logo
Delhiwale: Paradise is in Sector 14, see!

Delhiwale: Paradise is in Sector 14, see!

Hindustan Times06-06-2025
Washed laundry is drying in the porch. The bungalow truly looks ordinary, here in Gurugram's Sector 14. A jaali door opens into a corridor illumined in the afternoon light. Spotting the staircase inside gives the first jolt. It is littered with neat stacks of books. Up the stairs, the veranda is wholly crammed with books. So is the drawing room. So are the two bedrooms. The kitchen, too. Books claim beds, sofas, tables and chairs.
This private library is the work of a lifetime.
At 84, the antiquarian bookseller Vijay Kumar Jain is warming up to the theme of retirement. His long relationship with 'old, rare books on South Asia in general and India in particular' had begun in the 1960s. Gradually, the collection became renowned. Bibliophiles from across the world would visit his ancestral mansion in the town's Sadar Bazar to view the prized editions. After the family sold the old house a decade ago, Vijay Kumar moved the collection to his current address. Today, the books inhabit the bungalow's first floor. He, with wife, Nisha, and their family, inhabit the more navigable ground-floor rooms.
Attentively waving an arm towards his precious piles of hardbounds, the mild-mannered host murmurs softly: 'This section is all partition, Punjab is over there… that's Bengal… here is Gandhiana…' The first editions include several, but not all, of the 100 volumes of 'The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi.' A first edition Nehru is stacked tight in a shelf — its opening page bears the seal of 'Kitabistan, Allahabad.' 'The Jews of India' lies close to 'The Aryans in Iran and India.'
Smiling under his bushy moustache, the book collector recalls the cross-country tours of his youth, visiting collectors and sellers in various cities, plus the weekly excursions to Delhi's legendary Sunday Book Bazar.
During the early days of struggles and uncertainties, he would spent hours preparing the catalogues of his new acquisitions, the copies posted to college libraries and research scholars worldwide. Then came the day when young Vijay received his 'first fat order.'
It had arrived from Germany's Heidelberg University. The excitement propelled him to cycle to elder brother Satya Prakash's residence in distant Delhi. He had felt an urgent urge to share the news with his beloved 'bhai saheb,' who had initiated him into books.
Vijay Kumar had five brothers. All have passed—one was Ansari Road bookseller Ramesh Chandra, who operated independently.
Strolling slowly from one room to another, the elderly gent pauses to gush over handsome bindings. He picks up the yellowed front page of the 3 April, 1924 edition of 'Young India,' a journal that Gandhi edited.
Finally, settling down into a chair, he grows sentimental. 'When I hold an old book, I feel ajeeb sa anand, a kind of mental sakoon.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tricolour hoisted only at Red Fort and not on other Mughal-era buildings because…, what is the Nehru connection?
Tricolour hoisted only at Red Fort and not on other Mughal-era buildings because…, what is the Nehru connection?

India.com

time15 hours ago

  • India.com

Tricolour hoisted only at Red Fort and not on other Mughal-era buildings because…, what is the Nehru connection?

Tricolour hoisted only at Red Fort and not on other Mughal-era buildings because…, what is the Nehru connection? Independence Day Facts: 15th August is about to come, and people are ready to celebrate the day with full zeal and patriotic fervour. Independence Day is not just a day but its an emotion for every Indians. It is the result of numerous sacrifices. When the Prime Minister of the country hoists the flag at the Red Fort, every Indian, whether he is living in abroad, get emotional, remembering the sacrifices people made for the independence of the country from the British rule. But do you know why the tricolor hoisted only at the Red Fort and not at any other Mughal buildings like Taj Mahal or Fatehpur Sikri? Let us know the reason behind this.

Why UP's proposed ‘One District, One Cuisine' initiative risks flattening India's rich food heritage
Why UP's proposed ‘One District, One Cuisine' initiative risks flattening India's rich food heritage

Indian Express

time20-07-2025

  • Indian Express

Why UP's proposed ‘One District, One Cuisine' initiative risks flattening India's rich food heritage

The first time I went to Lucknow, in 2013, I followed the usual script handed out by friends, family, and the internet. I sampled the famous galawat ke kebab at Tunday Kababi, biryani from Idrees, kachoris from Durga Khasta Corner, chaat from Royal Café, and, of course, a steaming kulhad of chai from Sharma Ji ki Chai. Lucknow's food felt like a neatly curated checklist; one dish, one shop, one picture for each craving. But moving and living in Lucknow has changed how I taste the city. Kebabs, chai, kachori, or even chutney — there are dozens of variations, each with its own loyal following and story. Chowk's tangy khasta is nothing like Hazratganj's buttery one, and the tea that fuels conversations in Aminabad tastes and feels different from the chai in Gomti Nagar. When people ask me for food recommendations today, my goal is simple: To make them see Lucknow beyond galawati kebabs and Instagram-famous shops. That's why the Uttar Pradesh government's proposed 'One District, One Cuisine' initiative, which got a boost after Lucknow's nomination for 'UNESCO's Creative City of Gastronomy' got accepted, and through which the government intends to popularise one cuisine from each district, worries me. It sounds neat on paper — who wouldn't want to link every district to a proud local delicacy? But food doesn't work like that. A city's culinary identity is not a single dish on a pedestal. It's a messy, fragrant, indefinable table where stories, communities, and forgotten recipes coexist. How do you pick one dish to represent Lucknow when its foodscape includes street-side kachoris, temple prasads, majlis tabarruk, and home-cooked aloo gosht with a side of faith, migration, caste, and family history? Food is part of our intangible cultural heritage, a way of life passed down through generations. Recipes, cooking techniques, and even the etiquette of dining are reflections of values, belief systems, and social identities. As Harvard anthropologist Theodore Bestor said, 'the culinary imagination is the way a culture conceptualises and imagines food'. Reducing an entire district to one state-approved 'representative' dish risks flattening that imagination, turning living traditions into branded commodities. Just as there is no one 'Indian' language, there is no one 'Indian' food. India's culinary heritage is enormous, shaped by local ingredients, caste-based cooking methods, and regional beliefs. For the longest time, the West thought Indian food meant butter chicken. Now, chefs like Vijay Kumar are changing that narrative; Semma, which serves South Indian food, has won Michelin stars three years in a row in New York. That's what happens when you let food speak for itself instead of forcing it into a simplified box. India's diversity cannot be captured in a single dish. What we eat, how we eat and why we eat what we do are key to understanding India's social landscape. It is a work of caste, class, religion, region and kinship. Consider Lucknow again. During Muharram, some distribute roti, others sharbat or khichda; during Shravan, some cook sabudana khichdi, others make makhana kheer or khamang kakdi. These are not just recipes but expressions of belief and community, woven into social interactions and rituals. Which one of these would you choose to represent 'Lucknow's cuisine'? And more importantly, who gets to decide? Colleen Taylor Sen, in Feasts and Fasts (2014), describes Indian cuisine as 'an active, ever-changing product of 5,000 years of political upheavals, migrations and conquests, revelries and lamentation'. How then can a policy like 'One District, One Cuisine' hope to do justice to this dynamism? Social media already promotes homogeneity by amplifying the most photogenic or viral dishes. The algorithm favours popularity, not cultural nuance. When state policy mirrors that behaviour, we risk celebrating virality instead of vitality. Food scholar Lucy M Long defines culinary tourism as 'the intentional, exploratory participation in the foodways of another — participation including the consumption, preparation, and presentation of a food item, cuisine, meal system, or eating style considered to belong to a culinary system not one's own.' Culinary adventuring, whether through street food in a far-off country or at an immigrant-run eatery in your own city, promotes diversity and understanding. A plate of kebabs in a Hazratganj restaurant might tell a story of aristocratic Awadhi refinement, while the same kebab in a Chowk stall speaks of street-side hustle and working-class ingenuity. A one-cuisine policy stands to kill curiosity by presenting a single, state-sanctioned narrative of what a place 'tastes like'. Which story would 'One District, One Cuisine' choose to erase? Food is not just about consumption; it is about belonging. A humble plate of food can be a profound communicator of identity: both a representation offered by those who cook it and an experience for those who taste it. In multicultural societies, culture is constantly recreated and reconstructed through interactions, and food often crosses ethnic and religious boundaries. Khamiri rotis, for example, are shared between Hindus and Muslims in Old Delhi; sharbat is as much a community beverage in Muharram as it is during a langar or bhandara during festivals. When policies are imposed from the top down, they risk silencing these organic cultural exchanges. Promoting food democratically, from the bottom up by listening to the people who cook, sell, and eat these dishes every day would be a different matter altogether. But if it comes through government committees and hashtags, it feels less like a celebration and more like appropriation. To truly celebrate Uttar Pradesh's food, we need to listen to its kitchens, not its hashtags. The writer is a chef and author

Chandigarh: It's Indian attire for GMCH graduates on convocation
Chandigarh: It's Indian attire for GMCH graduates on convocation

Hindustan Times

time13-07-2025

  • Hindustan Times

Chandigarh: It's Indian attire for GMCH graduates on convocation

The Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH) is set to hold its 11th convocation on August 8. Following other premiere institutes of the city, this year GMCH has opted for an Indian traditional attire for its students. The chief guest and guests of honour will be adorned with a navy blue colour velvet stole with a GMCH logo on it. (HT File) During the college council meeting, it has been decided that men graduates will wear cream/off white colour kurta pajama and women graduates will wear saree/suit of the same colour with a suitable footwear along with a stole to signify their academic achievement. The decision is in alignment with a United Grants Commission (UGC) circular that has advised educational institutes to consider using ceremonial robes made out of handloom fabrics for special occasions such as convocation, etc. In the UGC circular, it was mentioned that apparel made from handloom fabrics is more comfortable in the Indian climate. Most of the educational institutes have welcomed the decision to leave the british style black robe and cap and opt for saree, kurta pajama, Nehru jacket, etc. as their special occasions dress code dress code. The MBBS students from batch 2017 and 2018, MD/MS/DM students of batch 2021, M Phil clinical psychology and psychiatric social work of batch 2021, BSc nursing and B Optom of batch 2019 and BSc MLT/X-Ray/anaesthesia/radiodiagnosis of batch 2020 will be awarded degree in the convocation. The male faculty will be wearing cream/off white colour shirt and black colour trouser while female faculty will wear saree/suit of off white/beige colour. The chief guest and guests of honour will be adorned with a navy blue colour velvet stole with a GMCH logo on it. The other dignitaries on dice will have maroon colour velvet stole with a GMCH logo. The faculty will be provided with maroon colour silk stole with GMCH logo. Director, GMCH, Dr Ashok Kumar Atri said, 'The dress code has been decided in alignment with Indian tradition.' In Chandigarh, Punjab Engineering College (PEC) was the first institute to opt for a traditional dress code for its convocation in 2022. The decision was later followed by the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) in October 2024 and later by Panjab University (PU) in February 2025. The central government has laid their focus on discarding British style black robe and cap as to get away with the colonial mindset and to replace it with a traditional dress code.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store