
Drivers caught behind wheel of unroadworthy vehicles up 52% in a year
This is up from 8,614 during the previous 12 months.
The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency statistics, released in response to a freedom of information request, show the number of penalty point endorsements issued for driving vehicles with defective brakes, tyres, steering or other problems.
The offence attracts three penalty points which stay on drivers' licences for four years.
As the figures only reflect those caught, the RAC believes they represent the 'tip of the iceberg' when it comes to the number of unroadworthy vehicles being used.
RAC mobile servicing and repairs team leader Nick Mullender said: 'The steep increase in drivers receiving points on their licences for unroadworthy vehicles is a cause for alarm, as it could indicate more drivers are running the gauntlet and driving unsafe vehicles – although it's also possible more drivers are being caught by the police.
'Whether it's brakes, tyres, steering or something else, every mechanical component in a vehicle plays a critical role in ensuring it can be driven safely and confidently.
'By getting behind the wheel of vehicles that are defective, a minority of drivers are needlessly putting the law-abiding majority at serious risk.
'For every person caught there will doubtless be more who are knowingly in charge of unroadworthy vehicles that could be involved in completely avoidable collisions in the future.
'We strongly urge drivers to keep on top of routine maintenance and get any issues checked by a well-qualified mobile mechanic or reputable garage.'
Chief Superintendent Marc Clothier, part of the portfolio for roads policing at the National Police Chiefs' Council, said: 'These figures are shocking.
'If you are driving an unroadworthy vehicle with defects such as tyres or brakes, you are not only putting yourself at risk but you are putting the lives of other road users at risk too.
'Ensuring your vehicle is roadworthy and safe to drive is your responsibility and we would encourage everyone to routinely check their vehicle before getting behind the wheel.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts
BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts The presenter was caused 'serious harm and distress' after being bombarded by Facebook messages Broady was caused 'serious harm and distress' BBC tennis presenter Naomi Broady was indundated with Facebook messages from a crazed stalker who also targeted her sister with a series of bizarre gifts, it has been revealed. The former player - who works as a commentator on BBC Radio 5Live and was part of the broadcaster's coverage of Wimbledon earlier this summer - was bombarded with messages from David Richardson during a terrifying 11-month campaign between January and December 2023. It came after Richardson, 39, stalked Broady's sister Emma over a three-year period. Richardson, of Stockport, Greater Manchester, appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court last month, where he pleaded guilty to the harassment of 35-year-old Naomi - who is also the brother of British No.5 Liam Broady - as well as the stalking of Emma, the Mirror reports. According to court documents, he "sent multiple unwanted images and messages via Facebook and [sent] unwanted gifts, cards and paintings," while he also caused the presenter "serious harm and distress". The court papers detail how Richardson "between 13/9/2020 and 4/12/2023 at Stockport, pursued a course of conduct, by sending multiple unwanted images and messages via Facebook and sending unwanted gifts, cards and paintings, which amounted to stalking causing Emma Broady serious alarm or distress, which had a substantial adverse effect on her usual day-to-day activities when you knew or ought to have known that your course of conduct would cause alarm or distress." They add: "Between 18/1/2023 and 4/12/2023 at Stockport, [Richardson] pursued a course of conduct which amounted to the harassment of Naomi Broady, and which you knew or ought to have known amounted to the harassment of her in that you sent various unwanted messages on Facebook." Article continues below Richardson has now been banned from contacting the sisters or visiting their homes ahead of being sentenced at Manchester Crown Court on August 18. When approached by the Mirror at his home in Stockport, Richardson confirmed he had entered guilty pleas, before explaining that he had tried to strike up a relationship with 37-year-old Emma, only for her to rebuff him and for him to start targeting Naomi instead. "I wanted to try to win her over," he said. "I wanted to ask her out.. I was a bit out of practice with the girls... I've not been in a relationship. So I just bought her a Selfridges voucher and some flowers for her birthday. And then I didn't ask her out. "But then Valentine's Day came along, so I bought her another Selfridges voucher and flowers, and then Christmas came along. You know, I sent it to her again, but she thanked me and said it really cheered her up." As a player, Naomi won one WTA Tour doubles title, as well as nine singles titles and 20 doubles titles on the ITF Women's Circuit, before retiring in 2021. It comes after fellow British tennis stars Emma Raducanu and Katie Boulter were made victims of stalking campaigns, with the former left in tears on court at a tournament in Dubai earlier this year after seeing a man who had followed her to competitions in the stands. The man, who was removed from the match and later given a restraining order by Dubai police, had given the 22-year-old a letter and asked for a photo with her in a coffee shop the previous day. Raducanu had previously been the victim of a stalker who walked 23 miles to her home and stole a shoe from her porch, with the obsessive man - 35-year-old Amrit Magar - later given a five-year restraining order and made to wear an electronic tag. Boulter, meanwhile, revealed that she has been followed by fans after tournaments, while she had received threats of violence from fans who were on site at competitions. Article continues below 'One time in Nottingham, I had someone messaging me on social media saying: 'I'm outside. I'm going to hurt you if you come outside'," she explained. "I alerted the WTA, and they found the guy, who was actually on site. 'Things like this happen all the time. Obviously we are very well protected, which makes you feel safe. The WTA does a great job of being there for you with that. I do feel like we are protected as much as possible, which at least puts your mind at ease a little bit.'


Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Police chiefs must learn to use their common sense
Britain's top cop club has released new guidance to forces in England and Wales on when and how to describe the suspects of serious crimes. It's a day late and a dollar short. The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC), stirred from their deckchairs by nationwide riots of only twelve months ago, are now advising constabularies that it's probably a good thing in most circumstances if people's ethnicity and immigration status are disclosed at the point of charge. If you're wondering why it takes this body in conjunction with the College of Policing to tell chiefs they are allowed to use common sense, you're in good company. But let's apply this new dispensation to a real-life example to see if it flies. Say, the one where police obfuscation over the identity of a suspect contributed to the worst public order breakdown for over a decade. Alex Rudukabana, the Southport child murderer, was arrested on 29 July last year. Police gave the first information about him to the public later that same evening, which did nothing to contradict misinformation already halfway round the world. Its selectivity only fuelled public anger. After arrest for multiple murders, the police had 96 hours to charge or release him under legislation. By the time police announced he had been charged on the morning of 1 August, serious disorder had broken out in five locations with dozens of officers injured and a violent contagion was released across the UK. It's fair to say that this anaemic intervention should at least stop huge inconsistencies that exist across the country. Chief officers are clearly befuddled by what they perceive to be legal or community tension obstacles to doing the right thing at the right time. Merseyside police, perhaps stung by their mishandling of the Southport massacre comms, swung into action when a car-ramming horror happened on the streets of Liverpool in May. The ethnicity of the alleged assailant – 'a white British man' – was released two hours after his arrest and long before Paul Doyle was charged with multiple counts of GBH. Contrast this with the arrant idiocy of Warwickshire police, whose extreme reluctance to confirm the immigration status and ethnicity of two reported asylum seekers suspected of the rape of a 12 year old girl in Nuneaton recently was based not on any legislative obstacle but on the lack of guidance to tell them they could. The precise status of the alleged attackers Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir is still shrouded in mystery. While they are entitled to the presumption of innocence and due process, I can't see anything that would preclude those facts from being released. Beyond, of course, the cack-eyed fealty to 'community cohesion', which seems to eternally ignore the fact that this social contract relies on the majority in the country believing in it. There is no substitute for the fullest information being disclosed accurately and fast. Where there might be a legal impediment, for example age, that is relied upon to stop any early disclosure, this must be changed. The National Police Chiefs Council ought to be an anachronism these days. We introduced local democratic accountability years ago in the form of policing and crime commissioners (PCCs). But they are too often incompetent duds and political retreads far behind the curve of public opinion that elected them. If this architecture must exist along with the insatiable bureaucracy of the College of Policing, it ought to spend more time ensuring that police chiefs and their guidance are both fit for purpose. Otherwise we will continue to see people like Essex Chief Ben-Julian Harrington well over his head when it comes to policing protests, such as those tinderbox concerns over illegal migration, despite being the NPCC lead for public order. His misunderstanding of the Human Rights Act and the convention it is built on meant that masked antifa protestors from outside the community were given a police escort into and away from a then peaceful demonstration by townspeople outside a hotel for migrants in Epping. This had disastrous results both in terms of disorder and public confidence. One thing PCCs can do is hire chief officers who are able and willing to do the thing public trust relies on – police without fear or favour – and fire those who can't. Perhaps it is not too late for them to step up.

Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Over 70s face UK driving bans if they fail eye tests
The UK is one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving, leading ministers to consider compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 and a driving ban for those who fail. The shake-up could also see the drink drive limit in England and Wales to be lowered in line with Scotland's laws. Under the plans being considered by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales could be cut from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100ml of breath to 22 micrograms. 🏠 Moved home? You must update your: ➡ driving licence ➡ vehicle log book (V5C) ➡ Direct Debit for vehicle tax ➡ private number plate documentshttps:// #DVLADigital — Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (@DVLAgovuk) August 8, 2025 This figure would be in line with Scotland, which cut its drink-drive limit in 2014, and the rest of Europe, where no other country has a limit as high as that in England and Wales. Ministers are also considering tougher penalties for uninsured drivers and failing to wear a seatbelt. Last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents, and numbers have remained relatively constant following a large fall between 2000 and 2010. A Labour source said: 'At the end of the last Labour government, the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads was at a record low, but numbers have remained stubbornly high under successive Conservative governments. 'In no other circumstance would we accept 1,600 people dying, with thousands more seriously injured, costing the NHS more than £2 billion per year.' Recommended Reading: Meanwhile, the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has risen over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022 and prompting concern that existing road safety measures are no longer working. Other proposals are reported to include allowing the police to bring prosecutions for drug-driving on the basis of roadside saliva tests rather than blood tests as increasing numbers of drivers are being caught with drugs in their system. The Labour source added: 'This Labour Government will deliver the first road safety strategy in a decade, imposing tougher penalties on those breaking the law, protecting road users and restoring order to our roads.' The strategy is due to be published in the autumn, and all proposals will be subject to consultation.