Minnesota students own the national speech and debate tournament
The big picture: They're among the 6,300 competitors at this week's National Speech & Debate Tournament in Des Moines.
Since 2000, Minnesotans have won the tournament's main events more times (43) than competitors from any other state, including Texas (38), California (37) and Florida (35).
🎙️ Kyle's thought bubble: Their success came after proving themselves at Twin Cities tournaments, which — as a former Minnesota speech kid and now a part-time coach, I can attest — are some of the toughest local competitions in the U.S.
Every time I watch these competitors, and hear the strength in their voices, I know our future is in good hands.
How it works: At nationals, 12 main categories of competition fall under the umbrellas of "speech" or "debate."
In debate events, competitors verbally spar over morals and values, current events or policy plans or in mock sessions of a legislature.
In "public address" speech events, competitors deliver persuasive or informative speeches. In one event, high schoolers have 30 minutes to prepare a seven-minute oration on questions like: "Will Syria be able to establish a stable government anytime soon?"
"Interpretation" events look more like competitive acting, featuring humorous or dramatic monologues or a scene with a partner.
Case in point: White Bear Lake's Sanyu Mwassa and Mariam Elias-Danjuma won the championship in 2024 for their "duo interpretation" about how white audiences demand Black artists to perform pain.
By the numbers: Apple Valley remains the region's most venerable speech power, producing more champions (16) than any other U.S. high school since 1931.
The next closest to that mark anywhere in the U.S.? Eagan, which is tied for second place with 10 speech and debate titles. Eastview is not far behind them with eight.
What we're watching: Minnesota has produced 40 main event finalists since 2022 — and four of those competitors are back this year for another run at the stage.
The returning finalists: Apple Valley's Aniya Bostick and Isaiah Craig, Eastview's Sahiti Atluri and Moorhead's Eleanor Culloton.
The intrigue: Some of our future leaders in politics and culture are probably in Des Moines right now.
Four of the nine current U.S. Supreme Court justices are speech and debate alums — and Neil Gorsuch is a former national champion.
A young Oprah did speech. So did Paul Rudd, Jason Sudeikis, Hasan Minhaj and Stephen Colbert. The actor Josh Gad (Olaf in "Frozen"!) gave one of the most memorable speeches in the history of the national tournament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
7 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Boston tour highlights fight to preserve African American history amid ‘whitewash' fears
Advertisement 'This was a controversial monument,' Paris Jeffries said. 'Sixteen clear-faced Black people with guns in their hands.' Historians worry that pressure on the Park Service could lead to the erasure of history involving slavery, the civil rights movement, gay and transgender figures, and other subjects deemed improper by the Trump administration. 'President Trump and his minions are not just rewriting policy,' Markey told reporters. 'They are trying to rewrite the history of the United States of America. [The administration] wants a climate of denial of the role of Black people, of brown people.' On Boston Common, the group stopped briefly at the Embrace monument, which remembers the Rev. Martin Luther King and Coretta Scott King, who met and fell in love in Boston. The group ended up at the Advertisement Standing beside Paris Jeffries and other Black leaders, Markey spoke about the importance of preserving history from the same pulpit where Frederick Douglass and Maria Stewart advocated for abolition. He criticized the Trump administration for instructing the National Park Service to 'We must stand with museums and curators, teachers, and historians, and refuse to be complicit in the lie being told by the Trump administration,' Markey said at a press conference. Dr. Noelle Trent, president and CEO of the Museum of African American History, said, 'efforts to remove the uncomfortable and complex part of our collective history is an erasure. My colleagues and I deal with this threat every day.' Trent urged listeners to become members of the museum and support it financially given the uncertainty of federal funding to institutions honoring Black history in the Trump era. The museum received a letter in April that a $500,000 grant it had received from the federal Institute of Museum and Library Services was terminated. But it was reinstated after attorney general Andrea Campbell and 19 other state attorneys general The museum, which partners with the National Park office in Boston, is also eligible for grants from the Department of the Interior, but Trent said that the money comes with strings under the Trump administration. Advertisement 'The dynamics of that relationship have shifted greatly,' she said. 'If we were to receive funds, we are now being asked to align ourselves with not only the executive orders and secretarial orders that exist at this moment but any more that will come after the duration of that particular agreement.' Kyera Singleton, executive director of the Royall House and Slave Quarters in Medford, a plantation that was home to the largest slaveholding family in Massachusetts, also worries about federal funding to Black history museums. The Royall House does not directly rely on federal funding but has received support from Mass Humanities, a nonprofit that was affected by the cuts to the National Endowment for Humanities. 'It really highlights the ways in which the inequities have always existed, specifically for smaller house museums and Black history sites,' Singleton said. Attendees at Monday's event also highlighted the impact of the Trump administration's cuts to the National Park Service. Kristen Sykes, Northeast regional director for the said her organization estimates that the Park Service has lost about 24 percent of its employees since Trump took office. She's worried about the proposed $1 billion cuts to the National Park Service in Trump's Sykes said her organization estimated the cuts could result in the closure of hundreds of park units across the country. 'We're already seeing huge impacts, with over 4,000 staff who've either been fired, retired, or been bought out,' Sykes said in an interview. Advertisement Paris Jeffries reflected on how parks and monuments keep history alive. 'This is why the Park Service matters, because memory needs a body, grass, and granite, a place where stories breathe and people can gather,' he said. 'Monuments are a city's vocabulary.' Angela Mathew can be reached at
USA Today
11 hours ago
- USA Today
The NFL can't be trusted to not meddle in ESPN's business. It already has
It's quite possible the NFL had nothing to do with the shelving of ESPN's long-planned docuseries about Colin Kaepernick. It's also quite possible that Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and unicorns exist. When news broke that the NFL and ESPN were getting in bed together, with the league eventually owning 10% of the network, concerns immediately arose about the deal's impact on ESPN's journalistic independence. A media outlet being owned, even slightly, by an entity it covers. What could possibly go wrong! Even NFL commissioner Roger Goodell's promise to ESPN employees that the league wouldn't interfere with the network's journalism wasn't enough to satisfy concerns. Why? Because the league has shown over and over again that it can't be trusted. Its long-standing denials that the game could cause traumatic brain injuries. Its bait-and-switch on health care for retirees. Its abysmal treatment of Black players. I could go on. The only constant in the NFL, besides Jerry Jones' inability to see his shortcomings as a GM, is that the NFL is going to do what's best for the NFL. And a documentary on Colin Kaepernick would be the opposite of what's best for the NFL. OPINION: I was interviewed by Spike Lee for Colin Kaepernick doc. What happened to it? The NFL has largely moved on from the firestorm that surrounded Kaepernick's protests of racist policing of people of color. Kaepernick hasn't been on an NFL roster in eight years, and the other players who were prominent in their support of him or active in the Players Coalition are no longer in the league. The fans who claimed they'd never watch the NFL again because of the protests by Kaepernick and other players are, predictably, watching the NFL again. Donald Trump, who did as much as anyone to fan the fury over the player protests, has long since turned his attention to demonizing other protestors and people of color. A Kaepernick documentary puts it all — the reasons for the protests, Kaepernick's collusion lawsuit, Goodell's 2020 apology to the former quarterback — back in the spotlight, and the NFL would prefer just about anything but that. Especially given the merger with ESPN is expected to require approval from, among others, the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission. Fear that Trump would put his thumb on the scale of a major merger cowed CBS into paying an eight-figure sum to settle a winnable lawsuit the President filed against the network. Canning a documentary probably seems like a pittance by comparison, a couple of days of unflattering stories preferable to another season of manufactured outrage. "ESPN, Colin Kaepernick and Spike Lee have collectively decided to no longer proceed with this project as a result of certain creative differences," ESPN said in a statement to Reuters, which broke the news Saturday that the documentary has been shelved. OK. Sure. "The NFL played no role in this decision," NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy told USA TODAY Sports. OK. Sure. Again. Merger aside, the NFL and ESPN have been here before. And by here, I mean having a 'change of heart' about the network airing something that would make the NFL look bad. Back in 2013, ESPN was collaborating with PBS' Frontline on 'League of Denial,' an investigation into how the NFL had handled the growing crisis of former players developing chronic traumatic encephalopathy and other trauma-related brain diseases. But on Aug. 22 of that year, PBS released a statement saying ESPN was no longer involved in the documentary. 'We don't normally comment on investigative projects in progress, but we regret ESPN's decision to end a collaboration that has spanned the last 15 months and is based on the work of ESPN reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Steve Fainaru, as well as FRONTLINE's own original journalism,' Frontline executives said. Unsurprisingly, the NFL denied pressuring ESPN. A day after Frontline's announcement, however, the New York Times reported that ESPN's decision came after Goodell and then-NFL Network president Steve Bornstein had expressed their displeasure with 'League of Denial' during a lunch with network executives. The NFL succeeded in blackballing Kaepernick once. Why did anyone think it would be different this time around? The NFL has a vested interest in avoiding stories that could tarnish its image and put any of its multibillion-dollar revenues at risk. ESPN has a vested interest in keeping the league happy — now more than ever. If that means journalistic independence has to take a back seat every once in a while, so be it. When there's money to be made and bills to pay, integrity is expendable. Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.
Boston Globe
14 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Kate Merrill lawsuit: Microaggression vs. discrimination
In this case, the meteorologist, Jason Mikell, allegedly took offense at her correction and, according to the lawsuit, confronted her by 'loudly yelling at her on the studio floor and asserting that she was being critical of him.' After she complained to human resources about his reaction, she subsequently learned that she was under investigation for other alleged microaggressions. Faced with demotion from the anchor desk, she quit and is now suing WBZ, CBS, and its parent company, Paramount Global, along with several former colleagues for discrimination, saying she lost her career in television journalism because she is white. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Advertisement What if everyone involved had simply tried to talk to each other instead of marching to HR to lodge a complaint? Is there no middle ground where people of basic good will can meet, talk, and move on? Without it, this country is going to swing back and forth between the extremes of cancel culture, where every utterance can be taken as an expression of bias, and the anti-DEI fervor, led by President Trump, that is empowering a new class of aggrieved white people. Are microaggressions teachable moments? Or is someone charged with launching them so beyond redemption that they are unworthy of employment? Addressing a School Committee chair and her assistant as 'ladies' cost Vito Perrone, a candidate for school superintendent in Easthampton, a job offer in 2023. Former state treasurer Shannon O'Brien was fired as chair of the Cannabis Control Commission in 2024 for alleged grievances that included suggesting to a Black commission member that she would know a lawmaker who was also Black. Advertisement In Merrill's lawsuit, the former anchor said she learned that Mikell, who is named as a defendant, had complained that she welcomed him to Boston by saying he would 'find his people.' She contends she only meant he would 'create a community of friends' but he interpreted it differently. Courtney Cole, another Black colleague who is named in the suit, was allegedly upset because Merrill said she should go to Nashville where she could become the main anchor, a statement that Cole interpreted as implying she would be a better racial fit in Nashville. Saying nothing was also a problem for Merrill. For example, Mikell also allegedly complained that Merrill did not ask him about his weekends. Other complaints involved allegations that Merrill rolled her eyes when talking to people of color and did not greet people of color when they entered a room. In her lawsuit, Merrill also said that when Mikell was hired, he allegedly told her he had never been to Boston before, asked for help in getting acclimated, and specifically asked for help with pronouncing local town names. Since a television meteorologist is part of a news broadcast, proper pronunciation does matter. 'There's always been a certain charm about the peculiar spellings and unusual pronunciations of local city and town names, but on-air reporters' failing to say them correctly can undermine the reporter's credibility and authenticity for people who live here and call into question other aspects of the reporter's work,' Marjorie Arons-Barron, the longtime WCVB editorial director who is now a blogger, told me. 'Faith in our institutions, including media, is already low enough.' Advertisement Mispronouncing Concord, if that's what happened, isn't the end of journalism. But even in a weather report, it would be better to say it correctly. There should be some way to tell someone that. Joan Vennochi is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
