Department of Transportation Eases Safety Regulations for Self-Driving Cars
The Department of Transportation (DOT) said on Thursday that it would ease some safety regulations for the development of self-driving vehicles in a move to maintain U.S. global dominance in the industry.
The DOT stated that it would expand the Automated Vehicle Exemption Program (AVEP)—which currently applies only to imported AVs—to include domestically-produced automated vehicles (AVs).
The program will exempt U.S. automakers from safety regulations for AVs intended for research or demonstration purposes,
'This Administration understands that we're in a race with China to out-innovate, and the stakes couldn't be higher,' Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy said in a
Duffy stated that the move is part of the DOT's innovation agenda to move the United States 'closer to a single national standard' that promotes innovation by removing barriers while also maintaining safety.
To maintain safety, NHTSA said that it will continue requiring vehicles with certain advanced driver assistance and automated driving systems to report crash incidents, and streamline the reporting process to remove 'unnecessary and duplicative requirements.'
Related Stories
2/7/2025
1/21/2025
NHTSA's chief counsel, Peter Simshauser, said the move would allow AV manufacturers to 'develop faster and spend less time on unnecessary process, while still advancing safety.'
The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association (AVIA) said in a
'We look forward to working with Secretary Duffy and his team to implement smart, forward-looking policies that will make our roads safer, expand mobility, strengthen supply chains, and drive American economic growth for generations to come,' AVIA CEO Jeff Farrah stated.
John Bozzella, president and CEO of Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said that the new framework would help ensure that the United States will not 'cede AV leadership to China and other countries.'
Bozzella added that the new framework for self-driving cars is 'overdue.' He said that the AV industry has been 'hamstrung by government inaction' in the past years.
'This technology works. It will help improve safety on the roads and increase mobility,' he said in a
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety voiced disappointment with the administration's move, emphasizing the need to enhance information on the safety of using self-driving cars on public roadways.
'The AV industry has been offering a myriad of promises, such as a reduction in crashes, more accessibility, less congestion and lower carbon emissions,' the agroup said in a
'However, troubling incidents have already occurred in the small number of cities in which they are currently deployed ... Without safeguards, safety regulations, transparency and accountability, the success of AV deployment is imperiled at best and could result in deadly consequences at worst.'
The Epoch Times has reached out to the DOT for comment on the group's concerns but did not receive a response by publication time.
In 2022, General Motors (GM) filed a petition with NHTSA seeking permission to deploy up to 2,500 self-driving vehicles annually without human controls such as brake pedals or mirrors. The automaker subsequently withdrew the petition last year after a lengthy government review had not been completed.
In December 2024, GM
Reuters contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas Republican on deficit spending in GOP bill: ‘It's not a perfect world'
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) lamented the deficit spending in the GOP's 'big, beautiful' spending package, but framed the issue as a necessary compromise to avoid having to negotiate with Democrats. 'I don't want to have any deficit spending. But what I'm trying to suggest to you is that we are stuck in a paradigm where we have to pass this ourselves,' Sessions told CNN's John Berman in an interview Thursday morning. The Texas Republican said he conceded on demands from a handful of Republicans representing blue-leaning states who pushed to raise the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, adding, 'It's a balance there.' 'What we're trying to do is balance out where the American people get jobs and job creation. We really don't want to see people just leave these blue states because of taxes that they can't afford their property,' Sessions said. 'So, it is not a perfect world, John.' He also pointed out that if the sprawling legislative agenda is not passed through the reconciliation process, then Republicans would have to turn to Democrats — which, Sessions argued, would not necessarily reduce deficit spending but would mean less of Trump's agenda could make it through Congress. 'The bottom line is, is that this has to come together as a piece of legislation. You see, John, if we do not pass our one big, beautiful bill, then we negotiate with Democrats, essentially nine Democrats, that simply raises spending to get us where we get the tax cuts that we save them, where they ought to be,' the GOP lawmaker said. 'So it is, no question about it, not a perfect battle for Republicans,' he added. The interview comes amid criticism from tech billionaire Elon Musk that has slowed momentum in the Senate on the bill. The Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday projected that the 1,116-page House passed bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Slams the Brakes on Ethane Exports to China -- Millions in Energy Deals Hang in the Balance
Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Enterprise Products Partners just hit a regulatory wall. Both midstream giants confirmed they've received official notices from the U.S. Commerce Department requiring new licenses to ship ethane to Chinaan unexpected curveball that caught the market off guard. Energy Transfer is scrambling to file for an emergency authorization, while Enterprise revealed its request to ship 2.2 million barrels has already been denied. Shares of Energy Transfer dipped 2%, with Enterprise sliding 1.2% in after-hours trading. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ET. This could reshape the U.S.-China ethane trade flowat least in the short run. China's petrochemical sector leans heavily on U.S. ethane to produce plastics and chemicals, favoring it over pricier alternatives like naphtha. On the flip side, American producers rely on China to absorb excess supply from the shale boom. With this new licensing hurdle, producers might have to reroute cargoes, lean on domestic storage, or find new buyers fast. Analysts say this adds friction to a trade already fraying under the broader U.S.-China tech and resource tensions. Whether this turns into a long-term choke point or just a licensing hiccup is still unclear. Energy Transfer is evaluating how wide the net of these restrictions may stretch and whether its bottom line could take a hit. Enterprise has 20 days to push back on the denialsbut unless Washington reverses course, the export block could become final by mid-July. As the U.S. sharpens its stance on exports with military relevance, this may not be the last time energy markets get caught in the crossfire. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Loblaw pulls Folgers coffee from shelves over 'unjustified' cost increases
Shoppers at Loblaw Cos. Ltd.'s stores will soon no longer be able to get a coffee fix by purchasing Folgers-brand products after a pricing dispute prompted the grocer to pull them from its shelves. In an email sent to retailers on Wednesday, Loblaw said it decided to delist all Folgers products after talks with the coffee maker's manufacturer couldn't solve the impasse. "After several weeks of negotiations, we were unable to reach an agreement with the manufacturers of Folgers coffee regarding their significant and unjustified proposed price increases," said the email signed by Loblaw category director Suren Theivakadacham and obtained by The Canadian Press. "We are doing this because we are on the side of customers, and doing what we can to keep prices low ... This decision to delist Folgers coffee reflects our commitment to providing value for customers by not accepting unreasonable cost increases that would hurt Canadians." The email contained an attached list of alternative coffee products the grocer offers as stores prepare to update their shelves. The move comes as coffee prices continue to rise in Canada. Last month, Statistics Canada reported the price of coffee and tea was up 13.4 per cent in April on a year-over-year basis — outpacing both the 3.8 per cent increase in the cost of groceries that month, as well as Canada's overall inflation rate of 1.7 per cent. Experts say higher coffee prices are in part due to recent extreme weather and changes in temperature, which have caused some producers to experience lower yields. Other pressures include a weak Canadian dollar, making it more expensive to import coffee to Canada from other countries, along with the fact coffee is one of the products still subject to Canada's retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. While the U.S. isn't a major producer of coffee, Canadian distributors often purchase it from American brokers. Folgers products are made by the Orrville, Ohio-based J.M. Smucker Co., which raised prices of its coffee offerings both last June and October in response to higher costs it is facing. President and CEO Mark Smucker told analysts on the company's quarterly earnings call in February that more coffee price increases were likely on the way. He said pricing decisions are dictated by costs it faces. "Although we haven't laid out when other pricing is going to happen, we do expect it's going to happen in the next fiscal year, probably in the first half," Smucker said at the time. The company did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday. Loblaw spokeswoman Catherine Thomas said Folgers' proposed cost increases were "unreasonable and unjustified based on underlying costs" and that the grocer felt it was important to push back as many Canadians continue to struggle with unaffordability. "Despite several attempts to address this with the manufacturer, we were not successful," Thomas said in a statement. "We will not accept or pass unjustified cost increases on to customers and therefore we have removed Folgers from our shelves ... We recognize this may create some inconvenience for customers and for that we apologize but again, we will do what is right to help address price increases." Thomas added Loblaw expects most of its stores to be out of stock of Folgers products over the next week or two. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025. Companies in this story: (TSX:L) Sammy Hudes, The Canadian Press
