Alberta government orders removal of sexually explicit books from school libraries
school libraries
, mandating the removal of books containing explicit sexual content from K-12 schools by October 1.
The move, announced through a ministerial order by
Education
and
Childcare
Minister Demetrios Nicolaides, comes after months of growing debate over certain graphic novels available in public school libraries.
'This is not about banning books,' Nicolaides said. 'Our actions to ensure that materials in school libraries don't expose children to sexual content were never about banning books. These new standards are to ensure school boards have clear guidance to ensure age-appropriate access while reflecting the values and priorities of Albertans.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
The order prohibits materials with 'a detailed and clear depiction of a sexual act,' including masturbation, genital contact, and penetration. Non-explicit sexual content will only be available to students in Grades 10-12 if deemed developmentally appropriate. Students in Grade 9 and below are not allowed access to such materials.
Books specifically named by the province as inappropriate include:
Live Events
Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe
Fun Home by Alison Bechdel
Blankets by Craig Thompson
Flamer by Mike Curato
These books were found in both elementary and high schools under the Calgary Board of Education and the Edmonton Public School Board.
The government says materials about puberty, menstruation, and breastfeeding are not restricted at any grade level. Religious books, such as the Bible, are exempt from the new order.
School boards must now:
Remove all books with explicit sexual content by October 1, 2025
Publicly post their library catalogues
Ensure staff supervise students' access to library resources
Align their policies with the new standards by January 1, 2026
No additional funding has been allocated to support schools in implementing these changes.
The Calgary Board of Education responded, saying it 'already has rigorous processes' for evaluating library materials. The Calgary Catholic School District also stated it 'will align with the new mandated standards.'
Critics, including public librarians and teacher unions, argue this is a political move targeting LGBTQ+ content. 'This is a ban in all but name,' said Peter Bailey, CEO of St. Albert Public Library.
An online government survey that received over 77,000 valid responses showed 42 percent of Albertans supported banning sexually explicit content outright, while 22 percent favored limiting it based on grade level.
The policy does not apply to classroom materials selected by teachers or municipal libraries located within school buildings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump hits brakes on Obama's speed rule: Limit on large trucks, buses removed; what changes
Representational AI image The Trump administration has scrapped a proposed rule from the Obama era that aimed to limit the speed of large trucks and buses on US highways to improve safety and cut fuel costs. The speed limiter rule was first proposed in 2016 by Obama-era regulators. It aimed to cap the top speed of big rigs and buses to reduce the severity of crashes. Officials believed this could save between 63 and 214 lives annually and cut over $800 million in fuel and emissions costs. The suggested speed caps ranged from 60 to 68 mph. On 24 July, the Trump administration formally ended the plan. Federal regulators said mandating speed governors on all trucks over 26,000 pounds could increase operational costs, worsen traffic flow, and potentially harm road safety. They also warned of longer delivery times, lower driver pay, and a shift of heavy trucks to smaller roads. Truckers and states Independent truckers and several states opposed the Obama-era proposal. More than 15,000 public comments were filed against it. Many states argued the rule would interfere with their authority to set speed limits. The administration, following Trump's broader push against burdensome regulations, sided with these objections. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World Undo Regulators also noted that the original proposal did not address the safety risks of slower trucks mixing with faster-moving cars. Additionally, modern safety technology—such as radar-based emergency braking—has improved vehicle safety since 2016, reducing the need for such a rule. Safety concerns While this national plan has been dropped, the debate around speed-limiting technology isn't over. The American Trucking Associations (ATA), which had backed a 65 mph cap, said it remains open to working with regulators on balanced safety measures. In California, a bill to alert drivers when speeding was vetoed last year by governor Gavin Newsom.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump: Everyone is saying I will Destroy Elon Musk's companies, but this is not so, I want Elon to ...
Donald Trump has denied claims that he intends to harm Elon Musk's companies or eliminate their government subsidies, emphasizing his desire for all US businesses to prosper. This statement follows escalating tensions between the two figures, sparked by Musk's opposition to Trump's spending bill and the resurfacing of Trump's connection to Jeffrey Epstein. President Donald Trump has publicly refuted claims that he intends to destroy Elon Musk 's companies or remove their significant government subsidies . He stated that he wants all US companies to thrive because their good performance is better for the country. Trump's denial comes soon as a war of words between the two figures continues to escalate. 'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the US Government,' Trump stated in a post on Truth Social. 'This is not so! I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!," he noted, adding, 'The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us.' "We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!" he stated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Elon Musk opposed Trump's 'One, Big Beautiful Bill' Trump's statement addresses ongoing speculation fueled by a public spat with Musk. The 'problems' between the pair reportedly began with Musk's opposition to a major spending bill – 'One, Big Beautiful Bill' – pushed forward by the President. The dispute intensified when the Tesla CEO brought up Trump's past association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In June, Trump had threatened to cut some of Musk's government contracts as their disagreement over the 'Big Beautiful Bill' deepened and their relationship visibly soured. This marked a shift, as Musk had previously chaired the president's Department of Government Efficiency and had contributed millions to Trump's re-election campaign. Musk says Tesla is facing a 'few rough quarters' On Wednesday (July 24), during a second-quarter earnings call, Musk indicated that Tesla could face 'a few rough quarters' due to upcoming tariff costs and the expiration of federal electric vehicle benefits at the end of September. Earlier the same day, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had also suggested that the current administration was not keen on federal agencies collaborating with Musk's artificial intelligence startup, xAI . Realme 15 Pro: Flagship Features for Less? AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
MPs, diplomats hail Operation Sindoor, asks world to pressure Pakistan to stop terror
Ahead of the debate in parliament on Operation Sindoor , eminent parliamentarians, diplomats, and defence experts hailed the military strikes on terror hubs in Pakistan and asked the world to intensify pressure on Pakistan to stop cross-border terrorism . Taking a subtle swipe at Congress which is trying to corner the government over some issues regarding Operation Sindoor, BJP MP Aparajita Sarangi said that Sindoor-like strong retaliatory action should have been taken after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Management Leadership MCA Technology Finance Digital Marketing Artificial Intelligence others Project Management Cybersecurity Product Management Data Analytics Design Thinking healthcare Data Science Others Public Policy Data Science Healthcare MBA CXO Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK GMPBE India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta CERT-IIMC APSPM India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK General Management Programme India Starts on undefined Get Details 'What happened on the 7th of May, under the name of Operation Sindoor and the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and senior leaders, should have occurred after the Mumbai attacks in 2008,' Sarangi said at a conference in New Delhi on July 23. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Things Women Should NEVER Wear! Sarangi, BJP MP from Bhubaneswar, also confirmed that the ceasefire resulted from 'mutual discussion and mutual deliberation' between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of Pakistan and India, thereby repudiating repeated claims of the US to have brokered the ceasefire. The conference titled 'Decoding Operation Sindoor: New Normal, New Doctrine,' marking three months since the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, was organised by Centre for Global India Insights (CGII), a think tank focused on global affairs. Live Events More than a month after the Pahalgam terrorist attack, Sarangi travelled to Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea, Japan, and Singapore as part of a multi-party delegation of MPs to project India's viewpoint in the aftermath of 'Operation Sindoor. She underlined that the overarching thrust of multi-party delegations was to set the narrative straight. In a similar vein, Priyanka Chaturvedi, MP and national spokesperson of Shiv Sena (UBT), emphasized that the purpose of the all-party delegations was to strengthen India's fight against terrorism, which remains incomplete if the international community continues to provide aid through funding mechanisms that ultimately support terrorism funded by taxpayers' money. 'This calibrated paradigm-shifting retaliation against the butchers of Pahalgam, which took barely 22 minutes, ended decades of strategic patience, ushering in a new era of offensive defence. The military strikes by India vividly sent the signal that that from now onwards, it will be blood for blood,' said Manish Chand, CEO, Centre for Global India Insights. 'Operation Sindoor is still on; India cannot afford to let its guards down. Eternal vigilance is the only way to go,' he said. Brij Lal, a former IPS officer-turned politician, lauded bold action taken by the government in the form of Operation Sindoor and criticised previous governments who would simply 'condemn' acts of terror in the past. He emphasized that India will respond decisively to every attack on its forces and citizens. Lal, Member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha), proposed the construction of a Sindoor memorial at Baisaran Valley as a symbol of the historic operation, which the Prime Minister agreed to under his own signature. Former Member of Parliament. Amar Patnaik urged the audience not to view Operation Sindoor merely as a military response to an act of terror, noting that there are various ways to respond, with military action being the last resort. Sujan Chinoy, Director General, Manohar Parrikar Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses who also travalled to different countries, as part of multi-party delegations, emphasized the importance of traditional intelligence gathering, building secure communication, and relying on domestic real-time location updates. He called for the development of domestic standards and certification of defense equipment to truly make India 'Atmanirbhar' in the defence sector. Calling for enhanced readiness to prepare for the spectrum of conflict, not only conventional but also cyber, grey-zone, Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Syed Ata Hasnain underlined that Operation Sindoor was not a reactive action, but part of a well-thought-out effort to shape the battle space. This is deterrence by punishment, yes, but also by denial, deception, and disruption.' Air Vice Marshal (Retd.) Anil Golani, Director General, Centre for Air Power Studies (CAPS) pointed out that India achieved not only tactical success but also psychological ascendancy from Operation Sindoor. 'Our adversaries, and even our allies, now recalibrate their perception of India's threshold,' he said. He called for strengthening jointness among the tri-services, stating that the future demands integration not only of command structures but also of narratives, data, and objectives.
