How worried should Sask. people be about measles?
"I've never seen measles because it's not something that's been around," she said in the latest episode of CBC's This is Saskatchewan podcast. "Most of the time it's a viral infection that people get over pretty quick, but it can have really devastating consequences and that's why it's so scary."
Health experts say vaccination rates of 95 per cent would constitute good herd immunity, but in some geographic areas, vaccination rates could be as low as 40 or 50 per cent.
On top of that, half a dozen cases of measles have cropped up recently in Saskatchewan.
Statistics show one in four or five people who get measles will end up hospitalized, while one in a thousand could face encephalitis or inflammation around the brain, Kurji said, noting other long-term consequences include the risk of deafness or blindness.
Just how contagious is measles?
When calculating how contagious a disease is, experts use an R0 value, which is the number of people that one infected person will pass on a virus to, on average. For example, one person who got COVID would infect four to six other people on average. With measles, that number rises to 12 to 18 people.
"There's some statistics that say that 90 per cent of people who are exposed to it, if you're not vaccinated, are going to get results," Kurji said.
Saskatchewan's Chief Medical Health Officer Dr. Saqib Shahab stresses that for those that are unvaccinated, measles is the most highly contagious disease that exists. He also noted that measles has only shown up in 0.1 per cent of people who are fully protected with vaccines.
"If they do happen [in vaccinated people], it's a mild rash and it really doesn't transmit further," he said.
Shahab said the main concern from a public health standpoint is ensuring everyone is protected by making sure their vaccinations are up-to-date and complete. Adults born between 1970 and 1996 may have only received one vaccination and are encouraged to get a second booster shot at a public health clinic.
"If you're fully vaccinated, you should not be concerned," Shahab said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
7 hours ago
- CBC
P.E.I. program is helping parents of children with complex needs navigate health-care system
The Children with Complex Needs Navigation Program started in the winter. It was created in response to a Health P.E.I. survey done a few years ago that suggested most caregivers needed more support. As CBC's Sheehan Desjardins reports, one group says the program is already making a difference.
Vancouver Sun
9 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Renewing long-term care needs a balance of quality and quantity
Canada's long-term care sector is in the midst of an unprecedented boom, with federal and provincial governments investing billions to fund the development of new facilities. In Ontario, for example, the government has committed to building 30,000 beds by 2028. In B.C., plans are underway to replace or build 5,070 publicly subsidized beds by 2030. Similarly, Nova Scotia has committed to adding or modernizing 5,700 long-term care beds by 2032. To meet the demands of an aging population, the Canadian Medical Association has estimated that 199,000 new beds will be needed by 2035, costing $64 billion in capital. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. This investment is both urgent and necessary. But the investment requires more than beds alone. Building more beds has received far greater attention than supporting the care that residents need. Equal emphasis must be placed on improving quality of care, otherwise we risk scaling up the very problems we set out to solve. A clear example of this challenge is the ongoing use of antipsychotic medications in long-term care. These medications are often prescribed to manage behaviours in residents with dementia, even when there is no diagnosis, such as schizophrenia, that would warrant their use. This is considered inappropriate and can lead to serious harms, including sedation, falls, strokes and even death. Despite years of awareness and improvement efforts, Canada's rate of antipsychotic prescribing in long-term care has climbed following the COVID pandemic. Currently, 24.5 per cent of residents are prescribed these drugs when there is not a diagnosis to indicate their use. This is more than double the rate in the U.S. at 10 per cent and well above the 18 per cent in Australia and 15 per cent in Sweden. These differences point to a care system that is stretched thin, where medications are sometimes used as a substitute for time, training or resources to provide more personalized care. In response to these rising rates, a national coalition has set a target to reduce inappropriate antipsychotic use in Canadian long-term care homes to 15 per cent . Developed by an expert panel through a months-long consensus process, this is an achievable and necessary goal. But meeting it requires reinvestment not only in where care is delivered, but how it is delivered. This includes investing in training in behavioural support and dementia care. It means providing enough staffing hours, so care teams have the time to build relationships and understand resident needs. It also requires clear accountability supports in long-term care to sustain improvement efforts. We already know these approaches work. Across Canada, many homes have successfully implemented behavioural approaches that reduce reliance on medications while improving resident well-being. Music therapy, access to outdoor space, one-on-one engagement and meaningful recreational activities have all been shown to support residents with responsive behaviours without the need for antipsychotics. These approaches not only improve symptoms safely but treat residents with the care and dignity they deserve. Canada has an opportunity to renew long-term care. The success of this reinvestment must be measured not only by how many beds we add, but how well those beds are staffed, how care teams are supported, and how our residents are treated. Prioritizing quality alongside quantity is the only way to deliver not just more care, but better care. Dr. Wendy Levinson is chair of Choosing Wisely Canada and a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto.
Toronto Sun
a day ago
- Toronto Sun
LILLEY: CSA pushes for mandatory masking in all health settings
Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox A member of the medical staff listens as Montefiore Medical Center nurses call for N95 masks and other critical PPE to handle the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on April 1, 2020 in New York. (Photo by Bryan R. Smith / AFP) (Photo by BRYAN R. SMITH/AFP via Getty Images) Are you ready to wear a mask every time you visit your doctor or go to a hospital? That's a recommendation soon to come from the Canadian Standards Association backed by several activist groups. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The CSA is conducting public consultations on the issue until Aug. 19. The proposal would be that patients, staff and medical personnel would be required to wear an N95 respirator mask – not those little blue surgical masks – at all times. Part of the proposal would exempt some areas of a hospital; for example, if it was just in use by administrators and not open to patients. The activists backing this, though, believe that isn't good enough and want the exempt areas limited or done away with all together. The idea is likely to gain support from some groups but don't expect everyone in the medical community to be on board even though supporters claim this idea is backed by the best science. One specialist in the infectious disease area reached out to express their opposition, adding many doctors don't like this. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'It has caused massive waves in the infection control community because even they think it's ridiculous,' the doctor said. Thankfully, for those who believe in sanity, pronouncements from the CSA aren't binding on hospitals or doctors' offices. The CSA is a private organization and while a recommendation from the organization can carry some weight, it's not backed up by law. 'There are no plans to adopt or implement such a requirement in Ontario,' said Jackson Jacobs, a spokesperson for Health Minister Sylvia Jones. Alberta's health ministry also has no plans to make masks mandatory. 'At this time, decisions regarding mask use will continue to be guided by site-level leadership, provincial health agencies, and operational teams based on local context and clinical judgment,' a spokesperson for the province's Ministry of Primary and Preventative Health Services. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Masks have become very political since the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommended video We all know those people, on both sides of the divide, who can't let go of those dark days. For many it has resulted in not being able to function in public without wearing a mask. You can see these people walking along the street, through parks or driving their car all alone with a mask on. It's more of a security blanket and a political statement than a medical device. Still, supporters are dressing this idea up as settled science. An international coalition of highly political doctors calling themselves The World Health Network has been organizing a campaign to support making this measure mandatory. 'The World Health Network (WHN) supports the draft CSA Z94.4-25 standard, which establishes a science-based framework for the selection, use, and care of respirators across workplaces, including health care,' the WHN statement reads. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Let's be clear, the WHN believes that wearing N95 masks all day everyday should extend to other workplaces as well, but they are adamant in their support of a CSA guideline calling for mandatory use in health settings. 'It establishes that all health-care workers must wear respirators (minimum PL1) in health-care facilities and during delivery of care, except in designated low-risk zones determined by qualified airborne transmission risk assessment,' their statement reads. One of the backers of the WHN is a Calgary-area doctor named Joe Vipond. If that name rings a bell it's because during the pandemic, Vipond was a strong critic of the Kenney government, supported every stronger lockdowns and opposed any easing of restrictions. He was highly visible in the media without ever exposing his strong NDP ties, including nearly $20,000 in donations to the Alberta NDP. Now, he and his official sounding group want the CSA to recommend mandatory N95 masks in all health settings and then for governments to use their legal and regulatory authority to make that a reality. There are people who need to wear masks for health reasons; there is no medical basis for me to wear a mask for a doctor's appointment or in-patient service in a hospital. There is no need for nurses, doctors and support staff to be forced to wear these devices over a gruelling shift. Let's hope medical officials and provincial health authorities take a pass on this idea. Weird Opinion Columnists Columnists Toronto & GTA
