Texas banned abortions - and then sepsis rates started to soar
ProPublica analyzed seven years of Texas hospitals' discharge data — from 2017 through 2023 — and found that since 2021, when the southern state's initial abortion ban went into effect, the rate of sepsis surged by more than 50 percent for women hospitalized when they experienced miscarriages in the second trimester.
Sepsis is a medical emergency that occurs when a patient's body improperly reacts to an infection. It can lead to organ failure or death if not treated quickly enough.
In September 2021, the state banned most abortions after a fetal heartbeat was detected. Then, in August 2022 following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade, Texas's 'trigger law' took effect, criminalizing abortion. Doctors who perform abortions could face life in prison and fines of up to $100,000. Now, abortions are banned in all cases except if the mother's health or life is at risk — a definition that the state's supreme court has refused to clarify.
The rate of sepsis among patients experiencing second-trimester pregnancy loss remained pretty steady until the state added criminal penalties for abortion providers, the analysis shows.
In 2021, before they were introduced, 67 patients who miscarried in the second trimester were diagnosed with sepsis but after, in 2022, that figure increased to 90. That number increased again to 99 in 2023.
ProPublica believe those figures could be 'conservative.'
Treating miscarriages has also become complicated as a result of these laws. Medical professionals are constrained by either having to wait for the mother's life to be in jeopardy or having to wait for the fetus' heart to stop beating.
For example, three days after the fetal heartbeat law took effect, on September 3, 2021, Josseli Barnica went to a Houston hospital at 17 weeks pregnant to discover she was battling a deadly infection as a result of a miscarriage. But doctors were restricted in how they could treat her, since her fetus still had a heartbeat. After 40 hours in pain from the infection, Barnica delivered the fetus after there was no longer a detectable heartbeat. Three days after being treated and discharged, she died from sepsis. Medical experts who reviewed her case told ProPublica that they believed her death was 'preventable.'
Another patient cited in the study, Nevaeh Crain, died after doctor's waited for her fetus' heart to stop beating as her organs failed. Before rushing the teenager to the operating theter, they conducted another test to confirm her fetus had expired, the outlet reported.
The data also underscores the confusion around miscarriage treatment. The rate of sepsis was less severe for pregnant patients who were admitted to the hospital without a fetal heartbeat. The rate moved from 2.1 percent in 2017 to 3.1 percent in 2023 for those admitted with fetal death, and from 3.7 percent to 6.9 percent for those without fetal death.
'What this says to me is that once a fetal death is diagnosed, doctors can appropriately take care of someone to prevent sepsis, but if the fetus still has a heartbeat, then they aren't able to act and the risk for maternal sepsis goes way up,' Dr. Kristina Adams Waldorf, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at UW Medicine, told the outlet. 'This is needlessly putting a woman's life in danger.'
Other indicators suggest pregnancy in Texas has become more dangerous. Since 2021, dozens more pregnant and postpartum women have died in Texas hospitals than had before the Covid-19 pandemic — despite a drop in maternal mortality rates at a national level in the same period.
There were 79 maternal hospital deaths in 2018 and 2019 compared to 2022 and 2023 when there were 120. Despite this alarming uptick, the Texas Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Review Committee opted not to review pregnancy-related deaths in 2022 and 2023.
'The fact that Texas is not reviewing those years does a disservice to the 120 individuals you identified who died inpatient and were pregnant,' said Dr. Jonas Swartz, an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Duke University. 'And that is an underestimation of the number of people who died.'
The laws in place appear to be interfering with patient care, one doctor suggested.
'We have the ability to intervene before these patients get sick,' Dr. Sarah Prager, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Washington, told the outlet. 'This is evidence that we aren't doing that.'
Even though the Texas Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit asking for clarification over who qualifies for an abortion in the state, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick called on the state legislature to clear up the language of the law. 'I do think we need to clarify any language so that doctors are not in fear of being penalized if they think the life of the mother is at risk,' he said last month.
Gov. Greg Abbott, however, doesn't seem to be convinced that any clarification is necessary. 'There have been hundreds of abortions that have been provided under this law, so there are plenty of doctors and plenty of mothers that have been able to get an abortion that saved their lives and protect their health and safety,' he told the Houston Chronicle this week before ProPublica's report was released. 'So I know as the law as it currently exists can work if it is properly applied.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
Brazil's former president Bolsonaro temporarily leaves house arrest for medical exams
Brazil 's Former President Jair Bolsonaro temporarily left house arrest Saturday to undergo medical exams in Brasilia, after a judge authorized him to spend six to eight hours at a hospital. Doctors at DF Star hospital said Bolsonaro was admitted for evaluation of fever, cough, persistent gastroesophageal reflux and hiccups. Tests revealed residual signs of two recent pulmonary infections, as well as persistent esophagitis and gastritis. He was discharged later in the day and will continue treatment with medication. He has been hospitalized multiple times since being stabbed at a campaign event before the 2018 presidential election. His most recent surgery was in April, for a bowel obstruction. Bolsonaro is on trial at the Supreme Court over his alleged attempt to remain in power after losing the 2022 election to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. A five-justice panel is expected to deliver verdicts and sentences on five counts against him between Sept. 2 and 12. Bolsonaro denies any wrongdoing. The far-right leader has been under house arrest since Aug. 5. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case, said Bolsonaro violated precautionary measures by spreading content through his three lawmaker sons. A small group of fewer than 20 people gathered outside DF Star hospital Saturday, claiming Bolsonaro is a victim of political persecution. Some thanked U.S. President Donald Trump, who has called the prosecution a 'witch hunt' and linked his decision to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports to Bolsonaro's legal troubles. ___ Luís Rua contributed reporting in Brasilia.
The National
6 days ago
- The National
NHS Fife 'broke the law' claims EHRC amid Sandie Peggie tribunal
The Herald reports that the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has told the health board to carry out an equality impact assessment, after it emerged one had not been carried out ahead of NHS Fife allowing a transgender doctor to use female changing facilities. Peggie, a nurse, was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on Christmas Eve 2023. She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment, and cited concerns about 'patient care'. READ MORE: Scottish Enterprise panned for lack of checks on Israeli-linked arms firms Peggie then lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination; and victimisation. The tribunal has become a flash point for gender-critical campaigners and anti-trans groups, with For Women Scotland, which took the case regarding the definition of a woman to the Supreme Court, being permitted to lodge a written intervention to the tribunal. Peggie's legal team requested a copy of any relevant impact assessments undertaken by the health board in August 2024. According to the Herald, the health board responded that it had not. This led to the EHRC writing to NHS Fife on multiple occasions. They said that under the Equality Act 2010, the health board had a 'duty to assess and review proposed new or revised policies or practices' and to publish them within a 'reasonable period'. The Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman as 'biological sex' was handed down on April 16 2025, after the EHRC first wrote to NHS Fife. The judgment led to the EHRC to release interim guidance – which banned transgender people from using the facilities of their acquired gender. It also made it compulsory for workplaces to provide single-sex facilities, a statement it would later retract. A consultation is currently underway, before the EHRC releases its full guidance. Prior to the Supreme Court ruling, the Equality Act had been seen as including transgender women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) as women. Baroness Kishwer Falkner, EHRC chair, said: 'Undertaking an equality impact assessment of relevant policies or practices, and publishing the results, are requirements of the PSED Specific Duties in Scotland. We believe NHS Fife failed to meet these requirements and told them to carry one out immediately. (Image: PA) 'NHS Fife has now confirmed that it has commissioned an equality impact assessment and anticipates it will be published by September 30. 'Since we first wrote to NHS Fife, the Supreme Court ruled on the definition of 'sex' in the Equality Act. The EHRC has been clear that all duty-bearers should be following the law, as set out in the judgment handed down on April 16. NHS Fife has assured us that it is following our advice to review the implications of the judgment for its policies and procedures, seeking specialist legal advice where necessary. 'We continue to urge NHS Fife to progress the corrective actions we directed without delay. These steps are essential to protect NHS Fife staff from discrimination and harassment on the basis of protected characteristics, including sex, religion or belief, and gender reassignment. 'We will continue to engage with NHS Fife and monitor its progress and the outcome of the measures it has committed to taking, to ensure compliance with the Equality Act and Public Sector Equality Duty.' In response, a spokesperson for the health board said: 'NHS Fife acknowledges the Equality and Human Rights Commission's media release of 13 August 2025 and welcomes its continued engagement and oversight. READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protesters meet JD Vance as he lands in Scotland 'We are committed to working constructively with the EHRC to provide assurance that we fully understand, and are meeting, our obligations under the Equality Act 2010 and the Public Sector Equality Duty. 'This includes considering the implications of the recent Supreme Court ruling and the EHRC's interim guidance. 'A comprehensive review and audit of our facilities has been completed, and an Equality Impact Assessment is underway. This will be concluded and published by 30 September 2025. 'Our priority is to ensure that all NHS Fife policies and practices protect the rights of our staff and comply fully with equality legislation.'
Daily Mail
13-08-2025
- Daily Mail
Outcry in India as Delhi moves to remove 'all ONE MILLION' stray dogs from its streets following rabies outbreak
India 's top court ordered authorities in the capital Delhi and its suburbs on Monday to remove all stray dogs, following a rise in rabies cases, particularly among children. India's Supreme Court took up the case after several reports in local media of stray dogs biting children in Delhi, with some turning fatal. On Monday, news outlet Live Law reported that the court told authorities in Delhi to pick up stray dogs from across the city, sterilise and vaccinate them and move them to dog shelters. The court ordered officials to set up multiple shelters across Delhi. These shelters need to be capable holding at least 5,000 dogs and having sterilisation and vaccination facilities, as well as being equipped with CCTV facilities to make sure strays don't escape. The court also ruled that Delhi needs to set up a hotline for citizens to report dog bites and rabies cases. 'Infants and young children, should not at any cost, fall prey to rabies. The action should inspire confidence that they can move freely without fear of being bitten by stray dogs. No sentiment should be involved,' the court said, according to Live Law website. Local media reports suggest that Delhi alone has 1 million stray dogs, though this number could not be independently verified. The city saw more than 35,000 animal bites, which largely came from dogs, in the first six months of this year alone. Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, for the Delhi government, urged for strong intervention as 'sterilisation only prevents the increase in their population, but it does not take away the power of the dogs to give rabies,' the website reported. However, the move has drawn criticism from conservationists over its implementation. 'Where are the shelters to house thousands of dogs?' conservation biologist Bahar Dutt said in a post on X, calling the top court's order an 'impractical unscientific move'. 'We need mass vaccination & mass sterilization — the only humane, proven ways to reduce conflicts,' Vidit Sharma, founder of animal welfare organization Save A Stray, said on X. Nishima Bhagat, who attended a candlelight march in the centre of the city on Monday night to protest against the court ruling, told the Guardian: 'We are walking in solidarity to show that there are people for the voiceless. They [the dogs] cannot speak for themselves. 'They cannot be put into the pounds. We cannot uproot them from the place where they live.' Mini Aravindan, a senior official at Peta India, said: 'It's infeasible to build and staff enough shelters for hundreds of thousands of dogs' and the cost would be huge. The Indian government said in April that nearly 430,000 cases of dog bites had been reported across the country in January, compared with 3.7 million cases all through 2024. India has 52.5 million stray dogs, according to a State of Pet Homelessness survey by Mars Petcare, while 8 million homeless dogs are in shelters.
