‘Everything we had': LA family devastated after losing millions in bold Hollywood-style heist of jewelry store
It seems like a plotline out of a Hollywood blockbuster: thieves cutting through a concrete wall in the middle of the night to break into a neighboring jewelry store and steal more than $2 million in cash and jewels.
But that's what happened in a brazen heist to family-owned 5 Star Jewelry and Watch Repair in Simi Valley, California, according to ABC7 Eyewitness News.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
'I feel bad because this was my life, my retirement … they got everything we had,' Jacob Youssef told KTLA5. At 71 years old, he was about to retire and had already left the business to his son Jonathan in 2015. 'I cannot rebuild what I did in my lifetime.'
Since the store was priced out of insurance, they've now lost everything.
A security camera shows one of the thieves crawling on his stomach through the neighboring store to avoid motion sensors and then spray-painting the camera lens.
'This wasn't random,' Ted Mackrel, owner of Dr. Conkey's Candy and Coffee told KABC. 'They sawed a hole in our roof Sunday evening of Memorial Day weekend and managed to dodge all security systems.'
From there, the thieves dropped into the shop's bathroom, shimmied along the floor and spent at least three hours cutting through a concrete wall and then a heavy safe.
Mackrel says the break-in was discovered on Monday morning when staff reported 'a big hole in the wall leading to the jewelry store.'
According to Jacob and Jonathan, the thieves stole all of the gold and jewelry in the safe, as well as customers' heirloom pieces — including a Rolex watch — that they were repairing at the time of the break-in.
But that wasn't all they lost.
'It's a hit,' Jonathan, who now runs the family business, told KTLA5. 'It's [my dad's] retirement, my future. I have a young family and three daughters. It's a lot to have to rebuild from, especially because my dad is 71. He can't work forever.'
Since the incident, the local community has started a fundraiser to help the family get back on their feet.
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
This event reveals a critical vulnerability that many small business owners face: relying entirely on their business as their retirement plan.
Recent Gallup research found that most small business owners don't have a succession plan, yet 74% of employer-business owners have plans to sell or transfer the ownership of their business for retirement.
An earlier 2025 survey by SCORE found that 34% of entrepreneurs have no retirement savings plan for themselves, with 18% planning to sell their business and use the money to fund their retirement. Another 21% have already used their retirement savings to invest in their business.
But this strategy comes with risks, including a lack of diversification, liquidity challenges and even the myth of the eventual sale.
'Of the approximately 77 million baby boomers in the U.S., an estimated 12 million have ownership in privately held businesses,' according to a whitepaper by Butcher Joseph & Co. and ITR Economics.
At the same time, about 10,000 baby boomers reach retirement age every day. But many are facing a similar problem, since 'their would-be heirs would rather have the proceeds of a sale than take over the family business.'
Another problem, however, is that with an influx of baby boomers looking to sell, 'we're entering an environment where buyers have the upper hand,' according to Entrepreneur.
That may be good news for young entrepreneurs looking to buy an established business, but perhaps less so for small business owners dependent on the sale for their retirement.
If you're self-employed or run a business, you may want to avoid putting all your retirement eggs in one basket.
If you're self-employed and don't have any employees, consider a solo 401(k) to beef up your own retirement savings. If you have employees, a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) IRA can help both owners and their employees contribute toward their retirement.
You may also want to consider contributing to personal investment accounts separate from the business. The more diversified you are, the better.
And don't forget about liquidity. If you can't sell the business right away, what would that mean for your retirement goals?
It's well worth consulting with a financial advisor as well as experts in succession planning to make sure you have an exit strategy that leaves you with options.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: S.F. drug treatment programs offer help, but to overcome addiction, this needs to happen
Regarding 'He overdosed after being turned away by S.F. drug treatment center. Mother seeks answers' (Letters to the Editor, June 10): Carolyn Stueve-Martin must realize no mental health or drug treatment service could help her son Jonathan's addiction unless he truly desired to stop and had adequate support to commit to permanent change. This means having a reason to live, a place to live and wanting an alternative lifestyle. It is not a third or fourth party's responsibility to prevent his death. It must be his support system, his capability to do so and his desire for such difficult change. There are multiple services available in San Francisco that are compassionate to this need, much more so than most other cities (perhaps like Stueve-Martin's hometown of Tulsa, Okla.). Where were family or hometown friends or many other potential opportunities for Jonathan to seek and receive addiction treatment and support? I understand how grief-stricken a mother must be over the useless death of her son, but pointing the finger at San Francisco and looking for answers will not return her child nor change the fact that he was an addict who didn't seek, desire or find help sooner. This major factor about addiction is so rarely discussed. ME Harrington, San Francisco Charge for parking Regarding 'There will be consequences for S.F. Mayor Lurie if free parking in Golden Gate Park ends' (Letters to the Editor, June 9): I didn't vote for San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie, but I might now if he makes a tough economic decision that also helps the environment. The most disgusting thing in the park is when cars choke its roads. It's insane when drivers come to the park looking for parking that just isn't there. The letter writer calls paid parking a tax, but the real tax is the gas guzzling and idling done by motor vehicles. The economic impact of climate change will negatively hit us in a myriad of ways. Why should cars be allowed to negatively affect the park? We need it as a bucolic retreat away from traffic jams. More taxes won't help Regarding 'Why can't anyone figure out how to save the San Francisco Centre? They're thinking too small' (Open Forum, June 5): William Fulton calls for yet another 'tax-increment zone,' yes, another city tax, to pay for transforming the San Francisco Centre into an urban gathering place. A better idea might be rezoning it for housing and retail. The mall is a multistory building where luxury condos would bring in permanent residents who would patronize retail shops, restaurants and entertainment venues. Instead of adding a new tax, give a tax exemption to the investor who converts the space. This might even bring some workers back to empty downtown San Francisco offices. James Sandler, Pleasanton Show their humanity I read a story about federal immigration arrests in the Chronicle, but I didn't see anything about the poor souls who were grabbed. President Donald Trump demonizes immigrants as 'murderers' and 'rapists' to obscure their humanity. Immigrants are members of our communities, doing essential and often hard jobs like working in the fields, in restaurants, as child-care providers and as maids. Many have lived here for years, if not decades. They are people who care for us and whom we care about. There is a counter to dehumanization. I encourage the Chronicle and other news media to tell these people's stories. David Fairley, San Francisco Great Valkyries coverage As a reader who has complained in the past about the Chronicle's imbalanced focus on men's sports ('Cover women's sports,' Letters to the Editor, Oct. 21, 2021), I want to applaud the coverage of the Bay Area's new WNBA team, the Valkyries. Marisa Ingemi's game reports, in particular, provide clear, technical overviews while her behind-the-scenes stories offer the kinds of insight that bring readers into the building process of this exciting young team.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
These are the 6 levels of wealth for retirement-age Americans — are you near the top or bottom of the pyramid?
If you're planning your own retirement, you probably have a retirement savings goal in mind. Americans believe the 'magic number' they need to retire comfortably is $1.26 million, according to a survey by Northwestern Mutual. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) Comparing your number with the actual net worth of retirement-age seniors should give you an idea of how realistic your long-term financial plan is and what kind of lifestyle you can expect in your golden years. Since the average age Americans expect to retire is 66 and medicare is available to those 65 and older, we looked at the net worth of households led by seniors of ages 65 to 69. Net worth is the total value of everything owned minus what is owed (liabilities). Here are the six levels of wealth for these senior-led households, based on the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances from 2022. 1. Financial vulnerable (Household net worth $69,500 and under) Seniors with less than $69,500 in net worth fall into the bottom 25% of retirees. This group is particularly vulnerable to financial shocks and highly dependent on public safety net programs such as Social Security and Medicare. If you're approaching retirement with less than this number, it could be a good idea to look for additional income, more ways to save money or even a potential delay to your retirement so that you can be less vulnerable in your senior years. 2. Lower middle class (Household net worth between $69,500 and $394,300) The median net worth of these households is $394,000, according to the Federal Reserve. That means if your wealth is under this benchmark, around half of all senior households in this age group are wealthier than you. This cohort, which can best be described as lower-middle class, isn't necessarily financially vulnerable. However, this is far from a comfortable retirement. Seniors in this wealth category may have to stick to a tight budget. 3. Solidly middle class (Household net worth between $394,300 and $1.16 million) Seniors with a net worth that places them between the 50th and 75th percentiles could be described as middle class. This means you have access to a more comfortable retirement. However, if much of your net worth is trapped in an illiquid asset, such as your house or private business, you may need to find ways to create liquidity in your senior years. Even if your assets are liquid and easily accessible, you probably still need a stringent budget and conservative spending habits to ensure you don't deplete your funds in retirement. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it 4. Upper middle class (Household net worth between $1.2 million and $2.9 million) Congratulations, you're officially upper middle class. It's possible you have even achieved the 'magic number' for retirement savings according to most Americans. A comfortable lifestyle is nearly guaranteed. However, it's easy to succumb to lifestyle inflation and unnecessary splurges which can quickly erode your financial security. 5. Affluent (Household net worth $2.9 million or more) Only the top 10% of senior households in this age bracket have a net worth above $2.9 million. These affluent retirees are usually former bankers, lawyers, C-suite executives or business owners who are accustomed to a lavish and financially unrestrained lifestyle. If you're a high earner who is currently planning for retirement, the gates to this affluent club should be within reach. However, you will need a robust savings habit and diligent investments over the long-term to get to this target. 6. Top 1% (Household net worth $21.7 million or more) Only the top 1% in this category have a net worth over $21.7 million. This is the ultra-wealthy bracket that most Americans can only dream of belonging to. Your retirement plan probably looks very unconventional. You may be less focused on budgeting and more focused on asset allocation, tax optimization and estate planning. Dealing with this level of wealth could be complicated, especially if your assets are spread across multiple jurisdictions. This is why many ultra-wealthy seniors rely on an army of tax accountants, wealth managers, lawyers, investment advisors and senior bankers to help them navigate this exclusive arena. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
San Francisco families outraged to learn $3.8M in donations meant to build playgrounds were allegedly misused
The San Francisco Parks Alliance (SFPA) — a nonprofit foundation established to 'create, sustain and advocate for parks' — has abruptly shuttered amid a media and legal firestorm over alleged mismanagement involving at least $3.8 million in donations. That leaves donors like Nicola Miner — whose Baker Street Foundation donated $3 million to the SFPA several years ago — 'speechless.' She gave the SFPA that money to support construction of two neighborhood playgrounds. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) 'I wanted a park here, that was what our money was for,' Miner told CBS News. But the parks never materialized. Instead, she learned that the SFPA — an arm's-length fundraising partner of San Francisco's Recreation and Parks Department — funneled nearly $2 million of her foundation's donation to cover general operating expenses. 'The money was not for general operating expenses. And so I just feel a real sense of betrayal,' Minser said. 'The fact that they took money away from families, I'm speechless.' The San Francisco Standard reports that top employees at the SFPA got bonuses despite a 'massive deficit', and the nonprofit spent more on 'swanky galas' and fundraising events than it made. 'You would never, in a million years, give a bonus under these circumstances,' Joan Harrington, a nonprofit ethics expert at Santa Clara University, said. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it In the wake of the allegations, San Francisco's mayor froze the organization's funding in May, and City Attorney David Chiu launched an integrity review into the nonprofit. Subsequently, The San Francisco Standard reported that the SFPA was abruptly 'winding down,' leaving donors and partners empty-handed. Just days afterward, the San Francisco Government Audit and Oversight Committee subpoenaed the organization's former CEOs and its board treasurer after they failed to show up at a committee hearing. Some donors may be left wondering how they could be let down by such a prominent and politically connected organization. It's a reminder that a prominent name is no guarantee of continued success or appropriate management — and the prudent approach to committing funds is to perform thorough due diligence. To help with this process, the Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society (Stanford PACS) has published 'The Stanford PACS Guide to Effective Philanthropy,' with questions that donors should try to answer before making a commitment. For example: Does the nonprofit comply with tax regulations? Are its donations earmarked for a specific purpose (like a playground)? Are the donations restricted or unrestricted? How does the organization track and report restricted donations? Restricted donations have conditions on how those funds are to be used, while unrestricted donations can be used for anything related to the nonprofit's mission. Stanford PACS also publishes the Philanthropist Resource Directory, which can be a helpful resource early in the due diligence journey. Several third-party websites are also available to help with this process. For example, GuideStar aggregates information about U.S. nonprofits registered as 501(c)(3) organizations and categorizes them based on the amount of information they self-report. It also publishes IRS Form 990 tax returns, which are filed by 'tax-exempt organizations, nonexempt charitable trusts and section 527 political organizations.' GiveWell researches and recommends charities working in global health and poverty alleviation 'that save or improve lives the most per dollar,' while Charity Navigator rates more than 225,000 nonprofits based on their 'cost-effectiveness and overall health of a charity's programs, including measures of stability, efficiency and sustainability.' The Stanford PACS guide also suggests looking at which organizations have received grants from respected foundations such as the [Gates Foundation] ) or Ford Foundation — both of which have searchable grants databases — and talking to people who've contributed to the organization or worked with it. Donors can also consider a Donor Advised Fund (DAF), an account that allows donors to give to charity, receive an immediate tax deduction and recommend grants from the fund over time. Donating a large amount of money to a charity is a big commitment — and even supposedly reputable organizations can run into trouble. So time spent on due diligence is time well spent. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
