Tesla Finally Updated the Model S and Model X. But Not Much Has Changed
Tesla updated the
Model S
and
Model X
today, but any significant changes are hard to spot. Many of the upgrades lie hidden beneath the familiar-looking exteriors, with Tesla making several minor tweaks to the cars that fail to enhance their appeal in the increasingly competitive luxury EV segment.
Tesla
claims the new S and X are 'even quieter inside,' with less wind and road noise paired with more effective noise cancellation. The EVs will also have a smoother ride thanks to new bushings and a new suspension design, although Tesla failed to provide specifics.
Photo by: Tesla
Photo by: Tesla
There's a new Fost Blue exterior color for the pair and a new front fascia camera for improved visibility. Inside, Tesla adds dynamic ambient lighting while increasing third-row passenger and cargo space in the Model X. Oh, and the
yoke
is still available as an $1,000 option on the Plaid variants.
The Model S Plaid has fresh exterior styling that Tesla says is optimized for high-speed stability, but the updated car has a lower top speed than its predecessor. It's down from 200 miles per hour to 149 mph—a huge drop. At least it can still hit 60 miles per hour in 2.5 seconds.
Tesla also has new wheel designs for the sedan and SUV, which improve aerodynamics and increase range.
Tesla Model S and Model X Range Gains
The updates have resulted in Tesla creating its longest-range EV ever—the Model S Long Range. The sedan can travel up to 410 miles on a charge, according to the company, while the Model S Plaid improves to 368 miles. The Model X can now go up to 38 miles more than before—352—while the Plaid gets a 21-mile bump in range to 335.
Photo by: Tesla
Mild Updates, Fresh New Price
Despite the mediocre enhancements to the updated Model S and Model X, Tesla is now charging $5,000 extra across both trims of each car. The Model S now costs $86,630, while the Model S Plaid starts at $101,630. If you want the crossover, you'll pay $91,630 for the Model X with all-wheel drive and $106,630 for the high-performance Plaid variant.
Read More Tesla News:
The Tesla Model Y Just Got Even Cheaper
Elon Musk to Remain Tesla CEO 'Unless I Die'
Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily.
back
Sign up
For more information, read our
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Use
.
Source:
Tesla / X
Share this Story
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Reddit
WhatsApp
E-Mail
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As disinformation and hate thrive online, YouTube quietly changed how it moderates content
YouTube, the world's largest video platform, appears to have changed its moderation policies to allow more content that violates its own rules to remain online. The change happened quietly in December, according to The New York Times, which reviewed training documents for moderators indicating that a video could stay online if the offending material did not account for more than 50 per cent of the video's duration — that's double what it was prior to the new guidelines. YouTube, which sees 20 million videos uploaded a day, says it updates its guidance regularly and that it has a "long-standing practice of applying exceptions" when it suits the public interest or when something is presented in an educational, documentary, scientific or artistic context. "These exceptions apply to a small fraction of the videos on YouTube, but are vital for ensuring important content remains available," YouTube spokesperson Nicole Bell said in a statement to CBC News this week. But in a time when social media platforms are awash with misinformation and conspiracy theories, there are concerns that YouTube is only opening the door for more people to spread problematic or harmful content — and to make a profit doing so. YouTube isn't alone. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, dialled back its content moderation earlier this year, and Elon Musk sacked Twitter's moderators when he purchased the platform in 2022 and rebranded it as X. "We're seeing a race to the bottom now," Imran Ahmed, CEO for the U.S.-based Center for Countering Digital Hate, told CBC News. "What we're going to see is a growth in the economy around hate and disinformation." WATCH | Experts warn Meta's moderation move will likely increase misinformation: YouTube's goal is "to protect free expression," Brooks said in her statement, explaining that easing its community guidelines "reflect the new types of content" on the platform. For example, she said, a long-form podcast containing one short clip of violence may no longer need to be removed. The Times reported Monday that examples presented to YouTube staff included a video in which someone used a derogatory term for transgender people during a discussion about hearings for U.S. President Donald Trump's cabinet appointees, and another that shared false information about COVID-19 vaccines but that did not outright tell people not to get vaccinated. A platform like YouTube does have to make some "genuinely very difficult decisions" when moderating content, says Matt Hatfield, executive director of the Canadian digital rights group OpenMedia. LISTEN | How Canada has come to play an outsized role in far-right misinformation: He believes platforms do take the issue seriously, but he says there's a balance between removing harmful or illegal content, such as child abuse material or clear incitements to violence, and allowing content to stay online, even if it's offensive to many or contains some false information. The problem, he says, is that social media platforms also "create environments that encourage some bad behaviour" among creators, who like to walk the line of what's acceptable. "The core model of these platforms is to keep you clicking, keep you watching, get you to try a video from someone you've never experienced before and then stick with that person." And that's what concerns Ahmed. He says these companies put profits over online safety and that they don't face consequences because there are no regulations forcing them to limit what can be posted on their platforms. He believes YouTube's relaxed policies will only encourage more people to exploit them. In a recent transparency report, YouTube said it had removed nearly 2.9 million channels containing more than 47 million videos for community guideline violations in the first quarter — that came after the reported policy change. The overwhelming majority of those, 81.8 per cent, were considered spam, but other reasons included violence, hateful or abusive material and child safety. LISTEN | Why you're being tormented by ads algorithms and AI slop: Hatfield says there is a public interest in having harmful content like that removed, but that doesn't mean all controversial or offensive content must go. However, he says YouTube does make mistakes in content moderation, explaining that it judges individual videos in a sort of "vacuum" without considering how each piece of content fits into a broader context. "Some content can't really be fairly interpreted in that way." Ahmed says companies should be held accountable for the content on their platforms through government regulation. He pointed to Canada's controversial but now-scuttled Online Harms Act, also known as Bill C-63, as an example. It proposed heavier sentences, new regulatory bodies and changes to a number of laws to tackle online abuse. The bill died when former prime minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation and prorogued Parliament back in January. Ahmed says he hopes the new government under Prime Minister Mark Carney will enact similar legislation. Hatfield says he liked parts of that act, but his group ultimately opposed it after it tacked on some other changes to the Criminal Code and Human Rights Act that he says were unrelated to the platforms. He says groups like OpenMedia would have liked to see a strategy addressing business models that encourage users to post and profit off of "lawful but awful" content. "We're not going to have a hate-free internet," he said. "We can have an internet that makes it less profitable to spread certain types of hate and misinformation." WATCH | How people can become more discerning news consumers:
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Driverless Teslas Hit the Streets—Analyst Sees More Upside for Tesla (TSLA)
Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is one of the . On June 11, Piper Sandler reiterated the stock as 'Overweight' with a $400 price target. The firm said it sees more Tesla upside on robotaxi deployment. Analyst Alexander Potter is optimistic that the stock will likely sustain its upward momentum over the coming weeks. Driverless Teslas are now being spotted on the streets of Austin, Texas, with CEO Musk acknowledging the deployment and predicting licensing agreements. Another significant development noted by the analyst is new data from Kelley Blue Book, which shows rising new car prices across the market. The analyst told investors in a research note how, together, the developments signify how the 'key component' of the firm's bullish thesis has started to play out. However, the firm has also warned that any high-profile robotaxi accidents would likely result in 'violent downside'. 'Bottom line: a key component of our TSLA thesis has officially begun playing out. We expect the stock to sustain upward momentum in the coming weeks, as more information is disclosed.' Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is an automotive and clean energy company that leverages advanced artificial intelligence in its autonomous driving technology and robotics initiatives. While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
How Robotaxis, AI, and 170Mn Users Can Reinvent UBER Technologies Stock
The ride-hailing game used to revolve around one key factor: who could recruit enough human drivers to move passengers safely and efficiently at the right price. But in 2025, that narrative has shifted dramatically. In Austin, driverless white Jaguar I-PACEs now ferry Uber (UBER) riders without anyone behind the wheel. Just outside the city, Tesla is preparing to launch a fleet of camera-only robotaxis. Meanwhile, in London, start-up Wayve has gained regulatory approval to navigate the city's complex roads using 'embodied' AI. The race has moved from driver recruitment to deploying and managing autonomous fleets. Confident Investing Starts Here: Amid all this disruption, Uber has taken a surprisingly strategic—and perhaps underappreciated—approach. Rather than building its own sensors and hardware, it's leveraging its strengths: a massive user base, rich data, demand density, optimized routing, and a payments platform trusted by over 170 million users. That focus on core assets, while letting partners handle the hardware, is precisely why I still rate the stock a Buy. Uber Earns the Right to Experiment For years, Uber's financials felt like a rollercoaster—propped up by subsidies and weighed down by stock-based compensation. But Q1 2025 told a different story. Revenue rose 14% year-over-year to $11.5 billion, while adjusted EBITDA surged 35% to $1.9 billion. Even more impressive, both operating and free cash flow hit $2.3 billion, confirming that margin improvements are translating into real cash, not just accounting gains. Just as important, Uber is no longer relying solely on ride-hailing. While Mobility still accounts for just over half of gross bookings, the other half now comes from Delivery, Freight, and a fast-growing advertising unit. That ad segment alone is running at a $1.5 billion annual pace after growing about 60% year-over-year, requiring virtually no additional capital. This diversification matters: it buffers Uber against economic swings in travel and commuting, while also funding autonomous tech partnerships without shareholder dilution. Autonomous Excitement for UBER Shareholders Waymo now operates around 100 fully electric Jaguars on the Uber platform in Austin—and according to both companies, those vehicles already complete more trips per day than 99% of the city's human drivers. Autonomy isn't just about cutting labor costs—it's about maximizing utilization beyond human limits. Drivers need breaks; robots don't. The math adds up fast, especially since Uber doesn't own or depreciate those sleek Jaguars—it simply collects a booking fee, while Alphabet picks up the hardware tab. Competition, however, is heating up. Tesla is set to begin a limited rollout of driverless Model Ys on June 22, capitalizing on Texas's flexible regulatory stance. Elon Musk has promised 'thousands' of robotaxis within a year, though federal regulators have already requested safety disclosures. Interestingly, this could actually benefit Uber. If Tesla underprices rides to stimulate adoption, overall trip demand increases, and Uber's algorithm is designed to route users to the vehicle that is cheaper or closer, regardless of who owns it. In that way, the platform profits from competitors' capital investments without having to match them. Developers Need Uber Uber's partner-first strategy is looking smarter with each passing quarter. Running a driverless fleet is massively capital-intensive—lidar systems alone can cost tens of thousands per vehicle, battery supplies are still tight, and companies need an entire depot network for charging and upkeep. Yet all that infrastructure is worthless if the cars are roaming without riders. In autonomous transport, the real bottleneck isn't hardware—it's passengers. Uber already owns the most valuable asset in autonomous mobility: the passengers. Around 28 million trips happen on its platform every day. For any autonomy start-up, partnering with Uber instantly solves the 'cold start' problem—vehicles don't need to roam empty looking for riders. Instead, the app routes them directly to waiting customers. In return, Uber takes its cut, typically a high-teens to mid-twenties percentage of the fare, with zero added capital investment. Layer on advertising, and the upside grows even more compelling. A captive rider staring at a screen in the back of a sleek, electric Jaguar is prime real estate for marketers. Equip those robotaxis with rear-seat displays, and the monetization potential accelerates. Even one ad per 10-minute ride could translate into billions in high-margin revenue by the end of the decade. Plentiful Risks and Real-World Friction As optimistic as the outlook may seem, none of this is a sure thing. A serious robotaxi accident could halt regulatory momentum, just as GM's Cruise experienced when one of its vehicles struck a pedestrian and lost its permits in California. Insurance costs in the U.S. remain steep compared to Uber's international markets, and litigation risk from aggressive plaintiffs' lawyers is always looming. Plus, if Tesla floods city centers with underpriced rides, Uber's take rate could shrink faster than trip volumes grow. Still, Uber's diversified business model offers a buffer. Even if autonomous rollouts stall, the core business is now profitable on its own. And if pricing pressure intensifies, Uber can rely on its growing ad revenue, delivery upsells, and loyalty programs, such as Uber One, to help protect margins and maintain resilience. Uber's Valuation To put these possibilities into a valuation framework, I built a ten-year discounted cash flow model. I project that gross bookings will grow at an average annual rate of 15% through 2028, gradually slowing to 8% as urban markets mature. Adjusted EBITDA margins are expected to expand from the current ~11% to 18% by 2030, driven by a growing contribution from high-margin advertising and fee-based robotaxi services. Applying an 8% weighted average cost of capital and a 3% terminal growth rate, the model yields an estimated equity value of approximately $108 per share. A couple of reality checks reinforce that result. At about 15x forward earnings, the stock trades at a discount to the S&P 500's 28x, despite better cash conversion. UBER's performance against its peers is also impressive, ranking highest on TipRanks' indicators and Smart Score. What is the Prediction for UBER Stock? On Wall Street, UBER stock carries a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 30 Buy, three Hold, and zero Sell ratings over the past three months. UBER's average stock price target of $99 implies approximately 15.5% upside potential over the next twelve months. Uber's Autonomous Advantage and Robotaxi Economics A few years ago, Uber's story hinged on whether part-time drivers could make city life more manageable without wiping out the company's margins. Today, the question has evolved: can removing drivers entirely push profitability to levels few envisioned back in 2017? Uber's decision to rent out its massive rider base to whichever autonomous platform proves safest and most cost-effective looks, for now, like the smartest, most capital-efficient move on the board. The company is generating sustainable profits, funding innovation through operating cash flow, and preserving the flexibility to pivot between partners or renegotiate terms as technology advances. Autonomous taxis won't take over every city street overnight—but the real contest over who profits from them is already underway. And because Uber controls the demand side, it's positioned to earn economic rent, regardless of which lidar, camera, or neural net ultimately powers the vehicle. With shares still trading at traditional software multiples—ignoring the platform's optionality—I'm happy to stay in the back seat with my Buy rating, and let the algorithms do the driving.
