
Gas flaring created 389m tonnes of carbon pollution last year, report finds
Flaring is a way to get rid of gases such as methane that arise when pumping oil out of the ground. While it can sometimes keep workers safe by relieving buildups of pressure, the practice is routine in many countries because it is often cheaper to burn gas than to capture, transport, process and sell it.
Global gas flaring rose for a second year in a row to reach its highest level since 2007, the report found, despite growing concerns about energy security and climate breakdown.
It found that 151bn cubic metres (bcm) of gas were burned during oil and gas production in 2024, up by 3bcm from the year before.
'Flaring is needlessly wasteful,' said Zubin Bamji, the manager of the World Bank's Global Flaring and Methane Reduction Partnership (GFMRP), which wrote the report. '[It's] a missed opportunity to strengthen energy security and improve access to reliable power.'
In many cases, observers complain, the rules to prevent needless flaring are weak and poorly enforced, and companies have little incentive to stop doing it because they do not have to pay for the pollution it causes.
The report found that nine countries – Russia, Iran, Iraq, the US, Venezuela, Algeria, Libya, Mexico and Nigeria – were responsible for three-quarters of all gas flaring in 2024. Most of the worst offenders were countries with state-owned oil companies.
Despite efforts to stop the practice, the intensity of flaring – the volume flared per barrel of oil produced – had remained 'stubbornly high' over the last 15 years, the report found.
Flaring intensity in Norway, one of the cleanest oil and gas producers, is 18 times lower than in the US, and 228 times lower than in Venezuela, according to the data.
Andrew Baxter, an oil and gas expert at the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund, who was not involved in the report, said it was 'deeply disappointing' to see a return to the gas flaring levels of 2007.
'Such levels of flaring are an egregious waste of resources,' he said. '[They] are catastrophic for climate and human health.'
The International Energy Agency has called for the elimination of all flaring except in emergencies by 2030. The value of gas flared last year, which would have been worth about $63bn at EU import prices for 2024, is more than half of the upfront costs that the IEA says are needed to stop the practice altogether.
Jonathan Banks, a methane expert at the nonprofit Clean Air Task Force, who was not involved in the report, said solutions were well known and often cost-effective. 'What is missing is the political will and regulatory pressure to implement them at scale.'
The report highlighted areas of progress, pointing to some oil and gas producers, such as Angola, Egypt, Indonesia and Kazakhstan, that had successfully reduced the amount of gas flared.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Kazakhstan, which has levied steep fines on companies that break the rules, had reduced flaring by 71% since 2012.
Banks said: 'We need more of this kind of action and more support to help lower-income, high-flaring nations overcome infrastructure and governance barriers.
'We also need global coordination, particularly from major oil importers, to create incentives that reward responsible producers and raise the bar for everyone.'
The report, which used satellite data to estimate flared gas, was produced by the GFMRP, which is made up of some of the world's most polluting governments and companies.
Its funders include European energy firms such as BP, Eni, Equinor, Shell and TotalEnergies, as well as major oil-producing countries such as the US, Norway and the United Arab Emirates.
The group has encouraged countries and companies to end routine flaring by 2030. According to the report, countries that endorsed the initiative have on average reduced their flaring intensity by 12% since 2012, though absolute volumes have fallen only slightly in that time, while countries that have not made the pledge increased their flaring intensity by 25%.
'Reducing gas flaring is not without challenges,' said Bamji. 'It requires upfront investment, adequate infrastructure, strong regulatory frameworks and sustained political will.'
If those conditions were in place, countries could significantly cut flaring, 'often while unlocking new sources of revenue and improving energy access'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump to present minerals deal to Putin in Alaska
Donald Trump is preparing to offer Vladimir Putin access to rare earth minerals to incentivise him to end the war in Ukraine. The US president will arrive at the much-anticipated meeting with his Russian counterpart on Friday armed with a number of money-making opportunities for Putin. They will include opening up Alaska's natural resources to Moscow and lifting some of the American sanctions on Russia's aviation industry, The Telegraph can reveal. Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, is understood to be among administration figures briefing Mr Trump ahead of his sit-down with Putin in Anchorage. Mr Bessent is exploring the economic trade-offs the US can make with Russia in order to expedite a ceasefire agreement. Proposals include giving Putin access to the rare earth minerals in the Ukrainian territories currently occupied by Russia. Ukraine is thought to hold 10 per cent of the world's reserves of lithium, used in the production of batteries. Two of its largest lithium deposits are in areas held by Russia, and Putin has staked his claim to the valuable minerals found in the regions his forces occupy. 'There are a range of incentives, in which a potential mineral/rare earth deal could be one,' a source with knowledge of the proposals told The Telegraph. In May, the US signed a rare earth mineral deal with Kyiv, allowing it to exploit Ukraine's ample natural resources. Washington will need to establish new mining operations, which could be accelerated by Russian co-operation. The president's America First policy has seen him strike several mineral deals since his return to the Oval Office, most notably with Ukraine and Kazakhstan. After Olzhas Bektenov, the Kazakhstani prime minister, visited the White House, the State Department said it was 'looking forward to working with Kazakhstan to deepen economic ties in... critical minerals sectors'. Other incentives include lifting export bans on parts and equipment needed to service Russian planes, swathes of which have fallen into disrepair. Western countries have restricted Moscow's access to crucial spare components and other equipment since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in 2022, forcing airlines and the military to cannibalise old aircraft for replacement parts. Nearly 30 per cent of Russia's western-made planes, cut off from maintenance, could be grounded within the next five years, Sergei Chemezov, the head of Rostec, Russia's state-owned defence conglomerate, suggested this year. Removing sanctions on Russian aircraft Lifting sanctions on Russian aircraft could prove lucrative for American manufacturer Boeing. With a fleet of more than 700 planes dominated by Airbus and Boeing, Russian airlines could return to the American suppliers for critical parts and maintenance. Recent major incidents highlight an urgent need to prevent the fleet degrading. In late July, a Soviet-era Antonov An-24, built in 1976, crashed in the country's far east, killing all 48 people on board. Days later, flag carrier Aeroflot grounded dozens of flights following a crippling cyber-attack. Mr Trump is also considering offering Russia opportunities to tap into the valuable natural resources in the strait which separates it from the US. Alaska, which is separated from Russia by by just three miles of the Bering Strait, is estimated to hold significant undiscovered oil and gas reserves, including 13 per cent of the world's oil. Developing Russia's presence in the strait would bolster Putin's strategic interests in the arctic region, which accounted for 80 per cent of Russia's gas production in 2022. British government sources told The Telegraph that such incentives could be acceptable to Europe, as long as Putin was not seen to be rewarded for the invasion. 'The sense is that it has to be presented to align with public opinion around this, it cannot be seen as a reward for Putin,' a source said. Israel could be used as model to end war Israel's occupation of the West Bank could be used as a model for ending the war in Ukraine. Russia would have military and economic control of occupied Ukraine under its own governing body, similar to Israel's de facto rule of Palestinian territory. The idea was raised in discussions between Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's special envoy and his Russian counterparts, according to The Times. The White House is tempering expectations ahead of the summit on Friday, portraying it as a 'listening exercise' for the president. 'This is really a feel-out meeting, a little bit,' Mr Trump told reporters on Monday, predicting he would know 'probably in the first two minutes' if Putin was serious about peace. European diplomats say there has been no notable change in Putin's overall war aim, which is to topple Mr Zelensky's government and replace it with a Moscow-friendly proxy. The Russian president's aides described the tet-a-tet primarily as a discussion on 'Russian-American relations', hinting at boosting trade cooperation. A White House official said: 'We do not comment on deliberative conversations that may or may not be happening. 'From the beginning, the president has been clear about his commitment to ending the bloodshed and achieving a full and comprehensive ceasefire. 'As the president stated: everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and that is what he is working towards.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Russia's GDP growth slows to 1.1% in Q2, says Rosstat
Aug 13 (Reuters) - Russia's gross domestic product grew by 1.1% in the second quarter of 2025 compared with 4.0% growth in the same period last year, federal statistics service Rosstat said on Wednesday, another sign that Russia's economy is slowing. Soaring defence spending saw Russia's economy rebound from contraction in 2022 as Western sanctions over the war in Ukraine, opens new tab took their toll, but this year officials have warned of recession risks as the economy cools. Elevated interest rates for several months, as the central bank seeks to reduce stubbornly high inflation, have hampered Russia's economic growth prospects. President Vladimir Putin has dismissed claims that the war in Ukraine is devastating Russia's economy, citing low debt and economic diversification as signs of resilience. After GDP growth of 4.3% last year, the central bank forecasts a 1-2% rise this year, while the economy ministry has said it will tweak its current 2.5% forecast. In late July, the International Monetary Fund raised its outlook for economic growth across emerging market and developing economies this year to 4.1% from 3.7%, driven by frontloading and a more upbeat view on China, but Russia was one of the few exceptions. According to the IMF, Russia's economy is now expected to expand by 0.9% this year, compared with its previous view of 1.5% growth.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Shadow tanker fleet grows more slowly as Western sanctions target Russian oil
LONDON, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Dozens of tankers have joined the shadow fleet this year compared with hundreds in previous years as the harshest Western sanctions yet target Russia's oil exports and add to the difficulty of finding suitable vessels, shipping sources said. The European Union and Britain last month imposed further sanctions on Russia over its war in Ukraine. Together with U.S. restrictions, they mean more than 440, opens new tab shadow fleet tankers face sanctions, including tankers Moscow needs to ship oil to its biggest buyers, China and India. The shadow fleet of vessels is used by Venezuela and Iran, as well as Russia to evade Western sanctions. Typically, the vessels are old, their ownership is opaque, and they sail without top-tier insurance cover to meet international standards for oil majors and many ports. Since the Ukraine war began in 2022, the shadow fleet has been especially used by Russia, which has relied on oil revenues to help finance its war effort. In addition to the sanctions, the Group of Seven countries has imposed a cap over what price level Russian oil can be sold at, adding to trade complexities. The size of the fleet is between 1,200 and 1,600 tankers, according to estimates from industry sources and analysts, including Lloyd's List Intelligence and shipbroker Gibson. This represents an estimated fifth of the overall global tanker fleet. That compares with a few hundred vessels operating before the Ukraine war, but sources say its growth has slowed year-on-year as the list of sanctions has grown and sales of second-hand ships have been under more scrutiny from authorities and legal compliance teams. The estimate of the shadow fleet's size does not include hundreds of smaller coastal tankers, which are not ocean-going but have transported oil, chiefly for Russia. "Regulators are closing the net," Anna Giacomello, analyst with British maritime cyber defence and risk intelligence company Dryad Global, said in a July report. For all the risks, the potential for profit remains a lure for some. "Operators may still enter the shadow fleet because it can be highly lucrative," said Leigh Hansson, sanctions partner at law firm Reed Smith, who advises shipping and trading companies on oil sanctions compliance. But she said the major established players would stay away and that only those with little experience of the shipping market may be willing to engage in risky operations, with older vessels that major ship insurers will not cover.