Republican senators confirm former Trump lawyer to lifetime judgeship over objection of Democrats, whistleblowers
Bove's nomination to the bench for the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals was one of the most controversial of Trump's appointments so far, especially within the legal community, where intense opposition from hundreds of former Justice Department prosecutors and dozens of former judges emerged in recent weeks.
Still, materials brought forward to the Senate Judiciary Committee by three whistleblowers were not enough to derail Bove's nomination. Taken together, the complaints portrayed Bove at Trump's Justice Department as a leader frustrated with underlings as he pressured them to align with the president's policies even if he faced significant opposition, according to multiple people familiar with whistleblower accusations.
The Senate approved the nomination 50-49, largely along party lines.
CNN has reached out to the Department of Justice but did not receive a response.
A Justice Department spokesman previously told CNN that Bove 'will make an excellent judge.'
'Emil Bove is a highly qualified judicial nominee who has done incredible work at the Department of Justice to help protect civil rights, dismantle Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and Make America Safe Again,' spokesperson Gates McGavick told CNN. 'He will make an excellent judge — the Department's loss will be the Third Circuit's gain.'
Among the accusations raised by whistleblowers in recent months were concerns over Bove's interactions with rank-and-file prosecutors.
In one case, at least some members of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee – the panel responsible for advancing Bove to a full Senate vote – were made aware of an audio recording of a meeting that Bove held with prosecutors earlier this year in which he pushed them to follow orders and dismiss the federal corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams, sources told CNN.
Democrats on the committee looked into whether the whistleblower's disclosures contradicted Bove's Senate testimony about the meeting and his denial that he threatened to punish prosecutors who refused to dismiss the Adams case in line with the administration's agenda. Sources have described the existence and substance of an audio recording to CNN, but CNN has not independently listened to it.
Two other whistleblowers went to the Senate Judiciary Committee with concerns about Bove's approach to the courts while pushing Trump's immigration agenda, which has at times deprived detainees of due process.
In the wake of some of the allegations against Bove, Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee walked out of a key vote earlier this month in protest. But Bove's nomination advanced over their opposition with all 12 Republicans on the panel voting to move it forward.
Leading up to the final vote Tuesday, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker said he had obtained new documentation related to Bove's alleged actions, claiming to have 'substantive information' to share with his colleagues about the nomination and inviting them to view it for themselves.
The Washington Post on Monday and Tuesday also described a whistleblower around the Adams case who provided documentation to the Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that Bove had misled the Senate.
Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary panel, accused Republicans of pushing the confirmation vote too quickly in light of the new allegations.
'It appears my Republican colleagues fear the answers,' he said ahead of Bove's final vote.
But Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley said Tuesday that his office looked into the whistleblower allegations, as well as followed up with additional interviews, but found no misconduct by Bove.
The Iowa Republican pushed back against the allegations and criticisms lodged against Bove, saying Senate Democrats had 'crossed the line' in their attacks and had not shared whistleblower documentation in a timely manner.
'This timeline raises serious concerns, and it's legitimate to raise them as a major problem,' Grassley said from the Senate floor just hours before the full chamber voted on Bove's confirmation. 'If my Democratic colleagues wanted to investigate allegations, they should have come to this senator and we could have vetted the allegations in good faith together.'
Grassley's office also told CNN they were not aware of one of the whistleblower's claims until media reports surfaced Friday. They did not meet with that person's lawyers until Monday, even though they had made themselves available to meet earlier, the senator's office told CNN.
In the end, the whistleblowers' disclosures were not enough to prompt the public release of the Adams case recording or its transcripts.
While nearly all Republican senators stood behind the president's nominee and criticized the timeline by which the most recent whistleblower came forward, a few in the party raised concerns.
GOP Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine opposed Bove's nomination during procedural votes last week. Collins released a statement at the time saying she could not trust that he would act as an 'impartial jurist' if confirmed. The pair ultimately voted with Democrats against his confirmation.
But key Republicans, including Sen. Thom Tillis – who previously was central to the withdrawal of another Trump legal nominee, Ed Martin, for DC US attorney — were willing to advance Bove's nomination and ultimately voted to confirm him.
Tillis previously had gauged Trump nominees by their responses on the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack, drawing a red line when Martin didn't denounce the violence.
On Bove, Tillis said earlier this month, 'The staff gave me a yes recommendation, until I have a reason otherwise. He didn't trip the switch on January 6.'
CNN has reached out to Tillis' office for comment Tuesday.
Trump nominated Bove in May to become a judge on the US Circuit Court of Appeals, which oversees federal precedent in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.
Before joining the Justice Department this year, Bove served as a private defense attorney for Trump responding to multiple criminal indictments, including one in New York City. The president then hand-picked him, alongside several of his other private attorneys, to fill leadership roles in the Justice Department.
The Adams case has long been part of the discussion around Bove's fitness for the federal bench. As Bove pushed for its dismissal earlier this year, a half-dozen Justice Department prosecutors resigned rather than follow his orders.
Some who resigned said they believed Bove's direction to dismiss the case was intended to coax Adams to support the Trump administration's hardline immigration policy enforcement in New York City. A federal judge ultimately dismissed the charges against Adams.
More recently, a whistleblower emerged around a separate series of events related to Bove giving directions to line attorneys working on immigration cases.
The whistleblower, former Justice Department immigration attorney Erez Reuveni, alleged Bove told other Department lawyers they may need to tell courts 'f**k you.'
Bove said in his congressional testimony that he didn't recall if he made the 'f**k you' comment at the March 14 immigration attorneys' meeting.
Another whistleblower has made claims to the Justice Department's watchdog that Bove suggested others in the department could ignore court orders during a contentious legal battle in an immigration case.
CNN's Morgan Rimmer contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Texas GOP issues arrest warrants in redistricting showdown with Democrats
Texas Democrats who have taken refuge in blue states to protest GOP-led redistricting in the Lone Star State face civil arrest warrants after missing a legislative session on Monday. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) signed the warrants, which allow for the Democrats' arrests, as Gov. Greg Abbott on Monday called their protest 'crazy bluster' and said the state would push ahead with redrawing maps. 'Democrats are freaking out because they are realizing Texas has the authority to redistrict, and we're going to do so in a way that's going to lead to these additional seats that will vote Republican, and they will be serving in Congress in the next session,' Abbott told Fox News's Sean Hannity on Monday night. Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin told CNN on Monday night that Republicans are getting what they asked for: 'Donald Trump, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, they said they wanted a showdown. And guess what? That's exactly what they're getting. A showdown.' The Texas House needs two-thirds of its members present to vote; Democrats' absence has deprived the chamber of that quorum. It will convene its second legislative day, likely without Democrats, on Tuesday. In Washington, President Trump is set to join CNBC for an interview Tuesday morning and sign an executive order on later in the afternoon. Just days ahead of his new tariff scheme taking effect and in the wake of a weak jobs report, he faces concern from Republicans on Capitol Hill. Catch up here:


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas Democrat: Trump ‘demanding' allies ‘rig' midterms for him
Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) said during a recent interview that President Trump is 'demanding' allies to 'rig' the 2026 midterms for him and argued that by redrawing the Congressional district in Austin, lawmakers are violating the Voting Rights Act. 'This is a five-alarm fire for our democracy. Donald Trump is the most corrupt president in American history, and he has no plan for winning the upcoming midterm elections,' Casar, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said Monday night on CNN. 'So, he essentially is demanding that his cronies rig those elections for him in this corrupt scheme.' 'That's why I'm so proud of the Texas Democrats who are showing the entire nation what it looks like to fight by going out across the country. We need everyone viewing at home, across America to say, even if we may have our differences on some issues,' the lawmaker told 'The Source' host Kaitlan Collins. 'At the end of the day, we should have the voters pick their politicians, not have politicians pick their voters.' He added, 'Donald Trump should not get to pick who your member of Congress is.' The redistricting tussle intensified on Monday as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) ordered the Democrats who fled the Lone Star State to be arrested. Over 50 state-level Democrats have left Texas, breaking quorum and hoping to wait out until the special legislative session ends. The move is a bid to stall the Republicans' effort to pass a mid-decade redistricting plan. Trump has blessed the effort, saying he would like the GOP to gain five seats in Texas in the 2026 midterms. Democrats who have left the state have fired back at Abbott for arrest threats and the redistricting efforts, while Democratic Party governors have warned they could retaliate similarly in their states. 'If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us no choice; we must do the same,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said on Monday. Casar, who represents Texas's 35th congressional district — which encompasses parts of East Austin — said the push to draw the lines of his district is a violation of the Voting Rights Act 'It disenfranchises the Latino voters that have a protected district here in Central Texas, and if Donald Trump is allowed to shred the Voting Rights Act here in Austin,' Casar said. 'He wants to spread that across America, just like you mentioned Kaitlan in Missouri or in Louisiana, or who knows where else.'


Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Where Homeowners Benefit Most from Capital Gains Tax Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Blue states, including California and Washington, are among those that stand to benefit the most from President Donald Trump's idea to eliminate the federal capital gains tax on home sales, according to a new study. A proposal to abolish the tax was first pushed forward by Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene last month and then echoed by Trump, who told reporters on July 22 that he was "thinking about…no tax on capital gains on houses." While it is not yet clear if the president's suggestion may lead to a real change in the way home sales are taxed by the government, real estate brokerage Redfin has calculated that homeowners in California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Washington, and New Jersey, in this order, would benefit the most from the abolition of the capital gains tax. What Is the Federal Capital Gains Tax on Home Sales—and Why Does Trump Want To Abolish It? Homeowners who sell a property where they have been living for longer than a year may have to pay capital gains taxes if they sell their property for more than they originally purchased it for. Capital gains taxes are a portion of the profit made by homeowners through the years that their property has appreciated in value. At the moment, capital gains taxes are limited by a cap. Homeowners who have lived in a home as their primary residence for at least 24 months in the five years before the sale receive an exemption on the first $250,000 of gains for individuals and $500,000 for married couples filing jointly. This cap, however, has not been updated since it was introduced in 1997 nor adjusted for inflation—leading many experts to support urgent changes to the exclusion. "It is not indexed for inflation. In real terms, the exclusion has gone down over these last 20-something years," William McBride, Chief Economist & Stephen J. Entin Fellow in Economics at the Tax Foundation, told Newsweek. "The high inflation we had in recent years, during the pandemic and consequently, is one of the things that has caused a lot of home price appreciation." While this is a problem that typically affects wealthier homeowners the most, the rapid appreciation that occurred during the pandemic homebuying frenzy means that "this is no longer just a concern for high-end properties," Shannon McGahn, executive vice president and chief advocacy officer at the National Association of Realtors (NAR), told Newsweek. According to a recent report by NAR, nearly 29 million homeowners, about one-third of the U.S. market, already face potential capital gains taxes if they sell, "and that number is expected to climb sharply over the next decade," McGahn said. If no change is made to the way capital gains are taxed, nearly 70 percent of homeowners could exceed the $250,000 cap, according to NAR. "A sizable portion of homeowners, especially in states with high home prices that have grown quickly, are sitting on more than the $250k/$500k of capital gains that are exempt from capital gains taxes," Chen Zhao, head of economics research at Redfin, previously told Newsweek. "These homeowners generally have owned their homes for a long period of time, but in some places, people are exceeding the current capital gains exemptions solely based on appreciation during the pandemic." Trump has hinted at the idea of abolishing the capital gains tax on home sales as a solution to the ongoing affordability crisis in the U.S. housing market. On July 22, he told reporters that "if the Fed would lower the rates, we wouldn't even have to do that." Greene has framed the tax as an "unfair burden" hurting the "American dream." Which States Will Benefit the Most—and the Least According to Redfin, more than a quarter of homes across the U.S. have gained at least $250,000 in value since the last time they were purchased, with 8 percent having gained more than $500,000. The owners of these homes are the ones that stand to benefit by a potential elimination of the capital gains tax. By the same reasoning, the states where homeowners stand to gain from the abolition of the tax are those where homes have appreciated the most in recent decades. These include some of the most expensive housing markets in the country: California and Hawaii. In the Golden State, the median home value is $766,896 and the typical capital gain of all homes is $332,659, according to Redfin. A total of 62.3 percent of homes in the state have gained at least $250,000 since they were last sold—the highest share of any state in the nation. One in three (33 percent) have gained more than $500,000. Hawaii followed with 61 percent of homes having gained more than $250,000 in value since they were last sold, while 34.6 percent gained over $500,000. The overall capital gain was even higher than that of California, however, at $338,346. The top five states that would benefit most from the abolition of the federal capital gains tax also include Massachusetts, Washington and New Jersey, with respectively 58.4 percent, 54.1 percent, and 52.2 percent of homes that have gained at least $250,000 in value since they were last sold. Do you think abolishing the federal capital gains tax on home sales is a good or bad idea? Let me know your opinion by emailing The states where homeowners would benefit the least from the change, on the other hand, are Mississippi, North Dakota, Iowa, Oklahoma and Wyoming, which have seen the smallest share of homes that have appreciated over $250,000 in the country, respectively at 1.2 percent, 2.2 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.1 percent and 3.4 percent. What Would Be the Impact of Eliminating the Capital Gains Tax? According to experts, eliminating the federal capital gains tax could have a positive impact on the U.S. housing market, unlocking homes that homeowners were previously holding on to to avoid a high fiscal burden. "Ending the capital gains tax could potentially spur some sales by removing a barrier to selling. Home sales have been in a slump for the past couple years, and this might nudge some sellers to consider," Bankrate's Jeff Ostrowski told Newsweek. "However, the tax burden is far from the main cause of the housing market slowdown." Some experts fear that such a move could have unwanted consequences. "Ongoing affordability issues could be exacerbated by abolishing this tax as it could fuel demand and lead to a more competitive housing market, especially where supply is constrained," Hannah Jones, senior economist at told Newsweek. "Removing this tax would favor wealthy owners which could worsen equity inequality and make the market even more challenging for low-to-mid-earning buyers." McBride also said the measure does not address another cause of home price appreciation in recent years: the lack of supply. "There's a shortage of supply and that's the fundamental problem that needs to be addressed directly. This proposal does not address that," he said. "We have a penalty on investment in housing, on the supply of housing, due to its tax treatment through our depreciation system. That should be addressed, that's the way to directly address this."