I'm 80 and still working. I've filed for bankruptcy twice and only have $37 in my savings account, but I feel blessed.
Sometimes, I feel it's sad that people like me are still working so late in life, whether it be because we didn't manage money better, were never taught how to do so, or had circumstances that hindered our financial goals.
I have to work because I've been single since 1997 and have a house payment, a car payment, and high credit card debt. I didn't take a 401(k) with my current company because I thought it was stupid to; I need the money now, not 10 years from now.
Are you an older American comfortable sharing your retirement outlook with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form. We are especially interested in hearing from people 80 and older.
On the other hand, if I didn't work, what would I do? I can't sit home all day — I would go nuts. Sure, I don't have the freedom to travel, but there are pros like keeping my brain active.
I started working as a teenager
When I was 16, I got my first part-time job as a cashier. I got married in 1962 and had a baby the following year. I tried going back to school, but I went to a Catholic school, and the nuns weren't having any of that. My husband was in the Navy, and I worked as a full-time checker while he was deployed.
When he came back, I became pregnant again. After having that child, I worked in another grocery store as the head cashier and at the customer service desk. Through the 1960s, I held a few other grocery jobs, doing accounts receivable for one and doing collections work for Sears Roebuck.
My last child was born in 1971. My husband left when my kids were little, and he wouldn't pay child support. Financially, I was always strapped, raising five children.
I went through the training to be a nurse's aide, but realized quickly it wasn't for me. With my experience in consumer collections, I got a job a few years later at a jewelry store as a credit manager. Then I became a credit manager at a construction company, a role I held for many years. I held various credit management jobs while in Las Vegas, such as for automobile, roofing, and lighting companies. I lost my job at a building supply company right before COVID hit.
I had to file for bankruptcy
I've always been living paycheck to paycheck and never had a lot in savings.
In 2001, I had 13 family members living with me due to unfortunate circumstances. They finally found work and got their own places, but that hurt me financially to the point where I've had to file for bankruptcy once in 2004 and most recently in October 2021.
In 2022, my youngest son was living with me. We had previously had a falling out, but when he said things weren't going well, I told him he always had a place to stay. After being out of work, he got a really good job as a city bus driver and was helping me financially.
One day, he never came home from work. He had collapsed from a massive heart attack.
My oldest son and my grandson came to live with me after that. My oldest son was constantly changing jobs. In December 2023, he had a major stroke and couldn't work, and I had to take out credit cards to support my grandson. That really set me back financially. My son didn't have insurance at the time, and I also had to make sure he had his medications and got to therapy.
Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you.
By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy .
He and his son moved back to Oklahoma to be with his dad in June 2024. My daughter moved in with me the following month due to a nasty divorce. She's doing great and has a good job. She helps me financially. I don't have anybody right now to have to take care of, except for myself and my dogs.
I've never thought I could retire
Now I find myself at 80 still needing to work. Part of that is financial, and part of it is because I would be bored; if you don't have any money to do anything with, what are you going to do? Your house can only get so clean.
I work as a full-time accounts receivable specialist. It's a very busy position, and I earn around $50,000 a year. I work from home, which I love. My company appreciates work-life balance, so if I need time off, they give it to me. I also get $1,784 in monthly Social Security.
I had 401(k)s from previous jobs, but I never had enough in them to be able to say, "I can retire." That's not going to happen.
I own my home, and I've been in it for 10 years. It's valued at around $400,000. If I sold it, I could retire, but if I do that, where am I going to go?
Debt, including everything except my house, is probably around $70,000. I'm trying to pay it down each month, but something always happens and I have to end up spending my money on something else. I put money in my bank account every month, but right now I have $37 in my savings account.
My credit is fairly good, and I'm satisfied with what I have. I'm more blessed than a lot of other people I know.
I make do with what I have
I have great-grandkids in town, so I like to visit and spend some time with them. Anything family-oriented is always great, whether it's going to somebody else's house, a dinner, or a barbecue. I like to take my dogs to the dog park when I can. Until last September, I walked a lot until I developed a couple of health problems that have prevented me from doing so.
Once a month, I go to lunch with my former coworkers at a company where I worked for 13 years. We go to an affordable restaurant and talk, cry, laugh, and remember the good times at our job.
Every night, I get online and play in my poker league. I don't play for money; I used to gamble, but I can't really do that anymore. I play for points, but I do pay for a $40 monthly membership. You earn tokens, which you can use to play in cash tournaments. I play in many charity tournaments, especially for autism.
I don't spend a lot. I like to shop at bargain stores, and I only buy reasonably priced things. I don't eat a lot, and I can get by with peanut butter sandwiches. I spend $150 to $200 at the grocery store monthly, and I do a lot of food prep. I spend about $100 on essentials like toilet paper, paper towels, and other items.
I can put $5 in my wallet, and it lasts me forever.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Is Walmart (WMT) a Buy Ahead of Q2 Earnings?
U.S. retail giant Walmart (WMT) is set to release its Q2 earnings report next week. This has some investors wondering whether it's a good idea to buy shares of WMT beforehand. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. What Wall Street Expects Wall Street is expecting WMT to report earnings of $0.72 per share, which would represent year-over-year growth of 7.46%. Revenues for the period are expected to come in at $175.51 billion, up 3.65% from the prior-year quarter. Will WMT be able to beat these estimates? As can be seen below, it has a very strong track record of doing just that. Key Issues Ahead of Earnings Walmart is a bellwether for the strength of the American consumer given that it is the largest retailer in the U.S. and sells everything from electronics to clothing, groceries and toys. As such, investors, analysts, economists and politicians will be looking at its results with eagle eyes. One area of particular focus, according to Victoria Scholar, Head of Investment at interactive investor, will be whether President Trump's tariffs trade policy has impacted US consumer confidence and prices. Have the import levies hit Walmart's top and bottom lines as well as prices on the shelves? 'As a company that prides itself on rock bottom prices, Walmart has already expressed frustration about the extra costs associated with tariffs, particularly from China,' Scholar said. 'Walmart delivered its first ever profitable quarter in e-commerce both domestically and globally in May, so focus next week will be on whether it can continue to grow earnings there. Investors will also be watching out for the performance of Walmart's advertising and its membership subscription Walmart+ as well as the retailer looking to bring in a diversity of revenue streams.' See below: Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell, urged investors to also look out for comments on shipping lead times, as well as inventory on the balance sheet. 'Retailing is all about shifting the right products at the right price in the right format to the target demographic. Do that, and the amount of unsold stock will be low and the need to discount to shift it will be reduced. Too much stock can mean price cutting is required and that could show up in the gross profit and then further down the profit and loss account,' she said. Is WMT a Good Stock to Buy Now? On TipRanks, WMT has a Strong Buy consensus based on 27 Buy ratings. Its highest price target is $130. WMT stock's consensus price target is $113, implying a 13.33% upside.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Amid bitter partisanship, permitting reform is a golden opportunity for bipartisanship
With states now fighting over redistricting maps, America's two political parties will need an opportunity to work together again. Permitting reform is one issue that is just right for this, even amidst an apparent trifecta. Strengthening American energy production has long been a bipartisan issue, as it fosters economic growth, protects national security, and increases the energy supply to drive down or stabilize utility costs for U.S. households in the face of growing demand. There has never been a better time for it. Done right, it secures American global leadership for another century. While recent debates around tax credits have made this issue seem increasingly partisan, reforming our existing energy permitting process is something on which lawmakers on both sides of the aisle largely already agree. Congress should capitalize on consensus to pass comprehensive permitting reform legislation. Debates surrounding energy tax credits in the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, in particular, brought energy production back into the spotlight this year. Reconciliation can leave bitter feelings, but permitting reform has a chance to offer both parties something they dearly want — energy dominance, reduced emissions, fewer arcane rules, and less back and forth political games undermining the development of new energy projects. All energy production would benefit from permitting reform. America's permitting system should be a gateway for energy projects. Right now, it's a bottleneck. Unpredictable processes and delays in approval are bringing new developments to a grinding halt. With the rise of AI and a digital world that increasingly relies on data centers, global energy demand has spiked. Congress is now tasked with ensuring that American energy production can keep pace with this demand and not fall behind foreign adversaries vying for our position as the global leader in innovation and technology. But as of late, lawmakers have remained stagnant on addressing permitting reform. Yet, while demand for all energy production is on the rise, Democrats have a lot less to fear from loosening rules than they may think. The vast majority of projects stuck in grid connection queues are renewable — over 95 percent of proposed new generation capacity is solar or wind. Much-needed reform to the approval process could free up all new projects, strengthen American energy dominance and unleash clean energy all at once. Permitting reform has long been a bipartisan issue. Last year, Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), then-ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and then-Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Joe Manchin ( introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 aimed at streamlining and expediting the approvals process. While this legislation was not ultimately passed, it is a prime example of members reaching across the aisle to drive movement on this front. Most recently, a bipartisan group of governors made an urgent call for permitting reform. 'It shouldn't take longer to approve a project than it takes to build it,' said Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R). He also highlighted the bipartisan nature of the issue, 'Democrats and Republicans alike recognize permitting delays weaken U.S. economic growth, security and competitiveness. Governors from both parties are working together to inject some common sense into our permitting process.' Voters in both parties agree. Recent polling conducted by Cygnal found that two-thirds of respondents agree that Congress should modernize permitting rules to accelerate completion of energy projects and reduce long-term cost pressures. Some conservative stalwarts will never support anything they see as helping clean energy, while some environmental activists are more concerned with punishing fossil fuel companies than they are with actually addressing climate change. These short-sighted visions represent the horseshoe of scarcity, decline and pessimism that has plagued American energy politics for decades. They believe we can succeed only by taking from the other side. America cannot afford delay. A dangerous world requires energy dominance in all industries, including new ones like clean energy. Moreover, Americans deserve to know that they will have reliable, accessible energy needed to power their businesses and residences. Permitting reform will make energy access more reliable, more abundant, cheaper and much cleaner. All Americans, and our planet, will win. The only losers will be those profiteering from political polarization. With some energy tax credits phasing out sooner than originally planned, many energy producers want to act swiftly to get new projects up and running. The permitting process, as it stands, is their biggest obstacle. As we head into the fall, our lawmakers should keep the cross-partisan opportunity on permitting reform top of mind. Liam deClive-Lowe is the co-founder of American Policy Ventures, an organization that builds projects to help policymakers collaborate and get things done.
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Putin got a warm Trump meeting. Europe is afraid Zelenskyy won't.
While publicly Europe and Ukraine have appeared upbeat, privately officials were wary of Putin's red carpet welcome back to the West, where he secured the veneer of global legitimacy without making the kind of gestures toward peace the U.S., Europe and Ukraine have sought. 'Worries have been there all the way this year, and yesterday's meeting did not really help,' a European official said. Trump's position on the war has yo-yoed in recent weeks. While he had for months blamed Ukraine for the conflict, he had been more critical of Putin and Russia in the lead-up to the summit. He even said Putin would face 'severe consequences,' if he did not agree to stop the war after Friday's gathering. But after several hours of meetings with Putin in Alaska, Trump backtracked on a demand for an immediate ceasefire, again said it would be up to Ukraine to end the fighting and advised Kyiv to 'take the deal,' without specifying what Putin had suggested. Trump said after the summit that he negotiated with Putin over land swaps but declined to provide more details. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Sunday will lead a teleconference among the 'coalition of the willing' — countries that have indicated they will provide troops and other support to Ukraine at the end of the war, according to a European official. Ahead of the summit, Trump said he supported some American role in providing security guarantees — some form of assurance or support from Washington to deter Russia from attacking again after a peace deal is agreed. Nordic and Baltic leaders welcomed those commitments again after Trump spoke with European officials late Friday. While Trump did much more than usual to consult with Europe in the lead-up to the summit with Putin and after, the frequent contact does not seem to have yielded tangible results. European officials are relieved that Trump did not agree to a deal with Putin but disappointed that the threat of steep secondary tariffs targeting third countries buying Russian oil was tabled. 'They want to try to influence the negotiation process as much as possible, because they know Trump really wants to do it this way, and they don't want to leave the initiative to Putin,' said Giuseppe Spatafora, a former NATO official who is now a research analyst at the EU Institute for Security Studies. 'In general, the Europeans talk much more often to Trump than during the first 100 days, which is good. They have influence. But it's limited.' Zelenskyy's last visit to the Oval Office in February quickly went off the rails when Vice President JD Vance and later Trump both lectured him for not being grateful enough for American support and overplaying what they said was a weak diplomatic position. Zelenskyy's decision to wear a black polo, black pants and boots rather than a suit further soured the atmosphere. But Trump and Zelenskyy have been on better terms in recent meetings, as Kyiv's allies sought to improve the relationship and Trump's frustration with Putin mounted.
