
Spanish island's bold message to Brits as notorious party town gets £4m overhaul
A popular Spanish resort appears to be ditching its boozy reputation thanks to a major transformation.
For years, Majorca's infamous town of Magaluf has become synonymous with rowdy, drunken Brits, cheap alcohol, and blaring nightclubs. The Magaluf Strip, officially known as Calle Punta Ballena, was the place for Stag and Hen Dos, as well as those wanting to get so drunk they'd forget all about the 'I HEART SPAIN' tattoo they had inked on their bum cheek the night before.
However, as anti-tourist sentiment gains momentum across Spain and the Balearics - it seems Magaluf's party-mad status is about to change. The town has already cracked down on binge-drinking and anti-social behaviour through a series of brutal rules. This includes all-inclusive resorts capping alcoholic beverages to just six a day, while bar crawls and public drinking are both prohibited.
The clamp-down has slowly altered Magaluf's questionable image, paving the way for a fresh start. This has recently been epitomised by a huge promenade refurbishment that was inaugurated in a ribbon-cutting ceremony last weekend (Sunday, June 22).
The promenade, which is now called Paseo Marítimo having been renamed after the founder of Meliá Hotels International, Gabriel Escarrer Julià, has undergone a 'complete rearrangement and beautification' with all of its infrastructure and services being 'renewed'. This includes new lighting, sewage systems, street furniture, and an irrigation network.
As previously reported, 650 metres of the promenade has been revamped in the initial phase, starting at the corner of the famous Nikki Beach and extending to Pirates Square. The work also includes the introduction of artificial sand dunes and palm trees grouped to form a 'small oasis area'.
According to Daily Majorca Bulletin, the refurb has been funded thanks to a €4 million grant from the EU Next Generation funds as well as €1 million of tourist tax revenue (equating to around £4.28 million). It is believed the second phase, which is also being partly funded by tourist taxes, will commence later this year - as early as November.
Mayor Juan Antonio Amengual, who attended the inaugural event, is said to have highlighted the 'importance' of the work that has been completed, arguing it is a further landmark in the 'transformation of Magaluf' which aims to bring about a 'change in image'. While the impact of British tourists wasn't explicitly mentioned, it's clear the town is trying to distance itself from its party-mad past.
To mark the work being complete, the town hall is believed to have organised a 'special day of events'. This includes a Gastro Fair, beach sport games, and a folk dance, reports local media.
Brits keen to check out Magaluf's new and improved image can fly directly from a slew of major UK airports, including London, Liverpool, Bristol, Manchester, Glasgow and Belfast. If you're flexible with dates, you can grab return fares for as little as £28 in July.
Accommodation in Magaluf is equally affordable, home to a slew of no-thrills apartments, hostels, and cheap hotels. For example, a week's stay (July 21-28) at the three-star HSM Don Juan will set you back £1,161. This is based on two people sharing.
However, if you want a more luxurious week away in the sun, check out Sol Barbados. This beachfront hotel boasts its very own waterpark and outdoor pool, as well as kids' entertainment, modern rooms, and a 24-hour front desk. Staying here on the exact same dates costs £2,402.
*Prices based on Skyscanner and Booking.com listings at the time of writing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
9 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Pilot's terrifying final words on deadly flight to Tenerife from UK
A British Airways flight from Heathrow was the second plane involved in the Tenerife airport disaster, but it never reached the island. Tenerife, with its sun-soaked beaches, is a favourite holiday destination for Brits. However, on 22 March 1977, a horrific tragedy unfolded when a passenger flight destined for Tenerife North airport, then known as Los Rodeos Airport, crashed, claiming the lives of all 583 people on board. It comes as, just three years after the first Tenerife plane crash, a Delta Flight exploded shortly after take-off, killing all passengers and crew on board. Tenerife boasts two airports, but Tenerife North is notoriously challenging for pilots due to its altitude of 2,000ft and often cloudy weather conditions that hamper visibility. Tragedy struck again just three years later, at 9.20am on 25 April 1980, when Dan-Air's Flight 1008 left Manchester Airport for Tenerife, carrying mainly British holidaymakers eager for the Canary Islands' sunny beaches and breathtaking landscapes. The flight crew comprised three seasoned pilots - Captain Arthur Whelan, 50, co-pilot First Officer Michael Firth, 33, and flight engineer Raymond Carey, 33. Five flight attendants were also on board, bringing the total number of passengers and crew to 146. For three hours, the flight went smoothly until the crew began their descent at 1pm local time, according to the Mirror. The winds were gusting from an unexpected direction, forcing air traffic to be redirected to Runway 12 rather than the standard landing strip. But this sparked a dilemma for air traffic controller Justo Camin, 34, as another aircraft was already approaching the identical runway, creating the terrifying prospect of a mid-air collision between the two planes. Operating without radar assistance, Camin was compelled to depend on procedural techniques to control air traffic and he directed each aircraft to stick to a pre-planned route. At 1:18 pm, Camin recognised he needed to place the Dan Air crew into a holding pattern to enable the aircraft in front to touch down safely on Runway 12. Yet, there was no established holding pattern for this runway, forcing Camin to think on his feet. He ordered Flight 1008 to enter a left-hand holding pattern, circling until the other flight had cleared. Responding to First Officer Firth's position report, Camin stated, "Roger, the er, standard holding pattern overhead Foxtrot Papa is inbound heading one five zero, turn to the left, call you back shortly." Captain Whelan responded with a brief "Roger", neglecting to repeat Camin's instructions back to him. Had he done so, the looming catastrophe might have been prevented. Nevertheless, when Camin told them to "turn to the left," he meant to say "turns to the left," specifying the direction the crew should follow whilst executing the holding pattern. But missing the vital 's', the crew understood this as "turn to the left." Camin, who had also authorised the flight to ascend to 5,000 feet, made a minor but crucial error. Captain Whelan, puzzled by the sudden directive to enter a holding pattern not indicated on any of his charts, executed a single left turn, aligning with a heading of 150 degrees, convinced this was what the controller intended. They were now soaring over mountainous terrain, where the minimum safe altitude was a staggering 14,500 feet. Just one minute and six seconds before the devastating crash, one of the pilots said, "bloody strange hold, isn't it?" adding, "it doesn't parallel with the runway or anything." The cockpit voice recording clearly captured the crew's escalating unease, yet no one challenged the controller's instructions. Controller Camin, under the assumption the plane was over the sea in his makeshift holding pattern, permitted the aircraft to descend another 1,000 feet, unaware it was actually amidst the mountains. Captain Whelan voiced his concerns about Camin's instruction to his co-pilot in the cockpit, saying, "I don't like that." His co-pilot replied, "they want us to keep going more round, don't they?" At this juncture, the automatic ground alarm blared in the cockpit, urging them to "pull up, pull up!" In a desperate attempt to avoid the looming mountainous terrain, Captain Whelan abruptly aborted his left turn for a drastic right turn. He believed this manoeuvre would enable them to circumvent the imminent obstacle. Typically, when hearing the alarm, the correct response would be to "pull up" in a bid to gain sufficient altitude to clear any surrounding terrain. Co-pilot Firth, after examining the chart, recognised the captain's decision was poorly judged and suggested different courses of action. The phrase "let's get out of here," uttered by Flight Engineer Carey, echoed through the cockpit voice recorder (CVR). Despite the engineer's warning, Captain Whelan continued with the steep right turn, which caused a drop of 300 feet. Spanish investigators declared categorically in their report this precise manoeuvre eliminated any possibility of avoiding catastrophe. Alerts from Flight Engineer Carey, "bank angle, bank angle!" ring out as the final recorded words before the CVR falls silent. Dan-Air Flight 1008 met its devastating fate as it slammed into La Esperanza at a height of 5,450 feet, just 92 feet (28 metres) below the summit. The impact destroyed most of the aircraft immediately, spreading wreckage across the mountainside. The tail portion of the plane careered several hundred metres, ultimately smashing to the ground, tumbling into a gorge, and breaking apart. Small fires broke out amidst the scattered debris, and Tenerife North Airport was shaken by the crash alarm for the second time in just over three years. Rescue teams arrived at the mountain within hours, but it was immediately apparent that none of the 146 passengers on board had survived the crash. The scene was so catastrophic not a single intact human body could be found, and many victims could not be definitively identified. While acknowledging the air traffic controller's error, Spanish investigators placed the entirety of the blame on the Dan Air crew. However, British investigators argued the controller should have recognised sooner the proximity between the two planes would pose a problem, allowing him to implement a standard holding pattern and prevent any confusion amongst the crew. They further contended the controller should not have issued an untested and non-standard holding pattern, but conceded that the Dan Air crew did not question the controller's instructions or seek clarification. The decision by Camin to allow flight 1008 to descend to 5,000 feet also drew criticism from the British team. They argued that if the holding pattern had been designed according to official regulations, the minimum altitude should have been set at 7,000 feet. Upon receiving a ground proximity warning, the captain - unable to see due to fog and cloud - opted to make a right turn, which tragically led them directly into the mountain. Typically, crews are expected to ascend as high as possible in response to such an alarm. What remains undisputed, however, is the omission of a single letter in a word triggered the series of events that ultimately resulted in the crash. Had the controller used "turns" instead of "turn", the tragic crash could have been averted. The investigation into the crash led to an increased emphasis on clear, standardised procedures across all flight operations, including holding patterns. The incident underscored the importance of unambiguous communication between air traffic controllers and pilots, with a particular focus on pilots repeating instructions from Air Traffic Control to eliminate any potential misunderstandings. Despite the tragedy, Dan Air managed to bounce back and continued operations until 1992 when it was acquired by British Airways. Even though it marked the largest loss of life on a British aircraft, the memory of Dan Air Flight 1008 and the 146 lives tragically lost that day seems to have faded over the last 45 years.


Daily Mirror
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Money-saving trend could help Brits push back on overspending with simple change
From skipping expensive dinners with friends to passing on a weekend trip, loud budgeting encourages open, honest conversations about money with friends and family Discussing personal finance is often considered a taboo subject, leading many to endure financial stress in silence while maintaining a façade of wellbeing. However, the emerging trend of loud budgeting is breaking this cycle of secrecy by encouraging candid discussions about money matters. Opting out of a costly dinner with friends or foregoing a weekend getaway, loud budgeting promotes frank conversations about finances with friends and family. It's all about prioritising your goals and savings over feelings of guilt and succumbing to social pressure. Zoe Brett, a financial planner at EQ Investors, has shed light on the essence of loud budgeting, its growing appeal, and tips for incorporating it into daily life. "Loud budgeting is really just about being open and honest with people about your finances," explains Brett. "So, rather than trying to keep up with the Joneses and pay for dinner at that trendy restaurant or the latest outfits, just because your friends or your family are, you are just honest and say actually, I don't want to spend my money on that, I'm budgeting." The advice comes after news that thousands of Brits are set to get a letter from HMRC after a drastic new tax rule comes into force. Brett says people feeling "fed up" is why the trend is gaining popularity as of late. "It's so hard for people to get onto the housing ladder these days, and everyone's been really impacted by the cost of living and are finding it increasingly difficult keeping up with certain lifestyles," she acknowledges. "Everything just feels very expensive and I think people are just a little bit fed up of feeling broke all the time." Brett has also observed an uptick in social media chatter about living paycheck to paycheck, even among those earning six-figure salaries. "I think a lot of people, especially Gen Z, often feel like there is no future for them so they overspend, which has created a little bubble of people who are now trying to unwind that and be a bit more fiscally responsible," Brett notes. One immediate benefit of loud budgeting is supposedly its positive impact on mental health. "In the short term, I think that it is actually pretty good for your mental health to stop having to struggle silently to try and keep up with your mates," Brett says. "Once you just take that first step, it builds momentum." Over time, this mindset can contribute to building financial security. That said, Brett has provided some practical tips for putting the loud budgeting trend into practice. The first is about "ripping the band-aid off" and getting over any reluctance about talking about money. For more stories like this subscribe to our weekly newsletter, The Weekly Gulp, for a curated roundup of trending stories, poignant interviews, and hot takes from The Mirror's Audience U35 team delivered straight to your inbox. "The first conversation is always the hardest, and it might be super awkward, but then once you've ripped the band aid off, you will realise that it's not actually as scary as it seemed," says Brett. She also notes its important to speak your financial goals into existence. and sharing your objectives with friends can even help maintain your accountability. "If you've got the right people around you, then they should honour that and support you, and may suggest things that are cheaper," she says. Taking the initiative to advocate for and propose cheaper activities and restaurants is another way to practice loud budgeting. "Rather than waiting for someone to invite you to something, suggest something to them that is within your budget such as drinks in the park, or cooking a meal at home or going to a free gallery." Just as much as emphasising your goals and struggles, it's also important to celebrate your financial achievements. "If you've done amazing and have really under-spent one month, remember to give yourself a pat on the back." Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you!


Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British horse racing cannot trust this anti-growth government
The British Horseracing Authority (BHA) and the racecourses are coming together on September 10 to strike for the first time in living memory. That is because of the catastrophic damage that racing faces if the Treasury implements its threat to increase the tax on online betting on horse racing. Cancelling all fixtures on that date to highlight racing's case to the Government will cost the sport £700,000. The cost of this strike to the bookmakers will be mitigated by taking bets on racing in Ireland that day. And they do not have to pay a levy to UK racing on those profits – a situation that remains a major point of contention between racing and the bookmakers. The Treasury's consultation around tax rates on online casino games has also created bad blood between the bookmakers and racing. The bookmakers are threatening 'consequences' for racing if their overall profits are hit by higher taxes on casino games. The racing industry, quite rightly, has no intention of offering such addictive, harmful products their support. Recent back-channel communications have suggested that an exemption on harmonising online betting tax rates will be carved out for racing, which would cost it £350m if its current rate matched the online casino games industry's 21 per cent rate. But the sport just cannot trust the vibes from this anti-growth government that is hostile towards racing and horse breeding in this country. The BHA is in a tight spot. It will be damned for getting on the front foot and fighting for the future of the sport. But it would also be damned if it appeared to be complacent and replied to potentially untrustworthy nods and winks. British racing is heading for reckoning over fixtures and talent drain The BHA has announced the fixture list for 2026. In normal years this would be as newsworthy as a village fete. But given the headwinds facing horse racing, what was presented was a finely nuanced plan that aims to make racing as appealing to fans as possible, without rocking the boat. This will, however, be the last plan that can afford to dance around the thorny issue that the racecourses, and not the BHA, own the majority of the fixtures. The BHA is fully aware that shrinking foal crops, combined with the leakage of older equine talent abroad, are creating different views as to where any additional prize money should be focused. One argument has it that financial resources should focus on retaining as many owners as possible. That would mean targeting all additional funds at what the BHA call developmental races – maiden races on the Flat and novice hurdles and chases over jumps. But others would argue that what really brings the fans through the gates are the very best horses forging rivalries, preferably over two or more seasons. The BHA, on this occasion, has pretty well split the additional £4.4m that the Levy Board has found down the back of its sofa evenly between the two very different philosophies. Bolstering the value of midsummer races for older horses, such as the King George VI and Queen Elizabeth stakes at Ascot, by over £2m doesn't go down well with the socialists. They view that as just giving more money to the richest people in the sport who don't need it. But that attitude totally fails to appreciate what all sporting fans crave; excellence. It also fails to grasp the fact that the richest owners – many of whom are Middle Eastern families – are huge net contributors to the sport who choose to race their horses in this country to the benefit of our racing fans. But that support cannot be taken for granted. The talent drain in full spate last week was a reminder that the sport in the UK needs to go further to retain the best horses. Serious Contender, who was second in the Irish Derby, has been flogged to Hong Kong where he will win more money than if he stayed in Europe. So any prospect of him and Derby winner Lambourn building up an identifiable rivalry is out of the window. Would that have been the case if the middle-distance races for older horses in this country were worth a lot more? Obviously not. Trinity College is also off to Australia. He won the Hampton Court stakes at Royal Ascot. Will he be back next summer? No. Four other potentially star horses from top southern yards, who were right in the mix at Royal Ascot, have also been seen in the departure lounge on their way out to Hong Kong and Australia. Power shift As for the future of the fixture list in the UK, has the creation of an independent BHA board actually wrestled any power and influence away from the racecourses? Quite possibly. Now that the racecourses have lost their ability to veto board decisions, as the regulator there is no reason why the board could not take the view that any races failing to attract eight runners are not 'in the best interests' of the sport. It could also stipulate that no fixtures are permitted if they fail to supply at least six races with eight or more runners. The racecourses would have to offer owners and trainers races that were sufficiently attractive to make it worth their while running their horses. Ironically, this would align the BHA board with its traditional nemesis, the bookmakers, who inevitably will also pressurise the racecourses with greater demands within their media-rights packages for a more consistent betting product. This approach neutralises the stranglehold the racecourses currently have on the sport, and their 'nuclear threat' to sue anyone who contests their ownership of fixtures. They could, of course, sue the independent BHA board for regulating racing in a manner which the board believes is in the best interests of the sport. That would be interesting.