Energy firms pay customers £7MILLION after overcharging them: Are you owed a refund?
Ten suppliers have paid thousands of customers £7million in refunds and compensation after overcharging them, the energy regulator has said.
Ofgem said over 34,000 customers with more than one electricity meter at their property had overpaid their energy bills between 2019 and 2024.
Suppliers can apply multiple standing charges for homes with more than one meter, but Ofgem says some customers were 'erroneously charged more than is allowed under the price cap when combined with unit rates.'
The regulator said it had investigated the issue and suppliers had agreed to issue £5.6 million in refunds and almost £1.4 million in goodwill payments.
Charlotte Friel, director of retail pricing and systems at Ofgem, said: 'We expect all suppliers to have robust processes in place so they can bill their customers accurately.
'While it's clear that on this occasion errors were made, thankfully, the issues were promptly resolved, and customers are being refunded.
'Today's outcome serves as a reminder to all energy suppliers that they must implement the price cap properly and do their due diligence.
'It also shows that, where appropriate, Ofgem is prepared to work with suppliers that fail to comply with our rules.'
Ofgem found that Octopus had the most customers affected by the error at 20,862, paying out £2.6million in total refunds.
'The other suppliers to give refunds were Eon Next, Ecotricity, EDF, Outfox the Market, Ovo Energy, Rebel Energy, So Energy, Tru Energy, and Utility Warehouse.
Earlier this week, the regulator ordered Good Energy to pay £150,000 to former prepayment meter customers for failing to issue final bills.
Supplier refunds
Supplier Number of customers affected Total refunds Total goodwill payments
Eon Next 160 £45,195.82 £9,330.33
Ecotricity 166 £36,633.12 £18,904.35
EDF Energy 3 £112.29 £30.00
Octopus Energy 20,862 £2,636,884.00 £546,278.00
Outfox The Market 570 £6,106.06 £4,590.00
Ovo Energy 2,372 £602,066.05 £280,068.73
Rebel Energy 15 £2,339.49 £575.00
So Energy 1,558 £266,041.16 £58,285.85
Tru Energy 70 £7,486.54 £11,663.00
Utility Warehouse 8,272 £2,043,098.84 £453,960.00
Total 34,048 £5,645,963.37 £1,383,685.26
Are you due a refund?
Affected customers will be refunded automatically if they have not already been, and do not need to contact their supplier.
If a customer has since changed supplier, they will be contacted by their previous supplier to arrange a refund.
Customers of Rebel Energy, which closed last month, leaving 90,000 homes without a supplier, will be refunded.
Ben Gallizzi, Uswitch energy expert, said: 'Technical errors like this can occasionally happen, but providers must act quickly to spot when issues arise and make every effort to resolve problems promptly.
'This overcharging error impacted households with multiple meters. Affected customers will be refunded automatically by their provider, so they shouldn't need to do anything to get their money back.
'If you have submitted a meter reading recently but think there's an error in your bill, contact your supplier to raise the issue.'
Can you save money on energy bills? Check the best fixed deals
When energy prices spiked most households slipped energy price cap tariffs, but it is now possible again to switch to fixed rate energy deals that can save you money.
This is Money's recommended partner uSwitch lets you compare the best energy deals for you, based on your home and gas and electricity costs.
> Compare the best energy deals with uSwitch*
By entering your address and energy usage, you can search for energy deals that can cut your costs and suit how you live.
Switching energy provider can also help the planet, if you move to one of the green deals offering electricity from renewable sources and more environmentally-friendly gas.
*
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
16 minutes ago
- Sky News
No sign of cost of living crisis end amid big consequential geopolitical shifts
Is the cost of living crisis over? If you're looking purely at the annual inflation data, the numbers us journalists, not to mention politicians and economists, tend to focus on, the answer might seem like: probably, yes. Sure, the rate is, at 3.4% in May, higher than the Bank of England's 2% target. But it's far below the double-digit peaks experienced in 2022. Plus, the Bank itself thinks prices are likely to drop back down towards 2% in the coming year or two, even assuming a few more interest rate cuts. End of story, right? Well, not quite. Because look a bit deeper into the numbers and you notice a couple of important things. The first is that whether the cost of living squeeze is over really depends on how you slice up the numbers. Look in a slightly different way and actually this is still an ongoing crisis for millions of families around the country. To see what I mean, recall that when economists talk about inflation, they are really referring to something quite specific. The rate at which the average level of prices across the economy (actually, it's a shopping basket of representative goods) has changed over the past year. And the change in that level over the past year is indeed 3.4%. But look back a bit further, say the past four years, and the rate of change is 25%. Why looking back makes sense Both of these numbers are accurate. They are both expressions of inflation, except that one is for a single year and the other is for a four-year period. But when you're going to the supermarket, or buying a big ticket item like a computer or a car, are you really thinking back over a 12-month horizon or, perhaps, thinking back further? For a lot of people, that four-year horizon feels much more representative of their everyday lives and retail decisions than the one-year horizon. True: the fact that it's up 25% is largely because of the enormous rise in prices in 2022 amid the energy price shock and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 3:05 But (and one can't emphasise this enough), it's not like prices went up and then went down. The prices went up and stayed up (in fact, they carried on getting more expensive). And when you look at the four-year, "recent memory" rate of inflation, it's higher in recent months than any period going back to the early 1990s. Now, economists have very good reasons for focusing on the annual rate of inflation. But by the same token, you can see why so many people scoff when they see the latest inflation data, finding it bears little resemblance to their lived experience. The problem isn't so much the data itself but the way we focus on an annual rate. Expect yo-yoing in the coming months However, even that annual rate might be in for more of a roller coaster than most economists assume. Because the second important underlying issue to remember is that we're living through big, consequential geopolitical shifts that could well be very inflationary but are really hard to model. Consider the events in the Middle East. Military conflict between Israel and Iran has already pushed the oil price up by 18% in June alone. If that price stays elevated, that will feed into higher petrol and other prices in the UK and further afield. And since no one has a clue what will happen next, you can expect that price to yo-yo around quite violently in the coming months. More broadly, it's very hard to know for sure what the impact of tariffs will be on UK inflation. The Bank of England's estimates in its latest set of forecasts suggested a reassuringly small impact on both economic growth and inflation. But no one really knows whether manufacturers will lift prices just for American consumers or for the rest of the world too. Finally, it's worth noting that in much the same way as the past few decades of globalisation were, all else equal, quite deflationary - with prices dropping as manufacturers shifted production to cheaper parts of the world, primarily Asia - the reversal of those forces could be very inflationary. Again, all this stuff is very hard to model and forecast. But we are living through a period of volatility, with significant historical shifts. It would be remarkable if that weren't reflected in the economic data, at some point.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Canada could produce first LNG by this weekend, sources say
HOUSTON, June 18 (Reuters) - Canada could produce its first ever liquefied natural gas this weekend, from the LNG Canada export facility in Kitimat, British Columbia, two people familiar with the startup of the plant told Reuters on Wednesday. The facility, the first of a handful of Canadian LNG projects to begin production, will be the first LNG facility in North America with direct access to the Pacific coast, significantly reducing sail time to Asian markets. When fully operational it will have a capacity to export 14 million metric tonnes per annum (mtpa), according to company statements. "We began cooling down Train 1 on Monday and as long as there is no unforeseen difficulty we expect to produce LNG six days from Monday. So I would say between Saturday and Sunday we can expect first LNG," one of the people familiar with the startup told Reuters. Cooldown of Train 1 is expected to continue until Thursday June 19 and extensive flaring is expected, LNG Canada told staff in a memo last Friday. First LNG will be produced from Train 1, with first LNG cargoes by the middle of this year, LNG Canada told Reuters on Tuesday. Only a portion of the processing plant will be operating this weekend, according the two sources. Train 1 which has a capacity of 6.5 mtpa, or half of the total output of LNG Canada, has had difficulties with one of its lines and it will only produce at half its capacity until it is able to solve the problem, one of the two sources told Reuters. LNG Canada did not comment on the production challenges. LNG tanker Gaslog Glasgow is on its way to LNG Canada's Kitimat port, according to LSEG ship tracking data. The vessel is expected to arrive on June 29 and will be loaded with LNG, the people said. It is now seven years since the partners, Shell Plc (SHEL.L), opens new tab, Petronas ( opens new tab, ( opens new tab, PetroChina ( opens new tab, Mitsubishi Corporation ( gave the project a financial go ahead. Once LNG Canada enters service, Canadian gas exports to the U.S. will likely decline, traders said, as Canadian energy firms will have another outlet for their fuel and will sell more to other countries. For now, the U.S. is the only outlet for Canadian gas. Canada exported about 8.6 billion cubic feet per day (bcfd) of gas via pipelines to the U.S. in 2024, up from 8.0 bcfd in 2023 and an average of 7.5 bcfd over the prior five years (2018-2022), according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That compares with a record 10.4 bcfd in 2002.
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ukraine says it held talks with US on supporting defence projects under joint fund
KYIV, June 18 (Reuters) - Senior Ukrainian officials spoke with their U.S. counterparts about the possibility of supporting defence projects in Ukraine under a joint investment fund set up last month, Kyiv's first deputy prime minister said on Wednesday. Kyiv is aiming to shore up support from Washington, which has been its top military backer, as it seeks to end its grinding war with Russia, now in its fourth year. Yulia Svyrydenko said the discussions included U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and took place during the G7 summit in Canada. "Talks focused on expanding the fund's mandate to support defense sector projects inside Ukraine," she wrote on social media platform X. The two countries established a joint reconstruction fund as part of a deal allowing U.S. access to Ukrainian minerals, which Kyiv hopes will pave the way for more support against Russia's full-scale invasion. Svyrydenko did not specify the nature of the defence projects. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has previously asked the U.S. for a licence to produce critical Patriot air-defence systems used to shoot down ballistic missiles. He has also said Kyiv is willing to purchase weapons from the United States, which under the Trump administration has not announced any new arms packages for Ukraine.
