logo
Disney has done the impossible, and made Snow White an even bigger bomb

Disney has done the impossible, and made Snow White an even bigger bomb

Yahoo12-05-2025

Hi-ho, it's back to the cinema for Disney's flop live-action Snow White. Having originally crashed and burned in March, the movie misfired all over again after the House of Mouse re-released it in the US last week. Talk about putting the 'grim' in Grimm Fairy Tale.
Disney's apparent calculation was that that the advent of summer blockbuster season could give this dead-on-arrival feature a new lease of life. You can sort of appreciate the logic: after all, May saw the ailing Marvel Cinematic Universe return from purgatory when Thunderbolts proved a surprise hit.
Where a caped crusader can go, surely Snow White and her terrifying CGI dwarf friends could follow? Who, moreover, wouldn't want to hear Gal Gadot ham her way through the dreadful All Is Fair one last time? A sort of evil twin of Frozen's Let It Go, the tune has acquired a cult fanbase on social media, where people are intoxicated by its sheer, 'how did this get made?' awfulness.
Sadly for Disney, such logic did not long survive contact with reality. Incredibly, the second coming of Snow White was an even bigger disaster than the original run. Unleashed on unsuspecting 1,000 cinemas across the US, the Rachel Zegler v Gal Gadot calamity brought in a pitiful $252 per screen. To date, the remake has cost Disney an estimated $115 million – much of the cost eaten up for by the bizarre decision to have Zegler act opposite CGI dwarfs straight from the Uncanny Valley.
The studio will no doubt claw back some of that cash when Snow White is released to video streaming this month. But if the film is about to be made available at home, why put it back in cinemas? It's the most illogical re-release since Sony tried to capitalise on the mockery directed at its dire Jared Leto superhero bust Morbius by putting it back in cinemas in June 2022 – when it did almost as badly as Snow White, bringing in $289 'per theatre'.
Hollywood could never be accused of clear-eyed thinking. In the case of Snow White, common sense dictated that the beloved animated classic should have been left well alone to begin with. In the case of Morbius, it has been asserted that Sony knew the film would crash hard second time around – but hoped the ensuing headlines would generate publicity for future superhero projects, including its more successful Tom Hardy Venom series.
'Putting Morbius back into theatres, knowing full well it would play in mostly empty auditoriums, is a way to keep the character in the news cycle,' claimed Forbes.
The other theory is that Hollywood's obsession with re-releasing old films has led to the mistaken idea that somewhere out there were people who wanted to sit through Snow White on the big screen a second time. Without question, re-releases have been a good news story in the industry. As Snow White flopped all over again, the 20-year-old Star Wars movie Revenge of the Sith blitzed its way to a $25 million (re)opening weekend.
Not bad for the concluding chapter of George Lucas's much-mocked prequels trilogy – a series so bad that its star, Natalie Portman, worried it had ruined her career. Two decades on, Lucas's Sith show was embraced as a lost classic. 'There is a hunger out there for big-screen Star Wars content,' Shawn Robbins, director of movie analytics at Fandango, explains to Business Insider. 'It's definitely not gone away.'
The revenge of Revenge of the Sith is part of a wider trend of cashing in on internet fandom for older films. An Imax re-release of Christopher Nolan's touchy feelie black hole epic Interstellar sold out almost its entire run in the US last year. Similarly, a restored version of the creepy animated classic Coraline outperformed expectations on both sides of the Atlantic in 2024 – notwithstanding a breaking scandal concerning the personal life of the original novel's author, Neil Gaiman.
'Moviegoers want to see films outside of their home,' exhibitor relations analyst Jeff Bock told Variety. 'That is the future bloodline of the industry.'
The success of the Coraline re-release was about more than grassroots nostalgia. Laika, the stop motion animation studio that made the film in 2010, had noted the emergence of an online following for the film – with its biggest fans typically too young to have seen the movie in cinemas 14 years ago.
'We began to gather around the idea that there was a demand, particularly from fans who may have discovered it on home media,' Laika marketing officer David Burke told Variety. Laika took the lead by creating TikTok content around the movie – further fuelling nostalgia for the film by 'fostering [an] intentionally cultivated sense of community.'
In the case of Revenge of the Sith and Coraline, the crucial ingredient is time. For Gen Z fans, the chance to see these films on the big screen was too good to pass up – who knows when they will next have the opportunity? But Snow White only left cinemas in April. It took its leave to the echo of some of the worst reviews this side of Tom Hooper's Cats (a movie all involved are happy to chuck into the void and never discuss again).
It isn't unthinkable that Snow White might one day acquire a cult following – terrible films often do. But that process will not happen overnight, In rushing too quickly back into the cinema, Disney merely reminded audiences of the terrible judgement that had led to the cack-handed reboot in the first place. It would take a power-drunk evil queen to conclude otherwise.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disney, NBCUniversal sue AI creator Midjourney in copyright dispute
Disney, NBCUniversal sue AI creator Midjourney in copyright dispute

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Disney, NBCUniversal sue AI creator Midjourney in copyright dispute

June 11 (UPI) -- Disney and NBCUniversal have joined legal teams in a lawsuit against AI image maker Midjourney over multiple claims of copyright infringement. The lawsuit filed Tuesday in California's U.S. central district claimed that Midjourney, a generative artificial intelligence startup, utilized and distributed proprietary AI-generated characters from NBCU and Disney productions such as the Simpsons, Star Wars, Toy Story, Shrek and others. It marked the first AI-related infringement lawsuit taken on by a Hollywood giant. "This is an extremely significant development," IP lawyer Chad Hummel told Wired. Meanwhile, Universal and Disney have petitioned for a jury trial and argue it risks upending "the bedrock incentives of U.S. copyright law." The two plaintiffs claimed that Midjourney's own website displayed "hundreds, if not thousands, of images generated by its Image Service at the request of its subscribers" they believed infringed on their copyrighted works. "Midjourney's bootlegging business model and defiance of U.S copyright law are not only an attack on Disney, Universal, and the hard-working creative community that brings the magic of movies to life, but are also a broader threat to the American motion picture industry," the complaint continued. The joint suit further says that San Francisco-based Midjourney allegedly ignored prior legal requests to cease and desist and included dozens of examples in the complaint, calling Midjourney a "bottomless pit of plagiarism." In 2023, Midjourney reported more than $200 million in revenue and in 2024 took in an additional $100 million on top of it to beat the prior year. "Midjourney, which has attracted millions of subscribers and made $300 million last year alone, is focused on its own bottom line and ignored Plaintiffs' demands," according to court documents. The two movie studios seek an unspecified amount in monetary damages, and further requested injunctive relief in order to prevent Midjourney from any future copyright violations.

Disney, Universal Slam AI Company As 'Bottomless Pit Of Plagiarism' In Scathing Lawsuit
Disney, Universal Slam AI Company As 'Bottomless Pit Of Plagiarism' In Scathing Lawsuit

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Disney, Universal Slam AI Company As 'Bottomless Pit Of Plagiarism' In Scathing Lawsuit

Disney and NBCUniversal joined forces in the first lawsuit of its kind against the artificial intelligence image company Midjourney on Wednesday, accusing it of copyright infringement. 'We are bringing this action today to protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content,' Kimberly Harris, NBCUniversal's executive vice president, told CNBC. The companies' lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleges that Midjourney sought 'to reap the rewards' of Disney and Universal-copyrighted characters by selling an AI image-generating service 'that functions as a virtual vending machine, generating endless unauthorized copies' of their copyrighted works. 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism,' the lawsuit reads. 'Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing.' Midjourney did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. The AI company made $300 million last year from its image service, which allowed subscribers to simply enter a text prompt to request any of the Disney or Universal characters to perform an action, according to the lawsuit. The AI then generates and displays a high-quality image of the character. The lawsuit lists several Disney or Universal-owned characters Midjourney generated, including Shrek, Darth Vader, Thanos from the 'Avengers' series, and the Minions characters from 'Despicable Me.' Horacio Gutierrez, chief legal and compliance officer for The Walt Disney Company, said in a statement to HuffPost that Disney's 'world-class IP is built on decades of financial investment, creativity and innovation—investments only made possible by the incentives embodied in copyright law that give creators the exclusive right to profit from their works.' He added, 'We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity.' The lawsuit contends that 'Midjourney could easily stop its theft and exploitation' of intellectual property since the AI service controls what copyrighted content it selects. However, Midjourney chose not to use copyright protection measures, even when Disney and Universal sent cease-and-desist letters, according to the suit. The lawsuit accuses Midjourney of promoting its AI tools using Disney and Universal characters, and says the AI company has already begun using such characters to train its video service. The companies are now asking for a jury trial to determine damages, which could include some of Midjourney's profits. 'Midjourney's bootlegging business model and defiance of U.S copyright law are not only an attack on Disney, Universal, and the hard-working creative community that brings the magic of movies to life, but are also a broader threat to the American motion picture industry which has created millions of jobs and contributed more than $260 billion to the nation's economy,' the lawsuit reads. College Student Allegedly Created Undressed Images Of Classmates With AI, Then Sold Them Top AI CEO Warns Lawmakers To Prepare For Tech To Gut Entry-Level Office Jobs Chicago Sun-Times Faces Backlash After Promoting Fake Books In AI-Generated Summer Reading List

Fact Check: Marvel actor Wyatt Russell isn't in LA protest video, honestly
Fact Check: Marvel actor Wyatt Russell isn't in LA protest video, honestly

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: Marvel actor Wyatt Russell isn't in LA protest video, honestly

Claim: A video authentically shows actor Wyatt Russell speaking at a Los Angeles protest. Rating: Context: The man in the footage was a protester named Aaron Fisher. In early June 2025, amid protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles, a claim (archived) circulated online that actor Wyatt Russell spoke out against law enforcement and military personnel in the city. U.S. President Donald Trump ordered the National Guard into Los Angeles despite California Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections. In a video accompanying the claims, a person social media users identified as Russell — the son of actors Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn who appeared in the 2025 Marvel movie "Thunderbolts*" — said in part: You feel tough with your assault rifles and your sticks. You should be standing here with us. You're on the wrong side of history. We know you got a job to do, but you took an oath to the Constitution, not to the fascists in the White House. One person shared the following post on X (archived): (X account @lesleyabravanel) The claim circulated elsewhere on (archived) X (archived) and Reddit (archived). Snopes readers also searched our website to find out whether the claim was true. However, the footage was miscaptioned. While the video was authentic, meaning it was not the product of artificial intelligence software or other digital manipulation, Wyatt Russell was not the person in it. Snopes confirmed the protester in the video is actually a man named Aaron Fisher. A spokesperson for Russell told The Independent, "This is indeed NOT Wyatt Russell, and we have been working to try and correct the mis-identification." A representative for Russell also confirmed the misidentification to Entertainment Weekly. Snopes reached out to a representative for Russell for comment on the misidentification and will update this article if we receive a response. In a post (archived) on June 9, 2025, an X user said they confirmed that the protester was not Russell but Fisher: Snopes reached out to Fisher, who confirmed to us that he is the person who appeared in the video. He provided the following statement via email: I found the mixup to be pretty humorous, and glad it helped to amplify the message. The proliferation of the words themselves, and the movement behind it, is what matters most. The deployment of the National Guard against the wishes of our Governor is dangerously un-American, and I will continue to peacefully protest in my community. Sommerlad, Joe. "No, Marvel Star Wyatt Russell Wasn't in Viral Clip Ripping National Guard in LA." The Independent, 10 June 2025, Accessed 11 June 2025. Thunderbolts*. Directed by Jake Schreier, Marvel Studios, 2025. Wang, Jessica. "No, That Isn't Wyatt Russell at the Anti-ICE Protests in Los Angeles — 'Not Wyatt Russell' Responds." 9 June 2025, Accessed 11 June 2025. Fisher, Aaron. "Wyatt Russell Misidentification." Received by Megan Loe. 11 June 2025. Email Interview.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store