logo
How Canada's Conservatives threw away a 27-point lead to lose again

How Canada's Conservatives threw away a 27-point lead to lose again

BBC News03-05-2025

Conservatives in Canada are trading blame for Monday night's election loss, showing that Pierre Poilievre will need to heal divisions within the movement as he fights to stay on as leader.As a clear Liberal win was emerging on election night, Conservative candidates and their supporters had one question: What the heck just happened?The party had lost a remarkable 27-point lead in opinion polls and failed to win an election for the fourth time in a row. And while it gained seats and earned almost 42% of the popular vote - its highest share since the party was founded in 2003 - its leader Poilievre was voted out of the seat he had held for the past 20 years."Nobody's happy about that," Shakir Chambers, a Conservative strategist and vice-president of Ontario-based consultancy firm the Oyster Group, told the BBC.The party is now trying to work out how it will move forward.
At the top of the agenda will be finding a way for the Conservatives to perform their duties as the Official Opposition - the second-place party in Canada's parliament whose job is to hold the sitting government to account - without their leader in the House.Ahead of a caucus meeting next Tuesday to discuss this, Poilievre announced on Friday his plan to run in an Alberta constituency special election to win back a seat.That special election will be triggered by the resignation of Conservative MP-elect Damien Kurek, who said he will voluntarily step down to let Poilievre back in after what he called "a remarkable national campaign"."An unstoppable movement has grown under his leadership, and I know we need Pierre fighting in the House of Commons," Kurek said in a statement.Unlike the US, federal politicians in Canada do not have to live in the city or province they run in. Poilievre grew up in Alberta, however, and will likely win handily as the constituency he is running in is a Conservative stronghold.A big question is whether Poilievre still has the backing of his own party to stay on as leader. Mr Chambers said the answer, so far, is a resounding yes."Pierre has a lot of support in the caucus," he said. "I don't think there's anybody that wants him removed, or that has super high ambitions that wants to replace him as leader."A number of high-profile Conservatives have already rallied behind him. One of them is Andrew Scheer, a current MP and former leader of the party, who said Poilievre should stay on to "ensure we finish the job next time".
Others are casting blame on where they went wrong.Jamil Jivani, who won his own constituency in a suburb of Toronto handily, felt that Ontario leader Doug Ford had betrayed the conservative movement and cost the party the election.The federal and provincial Conservative parties are legally different entities, though they belong to the same ideological tent, and Ford is leader of Ontario's Progressive Conservative Party.He frequently made headlines during the election campaign for his get-tough attitude with Donald Trump and the US president's trade war. "He couldn't stay out of our business," Jivani told a CBC reporter.Jivani, who in a past life attended Yale University with US Vice-President JD Vance, where the two became good friends, accused Ford of distracting from the federal Conservatives' campaign and of "positioning himself as some political genius that we need to be taking cues from".But Mr Chambers, the Conservative strategist, said that Poilievre will also need to confront where the party fell short.
Poilievre, who is known for his combative political style, has struggled with being unlikeable among the general Canadian public.He has also failed to shore up the support of popular Conservative leaders in some provinces, like Ontario's Ford, who did not campaign for Poilievre despite his recent landslide victory in a provincial election earlier this year. Ford did, however, post a photo of him and Liberal leader Mark Carney having a coffee."Last time I checked, Pierre Poilievre never came out in our election," Ford told reporters earlier this week. "Matter of fact, he or one of his lieutenants told every one of his members, 'don't you dare go out and help'"."Isn't that ironic?"Another Conservative premier, Tim Houston of Nova Scotia - who also did not campaign for Poilievre - said the federal party needs to do some "soul-searching" after its loss."I think the Conservative Party of Canada was very good at pushing people away, not so good at pulling people in," Houston said.Not every premier stood on the sidelines. Poilievre was endorsed by Alberta's Danielle Smith and Saskatchewan's Scott Moe, both western Conservatives.Kory Teneycke, Ford's campaign manager, who publicly criticised Poilievre's campaign during the election, angering federal Conservatives, rejected the notion that Ford's failure to endorse Poilievre had cost him the election.He told the BBC that, to him, the bigger problem was Poilievre's failure to unite Conservative voters in Canada."What constitutes a Conservative in different parts of the country can look quite different," he said, adding that Poilievre's populist rhetoric and aggressive style appealed to Conservatives in the west, but alienated those in the east."There was a lot of Trump mimicry in terms of how they presented the campaign," Mr Teneycke said. "Donald Trump is public enemy number one to most in Canada, and I don't think it was coming across very well."He added he believes some of the "soul-searching" by Poilievre's Conservatives will need to include a plan of how to build a coalition of the right in a country "as big and diverse as Canada".Asked by reporters what it would take to heal the rift, Ford answered: "All they have to do is make a phone call."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tory refuses 4 times to apologise for Liz Truss chaos in excruciating BBC clash
Tory refuses 4 times to apologise for Liz Truss chaos in excruciating BBC clash

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Tory refuses 4 times to apologise for Liz Truss chaos in excruciating BBC clash

Chris Philp, who held a key Treasury role during Liz Truss' short spell in No10, was pressed by Laura Kuenssberg to say sorry as the Tories try and move on from the misery caused when in power A former Treasury ally of Liz Truss refused FOUR times to apologise for the chaos the Tories unleashed in an excruciating TV exchange. Chris Philp, who is now Shadow Home Secretary, was told that not saying sorry "drives people bananas" by the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg. The Conservative frontbencher, who was Chief Secretary to the Treasury during Ms Truss' short spell in charge, admitted that "mistakes were made" - but offered no apology despite being repeatedly pressed. ‌ It comes after his colleague, Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride, vowed "never again" to pledge unfunded tax cuts as the Tories try to move on. Asked for the first time if he would apologise, Mr Philp said: "Well I think Mel, openly and honestly acknowledged that mistakes were made in that time. Mistakes were made. And what Mel was saying is that those mistakes will never be made again by a Conservative administration." ‌ He went on to accuse Nigel Farage's Reform of "making extravagant promises about massive tax cuts and increases in welfare that are completely unfunded". But Ms Kuenssberg refused to drop the matter, saying: "You were the Chief Secretary to the Treasury at the time. There were £45billion of unfunded tax cuts. Mortgage rates went soaring, there had to be emergency intervention. "I'll ask you again - do you want to just say sorry for that? Maybe so you can move on?" Mr Philp stammered: "Well, I think huge mistakes were made..." But the BBC host cut in: "Isn't this precisely the thing that drives people bananas about politicians? You make a speech in London, your colleague makes a speech in London expressing contrition, which is a fancy way for saying we got it wrong, we're sorry. "Will you say sorry to people for the Liz Truss implosion?" Mr Philp continued: "Oh, well, that was pressed on this Mel Stride and he said mistakes were made. "And it's not going to happen again. It's very, very clear indeed. And it's relevant because we see another party, Reform, saying you know what Liz Truss said times, times five times three on a whole bigger scale. So we've learnt from that episode and those mistakes will never be made again." Ms Kuenssberg tried one more time, asking: "As a as a human being, if you make a mistake, you say, yeah, we messed up and you just say, then you say, sorry." The Shadow Home Secretary retorted: "Look, we've been really clear. I mean, I don't know how many more times to say it was a mistake. They got it wrong. And those mistakes will never be made again."

EXCLUSIVE Tory feuding fears as frontbenchers moan about Robert Jenrick interfering in their policy areas - amid anger at 'petty jealousy' and 'fragile egos'
EXCLUSIVE Tory feuding fears as frontbenchers moan about Robert Jenrick interfering in their policy areas - amid anger at 'petty jealousy' and 'fragile egos'

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Tory feuding fears as frontbenchers moan about Robert Jenrick interfering in their policy areas - amid anger at 'petty jealousy' and 'fragile egos'

Fears over Tory feuding are mounting as Robert Jenrick 's allies hit back at claims he is jockeying to replace Kemi Badenoch. Insiders have admitted that the shadow justice secretary's increasingly punchy interventions are causing tensions with colleagues. Mr Jenrick has put out slick videos on issues such as fare-dodging on the Tube, the Chagos Islands handover to Mauritius and theft of tools from vans. Bin collections in Birmingham and immigration have also been on his list of hot topics. Ms Badenoch is believed to be relaxed about her former leadership rival's activities, with sources saying she wants her team 'out there getting a hearing'. However, one senior figure told MailOnline: 'It is more of a problem for other members of the shadow cabinet. 'Some have been very annoyed when he's waded in…. That has caused tensions. 'Kemi has a challenge managing the competition in her team.' Another well-connected Tory swiped that it was 'no surprise' Mr Jenrick's social media efforts were causing irritation - but suggested he was not making any progress with the public. 'The talk about Boris (Johnson) as an alternative indicates that people don't think Robert would make any difference,' they said. A Conservative source said: 'MPs have to get used to life in Opposition. The public just want the Conservatives to hold Labour to account. 'They don't care about who does it, they certainly don't have time for fragile egos and pettiness.' One Tory MP suggested shadow home secretary Chris Philp was the one 'on manoeuvres' and gunning for shadow chancellor Mel Stride's job - something he denies. 'Chris is insanely keen to promote himself. He's always pumping out stuff on the Conservative MPs' WhatsApp group. He's clearly very ambitious,' they said. Another veteran backbencher said Mr Jenrick's wide-ranging approach was an issue, but there was a problem with the rest of the shadow cabinet failing to make a mark. 'I think it's a fine balance between having effective people in your shadow cabinet, serving the wider good, but not allowing stories of leadership challenges to come from it,' the ex-minister said. 'I think there are a lot who still haven't transitioned from Government to Opposition.' A former minister described Mr Jenrick's manoeuvring as 'manic and desperate'. But they added: 'Hard working, capable and impatient are also words that apply.' A spokesman for Mr Jenrick said: 'Rob's just doing his job. He's working hard all day to make Labour pay for the damage they are doing to the country.' Mr Stride was asked in a round of broadcast interviews last week whether Mr Jenrick was 'not being helpful' with his social media presence. 'Rob is doing a great job being out there using social media and getting important messages across. That's what we're more broadly doing in the social media age as a party,' he said.

SNP ministers accused of secrecy over £2m Grangemouth carbon capture study
SNP ministers accused of secrecy over £2m Grangemouth carbon capture study

Scotsman

time6 hours ago

  • Scotsman

SNP ministers accused of secrecy over £2m Grangemouth carbon capture study

Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been accused of secrecy after refusing to publish a £2 million study into whether a pipeline that will connect Grangemouth with a key carbon capture project will fall flat. The 'alarming' move comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves is poised to confirm at her spending review this week whether the Acorn carbon capture project for St Fergus, near Peterhead, will finally receive the funding it needs to get off the ground. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Carbon capture technology is seen as being essential to Scotland and the UK reaching net zero | POOL/AFP via Getty Images The previous Conservative UK government only granted the Acorn project reserve status and ploughed funding into carbon capture and storage projects south of the Border instead. This comes as finance secretary Shona Robison asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves to award funding for the Acorn carbon capture project and to ensure Scotland receives a share of GB Energy funding that matches its contribution to UK clean energy goals, ahead of the UK spending review. She also called on the Chancellor to 'prioritise growth' and to fully fund the employer national insurance increase for Scotland's public services. Ms Robison urged the UK Government to abandon some of its 'damaging policies' such as cuts to welfare support for disabled people, to scrap the two-child benefit cap and to reinstate a universal winter fuel payment, ahead of the review on 11 June. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said the Scottish Government had not yet been provided with 'clarity' on spending priorities. The delays to the project has been partly blamed for SNP ministers rolling back climate targets, with the Acorn plans initially hoped to be up and running before 2030. But now, the Scottish Government has refused to release the results of a feasibility study into the pipeline, despite confirming the document was completed in March. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP ministers handed over £2m to National Gas last year to assess whether it was possible to turn an old 174-mile gas pipeline that runs from Grangemouth in the Central Belt to St Fergus, Aberdeenshire into 'Europe's largest carbon capture pipeline'. Officials have refused to release details of what the study shows, despite campaigners requesting it under Freedom of Information law. Acting Energy Secretary Gillian Martin during a visit to drone manufacturer Flowcopter in Loanhead, to mark the publication of the Scottish Government's Green Industrial Strategy | Andrew Milligan/PA Wire Concerns have been raised about carbon capture technology, which campaigners warn simply allows oil and gas companies to continue burning fossil fuels. Under the technology, harmful carbon emissions are prevented from being released into the atmosphere and instead trapped and injected into the seabed. Fears have been raised about leakage, with the technology not yet tested at commercial scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad During a trip to St Fergus in 2023, then prime minister Rishi Sunak also raised concerns about the technology, warning that it would be a boost 'if we can get it to work'. Now, campaigners have warned that any further public funds for the Acorn project would benefit major oil companies, including Shell, which have made £90 billion profits in recent years and Harbour Energy who recently laid off 250 staff despite paying out almost £1bn to shareholders in the past three years. The UK government has already pledged £22bn to the carbon capture industry, a move which the Public Accounts Committee branded a 'high risk gamble' that could push up household energy bills. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad First Minister John Swinney has vowed to increase the public handout from the Scottish Government for the Acorn project beyond £80m. But that is contingent on the UK government first backing the project - amid doubts the funding could be axed in the spending review amid a perilous economic backdrop. Friends of the Earth Scotland's climate campaigner Alex Lee said: 'The public are again being forced to pay for the oil industry's greenwashing carbon capture plans, and it is deeply alarming that we don't even get to see what our money has unearthed. 'Plans to run a 280km high pressure carbon pipeline through towns and villages are fraught with danger and uncertainty because this has never been done before in Scotland. Have the people who live along the route of this pipeline proposal been informed of the risks and consulted on these proposals? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It is a farce that ministers have been talking up carbon capture for 20 years and only now are they checking whether it would even be feasible to do this. 'When working climate solutions are crying out for funding, there should be no public investment in dodgy scams like carbon capture.' Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves and Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband during a meeting of the National Wealth Fund Taskforce in 11 Downing Street. PIC: Justin Tallis/PA Wire Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: 'The Greens have always been sceptical about putting too much reliance on untested carbon capture technology, and we are firmly opposed to using it as an excuse for more fossil fuel extraction or burning. 'Even its advocates don't think it will make any impact on our emissions in the near future, so the priority has to be the action we know how to take right now - cutting road and air traffic levels, insulating homes and shifting to clean heating, and supporting communities to change land use. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Climate action isn't rocket science and we don't need to wait for new technologies to get off the drawing board - we just need to do what we know works.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government provided National Gas with a £2m grant to support a study to explore the technical feasibility and viability of repurposing an existing gas pipeline for the transportation of carbon dioxide. 'The conclusions of the study were requested under environmental information regulations. However, for reasons of commercial confidentiality these can't be released. 'The Scottish Government fully supports the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS), and we have been advised by the Climate Change Committee that they 'cannot see a route to net zero that does not include CCS'.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A UK government spokesperson said: 'We are delivering first of a kind carbon capture projects in the UK, supporting thousands of jobs across the country, reigniting industrial heartlands and tackling the climate crisis.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store