‘Addiction is about isolation': RFK Jr. speaks to battle against substance abuse
RFK Jr. shared how his addiction began at a young age following the assassination of his father.
Now 42 years sober and working in his new role as the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, he said the fight against addiction starts with strong community support.
'I go to a meeting every day; I got off the plane last night. I went to a meeting,' Kennedy explained. 'When I came in 42 years ago, I said to a guy, 'How long do I have to keep coming to these meetings?' He said, 'Just keep coming until you like it.' I've been going 42 years, and I still don't like it.'
'Make America safe again': U.S. Attorney General gives update to the fight against opioid crisis
Kennedy called the addiction and overdose crisis a national security threat.
'Addiction is about isolation,' Kennedy said.
According to the Tennessee Department of Health, 3,814 people died from overdoses in 2021, which is a 26% jump from the year before.
Kennedy advocated for 12-step programs and local support systems, saying the key is rebuilding hope, especially for young people.
'I found that in the 12-step program, it is about getting rid of isolation, overcoming isolation, and re-establishing our connection to community,' he said.
'My life made it obvious that I didn't know how to run things, and I had to let someone else, which was God, run them,' Kennedy expressed. 'But when the cash prices start coming in, my inclination was to say, 'Thanks God I got it from here' and take the wheel of the car and drive off the cliff again. And the challenge for me, and I think for all of us who are trying to maintain long-term sobriety, is: how do we stay in a posture of surrender even when everything is going well in our lives?'
During his speech, protestors voiced frustration with his previous statements on autism and job cuts.
Autism community sounds alarms over 'harmful' RFK Jr. comments
These topics were not addressed in his speech on Thursday. But he did touch on topics often associated with the growing issue of substance abuse, including open borders.
'President Trump was in [Mexico] three weeks ago,' Kennedy described. 'He met with Claudia Sheinbaum, the new president of Mexico. He said to her, 'All of the drugs are coming through your country. Do you have an addiction problem?' She said, 'No, not really'. He said, 'Why is that?' and she said, 'Because we have strong families in this country.' And one of the things that addiction is a source of misery, it is also a source of misery.'
He continued on to say that while Narcan, border security, and funding are important, they are not enough without community connection.
'We have $4 billion at my agency to finance those solutions, and those attacks on addiction and overdose; that alone throwing money at it is not alone going to work,' Kennedy said. 'We need to really focus on re-establishing these historic ties to the community. We have this whole generation of kids who have lost hope in their future.'
⏩
Kennedy closed with a call for action to help young people find purpose and build a sense of belonging.
'I would encourage you all to think broadly about what our mission is because it is not just about making sure every cop and paramedic has Naloxone on them, though that is important,' Kennedy concluded. 'And it is not just about prevention on the border, that is important. It is not just making sure every addict, when they have those moments when they are willing to ask for help, that there's a rehab ready for them to go to, and that is critically important. But there are bigger issues: how do we restore our families? How do we restore that commitment to the community?'
His answer was to prioritize serving one another.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. attacks pediatric group after vaccine recommendations
Hours after the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) broke with Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and recommended COVID-19 vaccines for all young children, he blasted the association as beholden to corporate interests. The AAP on Tuesday recommended all infants and children 6 months through 23 months get vaccinated against COVID-19 to help protect against serious illness. Kennedy responded in a post on social platform X, calling the group's recommendations 'corporate friendly' because AAP receives donations to its Friends of Children Fund from vaccine companies like Pfizer and Moderna, among others. The philanthropic fund backs projects supporting child health and equity. The health secretary said the organization should disclose 'its corporate entanglements … so that Americans may ask whether the AAP's recommendations reflect public health interest, or are, perhaps, just a pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors.' Susan Kressly, AAP's president, in a statement said the group would welcome an opportunity to sit down with Kennedy to review the recommendations. 'This attack on the integrity of pediatricians is unfortunate, but it does not change the facts,' Kressly said. 'We are transparent about our funders, follow rigorous conflict-of-interest disclosures and maintain safeguards to ensure the integrity and independence of our guidance.' The AAP and HHS have been at odds for months, and tensions reached a head when Kennedy dismissed all the members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with his own handpicked representatives, including some outright vaccine skeptics. The AAP chose not to participate in the reconstituted panel's first meeting in June, calling it 'illegitimate.' Kennedy later excluded the fund along with other top medical organizations from working with the panel to research and help influence vaccination recommendations. Kennedy has long criticized the so-called medical establishment for conspiring to make Americans sick. His first ' Make America Healthy Again ' report accused doctors of being overly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to overprescribe certain medications that don't treat the root causes of disease.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kennedy's latest attack on vaccine science is as dangerous as it is cynical
While headlines have focused on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to cancel half a billion dollars in research funding for life-saving mRNA vaccines, another Kennedy attack on science has gone largely unnoticed — and it may have even greater consequences for public health. In recent weeks, Kennedy has amplified a campaign to undermine trust in older vaccines that use aluminum adjuvants, long relied on to protect children from deadly diseases. Why does this matter? Because Kennedy, now secretary of Health and Human Services, isn't just repeating discredited talking points — he's actively trying to intimidate scientists and strong-arm the global research community into rewriting decades of established vaccine safety science. The latest flashpoint is a Danish study, published in July in the Annals of Internal Medicine, that looked at more than 1.2 million children and found no link between aluminum-containing vaccines and conditions like autism or any of 50 chronic diseases. This should have been reassuring news for parents and public health officials everywhere. Instead, Kennedy and the anti-vaccine organization he once founded and led, Children's Health Defense, immediately pounced on the study. In a lengthy online rebuttal, Kennedy called the research 'deeply flawed,' demanded the journal retract the study, and even pressured Denmark to break its own privacy laws to release underlying patient data. He went so far as to threaten that the U.S. might cut scientific ties with countries that don't adopt his version of ' gold standard science.' This is not a normal scientific debate. It's an unprecedented attempt by a U.S. Cabinet official to bully both scientists and allied nations into submission — echoing the worst kinds of political interference in science. It's important to step back and see Kennedy's tactics for what they are. For years, he has relied on a small network of like-minded activists and researchers who have pushed the myth that vaccines cause autism or other neurological disorders. Many of their studies were bankrolled by anti-vaccine donors, including the Children's Medical Safety Research Institute and other groups linked to longtime vaccine opponents. For example, Kennedy's key scientific adviser, James Lyons-Weiler, has published and promoted research that mainstream medical organizations have denounced as junk science. Lyons-Weiler's own journal recently ran a paper Kennedy cited during his Senate confirmation hearings — a paper so flawed that an external review by top public health experts concluded it ' should be forgotten.' Yet Kennedy never challenges the credibility of studies that fit his agenda. Meanwhile, the Danish researchers behind the new aluminum study have no such conflicts of interest. Their work was reviewed and published by one of the world's leading medical journals, and their only 'sin' was to produce a result that contradicts Kennedy's belief that vaccines are to blame for autism. Some of Kennedy's claims are simply misleading. He accuses the Danish team of being secretly influenced by the aluminum industry. He tries to frame the study's funding as suspect, ignoring the fact that the supposed 'pharmaceutical giant' involved does not even make vaccines. Most troubling of all, Kennedy's crusade isn't just about aluminum. It's part of a larger pattern of using his government position to sow doubt about all vaccines, at the very moment when public confidence is already dangerously low. If he succeeds, we could see more parents skipping essential childhood immunizations. This could lead to a resurgence of measles, meningitis and other preventable diseases and needless suffering for children and families. We recently wrote about this coordinated campaign, warning that Kennedy's strategy is to undermine trust in every aspect of vaccine safety, from COVID shots to the routine vaccines that have kept generations of kids healthy. The response from scientists around the world has been swift and clear: The evidence is overwhelming that aluminum adjuvants are very safe and effective, and that vaccines do not cause autism. Kennedy's double standards are glaring. He demands the highest level of transparency and rigor from studies that contradict his views, but he champions deeply flawed or even retracted research when it suits him. He accuses his critics of financial conflicts of interest, yet his own movement is supported by organizations and individuals with a direct stake in vaccine-related litigation. The latest twist in this saga: Kennedy has appointed David Geier, a figure with a long, troubling history of promoting dangerous autism 'treatments' and running afoul of medical regulators, to lead a government-backed autism study. This move has drawn sharp criticism from leading autism advocates, who point out that Geier's previous work was discredited and even led to legal sanctions. We urge the media, policymakers and the public not to be distracted by Kennedy's noise. The real stakes are clear: Undermining vaccine science puts lives at risk. We must stand with independent researchers, uphold the integrity of medical evidence and protect the health of our children. Alex Morozov is the CEO and founder of Eviva Partners. Helen Petousis-Harris is a vaccinologist and associate professor at the University of Auckland. Stephan Lewandowsky is a cognitive scientist at the University of Bristol.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
RFK Jr. Attacks Pediatricians for Daring to Recommend Covid-19 Vaccines for Kids
RFK Jr. is officially waging a war against pediatricians. This week, he went after the American Academy of Pediatrics for rebuffing the federal government and continuing to endorse covid-19 vaccines for children. In an X post Tuesday afternoon, the health secretary and longtime anti-vaxxer accused the AAP of bowing to corporate pressure in making the recommendations. He also claimed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recent decision to oppose pediatric covid-19 shots represented a return to 'gold-standard science.' The AAP, by contrast, has maintained that covid-19 remains a serious health threat to children, particularly younger kids. In May, RFK Jr. announced that the CDC would remove its recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women to receive the covid-19 vaccine, including annual booster shots. Though Kennedy was flanked by NIH director Jay Bhattacharya and FDA chief Marty Makary, the announcement featured no actual CDC staff. Several days later, the CDC officially updated its language to state that these groups may get these vaccines in consultation with their doctors (the previous guidance said they should). RFK Jr.'s Baseless Purge of CDC Vaccine Panel Alarms Public Health Experts Some countries have started to ease off their covid-19 vaccine recommendations for children. And the CDC's vaccine advisory panel (outside experts who guide vaccine policy in the U.S.) was set to discuss their recommendations for the fall vaccination schedule in June, which would have included the covid-19 shots. Kennedy rushed ahead of the panel, however, and he provided no evidence at the time to justify the change. The next month, he unilaterally removed all members of the advisory panel and replaced them with members more supportive of his anti-vaccination views. On Tuesday morning, the AAP issued its own vaccine guidance, which, for the first time in 30 years, differs significantly from the CDC's stance. The AAP strongly recommends that all children ages 6 through 23 months old receive at least one covid-19 shot, citing their generally higher risk of having a severe infection. Older children are also recommended to get vaccinated if they fall into certain groups, including children at higher risk of severe covid-19 (such as those with weaker immune systems), children who have never been vaccinated at all, and children living with other people at high risk of severe covid-19. The AAP also took another swipe at HHS for its recent decision to recommend against vaccines containing thimerosal, a preservative that anti-vaxxers have long alleged causes autism despite many studies finding otherwise. It continued to endorse the small minority of vaccines made with the ingredient and recommended against delaying this year's flu shots to remove these products from the market. 'We extensively reviewed the most recently available data about covid-19 risks in kids, as well as safety and effectiveness of available COVID-19 vaccines. It's clear they are very safe for all populations,' said Sean O'Leary, chair of the AAP's Committee on Infectious Diseases, in a statement from the AAP. 'Among the reasons we decided to move to a risk-based recommendation for healthy older children is the fact that the hospitalization rate for young children and children with underlying medical conditions remains high, in line with rates for many of the other vaccine-preventable diseases for which we vaccinate.' Kennedy, however, alleged in his X post that the AAP's decision was possibly a part of a 'pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors.' And he called for the AAP to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. For starters, the AAP does disclose its funders, some of which do include vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer. These funders don't change the reality that while covid-19 is generally less dangerous to children than older adults, it isn't harmless. Covid-19 has sickened children, sometimes severely, and in rare cases, has even been fatal. Meanwhile, reams of scientific data have consistently shown that covid-19 vaccines greatly reduce the risk of severe illness. RFK Jr. Made a Million Dollars From His Anti-Vax Work He Previously Claimed Was 'Unpaid' Kennedy is also hardly one to talk about financial conflicts of interest, given that he has greatly profited from crusading against vaccine makers. And in fact, many of RFK's ideological allies and anti-vaccination proponents promote their own, often unregulated, health products and alternative treatments. In the battle between the AAP and the revamped HHS under RFK. Jr, I'd much rather back the side that doesn't demonize vaccines every chance it gets.
