What to know, the latest on Texas' redistricting efforts
Texas Democrats balked when Abbott agreed to add redistricting to their to-do list for a 30-day special session that began July 21 in Austin. Now, liberal lawmakers are crying foul with blue state governors threatening tit-for-tat responses and Texas Democrats weighing their own limited protest options as the GOP seeks to make major changes to the critical voter boundary lines that make up the nation's second largest congressional delegation.
Here's the latest to know on the controversial redistricting effort happening in the Lone Star State.
What could a new map look like?
Texas Republicans released their proposed new map on July 30.
Ahead of the official release, Punchbowl News first reported that the anticipated redraw would shift district boundaries around Dallas, Houston, Austin and the Rio Grande Valley.
There would still be 38 total seats in the Texas delegation under the new maps - leaving it second only to California's 52 seats. But five Texas seats would be redrawn in a bid that Republican envision giving their candidates a leg up with more GOP voters.
Democrats who at risk of losing their spot in Congress include Reps. Henry Cuellar, Vicente Gonzalez and Marc Veasey, according to Punchbowl.
Democrats charge partisan law violation
The rare push to redraw the boundary lines has led Democratic senators to accuse Trump administration officials of breaking a decades-old law limiting executive branch employees from engaging in partisan activities - such as advocating for a state's redistricting in order to benefit their political party.
In a letter to the Office of Special Counsel, California Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, along with Rhode Island's Sheldon Whitehouse and Illinois' Dick Durbin, called for an investigation into members of Trump's White House and Justice Department, accusing them of breaking the Hatch Act.
"The purpose of this redistricting push is to defeat Democratic Members of Congress and elect Republicans to affect the balance of political party power in the 120th Congress," the senators wrote.
"While such goals are appropriate for a political party organization, they are not appropriate for executive branch officials," they added, "especially at the Department of Justice which must take greater steps to ensure it acts with impartiality."
The Hatch Act does not apply to the president or vice president.
Hakeem Jeffries took a trip to Texas
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, made a trip to Texas July 30, the same day Republicans released their proposed map.
While there, Politico reported that Jeffries planned to meet with Rep. Al Green, a Houston lawmaker whose district could be caught in the crosshairs of a major map shake up.
"We understand that this is all hands on deck for us in the Democratic Party," Green told Politico.
Jeffries has been vocal in his opposition to the redistricting plans, saying in a July 15 press conference, "Texas Republicans are likely going to continue to act like political punks and bend the knee to Donald Trump's extreme agenda."
Later, he told CNN, regarding Democrats' response: "Let me just simply say the maps in New York are not as fair as they could be."
Redistricting arms race could ensue
Jeffries is not the only blue state lawmaker proposing an equal and opposite reaction to Texas.
Democrats coast-to-coast have promised a full-scale counterattack, should the Lone Star State move forward with redistricting.
"We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine the voices of the American people," Rep. Suzan DelBene, a Democrat from Washington and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told reporters at a meeting July 23.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has suggested a redistricting in his state to offset Republican actions. (But unlike in Texas where legislators decide district lines, Newsom does face a major obstacle in the form of a bipartisan redistricting commission, which oversees California's maps.)
The response from Democrats has enticed other Republican-controlled states to potentially jump in too.
Missouri Republicans are pondering a plan to give their party a geographical leg up, and legislatures in other states such as Florida and New Hampshire have the ability to reevaluate maps like Texas.
Texas Democrats eye leaving the state
Back in Texas, Democrats have a limited number of options to counter a GOP-controlled state House and Senate.
Their primary tool is a controversial and seldom used move to flee the state and break the quorum necessary to proceed in the legislative session. State Democrats last used the measure in 2021 to protest new voting restrictions. After that episode, in which representatives halted operations for 38 days, Republicans approved a $500 a day fine for breaking quorum.
The monetary punishment could be enough to give Democrats pause about leaving the state this time. However, the Texas Tribune reported deep-pocked Democratic donors are ready to assist and enable a potential walkout.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Greg Abbott might just have given Democrats eyeing 2028 the ‘knife fight' they needed
The Texas redistricting fight could end up being the first test of mettle for Democrats eyeing a 2028 play for the White House. With Greg Abbott, the state's Republican governor, directing lawmakers to gerrymander up to five congressional seats to add to the GOP's total, Democrats suddenly find themselves flush with political opportunity. For months, polling has shown that Democratic voters want their representatives to take on louder roles in opposition to Donald Trump. Survey after survey has shown the frustration the party's base harbors for members of leadership, frustration which boiled into rare public view earlier this year during an intra-party spat over a potential government shutdown. Now, Texas is giving Democratic governors, at the very least, an opportunity to give the voters what they want. That's why those same governors — the ones with Democratic state legislatures to back them up, that is — are lining up to threaten their own mid-decade redistricting efforts. And the list reads like a who's who of expected presidential contenders. In Illinois, New York, New Jersey and California, four of the Democratic Party's most prominent national leaders were fired up in their responses to questions this week about redistricting and their individual responses to the Texas plan to add as many as five GOP-leaning congressional seats. Adamantly backing them up was Ken Martin, the party chair who is on his own personal crusade to rebrand the Democrats' national image after the bruising 2024 cycle. 'We're not here to tie one of our hands behind our back,' Martin said in an interview with a Portland, Oregon news outlet. 'In the past, I think our party would bring a pencil to a knife fight. We're going to bring a gun to a knife fight.' He was even more explicit at a press conference with Democratic lawmakers who fled Texas to prevent the redistricting from taking place, telling reporters: "Now is not the time for one party to play by the rules while the other party has completely ignored it. They've decided to cheat, and we're going to respond in kind." The governors vowing to match any partisan redistricting committed by Texas Republicans offered similar analogies. The strongest response came from California's Gavin Newsom, who recently visited South Carolina as it is heavily speculated that he is considering a national campaign. He vowed that his state would fight 'fire with fire' and trigger its own redistricting process were Abbott to move forward in Texas. New York's Kathy Hochul, meanwhile, told reporters that she would push for ending the state's independent redistricting commission, explaining that she would no longer fight with her hand 'tied behind my back.' 'We're sick and tired of being pushed around when other states don't have the same aspirations that we always have,' the New York governor said on Monday. 'I cannot ignore that the playing field has changed dramatically, and shame on us if we ignore that fact and cling tight to the vestiges of the past. 'That era is over — Donald Trump eliminated it forever.' In Illinois, Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who is publicly harboring the escapee Democratic lawmakers from Texas, demurred on the prospect, though his office confirmed to Axios that he won't rule out his own reciprocal efforts: "Here in the state of Illinois, it is possible to redistrict -- it's not something that I want to do,' he said on Tuesday. Maryland's Wes Moore, another rising star in the party, issued a similar statement through a spokesperson on Tuesday; 'all options' are on the table. The Democratic leader of the state's House of Delegates just introduced legislation that would allow Maryland to pursue redistricting if another state did so mid-decade. In New Jersey, Gov. Phil Murphy is prevented from pushing for state lawmakers to begin their own redistricting efforts under the state's constitution. But Murphy told reporters on Monday that the issue was to be a talking point in conversations with other Democratic governors. 'I suspect as the Democratic governors get together for a drink or a coffee, this will be high on the agenda,' he said, according to The New Jersey Globe. While Democrats are likely limited in the number of states where they could mount their own bids to boost congressional representation for their party, the sheer size and density of California and New York could give them an edge. In general, the issue is providing the party the 'knife fight' it was looking for. With three Texas lawmakers risking arrest by fleeing the state to break a quorum in the legislature, Democratic voters are seeing the first hints of effective, unified Democratic resistance to the second Trump era coalesce across the country. It still remains to be seen if Texas Republicans will even be successful in their push. Assuming the GOP isn't scared off by threats from Democrats, court challenges could still prevent the state's new maps from going into effect next year — or at all. Abbott, however, seems to have ignited a spark within the Democratic Party. Even Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries was vowing that his party would respond from 'coast-to-coast' to prevent his caucus from losing up to five of its members in Texas, or at the minimum respond in kind. As the Democrats' leader in the House, Jeffries' own political future is tied to his ability to protect his members and repair a somewhat fractured party leadership as he braces for a wave of primary contests in 2026. On Monday, the Democratic minority leader vowed: 'We're going to respond and respond forcefully.' 'What is going on in Texas right now in terms of this second attempt to gerrymander the map we believe violates the Voting Rights Act,' Jeffries said during a CNN interview. 'You will not see that happen in Democratic states, but you will see governors and state legislatures and, of course, Members of the House Democratic Caucus respond in kind. There is no unilateral disarmament when we're in the middle of an all-out assault by Donald Trump.'
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stanford University laying off hundreds due to Trump cuts
Stanford University is set to lay off hundreds of employees, citing 'changes in federal policy' under the Trump administration. The elite California private school laid off 363 employees last week, a university spokesperson told The Independent. The move affected roles across departments, including those working in administration, research, alumni relations and campus operations, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. 'The university is providing support resources as well as layoff benefits to eligible employees,' school officials said in a July 31 statement. 'Nonetheless, these are difficult actions that affect valued colleagues and friends who have made important contributions to Stanford.' The layoffs are the result of 'ongoing economic uncertainty' and 'anticipated changes in federal policy — such as reductions in federal research funding and an increase in the excise tax on investment income,' according to a letter from Stanford Vice President for Human Resources Elizabeth Zacharias reviewed by the Chronicle. President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' — which he signed into law last month — increased Stanford's endowment tax from 1.4 percent to 21 percent, the Chronicle reports. Stanford's $37.6 billion endowment is among the largest in the country. Stanford also lost a significant amount of federal research funding as agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation are impacted by ongoing funding freezes, the Chronicle reports. Stanford has also been forced to make a $140 million reduction in its general budget for the upcoming year, according to a June statement from the school's president and provost. The school officials cited 'significant budget consequences from federal policy changes.' 'These changes include reductions in federal research support and an increase in the endowment tax,' the statement reads. The Trump administration has taken aim at higher education this year, and some schools have made deals with the administration to ensure federal funding isn't withheld. For instance, Columbia University in New York City agreed to pay the Trump administration a $200 million settlement last month to prevent funding cuts over claims that the elite school failed to combat antisemitism. Columbia University has not admitted wrongdoing and 'does not agree with the government's conclusion that it violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act,' according to a July 23 statement from the school. 'We are not, however, denying the very serious and painful challenges our institution has faced with antisemitism,' the statement continues. 'For these reasons, we took several important corrective steps in March, many of which are in this agreement, including a new provision for a liaison to the Jewish community, situated in University Life.'
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump accused of being 'like a medieval king' who has turned 'the Oval Office into a reality TV set'
The former UK ambassador to the US has delivered a scathing rebuke of Donald Trump, accusing him of acting like a 'medieval king'. Lord Darroch said the President had turned the 'Oval Office into a reality TV set'. The former diplomat was forced to quit his role in 2019 during Mr Trump's first term after leaked briefings showed him describing the President's government as 'dysfunctional', 'inept' and 'divided'. Speaking to broadcaster Iain Dale at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Lord Darroch defended the letter, which he said was a result of then-prime minister David Cameron urging him to be honest and direct. He told the audience that his comments were borne out by Mr Trump's actions as president. The former ambassador said Mr Trump was ultimately an unpredictable leader as he cited the numerous firings of top officials by the President, the various changes to his tariff policies and the recent move to place nuclear submarines near Russia. 'He's sort of like a medieval king - that sort of capricious decision-making - than he is like a modern politician where consistency is seen as important,' he said. 'He doesn't think that's important at all. He thinks that every day is a fresh day. You're basically battling with media. 'You're battling with your opponents. If it suits you today to reverse something you did last week, just do it. 'If you look at tariffs, that's a perfect example of unpredictability of capriciousness.' Lord Darroch suggested that Mr Trump's style stemmed from his time on the US version of The Apprentice. 'Donald Trump was made by reality TV,' he said, describing him as 'the American version of Alan Sugar'. He added: 'He learned a lot about how to present himself from reality TV. 'I think he's now literally turned the Oval Office into a reality TV set.' During his discussion with Mr Dale, the former diplomat praised the Prime Minister's handling of foreign policy, including his relationship with the US President. He told the broadcaster: 'So far, against a lot of predictions, Keir Starmer has proved himself really quite an adept Trump whisperer. 'He's done some clever things, including phoning Trump up after the assassination attempt - that was a clever thing to do, going to see him to sort of kiss the ring before the election.' The peer said the Labour leader had been better on foreign policy than domestic policy, but warned the PM there were 'not many votes in foreign policy'. Asked about defence, Lord Darroch suggested the UK would not be able to cope with a Russian invasion, although he said the chances of that were low. 'The truth is I don't think we are close,' he said. 'I do think it's less distant than it was five years ago. 'I do think the important point really is that we are woefully underprepared.' Lord Darroch has been outspoken in his criticism of Mr Trump since he was forced to quit his stateside role. Mr Trump had criticised him as as a 'stupid guy' and a 'pompous fool'.
