Department of Transportation Eases Safety Regulations for Self-Driving Cars
The DOT stated that it would expand the Automated Vehicle Exemption Program (AVEP)—which currently applies only to imported AVs—to include domestically-produced automated vehicles (AVs).
The program will exempt U.S. automakers from safety regulations for AVs intended for research or demonstration purposes,
'This Administration understands that we're in a race with China to out-innovate, and the stakes couldn't be higher,' Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy said in a
Duffy stated that the move is part of the DOT's innovation agenda to move the United States 'closer to a single national standard' that promotes innovation by removing barriers while also maintaining safety.
To maintain safety, NHTSA said that it will continue requiring vehicles with certain advanced driver assistance and automated driving systems to report crash incidents, and streamline the reporting process to remove 'unnecessary and duplicative requirements.'
Related Stories
2/7/2025
1/21/2025
NHTSA's chief counsel, Peter Simshauser, said the move would allow AV manufacturers to 'develop faster and spend less time on unnecessary process, while still advancing safety.'
The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association (AVIA) said in a
'We look forward to working with Secretary Duffy and his team to implement smart, forward-looking policies that will make our roads safer, expand mobility, strengthen supply chains, and drive American economic growth for generations to come,' AVIA CEO Jeff Farrah stated.
John Bozzella, president and CEO of Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said that the new framework would help ensure that the United States will not 'cede AV leadership to China and other countries.'
Bozzella added that the new framework for self-driving cars is 'overdue.' He said that the AV industry has been 'hamstrung by government inaction' in the past years.
'This technology works. It will help improve safety on the roads and increase mobility,' he said in a
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety voiced disappointment with the administration's move, emphasizing the need to enhance information on the safety of using self-driving cars on public roadways.
'The AV industry has been offering a myriad of promises, such as a reduction in crashes, more accessibility, less congestion and lower carbon emissions,' the agroup said in a
'However, troubling incidents have already occurred in the small number of cities in which they are currently deployed ... Without safeguards, safety regulations, transparency and accountability, the success of AV deployment is imperiled at best and could result in deadly consequences at worst.'
The Epoch Times has reached out to the DOT for comment on the group's concerns but did not receive a response by publication time.
In 2022, General Motors (GM) filed a petition with NHTSA seeking permission to deploy up to 2,500 self-driving vehicles annually without human controls such as brake pedals or mirrors. The automaker subsequently withdrew the petition last year after a lengthy government review had not been completed.
In December 2024, GM
Reuters contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
4 Things Schools Need To Consider When Designing AI Policies
Artificial intelligence has moved from Silicon Valley boardrooms into homes and classrooms across America. A recent Pew Research Center study reveals that 26% of American teenagers now utilize AI tools for schoolwork—twice the number from two years prior. Many schools are rushing to establish AI policies. The result? Some are creating more confusion than clarity by focusing solely on preventing cheating while ignoring broader educational opportunities AI presents. The challenge shouldn't be about whether to allow AI in schools—it should be about how to design policies that strike a balance between academic integrity and practical preparation for an AI-driven future. Here are four essential considerations for effective school AI policies. 1. Address Teacher AI Use, Not Just Student Restrictions The most significant oversight in current AI policies? They focus almost exclusively on what students can't do while completely ignoring teacher usage. This creates confusion and sends mixed messages to students and families. Most policies spend paragraphs outlining student restrictions, but fail to answer basic questions about educator usage: Can teachers use AI to create lesson plans? Are educators allowed to use AI for generating quiz questions or providing initial feedback on essays? What disclosure requirements exist when teachers use AI-generated content? When schools prohibit students from using AI while allowing teachers unrestricted access, the message becomes hypocritical. Students notice when their teacher presents an AI-generated quiz while simultaneously forbidding them from using AI for research. Parents wonder why their children face strict restrictions while educators operate without clear guidelines. If students are required to disclose AI usage in assignments, teachers should identify when they've used AI for lesson materials. This consistency builds trust and models responsible AI integration. 2. Include Students in AI Policy Development Most AI policies are written by administrators who haven't used ChatGPT for homework or witnessed peer collaboration with AI tools. This top-down approach creates rules that students either ignore or circumvent entirely. When we built AI guidelines for WITY, our AI teen entrepreneurship platform at WIT - Whatever It Takes, we worked directly with students. The result? Policies that teens understand and respect because they helped create them. Students bring critical information about real-world AI use that administrators often miss. They are aware of which platforms their classmates use, how AI supports various subjects, and where current rules create confusion. When students participate in policy creation compliance increases significantly because the rules feel collaborative rather than punitive. 3. Balance AI Guardrails With Innovation Opportunities Many AI policies resemble legal warnings more than educational frameworks. Fear-based language teaches students to view AI as a threat rather than a powerful tool requiring responsible use. Effective policies reframe restrictions as learning opportunities. Instead of "AI cannot write your essays," try "AI can help you brainstorm and organize ideas, but your analysis and voice should drive the final work." Schools that blanket-ban AI usage miss opportunities to prepare students for careers where AI literacy will be essential. AI access can vary dramatically among students. While some students have premium ChatGPT subscriptions and access to the latest tools, others may rely solely on free versions or school-provided resources. Without addressing this gap, AI policies can inadvertently increase educational inequality. 4. Build AI Literacy Into Curriculum and Family Communication In an AI-driven economy, rules alone don't prepare students for a future where AI literacy is necessary. Schools must teach students to think critically about AI outputs, understand the bias in AI systems, and recognize the appropriate applications of AI across different contexts. Parents often feel excluded from AI conversations at school, creating confusion about expectations. This is why schools should explain their AI policies in plain language, provide examples of responsible use, and offer resources for parents who want to support responsible AI use at home. When families understand the educational rationale behind AI integration—including teacher usage and transparency requirements—they become partners in developing responsible use habits rather than obstacles to overcome. AI technology changes rapidly, making static policies obsolete within months. Schools should schedule annual policy reviews that include feedback from students, teachers, and parents about both student and teacher AI usage. AI Policy Assessment Checklist School leaders should evaluate their current policies against these seven criteria: Teacher Guidelines: Do policies clearly state when and how teachers can use AI? Are disclosure requirements consistent between students and educators? Student Input: Have students participated in creating these policies? Do rules reflect actual AI usage patterns among teens? Equity Access: Can all students access the same AI tools, or do policies create advantages for families with premium subscriptions? Family Communication: Can parents easily understand the policies? Are expectations clear for home use? Are there opportunities for workshops for parents? Innovation Balance: Do policies encourage responsible experimentation or only focus on restrictions? Is the school policy focusing on preparing students for the AI-driven workforce? Regular Updates: Is there a scheduled review process as AI technology evolves? Does the school welcome feedback from students, teachers and parents? Skills Development: Do policies include plans for teaching AI literacy alongside restrictions? Who is teaching this class or workshop? Moving Forward: AI Leadership The most effective approach treats students as partners, not adversaries. When teens help create the rules they'll follow, when teachers model responsible usage, and when families understand the educational reasoning behind policies, AI becomes a learning tool rather than a source of conflict. Schools that embrace this collaborative approach will produce graduates who understand how to use AI ethically and effectively—exactly the capabilities tomorrow's economy demands.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Brad Keselowski Laughs at Connor Zilisch's Hard Fall after Xfinity Victory
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. NASCAR Cup Series driver Brad Keselowski laughed at Connor Zilisch's fall, which occurred when Zilisch was celebrating his victory at Watkins Glen International last weekend. The 19-year-old driver suffered from a broken collarbone and recently underwent surgery to expedite his recovery for a racing return. The incident occurred when Zilisch had just climbed atop his car, only to slip and fall headfirst. The event made headlines over the past week due to its severity. However, Keselowski found humor in Zilisch's fall, stating that he experienced falls in the past. When asked ahead of the race at Richmond if he planned on climbing on top of his car if he won the race, the 2012 NASCAR Cup champion said: "Probably not. I think I'll just grab my American flag and stand outside of it. But man, that was sure scary. I called Adam Alexander [NASCAR commentator] yesterday because now that we know Connor's okay, it is one of the funniest damn videos I've ever seen in my life. And we've all had our, you know, moments. "The funniest part to me was Adam just saying, 'Oh my god, he fell.' And my wife and I, we've had a lot of fun with that. But, you do this sport long enough, you're bound to have a moment that you wish you could have back. And, I've got quite a few of them, and Connor got his first one." Brad Keselowski, driver of the #6 Castrol Ford, walks onstage during driver intros prior to the NASCAR Cup Series Viva Mexico 250 at Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez on June 15, 2025 in Mexico City, Mexico. Brad Keselowski, driver of the #6 Castrol Ford, walks onstage during driver intros prior to the NASCAR Cup Series Viva Mexico 250 at Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez on June 15, 2025 in Mexico City, gave an update recently after undergoing surgery. Newsweek Sports reported his comments: "Wanted to give everyone a quick update. Had surgery on my collarbone this morning to get a plate and screws to help with the healing process. Been a tough few days for me mentally, but all the love you guys have shown has certainly helped. Thank you." Due to the injury, Zilisch was unable to race the next day in the Cup Series with Trackhouse Racing. It remains to be seen if he can return for the Wawa 250 at Daytona International Speedway next weekend. Addressing the topic of his racing return, Trackhouse's team owner Justin Marks said: "I think it's a discussion that we all have to have. We haven't really talked about much, obviously, since yesterday, but in the little bit that we've discussed in some of the quiet moments over the last 24 hours, it's going to have to be a group decision. "It's going to have to be sponsors, Chevrolet, the team, taking care of his development, taking care of him as a human and as an athlete, and then keeping his motivations high and making sure he knows he's got a group of people behind him that are supportive of him."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Washington Post fact checker hits ‘absentee owner' Bezos, tells him to commit to saving paper or sell it
The Washington Post is a sinking ship with a captain missing in action. And according to its now-former fact-checker, that missing captain is its billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos. "He has to be committed to it. If he's not committed to it, he should find someone else to own it," Glenn Kessler told Fox News Digital. "I feel like he was kind of committed to it. And then he's kind of an absentee owner, and he shouldn't be because it's, you know, one of the prime assets of American journalism." Kessler left the Post in July after more than 27 years at the paper — and his final years there were not the best. "What's so saddening is that five years ago, I would not have imagined The Washington Post would be in this state," Kessler said. Washington Post's Efforts To Court Conservatives Could Drive Away Its Liberal Readers, Ex-fact Checker Warns Kessler never considered leaving the Post until he was presented with the buyout offer, which he accepted. The Post has been financially bleeding, so much so that it reportedly was on pace to lose at least $77 million in 2024. The buyouts had targeted the most veteran staffers, aiming to cut costs and ward off layoffs for the time being. Read On The Fox News App The famed fact-checker was among several high-profile journalists and columnists who have left the paper in recent months, many of whom took issue with decisions and editorial changes Bezos himself had ordered. Kessler compared the Post to "being on the Titanic after it struck an iceberg — drifting aimlessly as it sank, with not enough lifeboats for everyone" in a piece he wrote on his newly-launched Substack account. "They have to have a vision of where they want to go. And I've not seen that vision yet. Or if there is a vision, it's not been clearly articulated," Kessler said. "It's gonna be a really rocky period in the news business in the next five to ten years. And the Post needs to be prepared for that. And I kind of feel like they've lost a lot of, you know, important sailors and captains to keep the ship going. So they're gonna have to make do with less." Bezos has been the target of intense blowback by liberals, who've accused him of bending the knee to President Donald Trump based on actions that have rocked the paper. First was his decision in October to halt the planned endorsement of then-Vice President Kamala Harris just days before the presidential election. Then, in February, he launched a new mission for the editorial pages to promote "personal liberties and free markets," vowing to not publish any pieces that go against those principles. Both instances sparked rebellion among the paper's liberal readers, leading to the cancellation of hundreds of thousands of subscriptions. Several staffers also resigned in protest. But Kessler wasn't always a Bezos critic. He credited the Amazon founder for saving the Post when he bought it in 2013. "Before Bezos bought the newspaper, it was in really bad shape," he told Fox News Digital. "People forget how, you know, because the Graham family didn't really have the resources to keep it going in the new era. And there had been a bunch of buyouts and people were asked to leave. So it had been a pretty grim period then." Washington Post Bombarded With 'Cake' Parties For Departing Staffers Things at the Post were souring so much so that Kessler himself had been interviewing for a different job outside the paper. That was until he was offered The Fact Checker stint in 2011, which he accepted, thinking that if the ship went down, he himself could stay afloat with his own "brand." "But then Bezos bought the paper, and he invested a lot of money in the paper," Kessler said. "So the size of the staff doubled. The number of foreign bureaus probably went up [by] at least a third. The resources devoted to engineering support surged, so the web pages started loading faster, and we could do fantastic graphics. There was investment in video… And you really felt like the Post was going places, and it was actually producing better journalism at any point in the time I had worked at the Post." "And now it is just… it's like it hit an iceberg, and it's kind of drifting there, and I don't think there's a plan to rescue it. Or at least a plan to, you know, turn the ship around and get it moving in the direction it was." Kessler blamed management for being "a little dazzled" by the traffic spike that came during the first Trump administration, reaching levels "almost equal" to the Post's top rival, The New York Times. But then, unlike the Times, the Post failed to capitalize on its new readers by not expanding its portfolio. "I've sat in many meetings and had many discussions and heard lots of speeches. I still have no idea what they're trying to do," Kessler said of his former bosses. "It vaguely seems to say we're gonna appeal [to] the people… who don't really care about the news. And we're gonna provide products that would allow them to read The Washington Post and find out information they need to know," he said. "And the problem, as I wrote in my piece, is that that's what The New York Times has been doing for ten years. They have 10 million subscribers, but a large chunk of that are people that don't get the core news product," Kessler continued. "They get the recipes, they get The Athletic — the sports section, they get product recommendations, they get the games, they play Wordle." Washington Post Reeling From Buyout Exodus As Bosses Hope To Turn The Page At Embattled Paper He said the Post is stuck with "the Avis problem," citing the car rental company's old ads that claimed "We try harder," alluding to the reality it was always in the shadow of Hertz, a dynamic similar to the Gray Lady. "The Washington Post has always been No. 2. It's never had the same size circulation as the Times. I would argue news coverage was better, but maybe I was biased about that," Kessler conceded to Fox News Digital. "But now in this fragmented marketplace, people have to make a choice. What Substacks am I going to subscribe to? What newsletters am I gonna get? What networks am I going to watch? 'Oh, I need one newspaper. I'll be willing to spend money on one newspaper,' and the default is always going to be, unfortunately, The New York Times." He continued, "It's a broader product. It has better arts coverage, theater coverage. I've never gotten an understanding of how the Post was going to combat that problem. And it sounded like the solution was, 'Oh, we're going to be like a mini-me New York Times with things to appeal to people that don't follow news.' Well, they already get that in The New York Times." The Post has scrapped an initiative launched last year dubbed "WP Ventures," meant to attract social media users. However, the paper appears to already be pivoting with Tuesday's announcement of former Axios executive editor and former Post reporter, Sara Kehaulani Goo, returning as its president of Creator Network — a new position Goo says will be "creating personality-driven content" and help provide advertisers "access" to a new audience driven by creators. The Times and the rise of new media weren't the only obstacles facing the Post. "Midway through my journalism career, I started saying, 'I'm working for a dinosaur.' And AI is quite possibly the meteorite that will kill off the last of the dinosaurs," Kessler said to Fox News Digital. "I'm greatly concerned about what AI is gonna do, because AI is gonna kill search. And search was how people often found our news articles." "The statistics I had seen was that four or five years ago, every 100 searches on Google yielded six clicks on a news site. Now it's about every 100 searches yields two clicks on the news site. When people use AI, a thousand searches result in one click," he continued. "So it's a dramatic difference. And if I were running a news organization, at this point, I don't know quite what I would do about that. So it's a bad time to be running a new organization. I do have sympathy for the situation that [Washington Post publisher and CEO] Will Lewis and [Washington Post executive editor] Matt Murray find themselves in right now. I just question whether or not they really have figured out what to do." Goo said in her announcement that "we're going to be infusing AI with everything that we do to help us maximize efficiency and scale." But the buck ultimately stops with Bezos, according to Kessler. "The Post was really at its high point [after Bezos' purchase]— the amount of stories we're producing, the quality of the stories was really significant. And then, traffic surged when Trump got elected and there was so much hunger and interest in the news we were producing. We kind of lost our way after that," Kessler said. "And not only lost our way, we started losing oodles of money. A hundred million dollars one year, I think the last number I saw [in] 2023 was $77 million… I think even for a person as rich as Jeff Bezos, that counts as real money." "And I have gotten the sense that he's a bit of an absentee owner. He's had other distractions, and he's committed more to some of his other enterprises, such as a space company, than he is to The Washington Post, which is really just a tiny part of his business investments. And maybe, I don't know, I hate to speculate, maybe you thought he gave us his best shot, and we blew it, and now we've got it muddled through," he added. A spokesperson for The Washington Post told Fox News Digital, "The Washington Post is reinventing itself to be a trusted news source for all Americans. That means working hard each day to publish the most accurate news, alongside opinions that resonate across the nation."Original article source: Ex-Washington Post fact checker hits 'absentee owner' Bezos, tells him to commit to saving paper or sell it Solve the daily Crossword
