logo
The Uncertain Future Of The Energy Industry In New Mexico

The Uncertain Future Of The Energy Industry In New Mexico

Forbes11-06-2025
Oil lines and pump jacks near Loco Hills in Eddy County, New Mexico.
Oil and gas production is one ingredient in New Mexico's cauldron of energy uncertainty, and it's a big one. An estimated 35% of New Mexico's revenue comes from oil and gas fields in the Delaware basin, part of the Permian basin that stretches into West Texas. Crude production exceeded 2 MMbopd (million barrels per day) in 2024, which was double that in 2019 before the Covid dropout in 2020. The entire Permian basin reached 6 MMbopd in 2024, about half of total U.S. crude production. But what will happen if the price of oil stays low?
Delaware basin on left extends into southeast New Mexico.
If the WTI price of oil stays at $63/barrel, Permian drilling of well inventory will last seven - ten years. This is better than three - four years for the Eagle Ford in East Texas, and the Bakken in North Dakota. But it illustrates one potential downside if the price of oil stays low.
Another downside is a projection by Vicki Hollub, CEO of Occidental, who said crude production in the Permian could peak by next year, due to cutbacks in capital spending.
Oil and gas production is one ingredient in the cauldron of uncertainties because 35% of New Mexico's revenue comes from the Delaware basin. Another ingredient is that oil and gas globally produces about 50% of greenhouse gases (GHG) that cause global warming. The oil and gas industry is responsible for the largest fraction of emissions in New Mexico at 41%.
Although there is a growing industry of renewable energies in New Mexico, and lots of government support, the revenue from this will never replace the revenue from oil and gas.
Another dilemma faced by New Mexico is the enormous volume of water that flows to the surface along with oil and gas—so called produced water. 2 billion barrels or 84 billion gallons are produced each year. Right now, this water is left in evaporation ponds, or disposed of in injected wells, or recycled and cleaned to be used in the next frac job. Disposal by deep injection is problematic because it has created earthquakes of magnitude 5, although this has been more of an issue in West Texas.
The dilemma is exacerbated because the Permian basin is largely a desert, and New Mexico is in a drought—some say a 20-year drought. A solution that cries out loud is to purify the produced water enough that it can be used in agriculture, or perhaps even drinking water. There are a range of systems from multi-stage filtration up to commercial desalination that can be used, but to achieve the required purification would be costly.
Twelve pilot projects are underway to test the effects of treated water on agriculture and manufacturing. But the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission stepped in last month to prohibit the next step—discharge of treated water to ground or streams. The Commission fears that chemicals still in treated produced water will be toxic, but there are no regulations governing their use.
As well as water treatment, the state would need to oversee storage, transport, and disposal of the water. Although there are no regulations for this, NMED (New Mexico Environmental Department) plans to use results from the pilot projects to design new standards, technical and operational, that would allow re-use of produced water to help resolve the fresh water problem in New Mexico.
Chaco Canyon was a central gathering place of Indian tribes around 1100 A.D. Eight man-made roads extended radially outwards, some for 50 miles or so. The large collection of ruins at Chaco include separate multi-story buildings and many circular kivas, underground religious centers. Carvings in sheltered sandstone clefts and alignment of structural walls reveal native knowledge of yearly seasons of the sun and moon.
Chaco Canyon lies in the San Juan basin, once the largest gas basin in the U.S. Chaco has been simmering in the New Mexico cauldron for a number of years. In 2023, Secretary of the Interior, Deb Haaland issued an order to restrict drilling or development of oil and gas operations to outside a 10-mile radius around Chaco. This was to enlarge the area of protection around Chaco Canyon, which is sacred to many Indian tribes. But not all tribes, as the Navajo Tribe did not live in the region until hundreds of years after 1100 A.D.
Kin Kletso Great House viewed from the clifftop.
The details of this issue have been spelled out separately. Chaco sits close to the southern edge of the oily window of the San Juan basin. In 2023, the Navajo Nation had wanted to specify a smaller radius of 5 miles, because some members owned mineral rights to some of the land around Chaco. They filed a lawsuit against the Interior Department and BLM (Bureau of Land Management) in January of 2025, arguing to revoke the 10-mile limit because it harmed the profits of lessees who were economically small operators.
Into the breach has stepped the Trump administration. New Interior Secretary, Doug Burgum, has told the BLM to reconsider the 10-mile limit. The All Pueblo Council of Governors has resisted this, but not the Navajo Nation. Given the Trump government's directive to revise or rescind actions that are an 'undue burden on the development of domestic energy resources', it's hard to see the BLM keeping the 10-mile protective limit at Chaco.
New Mexico was a hotspot of uranium mining back in the 1950s and 1960s when the cold war was at its height. Over 1,000 uranium mines came into existence, many that employed miners from the Navajo Nation. The uranium was bought by the U.S. government to be used for nuclear defense purposes. Church Rock just outside Gallup was an active mining site, and the scene of a bad flood that polluted the Rio Puerco in 1979—the largest-ever radiation accident in the U.S.
The health effects of mining, notably lung disease due to radon gas attached to mining dust, is a dark chapter in the history of mining. Lack of epidemiological studies and government bureaucracy delayed cleanup efforts for surface tailings radiation, and underground contamination of aquifers.
The U.S. Congress eventually passed RECA, an act that provided reparations to people affected by uranium mining and by nuclear tests in Nevada. The law was due to expire in June 2024, but the Senate passed a bill to extend it by six years. However, the House never brought it to a vote, so the law has expired. Under RECA, the government has paid claims of 41,000 people, and paid $2.6 billion in reparations, the majority to recipients from the Nevada nuclear testing site.
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 opened a door to nuclear power as an alternative energy source, to the tune of $30 billion. This would include reopening of old mines, many of which lie on Native land, as well as new mines.
The Trump government appears to have taken another giant step toward uranium mining by another new executive order on May 23 that prioritized nuclear fission reactors, traditional and SMRs (small modular reactors). This was ostensibly to provide burgeoning new electricity needed for U.S. data centers. According to the Secretary of Energy, 'Nuclear has the potential to be America's greatest source of energy addition. It works whether the wind is blowing, or the sun is shining, is possible anywhere and at different scales.'
Given the state's history, a lot of tension will arise if uranium mining is allowed to resume in New Mexico. Untrammeled growth of uranium mining and nuclear generation of electricity may ignite a spark to the ever-present fear of radioactivity in mining and disposal of nuclear waste, which are always simmering in the New Mexico cauldron of uncertainty.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Markets don't need Fed rate cuts to move higher, strategist says
Markets don't need Fed rate cuts to move higher, strategist says

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Markets don't need Fed rate cuts to move higher, strategist says

SoFi head of investment strategy Liz Thomas joins Market Domination Overtime with Josh Lipton to discuss the likelihood of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates in September. Although markets are still largely pricing in a September rate cut despite Thursday's hot inflation report, Thomas thinks it is not as certain as most seem to believe. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. Meanwhile, stocks falling most fall falling most of the day, closing near the flat line after a hotter than expected inflation print. This fresh data possibly complicating the Fed's rate cut decision for September. My next guest certainly thinks so. Joining me now got Liz Thomas, SoFi head of investment strategy. Liz, great to see you. So we get that PPI print, Liz, this morning. Um, you know, the market is betting on that cut next month, Liz. They expect it. Should the market be betting on that cut? Well, the market is betting on it and the market wants it very, very badly. And I think the bond market continues to try to send that signal. The debate before today had been whether or not the cut would be 25 or 50 basis points. Now, I think we've taken 50 basis points off the table with this print. But I have to say I'm surprised that the likelihood of a cut didn't come down further after today's PPI print. Now, part of it could be that PPI just isn't the headline maker that CPI or even PCE is because it's not consumer-based. But what you have to really pay attention to in this report is what happened which was outside of expectation. So a lot of the belief has been that tariffs have been absorbed by companies. Businesses are just eating them and letting them go into their margins. That's not what this report showed. So now you have to sort of expect that if businesses aren't eating them on the wholesale side, maybe they are planning on passing them through to to the consumer, and we just haven't seen that yet in the consumer inflation reports. That can take anywhere from three to six months, so we've still got some time and still some question marks. Let me ask you this. What about those economists I hear who say, you know, listen, inflation, it is not where J. Powell wants it. It's above target, but actually their argument would be, the Fed is now really focused on the labor market. That's what they're concentrating on, and that's why the cut is a lock next month. What do you say to that? Well, we've had we had one weak labor report. Now, it was mostly the weakness in it was about the revisions, not even the labor report itself. But I also would have to say, we haven't seen a contracting labor report. Even with those downward revisions last month, nothing contracted. So we haven't been losing jobs. We're just adding them at a much slower pace than we thought we were. If we get another weak labor report in the August numbers, so we'll get that early September, then I think it is more likely that the Fed goes ahead with a 25 basis point cut. If we get a hot labor report, it complicates complicates things a lot. So I think in this near-term scenario when we're looking at between now and September 17th for the Fed meeting, the labor report matters a lot. Over the longer term, though, I take Jerome Powell at his word, and he has said multiple times, high inflation doesn't work for anybody. It doesn't work for businesses. Now I'm paraphrasing. It doesn't work for businesses. It doesn't work for the economy. It doesn't work for consumers. So I think over the long term, they are going to have to really look at inflation. And the jobs market, too, we're at 4.2% unemployment. There's room for that to move up before they're going to get really uncomfortable. So I wouldn't hold that as the only thing that they're going to be concerned with. Liz, does the market need a cut to move higher? This is a controversial opinion. I don't think it needs a cut to move higher right now. I think the market really wants a cut. That's not to say that if expectations for a cut come down, yes, I do think we see volatility. But the market really has been driven lately by good, solid fundamentals, and yes, a lot of enthusiasm still over the AI theme and this technology super cycle. But I think that's warranted over the long term. Does it need a cut in order to keep having strong fundamentals from companies? Probably not. Does it need a cut to justify some of these high valuations? Perhaps. So I think that's the place that we're at right now, when the stock market is looking at the likelihood of a cut. A cut would help everybody feel perhaps a little bit better about these high valuations.

Tim Walz's Response To Trump's Depressing Smithsonian Audit Plans Is Going Viral
Tim Walz's Response To Trump's Depressing Smithsonian Audit Plans Is Going Viral

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tim Walz's Response To Trump's Depressing Smithsonian Audit Plans Is Going Viral

ABC News reports that Donald Trump is conducting a review of the Smithsonian Museum to make sure it aligns with his views of American History. Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said, "The Smithsonian is supposed to be a global symbol of American strength, culture and prestige. A place for families and children to celebrate American history and greatness. Instead, the exhibits have clearly been taken over by leftwing activists who have used the Smithsonian as yet one platform to endlessly bash America and rewrite / erase our magnificent story. These activists have obscenely defaced this beloved institution. The Trump Administration will proudly and diligently restore the patriotic glory of America and ensure the Smithsonian is a place that once more inspires love and devotion to this nation, especially among our youngest citizens." Needless to say, people aren't comfortable with this audit! And now, Tim Walz's response to the news is going viral: "If you're trying to erase history, you're on the wrong side of it." Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz "Is he going to add planes to the revolutionary war section?" one person asked. Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz "…later this week he plans on personally surveying the museum and will be placing a McDonald's golden arches 'M' sticker of approval on every piece and or exhibit he approves of…" another person joked. Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz And this is my personal favorite: "I'm excited for the interactive drinking bleach exhibit." Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz As this person said, "He must have read 1984 and got inspired." Andrew Harnik / Getty Images I guess we'll have to see what passes the Trump American history test. Trump Floats Alternative After Failing To Secure Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire Deal: 'Lives Will Be Saved' 'I'm Fine!': CNN's Jake Tapper Awkwardly Caught On Hot Mic Amid Trump-Putin Summit Multiple Men Have Impersonated ICE Agents To Kidnap And Assault Women

Home Depot, Target, Walmart: Retail earnings to watch this week
Home Depot, Target, Walmart: Retail earnings to watch this week

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Home Depot, Target, Walmart: Retail earnings to watch this week

Asking for a Trend host Josh Lipton outlines the biggest earnings reports investors should watch for this week, starting Tuesday, Aug. 19. Home Depot (HD) will release its second quarter earnings report on Tuesday before markets open. Analysts are expecting growth in revenue and same-store sales. Target's (TGT) second quarter results will be out on Wednesday before markets open. Analysts anticipate slowing store visits and await commentary on Target's earnings call about the company's termination of its partnership with Ulta (ULTA). Walmart's (WMT) second quarter earnings are out on Thursday before markets open. Analysts expect low revenue growth but a boost in store visits and same-store sales growth. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend. It's time now for your earnings what to watch, coming up some big box retailers, Home Depot, Target, and Walmart. First up, Home Depot, set to release earnings before the markets open on Tuesday. Consensus estimates have Home Depot's same-store sales climbing almost 2% for the second quarter, which would be just the second increase in 10 quarters for the home improvement retailer. Revenue expected to rise, but weakness and discretionary categories due to interest rates will likely stall Home Depot's revenue for Q2. Next, Target reporting second quarter earnings is coming Wednesday before the markets open and analyst saying that store visits might slow to the low single digits in Q2. In spite of Target's strategic moves, like price investments and product expansion, investors will be listening for any commentary on the call about Target agreeing to not renew its partnership with Ulta when it ends next year. And finally, Walmart releasing its second quarter earnings before markets open on Thursday, analysts expecting low revenue growth for the retail chain, primarily due to a high inflation, create creating a trend of value-seeking consumers. Walmart's price rollbacks and e-commerce offerings will likely boost store visits and same-store sales growth and analysts say tariffs are another factor that could weigh on Walmart's earnings. Related Videos Markets don't need Fed rate cuts to move higher, strategist says Retail trading trends: Top names investors are buying 3 reasons the Fed hasn't cut rates yet this year How Trump's pressure on Fed Chair Powell could backfire Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store