
BYD plans to roll out smart driving system in overseas markets soon, including Singapore
SHENZHEN: Chinese electric vehicle giant BYD plans to make its intelligent driving technology, known as 'God's Eye', available in overseas markets like Singapore soon.
The world's largest EV maker told CNA that while it cannot commit to a specific timeline, the technology could be rolled out progressively, with certain features made available first instead of all at once.
Singapore, where BYD has become the top-selling car so far this year, will get some smart driving features by next year at the latest, said Liu Xueliang, general manager of the company's Asia Pacific auto sales division.
These features include automated parking, adaptive cruising and remote parking, where a driver can use their mobile phone to park or drive their vehicle.
The system relies on different cameras, radar and lidar sensors to do this, though the specific configuration is based on different tiers.
Liu noted that BYD first needs to test its assisted-driving system on actual roads and 'constantly evolve the algorithm', given the differing road conditions in various countries.
'Of course, there are also some habits of local consumers, including some (assisted) self-driving, parking, and highway conditions,' he added.
On top of that, he noted that automakers need to adhere to each country's laws and regulations on unmanned driving, which are rapidly evolving as autonomous vehicle technology advances.
'We respect the laws and regulations of any market and need to pass their rigorous certification system,' Liu said.
'When everything is mature, we will gradually push this to the market in the short term.'
SHIFTING GEARS
This comes as China seeks new markets for its vehicles to boost its economic growth and exports, amid ongoing trade tensions and accusations of overcapacity by the likes of the United States and Europe.
Liu also said the highly competitive EV market in China is shifting gears from vehicle electrification.
'Now, the Chinese market is in the stage of intelligence competition,' he pointed out to CNA during a media visit to the firm's headquarters in Shenzhen.
China, which is the world's largest automotive market, has seen a years-long price war where carmakers have been slashing prices and offering features previously perceived as premium, such as smart assisted driving, for free.
BYD announced in February that it will offer the 'God's Eye' smart driving system, which was first unveiled in 2023, in nearly all of its vehicles at no additional cost to buyers.
The cheapest model it offered was the popular Seagull hatchback, priced at US$9,555 at the time.
Last weekend, the company announced a fresh round of subsidies and incentives for more than 20 models, reducing the price of the Seagull to about US$7,800.
BYD's move to integrate smart features in almost all its future vehicles was part of efforts to challenge its domestic rivals like Xpeng as well as American EV maker Tesla.
LARGER SCALE THAN COMPETITORS
Xpeng and Nio have announced smart features in their cars as well, but both Chinese EV makers sold about 100,000 to 200,000 vehicles each last year – significantly fewer than BYD, which sold more than 4 million vehicles globally in 2024.
Experts said this scale brings not just cost savings, but other benefits too.
Tu Le, founder and managing director of consulting firm Sino Auto Insights, said the data BYD can collect from the cars it sells will enable the technology to 'get better very fast'.
'Some of these other car companies (that) don't have as many vehicles on the road and aren't collecting as much data, it might take a little bit longer,' he added.
'They're already ahead of BYD currently (in terms of technology). Whether they can stay ahead of BYD in the long term, I'm not that sure.'
This has also put smart driving features within reach of many countries.
'If you were talking to somebody in Mexico, Thailand or Vietnam, it wasn't on their radar,' he said.
'Now, because BYD already sells into these markets, these capabilities are going to become standard. It's something that could be used all over the world within the next four or five years.
In terms of foreign markets, he also flagged concerns over whether countries or regions, such as Southeast Asia, are ready for assisted-driving technology.
Other challenges include data privacy and whether users will accept the technology.
"I have concerns and fears, such as what problems may arise in traffic jams, and scratches,' said 33-year-old Xi'an native, who only wanted to be identified as Mr Dong.
Thirty-three-year-old Su Na, who works in the exhibitions and events industry, told CNA: "I am still sceptical about new energy vehicles because there are too many that will catch fire or lock when there is an accident.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
32 minutes ago
- CNA
IISS' Robert Ward on Japan's firm multilateral stance and its security ambitions
The International Institute for Strategic Studies' (IISS) Japan chair Robert Ward shares how Tokyo is adjusting its security posture and ambitions ahead of a trilateral meeting with the US and Australia at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. He also explains how such multilateral platforms are important for Japan, especially in an era of great power rivalry.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Geopolitics Professor Philippe Le Corre on US-EU relations and Europe-Asia ties
Ahead of French President Emmanuel's keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Professor of Geopolitics Philippe Le Corre from the ESSEC Business School shares his thoughts on US and EU relations, as well as how Europe can offer Asia a different approach to international relations.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Why isn't China's defence minister attending Shangri-la Dialogue, and how will it affect Sino-US ties?
SINGAPORE: China's decision not to send its defence minister Dong Jun to this year's Shangri-La security dialogue (SLD) in Singapore reflects a deliberate decision on Beijing's part to withhold ministerial-level participation amid fraught geopolitical conditions, analysts told CNA. In a statement issued on Thursday (May 29), a day before the forum's official opening, China's Ministry of National Defense said a delegation from the People's Liberation Army's National Defense University would attend in Dong's place, without providing details on who would be leading it. The delegation 'will have in-depth exchanges with different parties to build more consensus', said ministry spokesman Zhang Xiaogang, who did not address why Dong would not be attending or whether the Chinese team would meet with US counterparts. This will be the first time since 2019 that China will not be represented by its defence minister at the annual security summit, a key platform where Beijing's positions on flashpoints like Taiwan and the South China Sea have drawn intense international scrutiny over the years. 'Past records show that the level of China's delegation is closely linked to the international climate and perceived external pressures,' said Lim Tai Wei, an East Asian affairs observer and professor at Soka University in Japan. With US President Donald Trump back in power, analysts who spoke to CNA believe that Beijing may see limited strategic benefit in sending its top defence ministry official to the annual event, particularly with newly appointed US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth slated to be in attendance. Without ministerial-level attendance, Beijing will also forgo the opportunity to hold high-level bilateral meetings with direct counterparts in countries like the US, experts added. CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE Beijing's decision to forgo high-level ministerial representation might also be related to unfavourable optics, Lim said, especially in environments where Washington and Western counterparts may seek to frame the dialogue in more performative terms. 'China operates within a high-context political culture, where atmospherics, non-verbal cues, and the overall tone of engagement carry significant weight,' Lim said. 'There tends to be a preference for controlled settings and predictability,' Lim added. 'In a fluid international environment, where developments can shift quickly, this may have contributed to the decision not to send a senior-level delegation this year.' Benjamin Ho, an assistant professor at the China Programme of the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) in Singapore, noted that China has historically sent its defence ministers to the annual summit when 'global conditions were right' for talks with counterparts - especially those from the US. US-China relations have rapidly deteriorated, particularly with renewed tariff disputes, trade tensions and Trump's decision to clamp down on Harvard's Chinese international students. Against this current backdrop, there has been 'little strategic reason' for Beijing to send a ministerial-level delegation to the SLD, Ho added. 'Last year, (then-US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin) reiterated the idea that when US-China relations are not good, (both sides) should meet and talk,' Ho said. 'But for China, it's quite different. For Beijing, if relations are not good, there is no need for the military to meet and talk.' 'Beijing only talks when political conditions are correct so I think (they) are operating from a very different kind of paradigm.' Lin Ying-yu, an assistant professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University in Taiwan, said Beijing's hesitation may reflect internal uncertainty about how to manage defence diplomacy under Trump's second term. 'China has yet to settle on a clear approach to engaging the US,' he said. 'At present, (President) Xi Jinping has not had direct or formal dialogue with Trump since his return to office so I think China has not finalised its position on how to handle relations with the US under this new term.' Sending a lower-level delegation would be a way for Beijing to test the waters, Lin added. 'This is a way for China to first observe how the US responds in the security and defence space, before deciding what kind of posture or attitude to adopt going forward.' ALLEGED CORRUPTION PROBE NOT AT PLAY? Dong, a Chinese naval admiral from the People's Liberation Army (PLA), assumed the role of Chinese defence minister in late 2023. His predecessors Wei Fenghe and Li Shangfu were both expelled from the ruling Communist Party and dismissed from their roles over bribes and other 'serious disciplinary violations'. Observers have noted Dong's own brush with the wide-ranging corruption campaign, which has plagued China's military since last year - nine PLA generals and at least four aerospace defence industry executives were removed as a result. Dong's SLD absence has prompted speculation of him being under an alleged disciplinary probe - but defence officials and analysts now caution against drawing direct conclusions, noting his recent travel history and no official comments linking him to misconduct. 'There's been speculation about whether Admiral Dong is in political trouble, but that doesn't ring true,' said Drew Thompson, a former US Department of Defense (DOD) official, in a LinkedIn post shared on Friday, which noted Dong's three-day visit to Berlin in mid-May, where he met with Germany's defence minister and addressed UN officials. Dong also recently held a high-profile meeting with Thailand's Chief of Defense Forces, General Songwit Noonpakdee, in Beijing. Thompson said it signalled that Dong remained active in his official capacity as Chinese defence minister despite his absence from the annual regional forum. Lin said there was no clear connection between the ongoing anti-corruption drive within the PLA and Dong's SLD absence. 'In China, decisions to prosecute senior officials are made at the top levels of the party hierarchy. These are not developments that outsiders can easily interpret or anticipate,' he said. From his assessment of the situation, it also appeared that Dong might have been given clearance to attend the summit in Singapore and may even have intended to go. 'But due to how the optics might play out, they likely opted for a lower-level delegation instead.' 'I don't believe this has anything to do with the current probe inside the PLA,' Lin added. REVERTING TO A PREVIOUS NORM Attended by world leaders and high-ranking government officials from more than 40 countries, as well as academics and business leaders, SLD is widely regarded as the region's most prominent multilateral forum on defence and security. China's attendance and participation is often among the highlights. The US has maintained consistent participation at the highest level, with its defence secretary attending every edition of the forum. By contrast, Beijing has varied its level of representation over the years, observers added. Since 2019, excluding 2020 and 2021 when the forum was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, China's last three defence ministers, Wei Fenghe, Li Shangfu, and Dong Jun each attended and delivered keynote speeches. But the level of engagement has not always been consistent, analysts noted. China began participating more actively in 2007, initially sending deputy chiefs of the General Staff, including Zhang Qinsheng and Ma Xiaotian, between 2007 and 2010. In 2011, during a period of improved China-US ties following then-President Hu Jintao's visit to Washington, Beijing dispatched its then-defence minister, Liang Guanglie, to the forum for the first time. But it lowered its profile the following year, sending Ren Haiquan, then vice president of the Academy of Military Sciences instead. Between 2013 and 2018, China continued to participate, but again at a sub-ministerial level. Delegation leaders during this period included Deputy Chiefs of the General Staff Qi Jianguo (2013), Wang Guanzhong (2014), and Sun Jianguo (2015 and 2016), as well as He Lei, vice president of the Academy of Military Sciences (2017 and 2018). The presence of Hegseth, an outspoken critic of China, may have been a significant factor in Beijing's decision not to send a defence minister to this year's SLD, analysts said. 'If Dong comes, he is basically coming here to get whacked by Hegseth,' Ho said. 'He is going to repeat very much the same lines, in a way, and if he doesn't repeat the same lines, then it's going to be much more aggressive.' 'For the Chinese, they don't see that the political conditions are right. Having a defence minister coming and saying certain things (in response), which may or may not run in accordance to what the party wants, might create more problems than solutions,' he added. China also has the Xiangshan Forum, its own security forum that's touted as an alternative to Singapore's SLD, Ho added. 'So in a way, they are not losing out because they have their own (security) platforms.' Tamkang University's Lin noted that Beijing favoured settings where it could shape its narrative. The Xiangshan Forum would be a much more comfortable platform for defence engagement as compared to the SLD. In his LinkedIn post, Thompson said Dong's absence could reflect deeper dissatisfaction with the nature of the SLD itself. 'I surmise Dong Jun's absence is a signal of frustration with the dialogue itself. They've never liked it, which is why they started the Xiangshan Forum,' said Thomson. He also recalled a past exchange. 'My PLA counterpart once explained what they didn't like. He said: 'We don't like being made out to be gladiators fighting one another for others' entertainment. We want to deal with our differences bilaterally, in channels, not in public forums.'' 'Beijing always wants to control the narrative and discourse. Shangri-La does not enable that. Xiangshan Forum does,' Thompson said. ABSENCE WITH A COST SLD remains one of the rare global venues which sees senior Chinese defence officials field direct questions from foreign counterparts, scholars and journalists - offering a rare window into Beijing's strategic posture. The presence of China's defence minister also enables other countries to engage Beijing in bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the forum. This year however, that opportunity will be missing, experts said. Dong's absence will be an 'opportunity loss' for Beijing, Ho said, noting that the decision likely reflects a calculated trade-off. 'They probably made a calculation to the extent that their strategic interest obviously outweighs the fact that they are absent … that the fact they can preserve their interest without being at the forum is something that probably swung the decision not to come,' he said. Ho pointed out that ministerial meetings can still happen through other channels. 'One could say that maybe the Chinese would find other avenues to meet the Americans, and not necessarily at the SLD. And I think vice versa - Americans will probably shrug and say, 'Okay, it's an opportunity loss, but we'll find other ways to meet the Chinese, assuming that's what they want to do.'' Thompson said that both Beijing and Washington still had pre existing bilateral mechanisms. 'Beijing knows how to engage Washington and does not need third countries to facilitate. If political conditions are right, the PLA will meet with the DOD,' he said. The overall strategic cost of skipping the forum would likely be minimal for Beijing, Lim said, adding that the Chinese defence minister typically served more as a diplomatic envoy than a core decision-maker. 'Take for instance regional players including ASEAN nations - they will be understanding of how China manages its representation,' Lim said. 'They have other avenues to engage with Beijing, and some of these, away from the glare of media and in a bilateral format, would probably be as useful, if not more useful, than a full-scale forum,' Lim said.