logo
GOP rebel mutiny threatens to derail Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' before key committee hurdle

GOP rebel mutiny threatens to derail Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' before key committee hurdle

Fox News22-05-2025

President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" appears to be in peril as of late Thursday afternoon, ahead of a critical meeting by the House Budget Committee to bring the legislation close to a House-wide vote.
At least three Republicans on the committee are expected to vote against advancing the bill, a multitrillion-dollar piece of legislation aimed at enacting Trump's priorities on tax, the border, immigration, defense, energy and raising the debt limit.
GOP Reps. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., and Ralph Norman, R-S.C., both told Fox News Digital they would vote against the bill in committee in its current form.
Norman said Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, also would vote against the bill. Roy himself signaled he was opposed to the legislation both on X and in comments to reporters.
"Right now, the House proposal fails to meet the moment. It does not meaningfully change spending (Medicaid expansion to able bodied, [Inflation Reduction Act] subsidies). Plus many of the decent provisions and cuts, don't begin until 2029 and beyond. That is swamp accounting to dodge real savings," Roy wrote Thursday on X.
Other members of the committee also suggested they had concerns.
Rep. Josh Brecheen, R-Okla., told Fox News Digital he wanted the Friday morning meeting delayed.
And Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Wis., a rank-and-file member who is not known for defying House Republican leaders, said the legislation did not seem "sincere" and would not reveal how he will vote.
With one expected absence for Republicans on the House Budget Committee, the GOP can only afford one "no" vote to still advance the legislation.
Once the bill is passed through the House Budget Committee, it must then come before the House Rules Committee — which sets terms for debating the bill House-wide — before it is weighed by all House lawmakers.
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has said he wants the legislation to pass the House by Memorial Day.
"I think we're on schedule," Johnson told reporters leaving a conference-wide meeting on the bill Thursday afternoon.
He also said he was confident Budget Committee Republicans could advance the bill on Friday.
"I'm talking to everybody and I think we're gonna get this thing done on the schedule that we proposed," Johnson said in response to conservative concerns.
Both Norman and Roy have complained that the legislation's provisions aimed at curbing abuse of the Medicaid system and rolling back former President Joe Biden's green energy subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act did not go far enough.
Timing is among their key concerns on both fronts. Conservatives have issues with Medicaid work requirements not going into effect until 2029, the end of Trump's term. They also questioned what they saw as a delay in phasing out green energy tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act.
"I questioned the timing on work requirements, I questioned the IRS phase-outs. I didn't get an answer on that," Norman told reporters after the Thursday afternoon meeting. "My point is, we need to have answers before it hits the floor."
Clyde told Fox News Digital of his opposition, "I'm a NO on advancing the budget reconciliation bill out of the Budget Committee in its current form."
"I'm actively involved in negotiations to improve this package, and I'm hopeful that we will do so quickly in order to successfully deliver on President Trump's agenda for the American people," he said.
Another issue at hand involves continued tensions over state and local tax (SALT) deductions, which primarily affect high cost-of-living states — and Republicans representing critical swing districts within blue states.
The Trump bill currently would raise the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 for single and married tax filers to $30,000 — a number that's not enough for a group of moderate House Republicans that's large enough to sink the final bill.
Conservative fiscal hawks have said higher SALT deduction caps must be paired with deeper spending cuts.
"SALT is a pay-for," Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who is not on the budget committee, said in response to conservatives asking for offsets.
He pointed out that SALT deduction caps would be eliminated entirely if Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which Republicans want to extend permanently via this bill, is allowed to expire.
"The fact is, if the tax bill expires, the cap on SALT expires, which means it goes back to unlimited. So any cap is a savings within the bill," Lawler said. "So this idea that we need to find a pay-for, that's not an us problem. That's other people's problems."
But Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., another SALT Caucus member, signaled he would be OK with moving up the deadline on Medicaid work requirements in exchange for raising the SALT deduction cap.
House GOP leaders are expected to continue negotiating with both groups, however.
Both Johnson and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said they expected the Budget Committee meeting to go on as planned.
House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, however, seemed less optimistic.
"We'll see," he said when asked about the Friday meeting, adding the likely "no" votes are "potentially enough to delay it."
Congressional Republicans are moving Trump's agenda via the budget reconciliation process.
By lowering the Senate's threshold for passage down to the House's own simple majority requirement, it allows the party in control of both chambers and the White House to pass vast pieces of legislation while entirely sidelining the minority — in this case, Democrats.
Eleven House committees have cobbled together individual portions of the bill, which will be put back into a framework that the House Budget Committee will consider Friday morning.
Then it must head to the Senate, which will likely amend the bill, which then must sync up with the House before arriving on Trump's desk for a signature.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three developers compete to redevelop two public housing complexes in Norfolk
Three developers compete to redevelop two public housing complexes in Norfolk

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Three developers compete to redevelop two public housing complexes in Norfolk

A trio of developers showed off their portfolios to Norfolk residents and city officials Wednesday, hoping to land the chance to redevelop two of the city's deteriorating public housing projects. Earlier this year, the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority announced a timeline to submit redevelopment plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by the end of 2025. The process would tear down and replace the public housing complexes, which contain 1,056 units on 55 acres and were built in the 1950s. Construction could begin in 2027, according to a presentation from the housing authority. On Wednesday, three developers — Rhode Island-based Gilbane Development Co., New York's The NHP Foundation, and Georgia-based Paces Preservation Partners — presented their portfolios to the city in hopes of becoming the lead developer for Young and Calvert. The three firms boasted similar qualifications. All have experience redeveloping former public housing into mixed-income and affordable housing developments. All have experience with several types of financing structures. And both potential developers and and housing officials said they advocated for a build-first approach, where vacant units would be redeveloped first so current public housing residents could stay in their units and avoid displacement. Officials hope to avoid a repeat of the redevelopment of nearby Tidewater Gardens, where many residents were displaced and relied on Housing Choice Vouchers to find replacement housing in the region. Those residents and community groups later sued the city and the housing authority, arguing the entities failed to find adequate replacement housing. A 2021 settlement gave displaced residents more opportunities to move back to the redeveloped area. As new buildings opened, some residents moved back but others opted not to. Gilbane officials, who presented first, compared the redevelopment opportunity to Madison Yards, a huge mixed-use development in Madison, Wisconsin, that turned a government building into 270 apartment units, 608,000 square feet of office space, a hotel and more. 'We're very fortunate to be shortlisted for this amazing opportunity,' said Bobvala Tengen, a senior development manager with Gilbane. The NHP Foundation presented its work on the Park Heights master plan, a redevelopment plan for 17 acres of the Park Heights neighborhood in Baltimore. The NHP Foundation Senior Vice Present of Development Mansur Abdul-Malik said the redevelopment was a story of how the neighborhood was rising above disinvestment and a declining reputation. The community will include green buildings with solar panels, public art honoring figures from the nearby Preakness Stakes horse race and opportunities for home ownership, he said. 'We're building a place, a community,' Abdul-Malik said. 'Not just property.' Paces Preservation Partners officials said they would work with residents to help bring their needs to the new development. They showed off another Milwalkee redevelopment, Westlawn Gardens, that brought 958 housing units, a 10,000-sqaure-foot pharmacy and a 12,500-square-foot business incubator space to the city, along with community parks and gardens. 'My commitment to you all today is we will work for the betterment of the people in the city, full stop,' said Steven Bauhan, chief development officer for project partner The Paces Foundation. Norfolk officials have long sought to demolish three public housing complexes in the St. Paul's neighborhood near downtown and replace them with mixed-income housing. City Council members approved a plan in 2018, and began to demolish the 600-unit Tidewater Gardens in 2020. So far, two new apartment buildings are open and construction is ongoing on additional phases. Trevor Metcalfe, 757-222-5345,

'Very disappointed' Trump in stunning live break-up with Musk
'Very disappointed' Trump in stunning live break-up with Musk

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

'Very disappointed' Trump in stunning live break-up with Musk

Trump says he is 'very disappointed' in Elon Musk after criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hits back on X, calling Trump 'ungrateful' and claiming he helped him win the 2024 election. Tesla shares drop 8% as public fallout between the two billionaires rattles markets. Tensions between Donald Trump and Elon Musk exploded into public view on Thursday, as the US president said he was 'very disappointed' by his billionaire former aide's criticisms and Musk hit back in real time on social media. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office after Musk slammed his tax and spending mega-bill as an 'abomination'. The world's richest man responded by live-tweeting on his X social media platform as Trump spoke on television, saying that the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without him and slamming him for 'ingratitude.' Where is the man who wrote these words? Was he replaced by a body double!? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 In an extraordinary rant as visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz sat mutely beside him, 78-year-old Trump unloaded on SpaceX and Tesla boss Musk in his first comments on the issue. 'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here... All of a sudden, he had a problem,' Trump said when asked about Musk. The clash comes less than a week since Trump held a grand Oval Office farewell for Musk as he wrapped up his time leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). South African-born Musk, 53, hit back minutes later, saying Trump's claims he had advance sight of the bill were 'false.' 'Whatever,' he added above a video of Trump saying Musk was upset about the loss of subsidies for electric vehicles. Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful.… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk then ratcheted up the public spat even further, saying the Republican would have lost the election without his support. He was the biggest donor to Trump's campaign, to the tune of nearly $300 million. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk said on X. 'Such ingratitude.' Tesla shares fell sharply on Wall Street, down 8%, after his comments, in a sign of the huge stakes for a falling out between the world's richest man and its most powerful. 'A little make-up?' A wistful-sounding Trump took reporters through the break-up with Musk on live television, in what at times sounded more like a therapy session than a meeting with a foreign leader. Trump talked about Musk's farewell appearance in the Oval Office on Friday, when he turned up with a black eye that he said was caused by a punch from his son. Musk, at the time, was also facing reports of drug use on the Trump campaign trail. 'You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk, and even with the black eye. I said, you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup,' Trump said. 'But he said, 'No, I don't think so,' which is interesting and very nice. He wants to be who he is.' Trump said he could understand why Musk was upset with some of the steps he had taken, including withdrawing a nominee to lead the NASA space agency, which the tech tycoon had backed. Through it all, the visiting German chancellor sat silently. Merz had prepared to avoid a repeat of the ambushes that Trump unleashed on the Ukrainian and South African presidents in the Oval Office - but in the end it was Musk that the US president ambushed. At the center of the bitter row is Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' on tax and spending. The centrepiece of his domestic agenda, it aims to continue tax cuts from his first term - and could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. Musk, however, called it a 'disgusting abomination' on Tuesday on the grounds that it will increase the US deficit. A day later, the magnate called for Republicans to 'kill the bill,' and for an alternative plan that 'doesn't massively grow the deficit.'

Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe
Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe

Sometimes a public company has a controlling shareholder who wants to take it private by buying out all of the other shareholders, and that's always messy. 1 The controlling shareholder will to some extent be negotiating with herself: She will want to buy the company for a low price, but the company's shareholders will want to get a high price, but she's the controlling shareholder and can vote for the low price. There are standard solutions to the problem, but they are only partial solutions: In the past few months, I have written a few times about 23andMe Holding Co. as an illustration of these problems. 23andMe is a publicly traded genetic testing company that was once worth about $6 billion, but it has now fallen on hard times. Its founder, Anne Wojcicki, owns about 49% of the voting power of the stock, making her effectively a controlling shareholder. She offered to buy all the stock she didn't own, to take the company private and fix its problems 'outside of the short term pressures of the public markets.' But the board of directors, whose job was to find an 'actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders,' didn't think her offer was good enough.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store