logo
As Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia hail US tariff discounts, what factors account for the outcome?

As Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia hail US tariff discounts, what factors account for the outcome?

CNA16 hours ago
KUALA LUMPUR: Three Southeast Asian states involved in ending a recent armed conflict in the region - Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia - hailed the reduction in tariff rates imposed by the United States as a victory after prolonged talks, and a reprieve for their domestic economies.
Experts said the ceasefire, which allowed US President Donald Trump to burnish his peacemaker image, was among several contributing factors that led to substantial tariff discounts for these Southeast Asian countries.
Joanne Lin, who is senior fellow and co-coordinator of the ASEAN Studies Centre at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, said the timing and geopolitical backdrop were crucial in how Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia secured the reduced tariff rate.
'Their success came just days after a US-endorsed ceasefire was brokered between Cambodia and Thailand, with Malaysia playing a key mediating role,' she told CNA.
'This allowed Trump to publicly take credit for helping end a regional conflict, bolstering his image as a global dealmaker.'
Other factors cited included the willingness by Malaysia, Cambodia and Thailand to open up market access to the US, and a desire by Washington to move these three countries deemed to be China-friendly further away from Beijing's orbit of influence.
REGIONAL REACTIONS
Under the new executive order by Trump on Friday, Malaysia now faces a 19 per cent tariff rate on its goods exported to the US, down from 25 per cent.
Fellow Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) members Cambodia (36 per cent to 19 per cent) and Thailand (36 per cent to 19 per cent) also struck eleventh-hour trade deals with the US, achieving identical levies to Malaysia.
The Philippines (20 per cent to 19 per cent), Indonesia (32 per cent to 19 per cent) and Vietnam (46 per cent to 20 per cent) had announced earlier deals with the US.
The US tariff rates imposed on Singapore (10 per cent), Brunei (25 per cent), Laos (40 per cent) and Myanmar (40 per cent) remain unchanged.
These levies will come into effect from Aug 7 - a one-week delay from Trump's original Aug 1 deadline.
The reductions for the trio come after Thailand and Cambodia agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire brokered in Malaysia, with interventions from China and the US, specifically from Trump who had threatened to not make trade deals with them if the fighting had continued.
Malaysia is the only one among the three so far to overtly acknowledge that the ceasefire was a factor in the latest tariff rates meted out to the country.
'(Malaysia's role in facilitating the ceasefire) did definitely help,' said Malaysia's Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz at a press conference on Friday, in response to a question by CNA.
'How much? I am not aware. But all the goodwill that was achieved during the call between PM (Anwar Ibrahim) and Donald Trump, where one of the discussions was about the ceasefire, I believe did leave a good impression on Malaysia's role as chairman of ASEAN, in the peacekeeping and ceasefire discussions.'
He also stressed that the tariff negotiation with the US was a 'win-win situation' for both countries.
'It also shows the strong bilateral relationship between Malaysia and the US,' he said.
His ministry had earlier depicted Malaysia's reduced 19 per cent US tariff rate as a 'significant achievement', as other Southeast Asian neighbours welcomed similarly substantial discounts in their own US levies.
MITI said its latest US tariff rate was achieved after a 'thorough and methodical negotiating process' with Washington.
'Most importantly, Malaysia had stood firm on various 'red line' items, and the 19 per cent tariff rate was achieved without compromising the nation's sovereign right to implement key policies to support the nation's socioeconomic stability and growth,' MITI said in a statement.
Malaysia's rate - six percentage points lower than initially threatened - comes after Anwar said on Thursday he had spoken to Trump over the phone that morning.
Anwar said the pair discussed tariffs "in the spirit and principle of free trade" and that Trump had decided to review the tariff rates imposed on Malaysia.
Trump had issued a letter to Malaysia on Jul 7 saying it faces a 25 per cent tariff rate pending negotiations ahead of Friday's deadline.
Putrajaya responded by saying it would not budge on 'red lines' in tariff negotiations, including in areas of national interest like halal certification and digital trade.
Tengku Zafrul told reporters on Friday that Malaysia rejected US requests to abolish excise duties on alcohol, tobacco and the automotive industry, noting that Malaysia has its own national car with an automotive industry that employs 700,000 people.
Malaysia also turned down a US request to abolish foreign shareholder equity limits in certain strategic sectors, and held firm on its stringent digital platform laws, he said.
On the other hand, the minister acknowledged that Malaysia had agreed to eliminate tariffs on a number of US agricultural products, and facilitate the importation of halal meat from the US.
'Overall, I think given the many things that we stood firm on, we are quite happy that America understands our position,' he added.
'We want the rate to be fair in the region with our ASEAN neighbours. So I think we are quite satisfied, relatively speaking, where we are versus our ASEAN partners.'
The spokesman of the Thai Prime Minister's Office said the agreed tariff rate will help the country maintain its competitiveness.
Jirayu Chuopsap said it was a 'win-win approach' that would ensure Thailand maintains its export base and long-term economic stability.
He added that it would 'emphasise Thailand's potential in the world trade arena amidst changes in international trade policy'.
Thailand had been facing a 36 per cent tariff and the prospect of missing the Aug 1 deadline to make a deal with Washington, amid the ongoing border dispute with neighbouring Cambodia.
Meanwhile, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet on Friday welcomed the 19 per cent deal with the US.
'This is the best news for the people and economy of Cambodia to continue to develop the country,' he wrote on social media, also thanking Trump for his 'initiative and decisive leadership' in securing the ceasefire and monitoring its implementation directly until permanent peace and normalisation of relations between Cambodia and Thailand is achieved.
Separately, Cambodia's Deputy Prime Minister Sun Chanthol said that his country's vital garment and footwear industry has averted a collapse with Washington's reduction of tariff rates on the country's exports to the US.
Cambodia was initially slapped with a 49 per cent tariff rate, before it was reduced to 36 per cent and later to the eventual 19 per cent.
"First off the bat, I have to thank President Trump for providing a rate that's competitive vis-a-vis our neighbouring countries and express gratitude to President Trump for his noble intervention for a ceasefire and peace," he said, referring to the armed conflict along the Thai-Cambodia land border.
WHAT EXPERTS ARE SAYING
Some experts have noted that Trump is using tariffs beyond the realm of trade and as a foreign policy tool for countries to acquiesce to US demands.
Analyst Adib Zalkapli, who is the managing director of geopolitical consultancy Viewfinder Global Affairs, told CNA that the Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire deal which Malaysia's PM Anwar brokered was 'certainly one of several contributing factors' behind the substantial tariff discounts for the three countries.
'From a political perspective, the ceasefire gave a convenient and symbolic conclusion to the tariff negotiations,' Adib said.
However, he noted that the negotiation process is also complex and influenced by multiple overlapping considerations, and that 'no single issue typically makes or breaks a deal'.
'These negotiations usually involve multiple, interconnected issues - the US wanted greater market access and the removal of non-tariff barriers, while the other countries keen to secure an agreement very likely responded by offering selective concession,' he told CNA.
Separately, Lin from ISEAS said that beyond the diplomatic optics of the ceasefire deal, Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia also showed a 'willingness to engage with Trump's transactional approach to trade'.
'Drawing lessons from fellow ASEAN members like Indonesia and Vietnam (who earlier secured lower rates) they reportedly offered pledges, including greater market access for US goods and commitments to increase American imports.
'Thus, the convergence of strategic timing and economic pragmatism were probably the key factors,' said Lin.
She added that the five ASEAN states that managed to get their respective tariffs reduced to 19 percentage points are seen to be open, flexible and willing to negotiate directly with the US on Washington's terms.
'Each of them offered concessions, whether by pledging to lower tariffs or non-tariff barriers, increase imports of US goods or expand market access. In short, they were responsive to US demands and willing to transact,' said Lin.
She also pointed out how several Southeast Asian countries, particularly Malaysia, Cambodia and Indonesia are seen as being within China's sphere of influence, with President Xi Jinping visiting Malaysia, Cambodia and Vietnam earlier this year, underscoring their strategic relevance.
'By engaging with these governments, the US not only secured trade concessions but also reinforced its presence in key parts of the region where influence is being contested with Beijing,' she added.
Anusorn Tamajai, the dean of Rangsit University International College in Thailand, said while the US' involvement in the ceasefire negotiations was an effective strategy that yielded positive benefits for both sides, and enhanced Washington's image in Southeast Asia as a peacekeeper, it was likely not the main reason tariff negotiations were successful.
'I believe it was more about trade liberalisation. That was the key - market access - which helped us successfully strike the deal on Trump-era tariffs,' he said.
Despite the more favourable tariff rate, Anusorn said Thailand's exports are likely to slow down for the second half of 2025. This is primarily because for the first five months, the growth rate has 'surged significantly', he said.
'Part of this was due to the US importers accelerating their imports to avoid tariffs, as it was still unclear what the final tariff rate on Thai products would be,' he said, adding that exports growth was likely to rebound in 2026.
Over in Cambodia's capital Phnom Penh, Ou Virak, the founder of Future Forum, a public policy think tank, said the situation is like returning to the status quo, given Cambodia's tariff rate is in line with the rest of the region.
'There's a joke that you don't need to outrun the bear, you just need to be faster than your friend. We expect the landscape will be similar (to previously),' he said.
The impacts on the garment industry, he expected, will be minimal given the US was unlikely to start producing such goods domestically.
'What is interesting is Cambodia's concessions on US goods but we hardly buy anything from the US, so there's nothing major there,' he said, referring to how Cambodia will impose zero tariffs on all American goods.
Meanwhile, former World Trade Organization chief economist Robert Koopma told CNA's Asia First that the language used around these tariff deals with the US contains 'a lot of constructive ambiguity'.
He noted the difference between them and trade agreements, which are usually extremely detailed and have 'very specific language'. But the deals made so far have very few details.
He said the deals 'allow the US president to declare victory', while most US trading partners have basically decided not to retaliate to get a relatively lower tariff than what was threatened.
'Both sides of the deal basically get to say, 'We got something out of this, and it's yet to be determined exactly what it is, and as time passes, we'll both interpret the language in the deal in a way that favours us'."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India aghast at Donald Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs
India aghast at Donald Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs

Business Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Business Times

India aghast at Donald Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs

[MUMBAI] Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25 per cent tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the 'most strenuous and obnoxious', in a Truth Social post on Jul 30. He added the US may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them 'dead economies' in another post. With no imminent trade deal, the 25 per cent tariffs kicked in as at Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath, and not the subject to the very highest rates, but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. 'Blunt-force' message 'Overnight, the US-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice-president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai-based financial services firm. The levies 'feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message'. Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal, or the lack of it, was the US pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As the US released rates across the world on Aug 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. 'The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' V Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel maker in the southern Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur, told Bloomberg News. 'We were expecting something in the 15 to 20 per cent range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbours on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. When the tariff rate news first dropped in late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being 'very disturbed'. A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40 per cent of its revenue from the US selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest US customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. 'The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for 'months and months', he said that he will have to start cutting his workforce. The US is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated US$129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25 per cent, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20 per cent tariff, Vietnam got a 20 per cent levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19 per cent duties. 'We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council. 'We will take it up with the government.' Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'my friend' in a Feb 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries 'special'. India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports, Bloomberg News reported, citing sources familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. 'It is a storm in the India-US relationship at this moment, but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Programme at Delhi-based Observer Researcher Foundation, told Bloomberg News. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a US-India trade deal continue. Negotiating tactic Jewellery businesses 'are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favourable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. 'The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing 'seems like a knee-jerk reaction', according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. 'This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said. BLOOMBERG

Cornell close to White House settlement of up to US$100 million
Cornell close to White House settlement of up to US$100 million

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Cornell close to White House settlement of up to US$100 million

The White House is eyeing a settlement of as much as US$100 million (S$129 million) in negotiations with Cornell University about an agreement that would reinstate hundreds of millions of dollars in frozen federal research funding, according to people familiar with the matter. A deal could be announced as soon as next week, said the people, who asked not to be named because the talks are private. One of the issues still under discussion is whether the pact would call for a resolution monitor to supervise how Cornell is carrying out changes required by the US – an arrangement accepted by Columbia University in a landmark US$221 million deal last month. An agreement would make Cornell the latest Ivy League school to settle with President Donald Trump as the White House probes US colleges over allegations they mishandled antisemitic incidents on campus after the October 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel and the Jewish state's retaliatory response in Gaza. Brown University announced a US$50 million deal with the government this week. Cornell declined to comment. The Cornell terms are still under discussion and subject to change. One of the people familiar with the talks characterised US100 million as the maximum, while another described it as within the range of US$100 million. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has said that additional settlements with universities are likely to use the Columbia agreement as a roadmap. That deal included a cash fine for civil-rights violations and a wide set of policy changes. In addition to mounting probes of antisemitism on campus, the administration has also pushed colleges to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion programs and criticised them for political bias against conservatives. The government agreed to restore funding to the University of Pennsylvania after the school reached a deal limiting the participation of transgender athletes in sports. The broad-based push for change has fueled concerns that the government is impinging on academic freedom and seeking to use the universities to advance its own viewpoints and agenda. Harvard University, the primary target of Mr Trump's pressure campaign, has filed two lawsuits challenging the government's efforts to freeze research funding and block international student enrollment. But the funding freeze has been taking a toll. Cornell warned in June that the pullback of US funding would force it to adopt 'financial austerity in all areas'. Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff said at the time that job cuts would likely be required, in addition to restrictions on discretionary spending and hiring. Cornell's US$10.7 billion endowment is one of the smaller funds in the Ivy League. BLOOMBERG

India reels from the shock of Trump's onslaught
India reels from the shock of Trump's onslaught

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

India reels from the shock of Trump's onslaught

NEW DELHI – President Donald Trump's new list of tariffs on half the world's countries sent the United States' trading partners scrambling to understand how their businesses will be affected. India got the bad news a day earlier – its goods face a tariff of 25 per cent or more – but the extra time was hardly enough to adjust to the fresh chaos. Indian negotiators had not expected to conclude a meaningful deal in time to meet Mr Trump's revised deadline of Aug 1. But they did expect to be treated as well as their neighbours, and to keep haggling with US officials until October or November, when Mr Trump was invited to visit India as part of the Quad defense group, which brings together four big democracies – India, the United States, Japan and Australia – with a shared interest in standing up to China. Instead, they were fed a heap of insults and injuries. Along with the 25 per cent rate, one of the highest in Asia and only a point lower than what was threatened on 'Liberation Day' in April, India was informed that its existing trade barriers are 'strenuous and obnoxious'; it will be charged an untold penalty for buying Russian oil; it is a 'dead economy.' It's archrival Pakistan was praised and promised an oil exploration deal. Hurt feelings aside, the results are confusing. Two of the biggest categories of exports to the United States from India are personal electronics, worth about US$14 billion a year, and pharmaceuticals, worth US$10 billion. Mr Rajesh Sharma, executive director of India Cellular and Electronics Association, said smartphones were exempted from these tariffs; so did executives at pharmaceutical companies. But on Aug 1, after reading the executive order, the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi concluded the opposite. India's stock markets dipped on the news for two days running. Indian and international banks wrote notices warning that the country's generally hard-charging economic growth is likely to slow measurably as a result of the tariffs. Then there are the unknown tariffs. On July 6, Mr Trump wrote that countries aligned with the Brics group, of which India is a founding member, would incur an additional 10 per cent penalty. Then on July 14, he said that, if Russia didn't make peace with Ukraine within 50 days, he would punish its trading partners with 'secondary tariffs' of 100 per cent. That figure is making Indians worry anew. Mr Trump added 'plus a penalty' to the 25 per cent rate imposed on India, for buying Russian oil and weapons. Ms Shashi Tharoor, a prominent member of the opposition, spoke to an Indian news agency about the possible impact. 'There's even talk of a 100 per cent penalty,' he said, 'which will destroy our trade with America.' There is evidence that Indian buyers of Russian oil were already pulling back before the executive order. 'Indian refiners have reduced Russian crude purchases this week,' said Ms Sumit Ritolia, an analyst at Kpler, which tracks shipping and commodities. They were already 'looking to further diversify, amid rising concerns over potential US sanctions,' having spent years taking advantage of discounted Russian oil to reduce their imports from the Persian Gulf. Reducing the United States' trade deficit is one of the Trump administration's goals, so persuading India to buy more American oil and gas would make sense. Last year, India exported US$45.7 billion more goods to the United States than it imported. It spent about three times as much importing oil. If a third of that were redirected to American sources, their bilateral trade would be evened out. Mr Trump's angry barrage of social media has complicated further negotiations. The breakdown of trust between Mr Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, whom Mr Trump called his 'true friend,' the US president is likely to make it harder to complete any deal, analysts say. Indian news outlets have reported that Mr Trump wanted to iron out some outstanding issues, after four rounds of direct talks between the two sides, in a phone call with Mr Modi. The Indian government was anxious to avoid any of his last-minute surprises. The US commerce secretary accused India of 'slow-rolling' its trade negotiations. Indian officials and analysts say the friction is caused by a fundamental difference of approach. Mr Trump has a penchant for quick, top-down dealmaking. India's bureaucracy moves at a methodical pace, especially when it comes to opening up the agriculture market, which is politically sensitive. India's recently concluded trade deal with Britain took three years of talks, under two British prime ministers. On Aug 1, India's Foreign Ministry released a statement that put on a brave face. 'India and the United States share a Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership,' established in 2013 between President Barack Obama and then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, 'anchored in shared interests, democratic values and robust people-to-people ties.' The ministry stuck to principles, revealing no plan for breaking through Mr Trump's hard line. 'This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges,' the statement said. 'We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' NYTIMES

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store