logo
Why Ohio voters face so many tax levies

Why Ohio voters face so many tax levies

Axios30-04-2025

Tuesday's primary may feel like déjà vu for some local voters: three tax issues rejected in November are back on the ballot.
Why it matters: These repeat requests risk causing " levy fatigue" among frustrated homeowners. But communities typically don't have another option to keep funding essential operations, due to the complexities of Ohio's tax laws.
What's on the ballot again: A fire levy in Franklin Township, a police levy in Blendon Township, and a bond to build schools in the Groveport Madison district.
How it works: Ohio's tax system quirks stem from House Bill 920, a reform lawmakers passed in 1976 but have tried to update in recent years.
As property values rise, the effective rate of an existing levy goes down, so it never collects more tax money than the amount voters originally approved.
Yes, but: That means governments and schools must ask for new funding more often, especially amid rising costs.
Zoom in: Franklin is back Tuesday in hopes of combining and replacing existing levies that aren't collecting as much today.
The situation is so dire that a fire station could close if the levy fails.
Unlike cities, townships can only levy a voted property tax.
Between the lines: Recent property reappraisals in Franklin County, which raised values by historic levels, are exacerbating levy fatigue.
Many residents' tax bills went up because HB 920 only limits increases on voted levies. Taxes tied to "inside millage" — a set amount governments and schools automatically receive — aren't capped.
Schools are also guaranteed a minimum amount of funding before 920 kicks in.
The other side: Groveport Madison's request, a bond, is how districts pay for construction. It's common in suburbs with booming enrollment.
The Ohio Facilities Construction Commission has agreed to pay 53% of a project that would replace the district's three middle schools and expand its high school.
But voters rejected a bond to fund the remaining 47% in November 2024 and May 2019.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

21 Greek coast guards, officials, charged in deadly migrant shipwreck
21 Greek coast guards, officials, charged in deadly migrant shipwreck

Yahoo

time27-05-2025

  • Yahoo

21 Greek coast guards, officials, charged in deadly migrant shipwreck

May 27 (UPI) -- A court in Greece charged 17 members of the Hellenic Coast Guard and four officials in connection with a shipwreck in which as many as 650 migrants drowned in the Mediterranean Sea off the southern city of Pylos in June 2023. Piraeus Naval Court deputy prosecutor Monday charged the captain of the coast guard vessel LS-920 with causing a shipwreck resulting in the deaths of 82 people -- the number of bodies recovered -- reckless interference with maritime transport and failure to provide assistance to a vessel in distress at sea. The charges stem from an alleged bungled effort by the coastguards to tow the overloaded Adriana, which was attempting to smuggle 750 paying migrants to Italy from Libya, causing it to capsize, and then conspiring to cover it up. Just 104 survivors were rescued. Another estimated 500 people beneath the deck of the fishing boat, including 100 women and children, remain missing, presumed drowned, according to the United Nations. The 16 crew members were charged with being complicit in the criminal acts allegedly committed by the captain, while the then-chief of the Coast Guard and the supervisor of the National Search and Rescue Coordination Center in Piraeus were among four officials charged with "exposing others to danger." Under Greece's legal system, charges do not necessarily mean a case will go to trial. Legal counsel for the victim said the charges were "a substantial and self-evident development in the course of vindication of the victims and the delivery of justice." Greek authorities have consistently denied the allegations made by survivors, claiming instead that the Coast Guard had instructed nearby ships to resupply the Adriana with fuel, food and water to enable it to sail on to Italy as it was not in need of rescuing. The Coast Guard initially declined to launch a disciplinary probe into the actions of the LS-920's captain and crew. However, analysis by the BBC, New York Times, The Guardian, other media outlets and human rights organizations of data and evidence from eyewitnesses found that the vessel was stationary for hours before it sank. Critical video, call and radio traffic evidence between the Adriana and the Coast Guard, said to be unavailable due to equipment failure, which has since been leaked, appears to show the Coast Guard instructing the Adriana's captain to tell the ships offering assistance that he wanted to continue to Italy. In one of the tapes, a National Search and Rescue Coordination Center officer apparently coaches the captain of the Lucky Sailor, one of the vessels that resupplied the Adriana, about what he had seen and heard -- "ok, ok, everybody screaming that they don't want Greece and they want Italy? -- and instructs him to make sure he records it in the ship's log. A trial of nine Egyptians accused of people smuggling and causing the disaster collapsed in May 2024 after a Greek court threw out the case, ruling it lacked jurisdiction because the Adriana went down 47 miles out at sea, meaning it was in international waters. The coast guard defended its record, telling the BBC in February that it was internationally renowned for its humanitarian efforts, particularly as it had rescued more than 250,000 migrants from the seas around Greece in the past 10 years and detained at least 1,000 people smugglers.

Why Ohio voters face so many tax levies
Why Ohio voters face so many tax levies

Axios

time30-04-2025

  • Axios

Why Ohio voters face so many tax levies

Tuesday's primary may feel like déjà vu for some local voters: three tax issues rejected in November are back on the ballot. Why it matters: These repeat requests risk causing " levy fatigue" among frustrated homeowners. But communities typically don't have another option to keep funding essential operations, due to the complexities of Ohio's tax laws. What's on the ballot again: A fire levy in Franklin Township, a police levy in Blendon Township, and a bond to build schools in the Groveport Madison district. How it works: Ohio's tax system quirks stem from House Bill 920, a reform lawmakers passed in 1976 but have tried to update in recent years. As property values rise, the effective rate of an existing levy goes down, so it never collects more tax money than the amount voters originally approved. Yes, but: That means governments and schools must ask for new funding more often, especially amid rising costs. Zoom in: Franklin is back Tuesday in hopes of combining and replacing existing levies that aren't collecting as much today. The situation is so dire that a fire station could close if the levy fails. Unlike cities, townships can only levy a voted property tax. Between the lines: Recent property reappraisals in Franklin County, which raised values by historic levels, are exacerbating levy fatigue. Many residents' tax bills went up because HB 920 only limits increases on voted levies. Taxes tied to "inside millage" — a set amount governments and schools automatically receive — aren't capped. Schools are also guaranteed a minimum amount of funding before 920 kicks in. The other side: Groveport Madison's request, a bond, is how districts pay for construction. It's common in suburbs with booming enrollment. The Ohio Facilities Construction Commission has agreed to pay 53% of a project that would replace the district's three middle schools and expand its high school. But voters rejected a bond to fund the remaining 47% in November 2024 and May 2019.

Chamber-backed tax reform group urges Ohio lawmakers stamp out ‘unvoted' increases
Chamber-backed tax reform group urges Ohio lawmakers stamp out ‘unvoted' increases

Yahoo

time24-04-2025

  • Yahoo

Chamber-backed tax reform group urges Ohio lawmakers stamp out ‘unvoted' increases

(iStock / Getty Images Plus) Ohio lawmakers seem committed to delivering property tax relief in the current session, but they're still zeroing in on their approach. They've introduced at least seven measures tweaking the homestead exemption — for disabled vets, military spouses, the elderly — and a handful more changing how counties calculate what homeowners owe. Most notably, however, House lawmakers have proposed an automatic rollback in the state budget that triggers if a school district carries over any more than 30% of their operating revenue. An organization backed by realtors, county auditors, and the Ohio Chamber of Commerce is wading into that debate. The Ohio Taxpayer Protection Coalition is urging lawmakers to avoid 'unvoted' property tax increases. 'Our point isn't to take away revenue from school districts,' coalition chair and former state tax commissioner Tom Zaino explained. 'Our point is to reduce the rate of increase of revenue without a vote of school district residents.' Zaino argued that state lawmakers need to revisit a measure passed in the 1970s meant to insulate homeowners from rising home values. Property taxes are calculated in mills — one mill is one thousandth of a dollar, or one tenth of a percent. In every county, taxing authorities like local governments, schools, and parks, can levy a total of 10 mills that will grow as home values increase. Any share beyond those 10 mills has to get approval from voters. Meanwhile, to receive state funding, school districts must levy at least 20 mills, or 2% of assessed property value. House Bill 920 placed a check on those voted levies to ensure rising home prices don't result in a taxing authority raising extra money. In effect, if your home value goes up, that slice of your property tax rate would decrease to keep your tax bill steady. 'What's happened, though, over the last 50 years,' Zaino said, 'is that these protections have been eroded by many changes made by the General Assembly, which has effectively created loopholes.' The tax reductions in HB 920 apply to most levies beyond a school district's 20 mill floor. So, school districts have been resourceful and looked to other sources of funding like emergency levies or local income taxes. That way they can meet immediate funding needs and still benefit from rising property values. Zaino argued that amounts to an increase in taxes that voters didn't approve, and lawmakers should prevent that strategy. To that end, the Ohio Taxpayer Protection Coalition is supporting legislation that would recalculate the 20 mill floor to include those other funding sources. Bailey Williams, from the liberal think tank Policy Matters Ohio argued Zaino's coalition is blowing the problem out of proportion. 'While property values across the state have seen significant growth coming out of the pandemic,' he argued, 'property tax revenues have only grown at a fraction of that rate.' Making the changes Zaino wants 'will harm schools, put more levies on the ballot, and will not fix the fact residential taxpayers are overburdened,' Williams argued. School leaders argue the problem isn't just districts making clever use of the system. As property values rise, HB 920 will reduce a homeowner's rate — but there's a hard stop at 20 mills. That means if property values rise high enough, the reductions stop working. Paul Imhoff from the Buckeye Association of School Administrators told lawmakers in 2019, there were 168 districts at the 20 mill floor. By 2023, that figure had ballooned to 409. 'Eighty-nine percent of the new floor districts went through reappraisal or update in 2023,' he explained, 'which indicates that the driving force in 20 mill floor districts clearly is rising property values.' He warned adding new levies to the calculation to generate more reductions won't help homeowners in the 203 districts that don't have those extra levies. In the end the bill would 'force the affected school districts to either cut essential services or place more levies on the ballot in response, or both,' he argued. In a written statement, Jennifer Hogue from the Ohio School Boards Association explained the group supports 'thoughtful, targeted property tax relief that helps those most in need without undermining the essential funding public schools rely on.' She argued any property tax discussion relies on a 'clear recognition of the vital role local taxes play' in funding public schools. 'While we are open to reform, we cannot support measures that limit local control or compromise a district's ability to meet the needs of their students,' Hogue added. 'Any changes must protect the stability and predictability of school funding.' A different proposal would allow revenue increases from rising property values, but they wouldn't be able to exceed the general inflation rate over the past three years. In his testimony, Imhoff noted his organization is still reviewing the bill. Zaino allowed that it would be an improvement and address some of the school funding concerns. Still, he grumbled districts 'can't rely on unvoted tax increases,' and insisted lawmakers shouldn't give up on closing the loopholes districts have been taking advantage of for years. 'There's not any one bill that is the silver bullet here,' he said. Zaino offered a tempered response to the various homestead and other property tax exemptions lawmakers have proposed. Those changes are relatively easy to understand and offer immediate relief, but that targeted approach usually winds up shifting the tax burden to others. 'Somebody's paying for this, Zaino said, 'so it's not like taxpayers are completely saving on that.' Williams argued instead of rejiggering the property tax calculation or providing new exemptions, lawmakers should employ a circuit breaker, like the one proposed by state Sen. Louis Blessing, R-Colerain Twp. That approach makes tax reductions based on a share of the homeowner's income rather than the amount of funding a school district is expecting. Williams explained one group regularly cited for property tax exemptions is seniors. 'There are some seniors who do not need property tax relief,' he said. 'The best way to tell is by how much of their income is consumed by property taxes, not looking at their age. The circuit breaker is targeted enough to get those seniors who need the most help, while asking those who can afford it to pay their fair share.' As for the budget proposal capping school district carryover balances, Zaino said they're still considering their position. He noted it might encourage districts to allocate that funding or just spend it down to avoid the reduction. Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store