Map reveals where Americans are at highest risk of number one killer... and the shocking reason why
A research team from the University of Michigan constructed a map of the more than 15,000 cattle and hog feeding operations in the US and found a quarter are located in just 30 US counties out of more than 3,000.
Based on the analysis, the factory farms occupy an area of about 500,000 football fields, with cattle operations representing almost 80 percent of that total. For comparison, there are about 16,000 high school football fields in the country.
Researchers found that these factory farms are putting millions of Americans at risk of heart disease, the leading cause of death in the US, and respiratory issues by pumping out high amounts of pollutants called PM2.5.
PM2.5 levels in the air near the animal feeding operations, or AFOs (large-scale facilities where animals are confined for concentrated feeding), were higher than in similar counties without such operations.
PM2.5 levels were 28 percent higher than average in tracts of land with cattle operations and 11 percent higher in areas with hog farms.
Both short-term and long-term exposure to PM2.5 has been found to trigger heart attacks, stroke, and other cardiovascular events.
Some states with the highest density of factory farms (more than 300 per county) include Idaho, California, Utah, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona.
In the study, the researchers focused on PM2.5 levels.
PM2.5 denotes particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers or less. They are about one millionth of an inch, meaning these particles are easily inhaled by anyone exposed to them.
The pollution is linked to a number of heart, lung and airway health effects.
'It lingers in the air and can get really deep into your lungs and create scar tissue. It's nasty stuff. There are really no safe levels of it,' said Benjamin Goldstein, a senior author of the new study.
The researchers note that the American Medical Association has estimated that for every 10 micrograms per cubic meter (10μg/m3) increase in PM2.5, there is a corresponding four percent increase in overall mortality, with a six percent increase in cardiopulmonary mortality and an eight percent increase in lung cancer mortality.
These health impacts have been observed at communities up to 11 miles from AFOs.
In the study, an analysis revealed that tracts of land with cattle AFOs exhibit an average PM2.5 concentration of 7.7μg/m3.
This is 1.7μg/m3 higher than identical tracts without these facilities.
Similarly, the areas with hog farms show an average PM2.5 concentration of 9.2μg/m3, which is 0.9μg/m3 higher than spots without such facilities.
The researchers said of these findings: 'These confirm that AFOs are associated with elevated local PM2.5 levels. Given the absence of a safe PM2.5 exposure limits, even slight increases in particulate pollution from AFOs pose health risks to nearby populations.'
AFOs release a variety of air pollutants including ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, methane, particulate matter (PM), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The researchers said: 'Because of high stocking densities at AFOs, vegetation is scarce, and animal hooves often kick up dust.
'The sheer number of animals also produce immense volumes of manure and urine.
'These activities generate airborne particulate matter, both directly as dust and indirectly through precursors volatilized at manure lagoons.'
The researchers found cattle farms are primarily concentrated in select counties within California, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Idaho, Iowa, and Texas, while hog farms are mostly clustered in Iowa, North Carolina, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and Missouri.
Several of these states have the highest rates of heart disease mortality in the US.
Cardiovascular diseases, including heart disease and stroke, claim more lives than all forms of cancer and accidental deaths combined, according to the American Heart Association.
It has been the leading cause of death in the US since 1950. In 2023, it was responsible for about one in three deaths, killing 919,000 people.
According to 2022 CDC data, the latest statewide available, Oklahoma had the highest heart disease mortality at 257 deaths per 100,000 people.
And the leading cause of death in all the other states, aside from Minnesota, is heart disease.
Previous studies have found that people who live within a few miles of an animal feeding operation are more likely to die from a cardiovascular problem than people who do not live near an animal facility.
The pollutants have also been found to increase the risk of contracting respiratory illnesses like asthma and bronchitis.
The researchers said they were concerned to find that communities near AFOs are 'often lower income, less educated, and composed of higher proportions of racial minorities compared to more distant neighborhoods'.
Specifically, these communities were more likely to have lower levels of health insurance coverage
'One of the things that this study reveals is that we could focus on a limited number of counties to really address health impacts in these communities,' said Joshua Newell, a senior author of the report published in Communications Earth & Environment.
He added that creating the map is important for policymakers, governments, and community groups to 'develop very targeted policies or measures' moving forward.
Although entities like the EPA and the Department of Agriculture do collect some data on AFOs, there's variability and inconsistency in how that data is reported across the country.
As a result, the existent body of data was messy and limited in its scope and accuracy, lead author Sanaz Chamanara said.
For example, she combined government data to start with an original list of more than 10,000 AFO locations.
But as Chamanara started verifying those locations with satellite imagery, she found thousands of sites without active AFOs.
'I can't remember the exact numbers, but, at the end, the data contained just about 5,000 locations,' Chamanara said, a number that was far too low to be accurate. 'I saw that and said, "This doesn't make sense." And that's when I started developing the whole data set.'
A community science project called Counterglow provided information on where to start looking for the missing AFOs, but Chamanara still had to comb through satellite imagery of every continental US county to locate the operations.
Because nationwide data is available on air quality and the socioeconomic makeup of communities, the team could use its new data and systematically examine correlations with the presence of AFOs on an 'unprecedented scale'.
Researchers have examined such connections before, but previous studies were constrained to much smaller, local extents.
The researchers used census data to analyze the sociodemographic makeup of the communities near feeding operations.
'The meat you eat comes from somewhere. It takes up a lot of space and produces a lot of pollution,' Goldstein said. 'And somebody else and place has to bear that pollution.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Men can't cope under pressure! Married blokes are more likely to CHEAT than women when they're stressed, study finds
Whether it's a new job, a house move or having children, there are plenty of things that can trigger nerves or anxiety. But ladies, beware – as a new study reveals men are more likely than women to have an affair during high–stress life events. Researchers from Indiana University Bloomington surveyed more than 1,000 adults who were in committed heterosexual relationships during the first year of the Covid pandemic. Participants were asked about whether they had engaged in any actions that their partner would consider to be infidelity. Overall, 19 per cent of people said they had engaged in some form of infidelity during the pandemic – either online or in–person. Analysis revealed that men were more likely than women to say their desire to be unfaithful increased during the pandemic. They were also more likely to report having cheated on their significant other. Experts said men may be 'especially vulnerable' to stressful events – and that these individuals may benefit from targeted support. The results, published in the journal Plos One, also showed that parents were more likely to have affairs than couples who did not have children. However in this group, both mothers and fathers were just as likely as each other to cheat. 'Our recent research found that parents, compared to non–parents, reported higher desire for and engagement in infidelity during periods of significant external stress, such as the COVID–19 pandemic,' they said. 'Men also reported greater desire and behaviour than women in general. 'These findings suggest that parents, and men in particular, may be especially susceptible to infidelity–related risk factors during high–stress life events. 'Targeted support for these individuals and their relationships may be especially important when navigating periods of collective or personal strain.' Further analysis revealed that older participants reported a greater inclination towards cheating than younger participants. This could suggest that longer–term relationships or accumulated life stress might impact relationship satisfaction, the team said. Previous research has already suggested that the Covid pandemic strained many romantic and sexual relationships. And other studies suggest that high stress and relationship dissatisfaction may prompt some people to consider engaging in romantic or sexual infidelity. According to the General Social Survey, which has tracked the social behaviours of people in the US for more than 50 years, approximately 10 per cent of married people engage in cheating in any given year. Of these, 12 per cent are men and 7 per cent are women. In the UK, around a third of marriages end in divorce and infidelity is one of the most commonly cited reasons. ARE MEN WITH SHORT AND WIDE FACES MORE LIKELY TO CHEAT? Researchers from Nipissing University in Canada looked at how different facial features affect sexual behaviours. The study involved 314 undergraduate students who were in romantic relationships. Each student completed a questionnaire about their behaviour, sex drive, sexual orientation, the chances they'd consider cheating, and how comfortable they were with the concept of casual sex. The researchers also took a picture of each student to analyse their facial width-to-height ratios (FWHR). The results showed that men and women with a high FWHR – square and wide faces – reported a greater sex drive than others. Men with a larger FWHR were also more easy-going when it comes to casual sex and would consider being unfaithful to their partners. The researchers hope the findings will shed light on the role that facial features play in sexual relationships and mate selection. Their research builds upon previous studies that have shown that certain psychological and behavioural traits are associated with particular facial width-to-height ratios (FWHR). Square-faced men tend to be perceived as more aggressive, more dominant, more unethical, and more attractive as short-term sexual partners than men with thinner and longer faces.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Not all ultra-processed foods are bad for you... study reveals the eight that actually make you healthier
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more It's no surprise that ultra-processed foods (UPF) are best eaten sparingly. They undergo multiple rounds of manufacturing, with factories infusing cheeses, cured meat, potato chips and more with additives that would never be found in the average household kitchen. A CDC report recently revealed that Americans get more than 50 percent of their daily calories on average from highly processed foods. Kids and teens got about two-thirds of their calories from these foods from 2021 to 2023. UPF-heavy diets have been linked to a laundry list of maladies, including obesity, heart disease, colorectal and breast cancers, diabetes and depression. Researchers also determined in April that for every 10 percent more ultra-processed food added to a person's diet, the risk of dying early from any cause jumped by three percent. They further found that one in seven of nearly 1 million premature deaths in the US could be tied directly to ultra-processed foods like meats, candy, ice cream, and even some seemingly healthy salads and breads. But not all ultra-processed foods are the same. Some UPFs, like frozen veggies, canned tomatoes, whole-grain bread, and Greek yogurt, are healthy swaps because their processing, including freezing and canning, preserves nutrients while avoiding risky additives. Part of the appeal of UPFs is their accessibility. They are generally cheaper than unprocessed chicken, fresh fruit, and organic vegetables. They help families keep their grocery costs down and get dinner on the table quickly. But experts argue that families do not have to sacrifice quality and nutrition for convenience. Canned low-sodium beans, frozen vegetables, and breads with a short ingredients label can be swapped out for some less-than-healthy pantry and freezer staples packed with sodium and preservatives. UPFs are difficult to avoid in the average American grocery store. They make up about 70 percent of the inventories. The American Heart Association said in a study out last week: 'Most of the foods containing industrial additives are also high in unhealthy fats, added sugars, and salt. 'Although the additives are part of the issue, the main problem is that children and adults in the United States eat excessive amounts of nutritionally poor UPFs.' The term 'ultra-processed foods' is an umbrella term that encompasses those items that have been pumped with preservatives, artificial colors, filler ingredients, emulsifiers, sweeteners, and flavoring. 'However, not all UPFs are harmful,' the AHA added. 'Certain whole grain breads, low-sugar yogurts, tomato sauces, and nut or bean-based spreads are of better diet quality, have been associated with improved health outcomes, and are affordable, allowing possible inclusion in diets.' Despite being ultra-processed, some of the best swaps for what most would consider 'junk food' contain fewer additives, including preservatives and colors, less added sugar, and lower sodium. Frozen veggies and berries, canned tomatoes, whole grain bread, and unsweetened Greek yogurt all qualify as processed foods because they undergo innocuous, and in some cases beneficial, processes. These include flash-freezing, canning, mechanical straining in the case of yogurt, and enrichment with vitamins in whole grain bread. The above CDC graph shows percentages of calories consumed from ultra-processed foods Still, most UPFs on store shelves also contain more saturated fat, sodium, and sugar, all red flag ingredients. Cured and processed meats such as pepperoni and chicken nuggets, canned fruits in syrup, frozen meals, candies and some breads, potato chips, ice cream, and more, are examples of 'red flag' foods. 'Identifying high-risk UPF subgroups is essential to balancing nutritional goals with the need for accessible and appealing food options,' the study said. Nutritionists recommend people swap out red flag foods with UPFs that include beneficial ingredients like whole grains, beans, yogurt, or nuts, as well as fortified cereals, whole-grain breads, or plain yogurts. These have been linked to better heart health compared to UPFs loaded with synthetic additives. Whole grain breads are full of fiber that reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Beans and nuts serve as the ideal protein-packed snacks, and unsweetened yogurt balances the body's gut microbiome and improves overall gastrointestinal health. Grace Derocha, a registered dietitian nutritionist and spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics told Real Simple: 'The science recognizes the complexity—UPF is a broad category, and context matters. We should differentiate between 'unhealthy UPFs' and more wholesome packaged items.' Over a dozen countries have officially advised against letting UPFs dominate one's diet. Some, like cities in Brazil have eliminated UPFs from foods served in schools while others, such as Colombia, tax them. The EU, UK, Canada, and several Asian countries have outright banned certain ingredients that were recently prohibited in California. The US has not established a formal definition of UPFs for regulatory purposes. And experts at the AHA worry that establishing one that is overly broad could backfire, leading to the vast majority of foods in grocery stores being slapped with a label that warns they are highly-processed, confusing customers to the point of ignoring the warnings. 'Food policy reform must consider the broader goals of the food system, including nutrition security, safety, and sustainability,' the AHA said. 'Although transformation of the food system is complex, it is achievable.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Why do I feel so much worse after a nap – and how can I avoid it?
I woke up on the couch feeling nauseous and groggy, with a needle-jabbing-my-temples headache. Was it the flu? Did I eat something bad? There was drool on my cheek, and I glanced at the clock. I remembered checking the time at 1.30 pm; it was now 4pm. I'd accidentally taken a nap. Many people say there's nothing like a good nap – but not me. It always gives me stomach-turning nausea, usually for the rest of the day. So I do my best to avoid dozing, even when I need the rest. In college, I'd power through even if I pulled an all-nighter. But now, as a mom, my no-nap lifestyle is more difficult to maintain. I feel like I'm playing real-life 'would you rather': zombie-tired from staying up all night with my crying baby or spin-cycle sick? Dr Waiz Wasey, a Mayo Clinic-trained sleep physician based in Scottsdale, Arizona, says symptoms such as nausea, dizziness and lightheadedness after a nap are common. These can vary from mild to day-ruining, and could have different causes. Because of this, he says, treatment isn't one-size-fits-all. There are several reasons people might experience nausea, dizziness or a generally unwell feeling after a nap. Sleep inertia: Wasey says sleep inertia, characterized by dizziness, lightheadedness, nausea and disorientation, is one of the main reasons people feel sick after taking a snooze. Sleep cycles typically last about 90 minutes, which includes three sleep stages plus REM sleep. People usually go through three or four sleep cycles per night, but when nappers wake without completing a full cycle, they may experience unpleasant, often disorienting, symptoms, he says. Most cases of sleep inertia are mild and resolve on their own after about 20 minutes, says Dr Funke Afolabi-Brown, a triple-board-certified sleep medicine physician based in Philadelphia. But extreme cases can involve 'debilitating symptoms lasting four to six hours, sometimes with vomiting or panic-like symptoms'. Sleep inertia isn't nap-specific: it can also happen when you wake from a night's sleep. But this is less common, says Wasey, as someone who has completed a few sleep cycles feels more restored upon waking. Symptoms also tend to be more severe after a nap because of your body's circadian rhythm, or natural daily sleep cycle. 'Your body isn't expecting to sleep in the afternoon,' Afolabi-Brown says. 'Morning grogginess usually resolves within 15-30 minutes, while post-nap symptoms may persist longer.' Wasey notes that people who have sleep apnea, insomnia or sleep deprivation are more likely to experience more extreme symptoms of sleep inertia. Gastrointestinal issues: Acid reflux – also called gastroesophageal reflux or heartburn – is a common cause of nausea, dizziness and chest pain after resting, says Dr Bharat Pothuri, a board-certified gastroenterologist based in Houston, Texas. It is characterized by stomach acid traveling into the esophagus, and lying down after eating makes it worse, says Pothuri. Just about everyone will experience some acid reflux now and then, Pothuri adds, especially after eating fatty or acidic foods. But some experience more severe symptoms. About 20% of the US population is affected by frequent acid reflux, or gastroesophageal reflux disease (also known as Gerd), and is more likely to experience nausea after lying down. Stomach issues can show up after a full night's rest, but it's especially common for daytime snoozers because they may lie down directly after lunch or a snack. Dr Rucha Mehta Shah, a board-certified gastroenterologist in Scottsdale, Arizona, says diet plays a role. 'Certain foods like fatty, fried, creamy, dairy or high-fiber foods can sit longer and cause more symptoms,' she says. Sign up to Well Actually Practical advice, expert insights and answers to your questions about how to live a good life after newsletter promotion Other causes: Dehydration and low blood sugar can make a person feel unwell upon waking, says Wasey. Sleep apnea, a condition where one's breathing stops and starts abruptly during sleep, can cause symptoms such as headaches, sore throat and even anxiety. 'Disruptions in breathing can lead to drops in oxygen levels that can trigger headaches, dizziness, and nausea,' he explains. Less common issues include dysautonomia, the inability to regulate involuntary body functions such as heart rate and blood pressure, and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, characterized by dizziness after your head changes positions, such as lying down or sitting up in bed. If you suspect any of these, Wasey says to talk with a doctor. A short slumber is a safe bet. 'We always encourage naps to be brief: 20 minutes or less,' says Wasey. 'If a nap is more than 20 minutes, it can go into deep sleep. If they wake during deep sleep, they're more likely to experience unpleasant symptoms upon waking.' If a quick lie-down doesn't seem like enough, give yourself time to complete one full 90-minute sleep cycle. 'I tell patients to either do a 20-minute or a 90-minute nap,' he says. If GI issues are causing problems, keep the nap under half an hour, says Pothuri. The digestive system tends to slow down after 20 minutes of sleep, which means food stays in the stomach longer. Plus, less horizontal time means less time for stomach acid to irritate the esophagus. Keep naps short, says Wasey – or skip them altogether. It helps to have a good night's rest, he says: 'Start a bedtime routine by winding down, reading a book or meditating, and limit blue light one to two hours before actual bedtime.' Afolabi-Brown says that if you take a nap, doing so earlier in the day can help ensure you don't have trouble sleeping at night. Snoozing too long or too late in the day can reduce your sleep drive, the pressure to sleep that builds in our bodies the longer we're awake. If you suspect GI issues, Shah recommends waiting until your food has digested before lying down – ideally three to four hours. If that's not realistic, try to avoid spicy, acidic and fatty foods before napping. And when you lie down, prop yourself up with pillows or an adjustable mattress. 'We want to work with gravity,' says Shah. 'Keeping the head and chest elevated will mean less acid injury to the lower part of the esophagus.' Over-the-counter antacids can alleviate symptoms, but if discomfort persists, Shah recommends seeing a doctor. Prescription medications may provide more relief, or a physician may want to check for other issues in the esophagus, such as infection, ulcers or esophagitis. After speaking with the experts, I set aside a day to try their advice. I kept breakfast and lunch simple, swapping an acidic orange for toast and ignoring lasagne leftovers in favor of a light salad. When my son went down for a nap, I made a mini mountain of pillows to prop myself up and set an alarm for 20 minutes. When I woke up, I felt refreshed, rested and happy – no nausea or brain fog. I don't always have the forethought to avoid triggering foods or arrange pillows. But thanks to these adjustments, I've discovered that there really is nothing like a good nap. Jillian Pretzel is a freelance journalist in Southern California
