saudi defense minister discusses efforts to promote regional security with US counterpart
RIYADH: Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman discussed efforts to promote regional and international security and stability with US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Wednesday. The two officials also reviewed the Saudi-US partnership and explored ways to further strengthen defense cooperation during a phone call, Prince Khalid said in a post on X.
Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
US Has Bank of Potential Military Targets in Iran: Col. Dahouk
On June 22, the US intervened in the Iran-Israel conflict, striking three nuclear facilities in Iran, namely Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, using bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles. The US President, Donald Trump, insisted that the US strikes had set Tehran's nuclear program back 'decades,' adding that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities were 'completely and totally obliterated.' However, there are reports suggesting the Israeli and US strikes have not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear program. In the light of this, recent US assessments suggest that Washington has up to a year before it will be forced to take action against Iran's nuclear program, Al-Hadath TV reported, citing its sources. The sources added that the US does not want to give Iran the chance to restore its nuclear power. Within this context, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, believes that the US strikes did not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear capabilities and that Washington has a bank of targets it could strike to prevent Tehran from possessing a nuclear weapon. One-Year Deadline Commenting on Al-Hadath's report, Col. Dahouk said: 'Based on the damage assessment of the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, namely Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, it seems that these sites were not completely destroyed.' He suggested that the US thinks that a year is enough 'if the Iranian did not change their calculations or sought to rebuild these sites. If they did that, the US would repeat the strikes.' Nuclear Calculations Col. Dahouk said that the nuclear technology and knowledge are hard to destroy by military strikes. 'It is clear that Iran has the nuclear technology, even though that Israel assassinated top Iranian nuclear scientists – a major hit for Iran,' he noted. 'But in the end, no one benefits. The US favors diplomatic settlement but it doesn't seem available now. Iran is under harsh sanctions and pressure. The US wants to impose more, and the military solution seems to be the last option. And this is what the US and Israel tried to do, and pressures continue on Iran to push it toward changing its nuclear calculations,' he said. Snapback Sanctions Asked whether the snapback mechanism could influence Tehran's calculations or if Washington would need to pursue a new negotiation mechanism, Col. Dahouk said the US prefers diplomacy but Washington and Tehran have diverging red lines in negotiations. 'Washington and President Trump are ready for diplomatic settlement. They want to embrace the diplomatic path but the red lines are different between the US and Iran,' he said. 'The US doesn't want Iran to possess any enrichment capabilities, but Iran wants to keep its right to enrichment. Therefore, there are some conditions that Iran doesn't want to accept. I think here lies the problem and I think that Iran has some enriched uranium with unknown whereabouts. But the main issue is uranium enrichment. The US will not allow Iran to enrich but Iran wants to keep that right. This is the dilemma,' he explained. Iran Nuclear Facilities The Former Senior Military Advisor said that the one-year deadline is an indication that Iran's nuclear program was not completely destroyed. 'The recent US assessment suggests that the strikes have set back the program few years,' Col. Dahouk noted. 'But what lies underground is still unknown, especially the 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium, and the condition of the centrifuges, whether they have been destroyed or not. So, the US strikes had some impact but they didn't destroy Iran's nuclear sites, particularly Natanz and Isfahan where facilities above the ground were destroyed but underground ones remained intact,' he added. Potential Targets Col. Dahouk explained that Iran has several sites, other than the three nuclear sites hit in the recent strikes, that could be on the US' target list. 'No, there are other sites that support the Iranian nuclear program. Some of these sites could be a potential target for US strikes,' he pointed out. Moreover, 'sites that were not completely destroyed could be hit again. I think that Iran's missile program could be also targeted, as well as other facilities. The US has a bank of military targets it could strike,' Col. Dahouk said. Short link : Post Views: 24
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Pakistan denies UN accusation of detaining Afghan refugees early, violating Sept. 1 deportation agreement
ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani interior ministry official on Wednesday refuted claims by the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), which said authorities were arresting hundreds of Afghan Proof of Registration (PoR) cardholders and forcing them to leave the country despite agreeing to extend their stay till Sept. 1. More than 1.3 million Afghans in Pakistan hold PoR documentation, while 750,000 more have another form of registration known as an Afghan Citizen Card. PoR cards were issued by Pakistan to Afghans who were registered in collaboration with the UNHCR, recognizing them as a legal refugees in Pakistan. Many Afghans have been settled in Pakistan since the 1980s to escape cycles of war in Afghanistan. However, Pakistan's government started a repatriation drive in 2023 to expel all those residing in the country illegally, mostly Afghans, after a spate of suicide attacks in the country that Islamabad blamed on Afghan nationals without proof. The government agreed to extend the deadline for PoR cardholders to stay till Sept. 1. However, UNHCR Pakistan spokesperson Qaisar Khan Afridi told Arab News hundreds of PoR cardholders in Punjab, Balochistan and Islamabad were arrested from Aug. 1-5. He said dozens were still being held while many have been asked to leave by Aug. 20. 'No arrest of PoR cardholders so far [has taken place] while action against Afghan Citizen Card [holders] and other illegal Afghans is underway,' Qadir Yar Tiwana, director of media at the interior ministry, told Arab News. He said authorities will start taking action against PoR cardholders in the country from Sept. 1, when the deadline for their legal stay passes. 'Their [PoR cardholders] extension expired on Jun. 30, while they have been given time till Aug. 31 for voluntary return,' the official said. 'Action will start from Sept. 1.' .Afridi said the UNHCR has conveyed its concerns over reports of PoR holders being arrested before the Sept. 1 deadline. 'We have expressed serious concern on the forceful deportation and arrest of PoR refugees and urged the Pakistani authorities to stop it,' Afridi told Arab News. He said the UN agency had urged Pakistan to extend the Sept. 1 deadline further to give Afghan refugees sufficient and reasonable time to return. 'In such a short period, over 1.4 million legal and documented refugees, including women and children, cannot go back,' he said. 'This action is against the commitment given to the UNHCR and constitutes a breach of Pakistan's international obligations,' Afridi noted. He urged the Pakistani government to stop the alleged deportations and adopt a 'humane approach' to ensure the voluntary, gradual and dignified return of Afghan refugees to their country. Pakistani authorities say all Afghan nationals must leave except those with valid visas, as part of the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan launched in late 2023. More than a million have returned under this plan so far. Pakistan has often blamed Afghan citizens— the country's largest migrant group— for militant attacks and crimes, accusations Kabul has rejected. Afghanistan is also facing a new wave of mass deportations from Iran, raising concerns among aid groups that the influx could further destabilize the country.
