
If Energy Star goes away, finding energy efficient appliances will be harder. Here are some tips
When Judy Sautner recently walked into Power Appliance, a story in a southeastern suburb of Cleveland, she had one goal in mind: replace her daughter's broken dryer with something that worked and didn't break the bank.
'I wasn't really worried about all the bells and whistles,' said Sautner.
Jay Buchanan, the store's owner, said many customers are like Sautner, and what they are looking for frequently ends up being an appliance with the Energy Star symbol.
The U.S.-based program claims that its blue seal of approval on efficient appliances saves households an average of $450 on their bills per year. Since its launch in 1992, Energy Star appliances have also prevented 4 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions, the main cause of climate change.
But the program's future is unclear. The Environmental Protection Agency has announced an agency reorganization plan that would eliminate its Energy Star offices. That would make it more difficult for customers to find energy efficient appliances. Here is a look at Energy Star along with tips to find energy efficient appliances if the program goes away:
How Energy Star works
Energy Star is a voluntary labeling program. The EPA sets energy efficiency standards for various machines, and then companies that produce them can try to hit or exceed those standards. If they do, they get the Energy Star sticker certifying it works as well as a standard product and uses less energy.
Companies are incentivized to make products that earn that sticker because state and local utility rebate programs, along with federal tax incentives, base qualifying appliances on the program. Consumers who want to save money through incentives and lower gas and electric bills know to look for it. And according to the program's website, roughly 90% of households recognize the symbol.
Qualifying specifications vary depending on the appliance, but requirements include the amount of energy consumed when a machine is turned off, the inclusion of a low-power or 'sleep' mode and a minimum efficiency rating when it's operating.
If Energy Star goes away
Finding and buying energy-efficient products without that certification wouldn't be impossible, just difficult, said Elizabeth Hewitt, associate professor of technology and society at Stony Brook University.
'You have to become a really savvy shopper,' she said.
It would mean consumers searching for, say, a dishwasher, would have to put together a list of options, gather specifications that come with each product, compare them, and recognize which numbers indicate that the dishwasher is energy efficient.
Specifications for a washing machine, for example, might include how many clothes can fit in a load, the gallons of water per load and the electricity required to run a cycle, while a furnace's specs focus on how good it is at converting energy into heat, how much of that heat leaks and how well its fan does at blowing hot air into the house.
Converting all those numbers into a single seal of approval would be complicated.
'Unless they're deep into analytics, they're not gonna freakin' know,' said Buchanan.
Buchanan said his customers usually ask for help finding energy efficient appliances. So if that seal of approval disappears, it'll change his life more than the lives of his customers. He said he'll have to do the work to figure out which appliances will save on energy bills.
The concern, said Executive Director Ben Stapleton with U.S. Green Building Council California, a nonprofit focused on sustainable building, is that extra set of steps will deter people from prioritizing energy efficiency.
'If we're just relying on the manufacturer and relying on people to go through the manual to see what the power draw is, it's hard to imagine that being effective,' he said.
Tips for picking appliances
Many utilities are incentivized to help households and businesses buy efficient appliances.
If Energy Star were to go away, utilities would need to figure out a new way of determining which appliances qualify for their incentive programs, said Mark Kresowik, senior policy director with the nonprofit American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Calling and asking them about qualifying appliances would be a good place to start, he said.
Consumer Reports, an organization that does independent product reviews, can provide information about appliances and their performance, although it requires a subscription to access some of its more detailed information.
The Consortium for Energy Efficiency, a collaboration with primarily utilities, has its own energy efficiency standards. Right now those standards are designed with Energy Star in mind, but Kresowik said incentive programs could shift to using product specifications.
The fate of Energy Star is still uncertain. The broad reorganization at the EPA reported last month would eliminate or reorganize large parts of the offices that keep the program running, but the EPA has not directly confirmed a plan to shut it down or provided a timeline.
Regardless of what happens to Energy Star or what appliances are bought, Stapleton said consumers always have agency to use products in an energy-efficient way, such as washing clothes in cold water or avoiding the water-heavy dishwasher settings. It always helps to choose the right sized products.
'Maybe I don't need the largest microwave that's on the market,' he said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Test vendor moves to toss California's lawsuit over botched bar exam, says fraud claims fail
June 23 (Reuters) - The testing company that delivered California's disastrous February bar exam asked a judge on Friday to throw out the bulk of The State Bar of California's lawsuit against it, claiming that the state bar cannot rely on the company's early statements about its online testing capacity to demonstrate fraud. In a court document, opens new tab filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, defendant Meazure Learning sought dismissal of five of the state bar's six alleged counts, including fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The company's filing, which is called a demurrer, did not address the state bar's breach of contract claim. The state bar on Monday declined to comment on the filing, and attorneys for Meazure did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The state bar sued Meazure in May, accusing, opens new tab the company of failing to live up to its promises that its systems could handle thousands of bar examinees. The state bar signed a $4.1 million contract with the company in September 2024 to administer the February and future exams, to be given both remotely and in person. The new format was meant to reduce the state bar's cost of administering the attorney licensing exam. However, the February test was marred with widespread technical and logistical problems. Some test takers were unable to log into the bar exam at all while many experienced delays, lax exam security, distracting proctors, and a copy-and-paste function that didn't work. In the new filing, Meazure argues that any comments made by the company about the number of online test takers it could handle outside of its actual contract with the state bar do not meet the standard to prove fraud of negligent misrepresentation because they are not binding. 'The court should reject plaintiff's attempt to turn Meazure's alleged breaches of contract into an intentional tort,' Meazure's demurrer reads. Meazure is already facing two proposed federal class actions from people who took the February test. State Bar Executive Director Leah Wilson said she will step down from her post in July, citing the bungled rollout of the new bar exam. Meazure, based in Birmingham, Alabama, bills itself on its website as the "largest and most experienced remote proctoring operation in the market," with more than 1,500 test centers in 115 countries. Meazure was formed through the 2020 merger of testing companies ProctorU and Yardstick. Read more: California Bar sues vendor over exam meltdown California bar exam test takers sue over 'disaster' rollout this week


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
US bond market braces for surge in Treasury supply in second half
BOSTON, June 24 (Reuters) - The bond market is bracing for up to $1 trillion of additional U.S. Treasuries supply in the second half of the year once lawmakers address the looming debt ceiling problem, possibly permanently, top rates strategists said on Tuesday. Any new issuance will likely be focused on shorter-dated debt including bills. With the flood of Treasuries, market participants are left to wonder: who is going to buy them all? Treasury issuance is meant to address the U.S. government's huge fiscal deficit. President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill would lead to a larger-than-expected $2.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the decade, despite a boost to U.S. economic output, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected. The U.S. Senate could vote on Friday on Republicans' tax and spending measure, said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday, and he was confident the House would then pass that version. "We are just about to go through a level shift," said Mark Cabana, head of U.S. rates strategy at BoFA Securities, during a panel discussion on Tuesday at the Money Fund Symposium in Boston. "You're going to see this big issuance clip and it's coming within the next few months. You can debate exactly when they raise the debt limit, but the X-date is coming soon." Bessent had said that the so-called X-date when the government would exhaust remaining borrowing capacity under the federal debt ceiling would come sometime during the mid-to-late summer. When the debt ceiling is reached the Treasury is unable to increase borrowings, but if it is lifted or eliminated, the government can then issue more debt. Cabana's forecast is for new supply of Treasuries to hit $1 trillion by the end of the year. Gennadiy Goldberg, head of U.S. rates strategy at TD Securities, also expects an increase of nearly $1 trillion in issuance this year, with about $700 billion supply in August and September. A surge in Treasury supply could increase repurchase, or repo rates, which refer to the cost of borrowing short-term cash using Treasuries or other debt securities as collateral. Higher Treasury supply typically saturates the market with additional collateral, which can initially lower repo rates due to excess supply. However, if supply exceeds demand substantially, it may lead to higher repo rates as lenders demand more compensation for holding larger volumes of securities. Goldberg thinks this year's supply will be concentrated on the front end of the Treasury curve - the two-year to the seven-year sector. "Our expectation is that the Treasury keeps issuance focused on the very front end of the curve in terms of coupons. We're not expecting auction size increases until the middle to end of next year, so August or November of 2026, and we don't expect any increases in the long end either," Goldberg said. "In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if there are some decreases in size on the long end, but twos, threes, fives, sevens, that's where the Treasury is going to really look to finance themselves, not 10s, not 20s, not 30s. So it's really that and bills." Adding to Goldberg's point, Ian Lyngen, head of U.S. rates strategy at BMO Capital Markets. noted that the U.S. Treasury has become so market-sensitive that it is willing to pull back on longer-term issuance if it leads to volatility in yields. It is not just the Treasury Department that has been more cognizant of the market's reaction, he said, but also Japan's Ministry of Finance and the UK. Money market funds, whose assets hit a record $7.4 trillion in June, are well positioned to absorb part of that Treasury supply, the strategists said. However, there has been a modest shift recently away from Treasuries by these money funds and into private repo transactions because of the latter's higher rates.


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
FedEx cost cuts boost quarterly profit above Wall Street target
LOS ANGELES, June 24 (Reuters) - FedEx (FDX.N), opens new tab reported better-than-expected quarterly profit, after cost cuts and improved export volumes pushed operating margins higher, and signaled caution ahead with a forecast for the current quarter that was short of analysts' target. The Memphis-based package delivery firm's adjusted profit was $1.46 billion, or $6.07 per share, for the fiscal fourth quarter ended May 31. That was up from adjusted profit of $1.34 billion, or $5.41 per share, a year earlier. Revenue was up just 0.5% to $22.2 billion. Analysts, on average, expected earnings of $5.81 per share on revenue of $21.79 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. FedEx forecasts fiscal first quarter adjusted profit of $3.40 to $4 per share, below analysts' estimates of $4.06 per share, according to LSEG.