logo
Complaint alleges OPD detective seized juvenile's phone without warrant

Complaint alleges OPD detective seized juvenile's phone without warrant

Yahoo19-04-2025

A complaint has been filed against an Owensboro Police Department detective who witnesses allege seized a cellphone from a juvenile without a warrant Thursday in the Holbrook Judicial Center.
Five witnesses, three of whom are unrelated to the juvenile or his court case, gave nearly identical accounts of the incident, which occurred outside courtrooms on the judicial center's third floor Thursday afternoon.
The juvenile's public defender, Colin O'Brien, filed a complaint against OPD Sgt. John Preston with OPD's Professional Standards Unit Thursday.
'He literally snatched that phone out of that boy's hand,' said Stephanie Green, who witnessed the incident.
'Even the child said, 'Do you have a warrant?' and his grandmother said, 'Do you have a warrant?' ' Green said. 'He (Preston) was walking away and waving it in the air like, 'ha ha.' '
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against 'unreasonable search and seizure,' and requires law enforcement to have a search warrant to search homes and seize property under most circumstances.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2014 a cellphone can't be searched without a warrant when a person has been arrested.
O'Brien said the juvenile was appearing in juvenile court on a 'status offense,' which is an offense only someone under the age of 18 could face. Examples of status offenses are truancy from school, being a runaway or possession of tobacco products by a minor.
The juvenile was not in court for any criminal charges, O'Brien said.
O'Brien said the juvenile was in the hallway with his grandmother when two detectives, Preston and a second detective, approached and said they wanted to ask the juvenile some questions. The juvenile declined to speak to them, O'Brien said.
'As soon as the first detective asked him if he wanted to talk and (the juvenile) said 'no,' he (Preston) said, 'we are going to be getting a warrant' for the phone, O'brien said.
'Sgt. Preston came up and said, 'We are going to be getting a warrant,' and forcibly took (the phone) out of his hand,' O'Brien said.
O'Brien said it appeared that 'Sgt. Preston (was) getting (angry) when the kid said he wouldn't talk to them.'
O'Brien said Preston gave his name when asked.
Liz Webb, who is not related to the juvenile or his case, said she heard several people question Preston about whether he had a warrant to take the phone.
When the juvenile refused to talk to the two detectives, Webb said the first detective started walking away, and that Preston took the phone from the juvenile.
'When he was walking down the hall, he lifted it up and said, 'I'm seizing it without' (a warrant,)' Webb said.
Kyle Webb, who also saw the incident, said the unnamed detective was 'very professional,' but that Preston was 'very aggressive.'
'The juvenile had the phone in his hand. He was trying to call somebody,' Kyle Webb said. 'The detective overpowered him.'
Kyle Webb said he heard Preston say detectives were going to get a warrant to seize the phone before Preston took it from the juvenile.
The detective identified as Preston was 'kind of 'in your face, I've got your stuff now,' ' Kyle Webb said.
Patti Cox-Young, the juvenile's grandmother, was with the juvenile, and said his status case was dismissed by the court.
The detectives said they wanted 'to talk to him concerning something his name had come up in, and he said, 'I don't want to talk,' ' Cox-Young said.
'He was cooperating, but he just didn't want to talk,' Cox-Young said. After taking the phone away, Preston left with the phone, Cox-Young said.
'I'm a very firm believer in the Constitution,' Cox-Young said and that, 'They trampled' on the juvenile's rights.
JD Winkler, deputy chief of police, said a professional standards unit complaint had been filed with OPD in relation to the incident, but that he could not comment further.
The Professional Standards Unit investigates complaints made against officers, and sends substantiated complaints to Police Chief Art Ealum for possible disciplinary action.
Preston told the Messenger-Inquirer Friday morning, 'We're actively investigating a juvenile crime. I can't speak on that.'
When the Messenger-Inquirer clarified that Preston wasn't being asked about any specific investigation but about the seizure of the cell phone, Preston referred comment to Mark Hammonds, OPD's public information officer.
The department would not be discussing the incident, Hammonds said.
'I spoke to the major above me, and he advised me there is an ongoing investigation, so OPD will not be giving out any details or making any statements in regard to that investigation,' Hammonds said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In NCLA Amicus Win, Supreme Court Revives Innocent Family's Suit over FBI's Wrong-House Raid
In NCLA Amicus Win, Supreme Court Revives Innocent Family's Suit over FBI's Wrong-House Raid

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

In NCLA Amicus Win, Supreme Court Revives Innocent Family's Suit over FBI's Wrong-House Raid

Curtrina Martin, et al. v. United States of America, et al. Washington, DC, June 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' dismissal of Martin v. United States, an Atlanta family's Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit against the government for a wrong-house raid in 2017. FBI agents invaded the home of Trina Martin and her family, shackling her partner on the floor and holding a half-naked Ms. Martin at gunpoint, while she expressed concern for her seven-year-old son's safety elsewhere in the house. One big problem: the FBI SWAT team had knocked down the door of the wrong home, on the wrong street, because the agent in charge had failed to verify its clearly marked address. The Justices remanded the case to the Eleventh Circuit for reconsideration. As NCLA's amicus curiae brief urged, the Eleventh Circuit should ultimately rule on remand that the FTCA does not shield the government from liability when federal law enforcement officers raid the wrong house. Ms. Martin and her family filed FTCA claims against the government for assault, battery, and false imprisonment, as well as Fourth Amendment claims against the individual FBI agents. The Eleventh Circuit below upheld the district court's dismissal of the case, concluding that the agents' actions violated no 'clearly established' law. It ruled that the family suffered harm resulting from an agent's 'discretionary act' (i.e., failing to check the house address), warranting total governmental immunity and no path to relief for the Martin family. The Eleventh Circuit also determined that the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution could shield the FBI and its agents from FTCA suits. NCLA's amicus brief forcefully argued that the Eleventh Circuit's mode of inquiry—which departed from the analytical process employed by all sister circuits—was inconsistent with the language and intent of the FTCA. Congress amended the FTCA in 1974 expressly to ensure that innocent people subjected to wrong-house raids and similar abuses by federal law enforcement officers would have a cause of action to sue. By expanding the FTCA's discretionary-function exception to encompass wrong-house raids such as this one, the Eleventh Circuit's decision effectively nullified the 1974 law. As Justice Sotomayor underscored in her concurrence (joined by Justice Jackson), 'Courts … should not ignore the existence of the [1974 amendment], or the factual context that inspired its passage, when construing the discretionary-function exception. … [A]ny interpretation should allow for liability in the very cases Congress amended the FTCA to remedy.' Today's Supreme Court ruling does not decide whether the 'discretionary function' exception applies in this case, an issue that the Court ordered the Eleventh Circuit to resolve, but the Justices found that the Supremacy Clause is not a defense the government may invoke in FTCA lawsuits. Justice Gorsuch explained in his opinion for the Court: 'The FTCA is the 'supreme' federal law addressing the United States' liability for torts committed by its agents. It supplies the 'exclusive remedy' for damages claims arising out of federal employees' official conduct.' NCLA released the following statements: 'The Supreme Court rightly held that innocent civilians should not be stripped of any meaningful remedy when they suffer abuse at the hands of federal law enforcement. The Martin family deserves their day in court. On remand, NCLA trusts that the Eleventh Circuit will carefully evaluate what qualifies as 'reasonable' law enforcement—and recognize that a trained FBI agent who fails to check a clearly marked house number before commencing a raid because 'it was dark outside' does not qualify.'— Casey Norman, Litigation Counsel, NCLA 'Law enforcement officers should not be able to evade accountability for entering the wrong house and terrorizing an innocent family in the middle of the night when Congress intentionally provided for redress in cases against the federal government in such circumstances. Thankfully, the Supreme Court's decision reaffirms that the Eleventh Circuit was wrong to preclude relief in this case and others like it.'— Jenin Younes, Litigation Counsel, NCLA 'All too often, court-created doctrines are used to reduce the government's liability to people whose civil liberties it has violated. Congratulations to our friends at the Institute for Justice for convincing the Supreme Court to clip the wings of such a doctrine in this case—at least where Congress had explicitly created a cause of action to sue.'— Mark Chenoweth, President, NCLA For more information visit the page here. ABOUT NCLA NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA's public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans' fundamental rights. ### CONTACT: Joe Martyak New Civil Liberties Alliance 703-403-1111 in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Oakland PD asks for help solving fatal shooting cold case
Oakland PD asks for help solving fatal shooting cold case

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Oakland PD asks for help solving fatal shooting cold case

(KRON) – The Oakland Police Department is asking for public assistance in solving the fatal shooting of 24-year-old Bert Brigham III. Brigham's death occurred almost four years ago on July 18, 2021, in the 1900 block of Foothill Boulevard. Oakland business looted following anti-ICE protest OPD has released images of four male suspects in their 20s and vehicles that may be connected to the case (pictured below). Per OPD, a white Kia Optima, a blue Toyota Camry, and a dark Honda Accord were the cars associated with the suspects. Anyone with information regarding this homicide is asked to contact the Oakland Police Department Homicide Section at (510) 238-3821. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

OPD continues Police in the Parks
OPD continues Police in the Parks

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

OPD continues Police in the Parks

Moreland Park was teeming with Owensboro Police Department officers on Thursday. But this gathering of law enforcement was an intentional meet and greet with the public that OPD calls 'Police in the Park' — a summer community outreach program. Sgt. Joseph Jones said OPD began hosting it about two years ago as a community event. Jones added that officers are there not only to answer questions, but also to play games or activities with those who show up. '…Do little things, have fun at the parks and an opportunity, again, to see officers in a different light than what they usually do,' he said. Throughout the summer, OPD plans to host at least four 'Police in the Park' events. Jones said the one at Moreland Park was the first for this summer. '…We just choose a random park in the city, try to head out there (to) make hot dogs, bring chips, lemonade…,' he said. Along with the food and games, OPD brought some of its vehicles, such as a restored 1956 Ford police car and current cruisers now utilized by patrol officers. '…It's an opportunity to bring out some things, let them see stuff that we use in our daily work,' Jones said. OPD also invited other local agencies such as the Center of Owensboro-Daviess County, a nonprofit that helps people connect to resources based on their need. Erica Wade, the Center's executive director, was there with the organization's new mobile unit. Wade said the idea is to bring 'community partners' such as Imagination Library to sites like Moreland Park. '…The mobile unit is like a pop-up resource fair,' Wade said. 'So we can bring as many as six community partners with us; we have four 10 by 10 tents that come with it; two private rooms, a waiting area on board and a wifi umbrella. This is our first one, so we kind of went light on this one, so we could see what it was all about. Next time we're hoping to bring some more folks with us.' Although more children were there Thursday, Jones said the Police in the Park events are meant for all ages. 'We had one time at the park that we had more adults come out than kids,' he said. Ultimately, Jones said it's about OPD's effort to bridge the gap between it and the community. '…Most people, their experience with the police is they see them making traffic stops or answering calls for service,' Jones said. 'We want them to see that they can come up to us and talk to us like anybody else … build that rapport, so if there's something going on they can pass that information along. It helps us gather information and helps us solves any crimes that are going on in our community.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store