logo
Minority ethnic community afraid following anti-social behaviour, police say

Minority ethnic community afraid following anti-social behaviour, police say

BreakingNews.ie2 days ago
Minority ethnic communities have been left feeling afraid following anti-social behaviour in south Belfast, police have said.
Police said young people have been gathering on Donegall Pass throwing items at members of the public.
Advertisement
Neighbourhood Inspector Roisin Brown said a number of the minority ethnic community have been targeted.
'Over the last 48 hours police have received multiple reports of young people gathering on Donegall Pass and throwing items including bottles, cans and water balloons at members of the public,' she said.
'A number of our minority ethnic community have been targeted and have been left feeling afraid and unwelcome in the area.
'Among a number of reports, one man was knocked off his scooter, whilst a vulnerable young woman was targeted by anti-social behaviour causing her to extreme distress.
Advertisement
'Along with this we are also receiving reports of elderly people being in fear.'
Ms Brown urged parents and guardians to know where their children are.
'I am appealing directly to parents and guardians to know where your children are and what they are doing.
'This guidance could well be the thing that prevents them from ending up with a criminal record,' she said.
Advertisement
'I am also appealing to these young people themselves, this may seem like harmless fun, however we are actively investigating reports of assaults and public order offences.
'We do not wish to criminalise young people, but this must always be balanced against our duty to keep the public safe and to investigate offences reported to us.
'I would ask that you all support us to put an end this behaviour.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PSNI officers were justified in shooting ‘highly aggressive' cow heading towards busy road, probe finds
PSNI officers were justified in shooting ‘highly aggressive' cow heading towards busy road, probe finds

Belfast Telegraph

time3 minutes ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

PSNI officers were justified in shooting ‘highly aggressive' cow heading towards busy road, probe finds

The Police Ombudsman concluded officers had acted with compassion while complying with their duty to protect the public. The watchdog examined both cases, which happened earlier this year, due to the discharge of police firearms. In the first incident, on May 15, police received multiple emergency calls reporting a cow loose on the Old Eglish Road near Dungannon. The animal was heading towards the A4 dual carriageway and was described as highly aggressive. Traffic was halted in both directions, and armed officers were deployed alongside eight veterinary professionals. Belfast History Explained: Who was Sheila the Elephant? Despite efforts to subdue the animal safely, a senior vet said euthanasia was the only viable option. This was due to the cow's volatility and the risk posed to the public, as motorists had started to get out of their vehicles to observe what was happening. Two officers discharged firearms using specialist ammunition, resulting in the humane destruction of the animal near the central reservation of the A4. Police Ombudsman investigators reviewed body-worn video (BWV), footage from police vehicles, and operational logs. While initial footage showed that there was only one visible shot, further clarification confirmed that two simultaneous shots were fired to the animal's vital organs due to the distance, safety constraints and the animal's demeanour. The decision to aim for the body rather than the head, which would have been the preferred option, was made to ensure a swift and humane outcome, in line with operational guidance and veterinary advice. The Police Ombudsman review of evidence concluded that PSNI officers had carried out the task to protect the public, as well as ensuring the animal did not suffer unnecessarily. In the second incident, on May 16, police were alerted by the Northern Ireland Ambulance Service to an overturned livestock lorry on the M1 eastbound between Junctions 14 and 13. The driver was reported as walking wounded, and both lanes were blocked. Roads Policing Units, the Ambulance Service and the Fire and Rescue Service attended the scene. Due to concerns about a potential cattle stampede and the possibility of injured animals requiring humane destruction, armed officers were deployed, and a veterinary professional was called in. NIFRS began cutting the roof off the overturned two-deck articulated lorry to extract cattle and the vet identified animals with fractures and other conditions. It was decided that if the vet could not use captive bolt euthanasia, as she was unable to reach or get close to the animal, armed officers would be authorised to use firearms. Ombudsman investigators found the lead PSNI officer had consulted with the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs Humane Slaughter Team and it had been agreed that the correct procedures had been put in place. At 9.42am, a specialist firearms PSNI officer euthanised one animal in the lower deck of the trailer that was identified as suffering unnecessarily and could not be reached. The vet also euthanised two further injured animals using the captive bolt method. By 1.18pm all livestock were removed from the trailer and armed officers left the scene soon afterwards. The Police Ombudsman's review found the use of firearms was proportionate, justified and executed with care and coordination. Director of Investigations, Nikki Davis, said, 'Our review of both incidents was important to ensure proper scrutiny over the discharge of police firearms for the humane destruction of animals. 'Public confidence depends on transparency in how such distressing incidents are handled. The public can be reassured that, in these cases, police officers acted with compassion while ensuring the safety of the community was protected.'

Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain
Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain

A jury has been discharged in the trial of a former priest who was the leader of the Nine O'Clock Service evangelical movement. Christopher Brain, 68, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, was charged with one count of rape and 36 counts of indecent assault between 1981 and 1995 against 13 women. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. He was the leader of the Nine O'Clock Service (NOS), part of the Church of England, in Sheffield between 1986 and 1995. The 11-strong jury, sitting at Inner London Crown Court, was discharged by Judge Freya Newbery on Thursday after failing to reach a verdict on five counts, having started deliberations on August 12. The judge told the jurors: 'I am going to discharge you now on those counts. For you it all comes to an end now. 'I am really grateful for such a lot of time that you have given.' Ms Newbury gave the jurors the option of exemption from jury service if summoned within the next 10 years. A further hearing to determine whether prosecutors believe there are grounds for a retrial for the charges was set for September 4. On Wednesday, jurors at Inner London Crown Court found him guilty of 17 counts of indecent assault against nine women. However, he was acquitted of another 15 charges of indecent assault against two women. The jury is still deliberating the rape charge and four further counts of indecent assault. The seven-week trial heard how Brain, 68, was praised by the Archbishop of Canterbury after his 'club culture' inspired services at St Thomas' Church in Crookes, Sheffield, and later Ponds Forge leisure centre, drew hundreds of young congregants. He was fast-tracked for Holy Orders as the movement took off, but it collapsed in controversy in 1995 after women alleged their charismatic leader had been sexually assaulting them, in some cases claiming he was helping to heal their sexual repression.

Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'
Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'

Daily Mail​

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'

An anti-Putin activist has been found dead in London after his asylum bid was rejected. After more than a year's wait for an appeal hearing, Alexander Frolov, 26, was found dead in Acton, west London, on July 28. His friends believe that he took his own life because of the mental pressure of being sent back to Russia. Originally arriving in the UK under a temporary visa as an agricultural worker in 2021, Alexander submitted his asylum application in December 2022. When Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, his friend Galina Shakirova said he was unable to return home as he 'refused to take part in killing people'. According to The i Paper, his asylum application was rejected in April 2024. Alexander had appealed the decision and was waiting for his hearing to be rescheduled when he died. Metropolitan Police are not believed to be investigating any suspicious circumstances into his death and an inquest will be held next week. He was described by the Russian Democratic Society as a 'dedicated opponent of Putin's regime'. They added he was a 'volunteer who gave his time to help others, and a constant presence at anti-war protests'. 'Alexander believed in the possibility of a free and democratic Russia and hoped to one day return to it,' the group said. His friend Galina, who met Alexander when they worked together as stewards at anti-war rally, called him 'kind, generous, quietly dependable'. She said: 'Imagine being an opposition activist who knows that returning home almost certainly means prison. You've spoken out publicly. You've worked with organisations labelled in Russia as 'undesirable' or 'extremist'. 'Then you ask for protection – hoping for safety, for a chance to survive. And instead, you're refused.' The Home Office said: 'It is our long-standing policy not to comment on individual cases.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store