Brazilian banks scramble to understand scope of US sanctions on Supreme Court justice
BRASILIA - Brazilian banks are scrambling to assess the domestic fallout from sweeping U.S. sanctions against a Supreme Court justice who oversees a criminal trial against an ally of President Donald Trump, as legal teams weigh how the move to isolate the judge financially could ripple through Brazil's financial system.
Justice Alexandre de Moraes is presiding over the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a far-right leader who is accused of plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral loss. Bolsonaro has denied attempting to overthrow the government, but said he attended meetings aimed at reversing the vote.
Trump, who has called the trial a "witch hunt" and revoked Moraes' U.S. visa, on Wednesday sanctioned the justice under the Global Magnitsky Act, accusing him of authorizing arbitrary detentions and suppressing free speech.
The act allows the U.S. to impose economic penalties against foreigners it considers to have a record of corruption or human rights abuses. The U.S. sanctions were accompanied by an executive order imposing steeper tariffs on Brazilian goods that also cited the case against Bolsonaro.
Sanctions under the Magnitsky Act freeze assets under U.S. jurisdiction and bar U.S. firms from doing business with designated individuals.
While Moraes holds no assets in the United States, according to Brazil's Supreme Court, the sanctions could prevent him from using payment cards backed by U.S. financial companies such as Visa and Mastercard.
The global reach of the U.S. financial system often leads foreign banks to restrict a wider range of transactions by sanctioned individuals to avoid secondary sanctions, raising questions of how far Brazilian financial institutions need to go to comply with the new orders.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down
Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO
Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights
Singapore 5 foreign women suspected of trafficking 27kg of cocaine nabbed in Changi Airport
Singapore Fallen tree branch damages two Yishun flats, showering one home owner in shattered glass
Singapore Man accused of raping woman who hired him to fix lights in her flat claims she made first move
Singapore 1 ticket wins $12.8 million Toto jackpot draw
Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family'
Bradesco CEO Marcelo Noronha told analysts on Thursday the bank was awaiting legal opinions from law firms it hired to assess the sanctions' reach.
A source at another top-five bank in Brazil said its initial view is that domestic operations are unaffected, but international and foreign exchange transactions could breach U.S. rules.
"So far, the consensus is that the safest ground is limited to transactions in local currency," the source said on condition of anonymity because the bank's analysis is private.
Brazil's central bank did not immediately comment on whether it had issued guidance to financial institutions on the matter.
Eduardo Bolsonaro, the former president's son and a lawmaker who is in the U.S. lobbying for his father and for amnesty for rioters who stormed government buildings following the election loss, praised the sanctions online, saying the cost of supporting Moraes "will be unbearable" and would be closely monitored by U.S. authorities.
President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva condemned the sanctions as unacceptable interference in Brazil's judiciary, while Vice President Geraldo Alckmin said that the Magnitsky Act should not punish judges for doing their job.
In a statement on Wednesday, Brazil's Supreme Court said it "will not deviate from its role of upholding the constitution and the country's laws."
On Wednesday night, Moraes was seen waving and smiling to fans at a soccer match. A picture of him making a rude gesture during the match circulated widely on social media and the local press. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
20 minutes ago
- CNA
US agency probes special counsel who prosecuted Trump: Report
WASHINGTON: US officials have opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who led two federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump, US media reported on Saturday (Aug 2). The Office of Special Counsel told The New York Times it was investigating Smith for potentially violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal workers from engaging in political activity while on the job. Republican Senator Tom Cotton had reportedly asked the agency to investigate whether Smith's actions had been designed to influence the 2024 US elections. The agency, which monitors the conduct of federal employees, did not immediately respond to request for comment by AFP. Smith was appointed special counsel in 2022, and charged Trump with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election and mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House. Trump denied both charges and sought to frame them as politically motivated, accusing the Justice Department of being weaponised against him. Neither case ever came to trial, and the special counsel - in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president - dropped them both after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election. Smith then resigned before Trump could fulfil his campaign pledge to fire him. The Office of Special Counsel operates separately from special counsel offices at the Department of Justice, such as the one headed by Smith. The prosecutorial decisions made by Smith do not typically fall under its remit, according to the Times. It cannot lay criminal charges against Smith but could refer its findings to the Department of Justice, which does have that power. The most severe penalty under the Hatch Act is termination of employment, which would not apply to Smith as he has already resigned. Since taking office in January, Trump has taken a number of punitive measures against his perceived enemies. He has stripped former officials of their security clearances and protective details, targeted law firms involved in past cases against him and pulled federal funding from universities. Last month, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) opened criminal investigations into its former director James Comey and ex-Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) chief John Brennan, two prominent Trump critics.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
No pets left behind: How a dog's hurricane rescue changed Florida law
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Trooper's story has inspired a new Florida law that makes restraining and abandoning pets during a natural disaster a felony. MIAMI – Hurricane Milton was barrelling toward Florida in October 2024 when the emergency call came in about a dog that was stuck in rising waters. Florida Highway Patrol troopers like Orlando Morales were looking out for crashes as residents scrambled to evacuate from the hurricane, a rapidly intensifying Category 5 storm. When Mr Morales responded, he was sceptical that it could be true. But then, in the distance off Interstate 75 near Tampa, he spotted the dog's head sticking out from the flooding terrain. Along a grassy field, he pulled his cruiser over and approached the trembling bull terrier as rain poured down. 'It's OK buddy, it's OK,' Mr Morales said in a gentle tone to the growling dog, according to police video. Nearly a year later, the dog, a bull terrier who was named Trooper after his savior, has been thriving in his new home in suburban Parkland, Florida, with Mr and Mrs Frank and Carla Spina and his adoptive sister, Dallas, who is of the same breed. Trooper's story has inspired a new Florida law that makes restraining and abandoning pets during a natural disaster a felony. The Florida Highway Patrol shared the dog's story on its social media accounts, urging residents, 'Do NOT do this to your pets please.' Within days, on Oct 15, his owner was charged aggravated animal cruelty. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Opinion At UN's Wipo, Singaporean Daren Tang strives to create an equal music for haves and have-nots Singapore We're in the business of giving everyone a superpower: CEO of shared e-scooter provider Neuron Mobility Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry World Pope Leo tells hundreds of thousands of young Catholics to build a better world Mr Giovanny Aldama Garcia, 24, of Ruskin, Florida, admitted to abandoning the dog, according to Ms Suzy Lopez, the state attorney for Florida's 13th Judicial Circuit. Mr Garcia told investigators that he was driving to Georgia to escape the hurricane, but left his dog, whom he called Jumbo, on the side of the road 'because he couldn't find anyone to pick the dog up,' Ms Lopez said. A lawyer for Mr Garcia, Mr J. Tony Lopez Mora, said his client 'denies that there was any case of animal cruelty and the case is set for trial later this year'. If convicted, Mr Garcia faces up to five years in prison. He was released from jail on a US$2,500 (S$3,225) bond, and his next court hearing is Sept 17. In May, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed Florida Senate Bill 150, which makes it a third-degree felony to restrain and abandon a dog outdoors 'during a declared natural disaster or at any time' when a mandatory or voluntary evacuation order is in effect. The bill was paired with another animal protection measure that increases penalties for animal cruelty. NYTIMES
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Australia's Victoria state seeks to enshrine work from home in law
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Under the plan, workers would be entitled to work from home at least two days per week, if the job allows. SYDNEY - The premier of the Australian state of Victoria announced on Aug 2 plans to enshrine working from home in law, saying it should be 'a right, not a request'. Under Ms Jacinta Allan's plan, workers would be entitled to work from home at least two days per week, if the job allows. 'We're doing that because we know what the evidence tells us – workers are more productive, it saves time for families, it saves money for families,' Ms Allan said, launching the proposed policy at the Labor Party's state conference. 'This change will mean that any worker who can reasonably do their job from home has the right to do so for at least two days a week.' Ms Allan said the policy would now go out for consultation with workers, employers and unions. She said it was important to 'get the details of this important change right'. Ms Allan said the move could save the average worker A$110 (S$91.70) a week, cut congestion on roads, and keep more women in the workforce. During national elections in May, the opposition Liberal-National coalition's plan to eliminate remote work was partly blamed for its poor performance. Victoria's opposition leader, Mr Brad Battin, said work from home arrangements had been valuable, and that he supported measures that promote better work-life balance. The measure is likely to come before the state parliament next year. AFP
