
SC allows Delhi govt to withdraw cases filed against Centre, LG by AAP govt on control over services, other issues
The Supreme Court has granted the Delhi government's request to withdraw cases against the Centre and the Lieutenant Governor concerning control over services and other issues. These cases included challenges to the GNCTD Amendment Act of 2023, disputes over Yamuna River rejuvenation, and disagreements regarding fund allocation for the Delhi Jal Board.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Rekha Gupta-led Delhi government to withdraw cases filed against the Centre and the Lieutenant Governor (LG) over issues including the control over services by the AAP government.The top court had in July, 2023 sought a response from the Centre on the then AAP government's plea challenging the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) (Amendment) Act, 2023 which created an authority for transfer and posting of Group-A officers in Delhi.The Act, initially an ordinance, had come a week after the Supreme Court handed over the control of services in Delhi excluding police, public order and land to the elected government.It seeks to set up a National Capital Civil Service Authority for the transfer of and disciplinary proceedings against Group-A officers from the Delhi, Andaman & Nicobar, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Civil) Services (DANICS) cadre.Another case that is sought to be withdrawn is against a decision of the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which was stayed in July 2023 by the top court.The NGT order of January 19, 2023 asked the LG to head a high-level committee constituted to deal with issues concerning the rejuvenation of the Yamuna River.The NGT constituted the high-level committee of authorities concerned in Delhi, where pollution of Yamuna was higher (about 75 per cent) when compared to the other river basin states.Among other cases that are sought to be withdrawn is the challenge to the alleged non-release of sanctioned funds for the Delhi Jal Board for the financial year 2023-2025 by the Finance Department of GNCTD, re-declaration that the LG of Delhi is bound by the aid and advice of the council of ministers of the GNCTD and directions for appointment of the chairperson of Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC).The Delhi government has also sought to withdraw the challenge to orders issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the LG with respect to release of payments to advocates appointed by the ministers without the concurrence of the LG of Delhi and the appointment of advocates on record (AoRs) and advocates in the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
UP govt teacher held for controversial post on Op Sindoor
Bijnor: An assistant govt teacher in UP was arrested on Tuesday for allegedly hurting religious and public sentiments for his remarks on Operation Sindoor on social media. Shehzad Ali, 45, teaching at a college in Bijnor's Sherkot area, was accused of also posting comments which targeted the RSS and the Centre. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Ali, who was heavily trolled online for the comments, was later suspended by the school administration. An FIR was registered against him under sections 353 (1) C (statements conducing to public mischief...) of BNS and section 66 of IT Act, based on the complaint filed by a local politician. Police produced him in court, which remanded him to judicial custody for 14 days. Bijnor SP Abhishek Jha said, "We've registered an FIR. Further investigation is on." Nishant Yadav, authorised controller of the college, said, "An inquiry panel will be constituted and the process of issuing a chargesheet will be done separately."


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Mob ‘beats man to death' after his vehicle hits tea garden worker in Tripura's Unakoti
A man was allegedly beaten to death by an angry mob after his vehicle hit and injured a worker at a tea garden in Kailashahar of Tripura's Unakoti district on Tuesday. The deceased was identified as Pradeep Das, 30, a resident of the Ratiabari area under Kumarghat in the district. Police, quoting locals, said three people were seen trying to take away some goats from the roadside in their vehicle, after which a few locals chased them. Some more people, armed with sticks, came in front of the vehicle to stop them. While trying to flee from the spot, the vehicle hit a tea garden worker and he fell into a concrete roadside drain. Soon, the other person in the vehicle, identified as Nirmal Das, hid inside the tea garden. Before Pradeep could also hide, the angry mob allegedly beat him to death and set the vehicle on fire later. 'A murder case will be lodged. Another section will be incorporated for setting the vehicle on fire. One of the co-riders is with the Kailashahar police. The other co-rider escaped from the spot and is known to be safe. We have started our investigation,' said an official from the Kailashahar police station. Nirmal Das, while speaking to reporters, said the occupants of the vehicle were friends. 'The vehicle was speeding and he (Pradeep ) hit two cows standing on the road and they (the irate mob) killed him because of that,' he said. In February, five people were detained after a 35-year-old man, suspected to be a thief, was beaten to death by an irate mob at Belonia in South Tripura district. In June 2021, three suspected cattle smugglers were lynched to death at two locations in Tripura's Khowai district. In February of the same year, a 55-year-old lorry driver was beaten to death by unidentified people in Lalchari village of Dhalai district. In December 2020, a 21-year-old man suspected of theft was lynched by a mob near Govind Ballabh Panth Hospital in Agartala. After a series of mob lynching incidents in 2018 over rumours of child kidnappers were reported, the state government introduced the Tripura Lynching/Violence/Mob Violence Compensation Scheme 2018. The cabinet has decided to implement the law, taking cue from a Supreme Court order in July 2018 where the court directed all state governments to frame a rule for implementing the scheme within one month. According to mob violence compensation rules, the state government has to pay Rs 4 lakh to families of people who die in mob violence and Rs 2 lakh to those who were crippled with 80 per cent injuries, Rs 1 lakh in case of 40-80 per cent injuries, Rs 95,000 for those who sustained damage in their pucca houses or ships, Rs 50,000 for damage in kutcha houses or shops etc.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Calcutta HC allows pleas challenging WBSSC teacher recruitment notification
The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday (June 3, 2025) granted permission to file pleas challenging the West Bengal government's notification on this year's teacher recruitment process. These pleas are expected to be heard by a vacation Bench of the court later this week. On May 30, the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) and the State Education Department issued a notification for the State Level Selection Test (SLST) for the recruitment of assistant teachers for classes 9 to 12 in government-run and government-aided schools. Concurrently, the State government has filed a review petition in the Supreme Court seeking modifications to the top court's April 3 order. The Supreme Court had cancelled nearly 26,000 teaching and non-teaching appointments made through the 2016 recruitment process, calling it 'vitiated and tainted'. On April 17, the top court directed that fresh recruitment be initiated by May 31 and completed by December 31. While many among the affected group of sacked teachers have reiterated their demand to be exempted from the new process, a section of waitlisted candidates from the 2016 panel have moved the Calcutta High Court against the 2025 notification itself. A large section of the protestors and litigants who had earlier challenged the 2016 appointments had claimed that, despite clearing the examination, they were denied jobs due to irregularities in the selection process. The current petitioners, who identify themselves as among those deprived, have argued that the latest recruitment guidelines violate the Supreme Court's directives. In particular, they have objected to provisions in the notification that appear to favour sacked teachers — such as the allocation of an additional 10 marks for prior teaching experience. Notably, no such provision existed in the 2016 recruitment. The Supreme Court, in its April 17 order, had clarified: 'We clarify that this order shall not be read as conferring any special right or advantage on the aforesaid teachers, insofar as the fresh recruitment process is concerned.' Suvojit Das, a teacher whose appointment from the 2016 panel was cancelled but who maintains he was untainted, told The Hindu that the current recruitment notification does not particularly benefit any category of affected candidates, whether sacked or waitlisted. He claimed that the sacked teachers are unwilling to participate in fresh recruitment. 'In the most unfortunate case where we are forced to partake in recruitments, we should not be made to compete with the entire pool of candidates this year. We should only compete for the number of declared vacancies of 2016 for which we had originally applied,' he said. 'Moreover, in that case, the untainted appointees of 2016 who might not clear the SLST this year should also receive some benefit from the government,' Mr. Das added. He further argued that a re-evaluation of the 2016 OMR sheets could help distinguish meritorious candidates — whether waitlisted or sacked — from those who were part of the tainted process. Meanwhile, the Detective Department of the Bidhannagar Police Commissionerate on Tuesday issued summons to two protesting teachers, Amit Ranjan Bhuiyan and Mehebub Mondal, for questioning.