
High Court to hear bid to challenge Palestine Action ban
On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge to that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.
The Government is opposing the bid for the legal challenge to be allowed to proceed, with the hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain due to begin at 10.30am on Monday at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'.
Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident, and are due to face trial in early 2027.
Since the ban came into force, dozens of people have been arrested at protests in cities including London, Manchester and Cardiff, including an 83-year-old reverend.
At the hearing earlier this month, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said the proscription was an 'ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'.
He also said that the Home Office 'has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now'.
Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that the harm caused by the ban would be 'far-reaching' and could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'.
Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court.
Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton.
Dismissing the bid for a temporary block, the judge said that the 'harm which would ensue' if a block was not ordered was 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'.
He added that some of the 'consequences feared by the claimant' were 'overstated'.
At a late-night Court of Appeal hearing, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis threw out a bid to challenge the High Court's decision, finding that there was 'no real prospect of a successful appeal'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
a few seconds ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Peter McVerry Trust seeks injunctions against alleged trespassers in Dublin properties
The High Court has granted injunctions requiring that a number of people allegedly in illegal occupation of three buildings in Dublin owned by the Peter McVerry Trust Ltd vacate the properties. Mr Justice Brian Cregan granted the trust orders preventing trespass by "persons unknown" at an apartment in Cabra Road, Phibsborough, a multi-unit building on the North Circular Road, Grangegorman, and a three storey Georgian building on Drumcondra Road Lower. The order also applies to three individuals who gave their names when a security company was sent to find out what was going on at the buildings. Advertisement On Wednesday, the trust was granted an order allowing for service of proceedings at short notice on the defendants in the three cases. The application was made on a one side only represented basis by Barry Mansfield, instructed by Lavelle Partner solicitors. In an affidavit, trust director Tony O'Brien said all three properties are used to provide accommodation for people in need. Those occupying the buildings were in effect "jumping the queue" by doing so and should not be allowed to unilaterally usurp the trust's function in allocating housing by doing it themselves, he said. He was particularly conscious of the risk of fire and the implications for the trust's insurance. Ireland Government approves €15m emergency funding for Pet... Read More When the trust learned of the occupations last March, they sent a security firm to investigate. They identified three people in each of the buildings but others refused to engage, Mr O'Brien said. In the North Circular Road building, it appeared access was being gained by ladder at a window of the rear of the property. Advertisement As owner of the properties, the trust wants to obtain vacant possession, he said. Mr Mansfield, for the trust, told the court it had not been possible to establish how many people were in the buildings. Two of the identified individuals appear to be connected but not the third, he said. Mr Justice Cregan said service could be effected through notices, in plain English, accompanied by the court papers in a box. He said the case could come back next week.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ian Hislop slams ‘mind-boggling' arrest of pensioner for holding up Private Eye cover at pro-Palestine protest
The arrest on terrorism charges of a 67-year-old man for holding up the front cover of Private Eye at a pro-Palestine protest is 'mind-boggling', Ian Hislop, the magazine's editor, has said. Pensioner Jon Farley, a former head teacher at a primary school, was arrested at a silent protest in Leeds on Saturday after police accused him of supporting Palestine Action, a proscribed organisation. The government voted earlier this month to designate the protest outfit a terrorist organisation after some of its members allegedly sprayed red paint at British fighter jets at RAF Brize Norton. The proscription afforded Palestine Action the same legal status as Isis, Al-Qaeda and far-right outfit National Action. The Private Eye cover held up by Mr Farley at the protest contained the words: 'Palestine Action Explained. Unacceptable Palestine Action: Spraying military planes with paint. Acceptable Palestine Action: Shooting Palestinians queueing for food.' At the bottom of Mr Farley's poster, the words 'Private Eye, no 1653' were written. West Yorkshire police arrested the pensioner under section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000. He had never been detained before. '[Police officers] picked me up, grabbed me, and took me to the side, and I ended up sitting on the pavement,' the 67-year-old told The Guardian. 'I think that's when they said something about the placard. And I said: 'Well it's a cartoon from Private Eye. I can show you. I've got the magazine in my bag,' by which time, they were putting me in handcuffs.' A fellow protester later pointed out to the police that the latest edition of Private Eye was on sale at a nearby newsagents. Mr Farley spent six hours in detention being questioned by counter-terror police. He was allowed to leave under bail conditions that he refrain from attending 'Palestine Action' rallies. Mr Farley says he has never attended a Palestine Action rally, and it would be illegal to hold such a meeting. He pointed out that 32 Palestinians were shot while queueing for aid on the day he was arrested. He described the incident as evidence of a 'whole atmosphere of intimidation', adding that he believed the police were 'making up the law'. Mr Hislop, defending the front cover, said it was 'quite blatantly an example of freedom of speech'. Asked about the arrest of Mr Farley, he said: 'I did think it was mind-boggling. I mean, ludicrous. He obviously couldn't believe it and the immediate response in the office was that someone said: 'Well, the jokes have been criminal for ages.'' Mr Hislop described the cover as 'a very neat and funny little encapsulation about what is and isn't acceptable, and it's a joke about – I mean, it's quite a black joke – but about the hypocrisies of government approach to any sort of action in Gaza. 'So it's not difficult to understand. It's critical, but it is quite clearly a joke. Seems to me absolutely extraordinary that someone could be arrested for holding it up.'


Belfast Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Man accused of ‘terrifying and horrendous' attack on Bulgarian family's home in Ballymena denied bail
A Bulgarian family was subjected to a 'terrifying and horrendous' attempt to break into their home during racially-motivated rioting in Ballymena, the High Court has been told. Prosecutors said Adam Connolly (32) repeatedly kicked at a locked internal door after others had forced open the front entry to the house on Clonavon Terrace last month.