logo
Visit Copenhagen to unlock the secrets to happiness: great food, self-assured style and bicycles

Visit Copenhagen to unlock the secrets to happiness: great food, self-assured style and bicycles

Irish Times26-05-2025

It's the bicycles you notice first when you arrive after the 15-minute journey by metro from Copenhagen Airport into Kongens Nytorv, the large cobbled square in Copenhagen city centre.
Cycling with confidence and speed along cycle lanes that run between the footpaths and roads, these bipedal owners seem to be going in all directions but the pedestrians, bus drivers and the trickle of cars seem to understand the hierarchy.
The bicycle is king in the Danish capital, and you'll see adults carrying children, shopping and sometimes even another adult on their bikes. We even witnessed two people transporting a sofa on a large front carrier of a bicycle during our visit.
Copenhagen is one of the best cycling cities in the world, and is nearing its goal of becoming a carbon neutral city by 2025 with more cyclists than cars.
READ MORE
Although smartphones have made paper maps almost obsolete for most of us, one of my favourite things to do when I arrive in a new city is to wander aimlessly with a paper map. Somehow it gives you a different perspective on the city, Copenhagen included, allowing you to discover a low-key place to eat along the interconnecting lakes that divide the city centre (Indre By) to Norrebro in the north, or a stylish coffee shop in the elegant streets of Frederiksberg in the west, or the vintage shops in the slightly grittier streets of Vesterbro in the south.
We spent our first day of three walking through elegant palace yards (and even caught the formal changing of the guard, which happens at noon every day at Amalienborg Palace), along pedestrian shopping streets, into city gardens, past monumental museums and crossing over canals.
Copenhagen: Nyhavn at sunset. Photograph: iStock
There is plenty to see in Copenhagen beyond the brightly coloured facades of restaurants and bars in Nyhavn, the new harbour area, which is a magnet for tourists. And since the city streets aren't dominated by motorised vehicles, spending time here is a less stressful experience than in other car-clogged places.
But all those bicycles are hard to ignore, so we decided to do as the Danes do and hired some on day two. Travelling at a slower pace than the locals, cycling allowed us to cover more ground and explore further.
We opted to cycle north of Nyhavn along the harbour side to see the statue of the Little Mermaid, one of the symbols of Copenhagen. Perched on a rock near Churchill Park, the tiny sculpture by Edward Eriksen was inspired by ballerina Ellen Price, who in 1909 danced the leading role in a ballet based on the Hans Christian Andersen's 19th-century fairy tale.
The Little Mermaid at the harbour in Copenhagen on October 9, 2015. Photograph: Odd Andersen/AFP via Getty
Bicycles are a great way to explore the outer reaches of the city too. And while Christianshavn, with its famous hippie quarter, Freetown Christiania, is perhaps not as relaxed as it was in previous decades (Pusher Street, where cannabis was openly sold despite being illegal in Denmark, was closed down in 2024 after gang-related violence), it still draws tourists.
Freetown Christiania. Photograph: Getty
We cycled north to the former industrial site at Refshaleoen, passing by the world-famous restaurant Noma, in its low-key site surrounded by glasshouses and wetlands. We were in awe of the new residential buildings in this expanding quarter.
Onwards we went to see the floating student houses at Urban Ritter, passing another urban farm and one of Copenhagen's coolest restaurants, La Banchina. Gro Spiseri, also surrounded by an urban farm in Osterbro district, is another popular eating spot with sustainability credentials.
And, not to be overshadowed, Copenhagen's waste to energy plant, Copenhill – another short cycle away – also attracts visitors to ski down its purpose-built ski slope or rock climb, and the views are spectacular from its rooftop cafe on a clear day. This whole Amager quarter has undergone urban renewal with lots of striking residential buildings.
Although we arrived too early in the season to indulge in the warm evening atmosphere, I have fond memories of a previous visit, sitting close to the stunning Opera House, eating street food from the popular, Reffen Street Food Market. Broens Street Food (Bridge Street Kitchen), just over the Inderhavn's bridge on the Christiania side, is another popular outdoor eating spot where everyone can grab a dish of their choice. The indoors Tivoli Food Market near the central train station is an good option for rainy days. Smørrebrød – open sandwiches with rye bread loaded high with everything from herring to roast beef – are a must.
Smørrebrød with prawns, chives, dill, lemon slices and edible flowers. Photograph: Getty
Organic food is a big thing in Denmark; a quarter of all food sold in Copenhagen is organic, and due to a a government policy, it makes up 88 per cent of food served in schools, hospitals and other public institutions.
We didn't have deep enough pockets to sample the many Michelin star restaurants, but the pastries in the artisan bakeries were too hard to resist. A cube-shaped pastry filled with pistachio cream and an excellent almond croissant were among the highlights.
There is also a rich choice of museums – from Danish 19th- and 20th-century art in the Hirschspurng Collection just north of the National Gallery, to the Museum of Danish Resistance, to the tiny Happiness Museum with its focus on wellbeing and quality of life. Although it rains a lot and the winters are long, the Danes are deemed to be among the happiest nationalities in the world.
We opted to visit the Danish Design Museum, housed in a former city-centre hospital with a stunning courtyard garden. With exhibitions on patterns, lamps and table setting through the ages and 19th- and 20th-century chairs, it is a great place to gain an understanding of the key principles of Danish design, which first came to international prominence in the mid 1950s and continues to flourish.
Copenhagen takes its design seriously, and although you mightn't get beyond a glimpse through apartment windows to see how the residents live, you can wander through the numerous furniture design showrooms antique shops, clothing boutiques and art galleries at your leisure.
If you have more time, there are lots of other museums, including the Louisiana Museum of Modern Art, which would require a day trip from the city centre.
And, as mentioned, the contemporary architecture in this city is so striking that Copenhagen is the Unesco-UIA World Capital of Architecture from 2023-2026. You'll see most of it as you wander by, but essential buildings to keep an eye out for include the Black Diamond Royal Library on the harbour, the nearby Blox Danish Architecture Centre, the Royal Danish Playhouse and of course the Opera House.
Finally, if you're travelling in the summer months, pack your swimming gear and join locals in one of the seven swimming spots on the harbour. Proud of the cleanliness of the harbour water, taking a lunchtime dip is as popular as weekend trips to places such as Island Brygge. You can also rent boats (
goboat.dk
) to tour the harbour and canals in your own time afterwards.
visitcopenhagen.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

To normalise invective against cyclists is to miss the point spectacularly
To normalise invective against cyclists is to miss the point spectacularly

Irish Times

time3 days ago

  • Irish Times

To normalise invective against cyclists is to miss the point spectacularly

I noticed the alignment of three articles in this paper in the last week. One was about how Ireland is likely to fail to meet its international commitment to reduce carbon emissions. One was about the unfamiliar pleasures of cycling in Copenhagen . One was a polemic against cyclists and their presence on mixed-use paths. The last was very popular and stimulated letters to the Editor about the iniquities of cyclists. We are too fast and too quiet. We frighten pedestrians. We should stay on the roads, with cars and lorries, where we belong. I don't cycle on the pavement for the same reasons that I avoid driving in city centres. I'm afraid of hurting someone. But when I'm tempted to ride where I shouldn't, it's usually because I've run out of safe road. Roadworks invariably close bike lanes and never make alternative provision. You can get off and walk or jostle drivers already annoyed by the disruption. Some junctions are obvious death-traps for cyclists, and others have special provision that rely on sensors that don't always work. [ The aggressive speed and silence of cyclists is a cultural problem that needs tackling in Ireland Opens in new window ] In other countries, I've cycled for pleasure as well as transport. I don't do that in Ireland because rural roads are too dangerous, but it's obvious to me why greenways might be busy: there are very, very few of them. There are also, compared with most European countries, very few public footpaths and hiking trails. I respect the postcolonial reasons for Irish landowners' resistance to the footpaths and bike tracks that criss-cross the hills, fields and woods of most of the Continent, but one result is heavier use of the existing few. READ MORE It's not comfortable to have cyclists and pedestrians mingling. The whole point of a bicycle is that it allows you to move faster than you can walk. Bikes are, indeed, quieter than cars, because they are not burning fossil fuel. No noise or air pollution, no disturbance of wildlife. We are, apparently, required to ring bells as we approach walkers, but not abruptly. A small, apologetic tinkle is correct. Anything louder smacks of aggression, like a car horn. I have ridden bikes almost daily for more than 40 years, all of them with bells. I am not musical so it's probably my failing that I never achieved control of the tone of these bells; I'm sure a more skilful percussionist could express the required range of emotion. My bike bells make a noise or don't, depending on the rain. I use them before crossing a pavement on a blind corner, or when I see someone about to step off a kerb into the bike lane. If, as often, that person is using earbuds or headphones, it doesn't work, and I wonder how many of the collisions between pedestrians and cyclists involve such scenarios. [ You'd be genuinely mad to buy an SUV unless you need it - just look at latest climate and safety figures Opens in new window ] The bike lanes of Copenhagen, like those of most cities, separate pedestrians from cyclists. There are also cross-country bike trails all over Denmark, connecting every town and city on routes that allow small children and elders to ride fearlessly. You can put your bike on the bus or train for longer commutes. The same is true of Belgium, the Netherlands, much of France and Germany. There are separate networks of hiking paths. You can – I do – run on the paved bike trails, but if you want to saunter there is other provision. We won't reduce carbon emissions or air pollution or deaths on the road by driving cars. Cars make us and our surroundings sick. At the moment, we have infrastructure that also makes them necessary, but the problem is the infrastructure, not the individuals doing their best to get themselves and their families through the day. I don't blame drivers for driving – no one would drive in Dublin for fun, and in much of rural Ireland there's no safe alternative even for the shortest journeys. People respond reasonably to unreasonable situations. Normalising invective against cyclists directs anger away from the structures of power and towards vulnerable human bodies. Some people will always need motorised transport and their needs should be generously met, but for most of us – just like for most Dutch, Belgian and Danish people – cycling and walking could be safe, clean, healthy and most importantly pleasurable ways of getting around. Playing divide-and-conquer between forms of active transport and outdoor activity only distracts us all from the most urgent problem of all, which is the climate emergency.

What can Irish aviation learn from the carbon-reducing experience of New Zealand?
What can Irish aviation learn from the carbon-reducing experience of New Zealand?

Irish Times

time05-06-2025

  • Irish Times

What can Irish aviation learn from the carbon-reducing experience of New Zealand?

'We've reduced our Scope One and Scope Two emissions by 94 per cent since we started, so we're down now to a footprint of 280 tonnes.' Those are the words of Claire Waghorn, the sustainable transition leader of Christchurch Airport in New Zealand , which has just been awarded Level 5 status of Airport Carbon Accreditation, the highest level yet awarded. What does all that mean? Aviation and air travel are going to be one of the hardest sectors of our economy to decarbonise. It's more or less physically impossible to take a big, or even a medium, jet aircraft and make it electric. The physics just won't let you. Keep the aircraft light enough to fly and you won't have enough battery power to get much farther than the airport car park. Put in enough batteries and the aircraft will be too heavy to even get off the ground. New Zealand, like Ireland, is utterly dependent on air transport for anyone who wants to go to another country, or visit from one. Indeed, it could be said to be even more dependent on aviation: at least in Ireland you can catch a ferry, however slow it might be, to Britain or France. In New Zealand if you're on a ferry you're just going to another part of New Zealand. The challenges involved in getting the carbon out of flying are simply enormous. To get to net-zero emissions by 2050, the world's airlines will need an estimated 450 billion litres of sustainable aviation fuel, made from a mixture of biofuels and hydrogen combined with carbon. Right now, only 125 million litres or so are being made each year, an almost literal drop in the ocean. READ MORE Given that, you'd expect Waghorn to be downcast about the prospects but nothing could be farther from the truth. 'It's not without its massive challenges' she admits to The Irish Times. 'Some of those are behavioural, in that we've got a whole bunch of people who've become very used to the accessibility of flying and they have an expectation that they deserve that as part of their lifestyles. 'Then we have the debates over electrification versus sustainable aviation fuel. But the way I see it is that these are all challenges, but none of them are technical impossibilities. What they do have is a lack of prioritising. 'I believe that it's not impossible, but we're not prioritising it collectively as a society. Equally, I think it's our job to be relentless about where we're trying to get and keeping on, no matter how many barriers pop up, or how devastating the news can be sometimes, in relation to climate inaction, I think it's our job to just keep finding a way to progress.' Christchurch Airport has certainly progressed. When we speak about Scope One and Scope Two emissions, that means the carbon emissions caused by the operations of the airport itself, so essentially those emissions over which an airport authority will have direct control. Scope Three and Four are those emissions from the aircraft and from people travelling to and from the airport, but more on those in a moment. What Waghorn and her team has done is to look at the airport and its operations as a little ecosystem of its own, and to start working on each piece, bit by bit. So 400 hectares of airport land have been given over to a solar farm, which is due to produce 170 megawatts of electricity. The airport itself uses about 5MW, so this is power that can be used by the surrounding community or it could, potentially, be directed to the production of sustainable aviation fuel at some point, using that electricity to separate hydrogen from water, and combine it with captured carbon – the Holy Grail of liquid fuel energy. Christchurch has formed a 'hydrogen consortium' with Air New Zealand to begin work on just that. Production is, if at all, a long, long way off but right now the airport and the airline are starting to work out what's needed, and where the building blocks need to be put in place. That's big-picture stuff but, as Waghorn says, there has been action on smaller items, such as replacing diesel generators with heat pumps, and swapping out 18 of their 19-strong ground-support vehicle fleet for electrically-powered vehicles. Even the Christchurch Airport fire service isn't immune from the transition – one electric fire truck is already in service, and more will follow. 'What served us really well was a framework where the responsibility rested with the different business units. Every part of the business had to answer to what they could impact or what they could take action on to lower our emissions' said Waghorn. One thing that Christchurch has not done is to impose a passenger cap. As the DAA , which runs Dublin Airport , points out, the will-it/won't-it passenger cap in Dublin isn't strictly speaking about emissions, it's about infrastructure and noise, but it's not difficult to envisage a carbon justification for a similar cap in years to come. It's a difficult decision that may well have to be made at some point. Waghorn says capping may have to be done but it needs to be carefully considered. 'We talked about a passenger cap at Christchurch' she says. 'But we also talked about the challenge of unintended consequences, such as instead of people flying to Christchurch, they just fly to Auckland or Queenstown instead. 'The problem is that when you put on a cap, the danger is that the passengers and the emissions just pop out somewhere else instead. I'm not totally against caps but the reason it hasn't come up as a conversation for us is that we are so utterly reliant on aviation.' Christchurch handles around five to six million passengers a year, compared with Dublin's 33-odd million, but are there lessons to be learned from New Zealand's experience? Perhaps, not least Waghorn's warning that capped passengers (or their emissions) have a habit of finding their way elsewhere in the system. 'That's especially problematic for island nations like us that don't have alternative options such as road and rail' says DAA director of communications Sarah Ryan. 'Plus tourism is one of our biggest indigenous sectors. 'Aircraft are the ultimate movable asset and capping in one place simply moves the emissions elsewhere, along with the jobs, etc that aviation generates. It's recognised that aviation is a hard-to-abate sector but technological improvements and alternative fuels are the way to go to address that, with supports and incentives to encourage it, not caps.' Dublin Airport and Christchurch have previously touched base on this very subject, Ryan says. 'We've previously had conversations with Christchurch on their sustainability approach, and we have found that they share much of the same challenges as us. 'There also seems to be an impression out there that only flights that land in Dublin emit carbon and somehow if they land at a different Irish airport, they don't. Clearly that is not the case. Attempting to duplicate routes at all regional airports rather than concentrating some on one hub which people have good access to is also against sustainability and efficiency principles. 'If you want to look at New Zealand, where I lived for three years in the noughties, there is a lot of intercountry flying as it is such a long country, never mind that it is over two islands. When I lived in Wellington, it was a nine-hour drive to Auckland (642km away); you definitely would want to fly that. Driving from Shannon to Dublin is 223km in comparison.' Dublin Airport recently opened a solar farm of its own, with 15,000 panels contributing a potential seven gigawatt-hours to nine gigawatt-hours annually. Even so, with that and with planned solar expansions, DAA still reckons that only 20 per cent of the airport's power needs will come from solar energy by 2030. With Dublin Airport currently holding a Level 3 Airport Carbon Accreditation rating, and with links to and from the airport still totally reliant on road transport of one form or another, it will clearly be some time before Dublin catches up with Christchurch. And that is before even considering the elephant-shaped cloud in the room: aircraft emissions.

DJ Annie Mac is boarding the UK slow-travel movement to save the planet and Ireland should follow suit
DJ Annie Mac is boarding the UK slow-travel movement to save the planet and Ireland should follow suit

Irish Times

time02-06-2025

  • Irish Times

DJ Annie Mac is boarding the UK slow-travel movement to save the planet and Ireland should follow suit

DJ Annie Mac is taking the train to Glastonbury this year. The Irish performer, whose real name is Annie Macmanus , joins a group of other artists playing at the Somerset festival who have all pledged to ditch the car in support of a new campaign entitled 'I came by train'. 'The point is to get people just to think a little bit harder about how they are getting places,' said the former BBC Radio1 DJ on her Instagram account last week. 'Can you get the train, can you get an affordable ticket, instead of getting the car, because by doing that, it's 67 per cent less polluting than getting in the car.' READ MORE Supported by the train app Trainline, the 'I came by train' campaign asks people to do their bit for the environment by pledging to switch one car journey to a train journey. Macmanus has joined fellow Glastonbury acts including Self Esteem and Sam Ryder in making the pledge to get there by train. By travelling on the train from London's Paddington station to Castle Cary, the nearest station to Glastonbury, festival-goers will save 12.8kg of carbon dioxide compared to those driving, according to the 'I came by train' carbon calculator. Travel from Holyhead to Castle Cary by train instead of by car and you'll save 31.5kg of carbon dioxide. Taking about six hours and about three changes, that route isn't going to be practical for everyone. But you don't have to be going to Glastonbury to do the right thing. Just swap one car journey to train, any journey at all, the campaign asks. From rising temperatures to water shortages, marine heatwaves to gorse fires and floods, the planet is clearly struggling. We know we need to change how we do things, but it can be hard to know where to start. And if a billionaire can send five celebrities on a space tourism-promoting flight , the emissions from which scientists say will contribute to global-heating and ozone depletion, why, you might ask, should you put yourself out by taking the train? But whataboutery really isn't going to get us anywhere. That's why, despite the gigantic problems, the unchecked corporate greed and the ambivalence of some governments, many people are still trying every day with small acts to do the right thing – from eschewing a disposable coffee cup, to taking a shorter shower, to switching off a light. How we travel has a big impact on carbon emissions and going car-free is the most effective way to reduce your carbon footprint. Almost one-fifth of greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland come from transport. Road transport accounts for nearly 95 per cent of transport emissions and passenger cars account for half of all road transport emissions. Buses and trains have lower carbon emissions per passenger kilometre than cars and can carry more people per trip, thereby saving a large amount of CO2. A typical train from Cork to Dublin, for example, replaces 90 cars on Irish roads and saves 1.6 tonnes of CO2 for every journey, according to Department of Transport figures. There were 215,333 passenger journeys across the Irish rail network in a single day in 2024, according to the National Transport Authority (NTA). Indeed, the numbers travelling by rail here are rising fast, with 38.5 million passenger journeys across the network in 2022 rising to 45.5 million in 2023 and about 51 million last year, according to Iarnród Éireann figures. If some of those train journeys are replacing car journeys, that's saving on emissions. [ What are Ireland's Greenest Places in 2025? Share the places you feel are contributing to a better environment Opens in new window ] [ Bruce Springsteen & E Street Band: Land of Hope & Dreams review – A roiling, righteous anti-Trump onslaught Opens in new window ] However, recent NTA fare increases on some routes feel like a regressive step. In April, the cost of a single cash fare from Greystones to Dublin Connolly rose from €3.90 to €5.10, and a return cash fare from €7.20 to €9.20, for example. Passengers need trains to be more reliable too. Relatively frequent weekend closures on some routes are causing frustration. Of course there are costs and delays with car travel too, and more emissions. If you're going somewhere this summer, you could be like Annie Mac and think a little bit more about how you get there. Whether you're dancing with Charli XCX at Malahide Castle, Billie Eilish at the 3Arena, or Oasis at Croke Park, you'll be doing the planet a favour if you travel by train.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store