Judge halts NIH research funding cuts as South Carolina institutions weigh impact
The NIH announced Friday that it would put a 15% limit on indirect funding, which generally covers overhead costs like equipment, operations, maintenance, accounting, and personnel.
The agency said it spent more than $35 billion in 2023 for competitive grants at institutions nationwide, about $9 billion of which was allocated for indirect costs. The rates for this funding varied as they separately negotiated by individual recipients.
Attorneys general in 22 states quickly sued to block the order, arguing it would 'devastate critical public health research' and halt 'cutting-edge work to cure and treat human disease.'
'This agency action will result in layoffs, suspension of clinical trials, disruption of ongoing research programs, and laboratory closure,' they wrote.
Judge tells agencies to restore webpages and data removed after Trump's executive order
A separate lawsuit was also filed by the Association of American Medical Colleges on behalf of dozens of medical schools, teaching hospital and health systems, and academic societies.
Hours later on Monday, Massachusettts Judge Angel Kelley granted a temporary restraining order, barring the NIH from implementing the policy change nationwide until further notice.
Democratic leaders celebrated that ruling in Tuesday as they discussed several Trump administration actions that have been blocked in court.
'The Trump administration has engaged in a number of brazenly undemocratic and illegal actions and their losing in court,' said Congressman Ted Lieu (D-Calif.). 'A judge halted the attempted cuts to NIH that would have affected cancer research.'
Another court hearing is set for February 21.
Multiple institutions in South Carolina receive indirect funding from the NIH to fund research in various academic areas. This includes the state's two largest colleges — The University of South Carolina (UofSC) and Clemson University — and the Medical University of South Carolina.
According to NIH data, MUSC recieved more than $128 million for research in 2024. Clemson was awarded about $25.2 million and UofSC recieved $70.3 million.
In separate statements provided to News 2, representatives from MUSC and Clemson said they were working to determine the impact of the proposed cuts and communicating with congressional leaders on the issue.
'At this time, all funded research activities and proposal submissions, including those with the NIH, should continue per standard business procedures without interruptons,' Clemson leaders wrote in a Feb. 9 message to faculty and staff.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump weaponization czar urged New York Attorney General James to resign over mortgage probe
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's political weaponization czar sent a letter urging New York Attorney General Letitia James to resign from office 'as an act of good faith' four days after starting his mortgage fraud investigation of her. Then he showed up outside her house. Ed Martin, the director of the Justice Department's Weaponization Working Group, told James' lawyer on Aug. 12 the Democrat would best serve the 'good of the state and nation' by resigning and ending his probe into alleged paperwork discrepancies on her Brooklyn townhouse and a Virginia home. 'Her resignation from office would give the people of New York and America more peace than proceeding," Martin wrote. "I would take this as an act of good faith.' Then last Friday, Martin turned up outside James' Brooklyn townhouse in a 'Columbo'-esque trench coat, accompanied by an aide and New York Post journalists. He didn't meet with James or go inside the building. A Post writer saw him tell a neighbor: 'I'm just looking at houses, interesting houses. It's an important house.' James' lawyer Abbe Lowell shot back on Monday, telling Martin in a letter his blunt request for James' resignation defied Justice Department standards and codes of professional responsibility and legal ethics. The Justice Department 'has firm policies against using investigations and against using prosecutorial power for achieving political ends,' Lowell wrote. 'This is ever more the case when that demand is made to seek political revenge against a public official in the opposite party.' 'Let me be clear: that will not happen here,' Lowell added. Lowell also blasted Martin's visit to James' home as a 'truly bizarre, made-for-media stunt' and said it was 'outside the bounds' of Justice Department rules. He included an image from security camera footage showing Martin, in his trench coat, posing for a photo in front of James' townhouse. He said Martin looked as if he were on a 'visit to a tourist attraction.' The Associated Press obtained copies of both letters on Tuesday. A message seeking comment was left for Martin's spokesperson. James' office declined to comment. The letters were the latest salvos in a monthslong drama involving Trump's retribution campaign against James and others who've battled him in court and fought his policies. James has sued the Republican president and his administration dozens of times and last year won a $454 million judgment against Trump and his companies in a lawsuit alleging he lied about the value of his assets on financial statements given to banks. An appeals court has yet to rule on Trump's bid to overturn that verdict. Earlier this month, the AP reported, the Justice Department subpoenaed James for records related to the civil fraud lawsuit and a lawsuit she filed against the National Rifle Association. Martin's investigation stems from a letter Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi in April asking her to investigate and consider prosecuting James, alleging she had 'falsified bank documents and property records." Pulte, whose agency regulates mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, cited 'media reports' claiming James had falsely listed a Virginia home as her principal residence, and he suggested she may have been trying to avoid higher interest rates that often apply to second homes. Records show James was listed as a co-borrower on a house her niece was buying in 2023. Lowell said records and correspondence easily disproved Pulte's allegation. While James signed a power-of-attorney form that, Lowell said, 'mistakenly stated the property to be Ms. James' principal residence," she sent an email to her mortgage loan broker around the same time that made clear the property 'WILL NOT be my primary residence.' Pulte also accused James of lying in property records about the number of apartments in the Brooklyn townhouse she has owned since 2001. A certificate of occupancy issued to a previous owner authorized up to five units in the building, where James lives and has rented out apartments. Other city records show the townhouse has four units, a number James has listed in building permit applications and mortgage documents. On Aug. 8, Bondi appointed Martin, a former Republican political operative, to investigate. Martin, the current U.S. pardon attorney and former acting U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., is also investigating mortgage fraud allegations against Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Schiff's lawyer called the allegations 'transparently false, stale, and long debunked." Lowell said it appears the working group Martin leads 'is aptly named as it is 'weaponizing'" the Justice Department "to carry out the President's and Attorney General's threats.' Solve the daily Crossword


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Alaska summit shows Trump always chickens out when facing Putin
An important part of American political folklore is that presidents in trouble travel. So it wasn't terribly surprising that President Trump announced he was flying to Alaska to meet fellow strongman Vladimir Putin. Trump hoped the much-hyped trip would divert public attention from the Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal and allow him to come home a hero with a Noble Peace Prize for himself and a peace deal carving up Ukraine. A peace deal would have been a feather in his cap and a new chapter in his famous ghostwritten book, 'The Art of the Deal.' Instead, the meeting became an epilogue that could called 'The Art of the Kneel.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky learned the hard way about another old political proverb which reads, 'When you not at the table, you're on the menu.' Before the conference started, Trump announced he would take 'severe' measures against Russia if the former Soviet strongman didn't agree to a ceasefire. Then, the acronym 'TACO' took effect — Trump Always Chickens Out — when he declared after the meeting that he supported Putin's position for an immediate peace conference while the war still raged. Trump melted like hot butter in the warm Anchorage summer sun and threw Zelensky and millions of brave Ukrainians under the wheels of Russian tanks. Reportedly, Trump accepted Putin's demands for territorial annexations. All Ukrainians got from Trump's travels was a lousy tee shirt with the imprint 'Putin Came and Trump Caved.' Americans were lucky that the president didn't give back Alaska to Russia as a bon voyage gift to Putin. Even Fox News anchor Marie Harf declared that Putin 'steamrolled' Trump. Russian military forces are steadily making inroads into Ukraine. The absence of a ceasefire is a boon to Putin and a problem for the undermanned Ukrainians who have held off the invaders for years against all odds. Trump pulled the rug out from under them during the talks in Anchorage. Why didn't Trump stand up to Putin? Inquiring minds want to know. Did the former Soviet KGB agent gain access to dirt on the U.S. leader in the top-secret Epstein files? Does Trump for all his bully bluster just turn to jelly when he confronts a leader with a stronger will? Monday, Zelensky met the U.S. president in the White House along with European leaders who came along to help the Ukrainian leader stiffen Trump's spine against the Russian dictator. The all-star cast of Ukrainian supporters included French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The European contingent pushed Trump for U.S. guarantees against Russian expansion. Those leaders are rightfully fearful of Russian expansion into their backyards and don't trust Trump to keep the hungry bear at bay after it devours a slice of Ukraine. NATO heads of state still maintain a vivid memory of another fateful summit meeting long ago when British Prime Minster Neville Chamberlain went to Munich, homburg in hand, and surrendered Czechoslovakia to Adolf Hitler's not so tender mercies. That was the beginning of the end for the rest of continental Europe. Other countries could be on the menu to fill another dictator's insatiable appetite to reconstitute the old Soviet bloc that he so faithfully served for so many years. Letting the Russian strongman take Eastern Ukraine would simply reward Russian aggression and encourage him to take even more territory. Joining Trump at this meeting was his Vice President JD Vance who is a vocal opponent of military support for Ukraine. Before the Alaska meeting, the veep undermined his own president's bargaining power when he announced that we're out of the Ukraine war funding business. So, who does Putin fear from the United States in his relentless and reckless quest to return central Europe to the Soviet, excuse me Russian fold? Certainly not Trump or Vance. Most Americans don't pay much attention to national security problems. Especially when the cost of living is so high. But the public should worry and worry hard when it has a president who can't stand up to foreign dictators. Freedom abroad and democracy in the U.S. are not safe with Trump in charge. Federal troops occupy Washington, D.C. and Russian forces control the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine. Tyranny is on the march across the world. Americans can't expect Trump to stop it.


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Latino civil rights group pushes Home Depot to limit ICE presence
The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is urging Home Depot to limit the presence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials (ICE) at its stores amid the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. LULAC, in a Tuesday press release, said that its national president, Roman Palomares, asked Home Depot CEO Ted Decker 'to establish a nationwide corporate policy denying Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal enforcement agencies access to Home Depot properties unless presented with a valid court-issued warrant and proper advance notice.' 'Day laborers and families must not be subjected to the fear of being hunted down in parking lots while pursuing honest work,' Palomares said in the release. He also noted that the Fortune 500 company benefits from labor from the communities that have been targeted by an uptick in deportation orders. 'With its size, reach, and influence, the company cannot claim neutrality — it has both the authority and the obligation to act decisively,' Palomares continued. 'To allow ICE to operate unchecked on its properties is not passive; it is complicity.' Earlier this month, the Los Angeles Times reported that an immigration raid in Los Angeles involved a Penske truck driver at a Home Depot saying he was seeking workers, according to a day laborer. Multiple Border Patrol agents leaped from the back of the truck while workers surrounded it and more than a dozen were arrested, according to the L.A. Times. 'This week, Border Patrol conducted a targeted raid, dubbed Trojan Horse, in Los Angeles at a Home Depot that resulted in the arrest of 16 illegal aliens from Guatemala, Mexico, Honduras, and Nicaragua,' a DHS spokesperson told The Hill in an emailed statement earlier this month. 'Federal law enforcement will continue utilizing all resources to arrest criminal illegal aliens and keep Americans safe.' The Hill has reached out to ICE for comment. Home Depot spokesperson Sarah McDonald said in a statement that the company is notified ahead of time when ICE activities 'are going to happen.' In many cases, she added, 'we don't know that arrests have taken place until after they're over.' 'We're required to follow all federal and local rules and regulations in every market where we operate,' she added.