BT plan to close Londonderry office 'came out of the blue'
BT's plans to close its office in Londonderry with the potential loss of around 140 jobs came "totally out of the blue", a trade union has said.The company told staff on Wednesday that it plans to close its building at Queens quay and move 95 of the jobs to India.Some employees could be offered positions in Belfast.Tracey Fussy, from the Communication Workers Union (CWU), said the company's staff in Derry now face "a very bleak future".
"The fact they have looked at Derry, pulled the work out of Derry, has come as an absolute blow to them," Ms Fussy told BBC Radio Foyle's North West Today programme. The is due to meet members who work at the site on Thursday."We believe companies like BT, their focus should be on creating good employment within the UK and the decision here to move that work to India is completely unpalatable," she said."We know it is to our members as well."Their loyalty, their long service in this instance, their feeling is it means absolutely nothing."
The Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald described the job losses as "deeply disappointing".The Sinn Féin minister said the news was especially concerning, coming so soon after the loss of 300 jobs at BT in Enniskillen.In January, BBC News NI reported up to 90 jobs could be at risk at BT's Belfast headquarters due to changes at the telecoms company."Our members would probably have thought that in terms of BT's operation in Northern Ireland that would have been it," Ms Fussy said.
BT said its proposals to close the Derry office were part of a programme of "consolidating into a smaller number of buildings".It said the building was "not suitable for the long-term".The company said some staff whose roles are not being transferred to India could possibly relocate to Belfast.Ms Fussy said for many that was not a "real option"."It's not something we believe our members could sustain over a long period of time," she said.The union will now enter a period of consultation with BT, she added.
The SDLP MP for Foyle, Colum Eastwood, said the prospect of job losses was "devastating news for BT workers, their families and the broader local economy in Derry". Sinn Féin assembly member Pádraig Delargy said the potential job losses are "hugely concerning" for the local community, while Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) assembly member Gary Middleton said he was deeply disappointed by the announcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BT won't cancel my internet and now I've had my MORTGAGE rejected: CRANE ON THE CASE
My girlfriend and I separated in late 2024 and moved out of our shared home. Ending the BT broadband contract proved ludicrously difficult. When I called, the person said there was an 'issue with the account' and they couldn't close it. I was put on hold and no one ever came back. This happened at least five more times between December 2024 and February 2025. In February, I cancelled my direct debit in the hope this would trigger a response from BT. I eventually I got a letter saying my service would be cut off - great. I called to settle the remaining balance, which was £296 including bills for the months that had elapsed and a fee for cancelling mid-contract. But again, I was told my account couldn't be closed and left hanging on the phone. Last month, I got a letter saying BT had handed my account to a debt collector. I spoke to BT once more, and it said it would write off the balance as a gesture of goodwill and close the account - but I've since learned that still didn't happen. I'm now buying my first home, and just have been rejected for a mortgage because of unpaid debts with BT. My credit rating is otherwise excellent. B.S Helen Crane, This is Money's consumer champion, replies: First things first, I want to call out the telecoms firm for its total incompetence in your case. It is outrageous that BT's inability to cancel your £33 per month broadband contract led to you being rejected for a mortgage. You were never told why your account 'couldn't be cancelled'. You had been more than clear on the phone that you would happily pay the early exit fee, and also pay for the router, which you couldn't return because had got lost in your house move. This amounted to about £200 - but dismantling a collective life after a break-up is a slog and you just wanted to cross the internet off your to-do list. BT didn't seem to want to accept your offer, though, and instead gave you the run-around for months. As you still had a year and a half left on your contract, I do wonder whether leaving people hanging when they phone up is a tactic to prevent them from cancelling. Cutting off a direct debit without telling the payee first is never advised. That is because it can lead to situations such as yours, where companies turn to debt collectors and credit ratings are affected. That said, I completely understand why you did it. For months you'd been paying BT for broadband no one was using, in a home you no longer lived in. You'd given the company much more than a fair chance to take what you owed, and it had ignored you. It felt like the only way you could get a response. Somewhere along the way, someone at BT seemed to acknowledge this - as when you called again they agreed to write off your remaining balance as an apology for the way you'd been treated. But that never happened, and you were stunned to find that this ended up in a failed mortgage application. I can only imagine how stressful and upsetting that was, especially as you were a first-time buyer. This could have derailed your house purchase, for which you'd diligently saved a £50,000 deposit. I contacted BT to ask why on earth this happened, and tell it to sort out the mark on your credit report without delay. Not only could this lose you the home you wanted, but mortgage rates are moving quickly and you could end up locked into a more expensive deal if they began to rise. I'm glad to say that BT did close your account, waive the debt and contact the relevant credit agencies to remove it from your record. You have now had a mortgage approved with a new lender, and are on the way to completing on your home. However, there are two things I still don't think are right. First, BT never explained why it wouldn't close your account, simply sticking to the line that there was 'a problem'. And second, it only paid you £100 compensation for this ordeal. It will cost you much more, as you ended up taking a mortgage with a higher rate, as well as an £1,000 arrangement fee. That said, you were pleased to get it sorted and move on. A BT spokesman said: 'We're sorry B.S's experience with us fell below the high standards of service we always strive to deliver for our customers. 'We have now cancelled the debt in question on the account and offered him a gesture of goodwill to acknowledge his experience. He is happy his complaint has been resolved, and this has now been closed.' The mystery of the disappearing John Lewis voucher In January, my work colleague welcomed his first baby and I organised an office collection to buy him a John Lewis voucher. I ordered the £120 online gift card to my work email before forwarding it to his. In April, the colleague told me that he had tried to spend the voucher online, but the balance was zero. We've both spoken to John Lewis and it said the voucher was spent in February on the purchase of a laptop, in circumstances we thought sounded suspicious. But we were told John Lewis won't be refunding the balance because this was a case of 'human error'. We don't understand what that means and I'm sad that the money I collected from my team has been stolen. A.H, West Midlands Gift grift: The John Lewis voucher this reader gave his colleague was stolen Helen Crane replies: Working out how someone got their hands on this voucher has been a real puzzle - but one thing that is certain is that this sounds very suspicious. On one conversation with John Lewis, you learned that the £120 balance from your gift card was then added to an existing gift card, which had collected the balance from four other cards to total a balance of £500. This was then used to purchase the laptop, which was later returned for a refund. I have written before about the ways physical gift cards can be hijacked by fraudsters, but accessing the balances of online ones is trickier. In the case of John Lewis, vouchers are sent to an email account and have a long gift card number and a Pin, which must both be entered to make a purchase online. One theory is that someone hacked into your colleague's emails, and got the code for the voucher that way. However, you spoke to your employer and there is no evidence of this having happened. While it is impossible to be certain, you work for a company that holds lots of sensitive data. In the event of a hack, you told me, a stolen John Lewis voucher would be the least of your worries. There are other possibilities, too. According to Norton Antivirus, computer bots exist which allow fraudsters to exploit the online gift card balance checks used by retailers. These bots scan the websites for active cards, and can test more than a million card and pin combinations each hour. Once working combinations are obtained, they can be used by the scammer or sold on the dark web. This is one of the theories that circulated regarding the Nectar card scam. If your colleague's voucher was stolen in this way, I'd argue it is a failure of John Lewis' security and you should be paid back. Frustratingly, when I contacted John Lewis, it refused to confirm how your colleague's gift card account was compromised. It said: 'We're really sorry to hear about [his] experience. We take security very seriously and have measures in place to protect our gift cards, with each having a unique number and Pin which only the receiver has access to.' It also said the voucher was delivered to your colleague successfully and that Pins can only be accessed via the receiver's email. John Lewis staff do not have access to these. It added that when you were initially told the fraud was due to 'human error,' that was not correct. I then contacted Voucher Express, the company which operates the voucher scheme on behalf of John Lewis and other retailers. It said the matter had already been addressed by John Lewis. Sadly, it's still not clear what has happened here.
BreakingNews.ie
17 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Government accused of being ‘all over the place' on its rent control plans
The Government has been accused of being 'all over the place' and 'confused' on its rent control plans. Taoiseach Micheál Martin accused the Opposition of confusing the proposals and said he did not accept that they would lead to an increase in evictions and rent costs. Advertisement The new rent proposals include extending a 2 per cent rent cap for areas of high demand nationwide, with an exception for new developments, which can charge rent increases in line with inflation. New tenancy reforms include six-year-minimum tenancies for the first time, to be rolled out from March 1st, 2026, which will ban no-fault evictions for landlords with four or more tenancies. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said the proposals were 'a shambles'. I'm heading into Leaders' Questions to challenge Micheál Martin on his plan to hike up rents again and again! Fianna Fáil are fleecing renters and we must fight back! — Mary Lou McDonald (@MaryLouMcDonald) June 11, 2025 'You are literally all over the place, confused by your own back-of-the-envelope proposal,' she said during Leaders' Questions on Wednesday. Advertisement She said there was 'a very real danger' that the plan will 'tighten' rental supply in the coming months, as landlords could delay putting properties back on the market to charge a higher rent from March next year. Ms McDonald said that the Government was unclear about whether the plan allowed all landlords to set their rents at 'full market' value at the end of the new six-year tenancies. The Sinn Féin leader and other opposition TDs said on Tuesday this would 'jack up' rents either in the coming months or in six years' time, facilitated by government policy. 'This clearly meant people staying in an existing property, signing a new tenancy agreement, along with people moving into a property for the first time. And then, you were caught out. Advertisement 'So throughout the afternoon, you scrambled around denying that this was the case and then sometime in the evening, somebody slipped off and bizarrely changed the press release on the department website with a new wording, a wording that changes nothing.' On Tuesday in the Dáil, Ms McDonald, the Social Democrats and People Before Profit raised concerns about a Department of Housing press release which said that 'all landlords will have the right to reset rent where the rent is below market at the end of each six-year tenancy, unless a 'no-fault eviction' occurs.' On Wednesday, Ms McDonald said that this line had been changed on the department's website to include all landlords 'who have entered into a new tenancy arrangement on or after March 1st 2026' will have the right to reset rent at the end of each six-year tenancy. Taoiseach Micheál Martin accused Ms McDonald of 'bluff and bluster' which he said would contribute 'nothing' to Ireland's housing supply. Advertisement 'You're attacking all of this, and you're making absolutely false assertions, because all you are interested in is the politics of this. 'How can I exploit the housing situation to gain electoral or political gain?' Social Democrats' deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan accused the Government of 'contradictory messages' on its rent control plans. He also asked whether they had 'ditched' the rent reset every six years based on comments given to the Dáil. Advertisement 'You've told it all just a few minutes ago that new tenancies after March 2026 will be capped at CPI (Consumer Price Index), no mention of a reset every six years. No mention of that. Is the reset gone every six years? 'Do you accept now they are going to lead to huge rent increases for most renters, and these measures will increase hardship, poverty, evictions and homelessness for renters?' 'No, I don't deputy,' the Taoiseach replied. 'The bottom line is, I repeat again, all existing tenants will not have their rents increase beyond 2% and no attempts by you to sow confusion will change that reality.' A row ensued in the Dail when Mr Martin accused the Social Democrats of not believing there is 'a role for the market' in housing supply, to which Social Democrat TDs objected.
The Guardian
20 hours ago
- The Guardian
BT considers takeover move for struggling rival TalkTalk
BT is weighing up a potential takeover of the rival telecoms and broadband company TalkTalk, which is struggling amid financial difficulties and a customer exodus. The UK's biggest broadband provider is understood to have discussed the strategic possibility of buying TalkTalk. However, it is understood no approach or talks have been held with TalkTalk, and bankers have not been asked to draw up takeover plans. TalkTalk, founded by Sir Charles Dunstone, is the UK's fourth-largest telecoms group, with about 3.2 million customers. However, the group lost 400,000 customers in the 12 months to February, and last year Dunstone and other shareholders were forced to inject £235m to shore up its finances. TalkTalk has struggled since it was taken private by Toscafund, a London-based hedge fund, in a £1.1bn leveraged buyout that added £527mn of debt to its balance sheet in 2021. It now has about £1.2bn in debt on its balance sheet. A BT-TalkTalk tie-up would give the combined group control of about 36% of the UK broadband market. 'Companies are always looking at rivals in their sector, particularly distressed assets,' said one City source discussing the potential takeover plans, which were first reported by the Telegraph. In recent weeks it has emerged that TalkTalk has fallen behind on payments with supplies and partners including Openreach and CityFibre. According to estimates from New Street Research, TalkTalk pays its broadband suppliers more than £60m each month. The Salford-based company cut 350 jobs last year as part of a wider plan to strip £120m out of the business. If a takeover offer from BT were to crystallise, it could face objections from rivals and an investigation from the UK competition regulator. Virgin Media O2 has also previously considered making an approach for TalkTalk. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion BT and TalkTalk declined to comment.
