logo
The BBC's problems go far beyond Gary Lineker

The BBC's problems go far beyond Gary Lineker

Spectator21-05-2025

As one might expect from a 103-year-old organisation, the BBC has a very high opinion of itself. Outside Broadcasting House stands a statue of George Orwell. Inscribed next to it is a quotation by him: 'If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.' A noble sentiment, and a more flattering testament to the corporation than Orwell's description of it after working there during the second world war: 'Something halfway between a girl's school and a lunatic asylum.'
In his growing outspokenness, the football pundit Gary Lineker might have thought that he was channelling Orwell. Even before he was accused of sharing anti-Semitic emojis on Instagram, his handsome salary and his unwillingness to trim his social media output to fit his employer's impartiality rules were making his role as Match of the Day presenter untenable. Yet the Lineker of today curiously embodies Auntie better than anyone else: smug, expensive, out of touch.
Our national broadcaster resembles the monasteries of Tudor England on the eve of their dissolution. Once a focal point for enlightenment, the BBC now houses a privileged and costly class that has forgotten its duty to the public. Mired in scandal, financially unviable and marooned in a changing world, the corporation is ripe for reformation.
The BBC was created in 1922 in response to the proliferation of radio. In the United States this had led to the swift creation of hundreds of stations. Frightened by this audio anarchy, Britain's six leading radio firms established a single, state-approved broadcaster.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Concerns as park left 'churned up' after BBC Radio 1 event
Concerns as park left 'churned up' after BBC Radio 1 event

BBC News

time33 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Concerns as park left 'churned up' after BBC Radio 1 event

Part of a city park has been left damaged, with grass and paths "churned up by vehicles" after a music event was held there, a local councillor has Park in Liverpool hosted the three-day BBC Radio 1 Big Weekend over the May Bank Holiday days on from the event, local people have been sharing photographs online of the damage to grass and City Council said "the damage was not extensive" but the BBC was responsible for any repairs. BBC Radio 1 has been contacted for comment. Opposition councillor Liberal Democrat Richard Kemp said he was concerned about the scale of the damage."I'm concerned about the grass and any gouging effects and trees pushed back or damaged during the installation of security fencing," he said. Mr Kemp, a councillor for nearby Penny Lane, added he had requested a report from the council to look at the impact to the local area and the environment.A city council representative said site walks had already taken place and a plan was "currently being pulled together which will provide a timescale for the repairs". "The damage is not extensive and the reinstatement work will be carried out by Liverpool Street Scene Ltd," it added. In 2024 the city became the world's first Accelerator City for climate action, under UN Climate Change's Entertainment and Culture for Climate Action city council representative said the authority had worked with external specialists to monitor the impact of the Big Weekend event, which included the "impact on the environment and sustainability" and would share those finding once a report has been written "in the coming months". Regular Sefton Park user Adam said he thought he damage was "minimal" and said it was "no worse than on a campsite where tents have been".A local resident, who did not want to be named, said she thought the grass had been protected "really well" and the event had been well organised."There was hardly any traffic disruption and not much noise," she said."The streets were fairly clean after, much cleaner than after a lot of other events. I thought it was really good for the city." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Meghan Markle sparks wild conspiracy theories that her baby bump is FAKE after cringe twerking video
Meghan Markle sparks wild conspiracy theories that her baby bump is FAKE after cringe twerking video

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Meghan Markle sparks wild conspiracy theories that her baby bump is FAKE after cringe twerking video

MEGHAN Markle has sparked wild conspiracy theories online that her baby bump was fake following her latest cringe video. Meghan, 43, posted a video of her and Prince Harry yesterday showing the Duchess twerking in a hospital room in an effort to induce Lilibet's birth. 4 4 The clip sparked bizarre claims from conspiracy theorists, who questioned whether the baby bump was real. The speculation suggested that Meghan wasn't pregnant at all and was in fact wearing a prosthetic pregnant belly or "moonbump". Some went even further with groundless claims that the video was faked, made on a film set or even generated by AI. Others claimed that "superhuman" Meghan shouldn't have been able to dance while so heavily pregnant and that it indicated she wasn't pregnant at all. Users also claimed that she would have had her jewellery removed and would have been wearing a gown. Meghan released the 80-second clip to her three million followers on Instagram after earlier posting unseen photos of her daughter. It showed the heavily pregnant Meghan making rowing movements and shimmying her shoulders beside the hospital bed. Prince Harry also shuffles into view in a hoodie to the strains of then-viral pregnancy hit The Baby Momma Dance. She posted it on the social media platform alongside the caption: "Four years ago today, this also happened. "Both of our children were a week past their due dates… so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work - there was only one thing left to do!" The Sussexes were blasted for invading their own privacy as a result. Royal expert Ingrid Seward said Meghan was a hypocrite as the couple regularly whine about a lack of privacy. She told The Sun: 'They can do what they like but why put it online? "Does Meghan have no boundaries? I think it's vulgar, unnecessary, attention-seeking. 'They make such a point about privacy and security and then they put stuff out there. Meghan can't resist putting it out there. 'I think it's completely hypocritical for everything she stands for. It's very embarrassing.' 4

Karoline Leavitt doubles down in BBC war of words over Hamas
Karoline Leavitt doubles down in BBC war of words over Hamas

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Karoline Leavitt doubles down in BBC war of words over Hamas

President Trump's press secretary has doubled down in a war of words with the BBC after claiming the broadcaster treated claims by Hamas as 'total truth'. Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a White House briefing on Tuesday that the broadcaster had been forced to repeatedly correct reports about fatalities at an aid centre in Gaza on Sunday. She acknowledged that US officials were investigating claims Israeli forces had killed Palestinians queueing for food at the distribution point, but added: 'Unfortunately, unlike some in the media, we don't take the word of Hamas as total truth. We like to look into it when they speak, unlike the BBC.' On Wednesday a report by Ros Atkins, a journalist for BBC Verify, said her claims contained 'misrepresentations and untruths'. The following day Leavitt responded on X, posting: 'Me: The White House doesn't take Hamas's word as total truth like the fake news BBC. Fake News BBC: We didn't do that! We just quoted the Hamas-run health ministry to run with our false claims.' Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager. Leavitt had shown a printout of BBC digital stories, claiming the corporation had edited the headline from claiming an Israeli tank had killed 26 people to claiming gunfire had killed 31. She said the BBC had corrected and taken down its story after reviewing video and finding a lack of evidence for its reports, and added: 'So we're going to look into reports before we confirm them from this podium. I suggest that journalists who actually care about truth do the same to reduce the misinformation that's going around the globe.' The broadcaster responded that it updated its stories throughout Sunday from 'various sources', adding that this was 'totally normal practice' and that all fatality figures were 'clearly attributed'. In his response on Wednesday Atkins said: 'Updated claims on fatalities were all clearly attributed to a number of sources in Gaza, including the Red Cross, which is an independent organisation.' He added that including clearly attributed claims from the Hamas-run health ministry was 'a necessary aspect of covering this conflict given Israel doesn't allow international news organisations into Gaza'. Atkins said the broadcaster did not remove or correct any material after viewing a video, which BBC Verify determined was unrelated to the aid centre incident, and that the articles remained online.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store