Haverhill charity faces £18k bill due to National Insurance rise
A charity is facing an £18,000 bill next month as changes to National Insurance contributions come into effect.Reach Community Projects, based in Haverhill, Suffolk, will pay an extra £12,000 on top of its current contributions.It comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her autumn Budget she would increase the National Insurance (NI) rate for employers to boost funding for public services including the NHS.Head of fundraising at Reach, Katie Chappell, said the announcement was a shock as charities hoped to be exempt.
"[Charities] are all in the same boat, everyone is finding it tough, everyone is surprised, everyone is disappointed, and everyone is struggling to find funds," she told the Local Democracy Reporting Service. "It's tough anyway being a charity right now, we are grateful for every single penny we get, but it is hard to get every single penny - it's going to be tough on us."Although known for its foodbank operations, Reach also provides free financial advice in schools, homelessness support and cookery classes for cheap, healthy meals.Ms Chappell said the extra bill could impact on whether the charity wanted to expand and potentially put its operations at risk."There are a lot of people out there who would just be finding life incredibly tough without our help," she added.
Reeves' changes included raising the NI rate paid by employers to 15%, a 1.2% hike, and reducing the threshold at which businesses are required to pay to £5,000, down from £9,100.Alongside her announcement was an increase in the employment allowance, providing relief of up to £10,500 a year.Joe Mason, Conservative county councillor for Haverhill, said although the relief was welcomed, many charities would still be negatively affected."We must do everything we can to help them continue their invaluable work, not make it harder for them to operate," he added.He also believed local businesses would also struggle with the higher rates.The Treasury has been approached for comment.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
21 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
New pension changes for 20m people in Pension Schemes Bill
Pension changes introduced today could make managing accounts easier for millions of workers planning their retirement across the UK. The Government's new Pension Schemes Bill is designed to support working people plan for their retirement by making pensions simpler to understand, easier to manage, and drive better value over the long term. Keeping track of pensions is notoriously challenging, with the average worker accumulating 11 different pension pots over their lifetime. This has resulted in £26.6 billion in lost pensions across the UK, according to the Pensions Policy Institute and the Association of British Insurers. One of its biggest benefits is the merging of small pension pots. The bill also introduces a new system to show how well pension schemes are performing, this will help savers understand whether their scheme is giving them good value and protect them from getting stuck in underperforming schemes for years on end, to help working people feel more secure about their retirement savings. For those approaching retirement, the changes will mean clear default options for turning savings into a retirement income. This means people will have clearer, more secure routes to decide how they use their pension money over time. The full changes are listed in detail here. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall says: "Hardworking people across the UK deserve their pensions to work as hard for them as they have worked to save, and our reforms will deliver a huge boost to future generations of pensioners." Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves describes the bill as "a game changer", giving "bigger pension pots for savers and driving £50 billion of investment directly into the UK economy– putting more money into people's pockets." Government launches plans to automatically combine small pension pots, here's what it's likely to mean for you... — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) April 24, 2025 What do these pension changes mean for workers? The bill will transform the £2 trillion pensions landscape to ensure savers get good returns for each pound they save, and drive investment into the economy, through a suite of measures, including: Requiring DC schemes to prove they are value for money, to protect savers from getting stuck in underperforming schemes. Simplifying retirement choices, with all pension schemes offering default routes to an income in retirement. Bringing together small pension pots worth £1,000 or less into one pension scheme that is certified as delivering good value to savers, making pension saving less hassle and more rewarding. New rules creating multi-employer DC scheme 'megafunds' of at least £25 billion, so that bigger and better pension schemes can drive down costs and invest in a wider range of assets. Consolidating and professionalising the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS), with assets held in six pools that can invest in local areas infrastructure, housing and clean energy. Increased flexibility for Defined Benefit (DB) pension schemes to safely release surplus worth collectively £160 billion, to support employers' investment plans and to benefit scheme members. What is the difference between a Defined Benefit (DB) scheme and a Defined Contribution (DC) pension? There are two different ways pension schemes work. With a Defined Benefit (DB) pension scheme, also referred to as final salary pension schemes, the amount you get is usually based on your salary and how long you've been part of the pension scheme. For a Defined Contribution (DC) pension, the figure you get is based on how much you and your employer invest in the pension and how your investments perform. Recommended reading: What's the expert view on the new pension changes? Nausicaa Delfas, chief executive of The Pensions Regulator (TPR) says: "The Pension Schemes Bill is a once in a generation opportunity to address unfinished business in the UK pension system. "Making sure all schemes are focused on delivering value for money, helping to stop small, and often forgotten pension pots forming, and guiding savers towards the right retirement products for them, will mean savers benefit from a system fit for the future. "We have long advocated for fewer, larger well-run schemes with the size and skill to deliver better outcomes for savers. As such we are also pleased to see the proposed legislative framework for DB superfunds, providing options and choice in defined benefit consolidation." Andy Briggs, CEO, Phoenix Group says: "The bill sets a clear direction for the future of pensions with the emphasis on building scale and ensuring savers receive value for money. "People across the country will feel the impact of these changes with plans to consolidate small pots, ensure the dashboard delivers and provide default retirement income options at the point of retirement. Patrick Heath-Lay, Chief Executive, People's Partnership adds: "This is a pivotal moment in pension reform. The bill contains many measures that will require providers to deliver better outcomes for savers and improve the workplace pension system."
The Herald Scotland
26 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why it feels like there are more f-words in Shetland
All of a sudden, people were phoning up the broadcaster to say there were 'lots more' f-words in the Sunday night police drama. 'So I went through the compliance forms from the previous series,' Allen said — in remarks first reported by comedy site Chortle — 'and it was the same [amount]. But it's just that this series there was a female detective, and people get worked up more about a woman swearing.' DI Jimmy Perez, played by Douglas Henshall, was replaced by Ashley Jensen as DI Ruth Calder. And that, for some viewers, made all the difference. I thought of that — though without the underlying current of misogyny — when I read a recent blog by former Labour MP Tom Harris. He was in the party for 34 years, joining under Neil Kinnock, becoming a minister under Tony Blair, and staying loyal (if sometimes uneasily) through Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband. It was Jeremy Corbyn who finally broke him. In 2017, he quietly voted Conservative. By 2019, he was publicly backing Boris Johnson — to the horror of some of his family. This year, he is back voting Labour — though it is fair to say his support is hardly enthusiastic. It's weird that this is worth noting, but it is. Parties and, to be fair, we political hacks often forget this: most voters are not like activists. They do not pick a team and stick with it no matter what. They switch. They weigh up who makes sense. They ask: Has this party fixed the thing I care about? Are they listening? Do they seem like they know what they are doing? Are they better than the other lot? While there may not have been more f-words in Shetland, one word I've heard a lot more of recently — especially in relation to Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse- is scunnered. It has been the word of the by-election campaign. How much Thursday's vote tells us about the 2026 Holyrood election is hard to say. It is a snapshot of where people in South Lanarkshire are just now. We should be careful about overanalysing. There has been relatively little scrutiny of the SNP's long record in government — something they will not be able to avoid next year. And by then, Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government will have been in office for two years, making more of their tough choices - the Chancellor's spending review next week might tell us more than anything said in this campaign, about their chances in Holyrood. All that said, if there is one clear message from the battle in South Lanarkshire, and from Tom Harris' blog and from the TV exec in Belfast, it's this: There might not be more f-words. But sometimes, it feel like there are. Right now, voters feel like there are. The party who wins next year, will be the one who convince the scunnered that they're on their side.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Fund Winter Fuel Payments with MP expenses cut says petition
The petition was started by Yvonne Keegan, who calls for the benefit to be reinstated: "I know first hand the importance of Winter Fuel Payment - it's a lifeline to pensioners during the harsh winter months. Their heating bills can skyrocket, and they end up struggling, trying desperately to keep themselves warm. "Meanwhile, our politicians are living comfortably with expenses that would be considered extravagant by most standards. We believe that our politicians – who have a stable income, can afford to pay their heating bills and do not need taxpayer-funded expenses to support this aspect of their lifestyle." Once a petition reaches 10,000 signatures, the Government responds, and if 100,000 people sign, a debate in Parliament is considered. This petition currently has 110,421 signatures. Signatures can still be added here. How much do MPs get paid? MPs' basic salary rose 2.8% to £93,904 from April, after Parliament's expenses watchdog linked it to wider proposals for the public sector. They can also claim expenses including: Office expenses Office running costs Staffing costs Travel for staff Centrally purchased stationery Postage costs Central IT costs Communications allowance They also receive allowances towards having somewhere to live in London and in their constituency, and travelling between Parliament and their constituency. MPs can claim their utility bills, including gas, electricity, other fuel and water bills, on expenses at a single property, either in London or their constituency. This is only available to those who aren't MPs in London, or don't occupy 'grace and favour' accommodation in London. There is no upper limit on how much MPs can claim back on heating and fuel costs. Which pensioners will receive Winter Fuel payments after the changes? The Government has said more pensioners will receive winter fuel payments, but payments will not be universal. Chancellor Rachel Reeves told reporters that 'more people will get winter fuel payment this winter', adding that further details will be announced 'as soon as we possibly can'. She said: 'People should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter.' My instant response to Winter Fuel Payment news & key message to the Chancellor (I heard while walking to the office, so pls forgive the fact it was done there and then for speed) — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) June 4, 2025 Pensions minister Torsten Bell told MPs that, while more pensioners will be eligible, there is no prospect of returning to universal winter fuel payments. Speaking to the Work and Pensions Committee, Mr Bell said: 'Directly on your question of is there any prospect of a universal winter fuel payment, the answer is no, the principle I think most people, 95% of people, agree, that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that. 'But we will be looking at making more pensioners eligible.' (Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) The decision to means-test the previously universal payment was one of the first announcements by Chancellor Rachel Reeves after Labour's landslide election victory last year, and it has been widely blamed for the party's collapse in support. The Government has insisted the policy was necessary to help stabilise the public finances, allowing the improvements in the economic picture which Sir Keir said could result in the partial reversal of the measure. Pension Credit is currently the primary benefit by which pensioners can receive the winter fuel payment. The credit tops up incomes for poorer pensioners and acts as a gateway to additional support, including the winter fuel payment. Recommended reading: What were the cuts to winter fuel payments, and who currently receives them? On July 29 2024, the Government announced that from winter 2024, winter fuel payments would be dependent on receiving another means-tested benefit, as part of measures to fill a 'black hole' in the public finances. This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. Asked what groups who are currently missing out on winter fuel payments he would like to include again, if possible, Mr Bell told the committee: 'We are committed to the principle that there should be some means-testing and that those on the highest incomes shouldn't be receiving winter fuel payments in the context of wider decisions we have to make – and fairness is an important part of that. 'You can then take from that that my priority is those who are on lower incomes but have missed out.'
