Japan grapples with far-right surge and prospect of new leader after general election
Shigeru Ishiba
is on the political ropes after a humiliating rebuke by voters in a general election on Sunday, which saw a striking rise in the popularity of fringe populist parties.
The results suggest that a country largely untouched until now by the far-right populism that has roiled European and American politics may be in for a period of messy instability.
Exit polls on Sunday night predict Ishiba's coalition government will lose its Upper House majority, handing them their second major electoral drubbing in less than a year, following the loss of the Lower House last October.
Most of the gains in the election went to the right or far right, led by Sanseito, a new party with an anti-immigrant platform that advocated lower taxes and peddled Maga-style grievances about immigrants and globalists.
Japan's
public service broadcaster NHK on Sunday projected that Sanseito could win 10-22 seats.
The Democratic Party For the People, another
conservative
populist
party, is projected to win 17 seats and the far-right Conservative Party of Japan could win two. Komeito, the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) Buddhist-backed junior coalition partner, will also lose seats. The centre-left Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan is expected to gain seats.
READ MORE
If confirmed, Sunday's result would be the first time in 70 years that a government led by Ishiba's LDP has lost control of both branches of the Diet. One of the world's most successful political machines, the LDP has held power for all but a handful of years since 1955.
During the campaign, the Japanese media reported that LDP candidates around the country were refusing to campaign with Ishiba, suggesting he had become a toxic figure.
[
As an Irishman living in Japan, I watch the rise of anti-immigrant rhetoric with unease
Opens in new window
]
Ishiba's popularity swooned after a scandal involving the payment of gifts to rookie lawmakers in March. Record food prices and declining wages have also been an emotive electoral issue. The price of rice, a national staple, almost doubled in June year-on-year. In May, the agriculture minister was forced to quit after he infuriated voters by saying he 'never had to buy rice' because his supporters gave it to him as a gift.
Sanseito advocated tougher restrictions on foreigners and other right-leaning causes, including changes to school education to make Japanese people 'proud of their country's history and culture'. Several Sanseito candidates said Japan should build a nuclear bomb.
Although he softened his tone during the campaign, Sanseito party leader Sohei Kamiya has been a high-profile anti-vaxxer and has blamed 'international financial capital affiliated with Jews' for the exaggerated fears of the coronavirus pandemic. Among the party's prescriptions was that young men should be conscripted to work on farms.
Inflation helped drive voters away from the LDP. Many are also frustrated by the threat of new
US tariffs
of 25 per cent, due to take effect on August 1st. Trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa was dispatched to Washington seven times in a fruitless bid to avoid the tariffs, giving the impression, said one lawmaker, that Japan was being 'mugged' by US president Donald Trump, who wants to cut a $70 billion trade deficit with Japan.
[
Donald Trump's nonsensical economics
Opens in new window
]
The election was prefaced by a sell-off of Japanese government bonds amid concerns that the government was floundering. Bond yields were pushed last week to their highest levels since 2008. Ishiba is now likely to come under pressure to adopt some of the populist measures of its rivals.
As the results came in on Sunday night, Yoichi Masuzoe, former governor of Tokyo, said that the rise of Sanseito 'feels strikingly similar to the situation after the 1929 Great Depression when the Nazis expanded their influence through elections'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Kamala Harris and Stephen Colbert symbols not so much of a vanished time as a lost US future
Time moves differently in Donald Trump 's presidency, so the effect of seeing Kamala Harris back on television screens was like the shock return of a once prominent but long vanished character from Dynasty or Falcon Crest, or any of the stars from the classic era of US soap operas that outlasted the rise and fall of several presidencies. The defeated Democratic candidate is in the public eye again to publicise 107 Days, her account of her belated, doomed attempt to resuscitate her party's hopes in the 2024 presidential race after Joe Biden 's candidacy became untenable. She was appearing on the The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, a flagship talkshow that CBS has decided to cancel once the season ends in May. The decision to end Colbert's run generated delight on the Republican right, not least from Trump, who is frequently in the firing line of Colbert's brand of slick, savagely funny satire. That CBS needed approval from the Trump administration for its sale to Skydance to go through, and that its parent company, Paramount, recently settled a spurious $16 million lawsuit with the president, was lost on nobody. David Letterman, the original host of the show, from 1993-2015, described the CBS decision as 'gutless' and 'pure cowardice'. READ MORE Ironically, the Trump lawsuit was framed around a charge that an interview Harris had given to 60 Minutes during last year's election campaign had been edited to her advantage. Cancelling Colbert was just the icing on the cake for Trump. And it was also a reflection of the fast-changing broadcast news and talkshow landscape. Letterman had the undivided attention of late-night America but the culture, and options, have changed enormously since then. CBS issued a bland statement thanking Colbert and leaked remarks to the effect that a staff of 100 and a bill of a $100 million for a dwindling audience had become impossible to maintain. The Ed Sullivan Theater, where The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is recorded live, in midtown Manhattan. Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty So when Harris and Colbert sat down, a desk between them, both seemed like symbols not so much of a vanished time as a lost future. It will be impossible for Americans to ever see Harris and wonder what the road not taken in 2024 might have looked like. The stark numbers of the election are worth repeating. Although Harris and the Democrats were trounced on the big blue and red electoral college board, in actual human votes, Trump won 77,303,568 (49.8 per cent) and Harris 75,019,230 (48.3 per cent). Some 2,284,338 votes separated them: a significant number of people but not so much that Harris and her supporters won't always imagine a different outcome. As Colbert mentioned, she looked rested. She revealed that she spent much of the past six months in restorative mode – 'lots of cooking shows'- and that, no, she had not watched much current affairs. 'I'm not into self-mutilation,' she said in a rare moment of sharpness. [ From the archive: It's a do-or-die moment for Kamala Harris. She needs to assert herself Opens in new window ] That acidic edge was a reminder of what Harris often seemed to lack during those 107 days when she sought to persuade Americans that she was a better alternative to Trump. She had the extraordinary rise from modest west coast immigrant home, a natural telegenic appeal and, when she permitted herself, came across as warm and authoritative. There was no menace. But there was too often a blurriness about what she might do. And even in Thursday night's harmless and friendly theatre in New York, her fatal conservatism remained intact. She brought no gossip or intrigue or fresh revelation, nothing to excite the hopes of the millions of lost Democrats out there. For six months, Trump has talked and talked and talked, as though the Oval Office is his psychologist's couch and the people of the United States his listener. It may be bewildering and contradictory and frightening. But it has the world's attention. [ US AI policy risks disaster because of Trump Opens in new window ] Harris teased an anecdote featuring Doug, her husband, and a missed birthday of hers in the days before the election but when Colbert teed her up, she broke into laughter and said, 'you have to read the book'. A mildly exasperated Colbert mimicked flicking through the pages. It's the golden rule of these shows followed by any celebrities there to sell a film or a biography: the host says lovely things about you and in turn, you tell a few self-deprecating yarns and everyone is happy. Even now, Harris held back. Six months in, Trump's second term has, for now, confounded the doom sayers. The markets continue to thrive despite the tariff upheaval. However, Friday's August deadline was accompanied by reports of a weakening labour market and a dip in markets. He has, as promised ended border immigration but the Ice deportation campaign continues to horrify many Americans. His vow to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict has not been fulfilled. The situation in Gaza has become even more horrifying that it was under Biden. [ Justine McCarthy: Keir Starmer and Donald Trump looked ready to put a ring on it. No wonder Melania stayed at home Opens in new window ] Already, the Democrats are nearing the point where potential challengers to the next Republican candidate will have to step into the bright lights. Many have interpreted Harris's decision not to run for governor of California next year as an intention to put herself forward as a presidential candidate in 2028. To Colbert's army of night-watchers who flicked off the TV for the night, it will take a lot of convincing by Harris if she is to catapult from her place as the face of calamitous disappointment for Democrat voters to their best future hope.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election winner in line for increased election expenses refund of up to €250,000
The winner of the presidential election will be entitled to reimbursement of election expenses by the State of an increased sum of up to €250,000 after this year's campaign. Unsuccessful candidates whose vote reaches a quarter of the quota are also in line for the same maximum level of refund. The sum is €50,000 more than the maximum reimbursement of €200,000 that was on offer after the 2018 election. The increase was approved by Minister for Local Government James Browne to reflect the increase in the consumer price index (CPI) – a measures of inflation – that has occurred since 2018. READ MORE On that occasion just two candidates qualified for reimbursement, President Michael D Higgins and Independent candidate Peter Casey . Mr Higgins's re-election campaign in 2018 had expenses of some €367,338, with €200,000 of this reimbursed. Mr Casey was repaid the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911. Others whose share of the vote did not meet the threshold for refunds were Independents Joan Freeman, whose campaign spent €253,194; Seán Gallagher , whose campaign had spending of €246,820; and Gavin Duffy, whose campaign cost €163,438. Sinn Féin spent €209,716 on the campaign for its 2018 candidate, Liadh Ní Riada, but also lost out on any reimbursement. The Department of Local Government on Friday said Mr Browne had signed an order increasing the maximum reimbursement amount from €200,000 to €250,000. 'Applying the CPI increase since the amount was last revised resulted in a potential increase to €252,700 which has been rounded down to €250,000.' The overall spending limit for individual presidential campaigns will remain at €750,000 for the forthcoming election, expected to take place in October or November. This €750,000 spending limit is still well above even the most expensive election campaign of recent times. That was Fine Gael's unsuccessful bid to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011, which ran up election expenses of €527,152. Mr Mitchell's campaign did not qualify for any reimbursement. There are just two confirmed candidates in this year's presidential race so far: Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness – a former European Commissioner and MEP – and left-wing Galway West Independent TD Catherine Connolly . Ms McGuinness has the backing of a large party and its financial resources. Ms Connolly is seeking donations from supporters and is likely to get funding from the smaller parties that back her including Labour and the Social Democrats . The sums raised for Ms Connolly's campaign through online fundraising as of Thursday evening stood at some €28,500.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Trump's week: out of the rough for now
This week, not for the first time, Donald Trump was accused of cheating at golf. Video footage from a round at a Scottish course appeared to show an aide surreptitiously placing a ball in a more favourable position. The metaphor is almost too easy. In both golf and politics, the US president plays a game in which rules are negotiable and perception trumps process. Yet even by the standards of his tumultuous presidency, Trump had reason to feel buoyed this week. Two significant trade deals – one with the European Union, the other with Japan – allowed him to claim vindication for his unorthodox approach to international economics. He has long argued that the global trading system short-changes the US and that tough talk and tougher tariffs would redress the balance. His critics, including most mainstream economists, have warned of retaliation, inflation and lost jobs. But, so far, the economic data has not borne out those dire predictions. Stock markets remain steady and recent opinion polls suggest Trump is regaining public trust in his handling of the economy. Flush with this perceived success, he has pushed further. New and broader tariffs were announced on Friday, targeting countries he claims have taken advantage of American goodwill such as Canada and Brazil. At the same time, he has signalled a shift on Russia, threatening imminent fresh sanctions unless progress is made on the Ukraine conflict. But warning signs are emerging. Revised labour market data revealed a marked slowdown in job creation over the last quarter. That followed a disappointing GDP report indicating that consumer spending – a key pillar of US growth – is cooling. The Federal Reserve, long a punching bag for the president, may now be forced to re-evaluate its reluctance to cut interest rates when it meets in September. READ MORE The bigger picture remains murky. Few details of the much trumpeted trade deals have been finalised. Implementation timelines are vague. So far, the primary impact of Trump's tariff policy has been to inject uncertainty into the global economy, not least in Ireland. The Department of Finance warned this week that the latest round of US tariffs could reduce Irish job creation by as much as 70,000 over the next five years. This is a serious threat, though not an existential one. The true risk lies in the White House's apparent addiction to drama. If the remainder of Trump's presidency continues to be defined by impulse, personal grievance and sudden policy shifts, then this current period of relative calm could prove fleeting. For now, he may feel like a winner. But in politics as in golf, it is not how you start that counts. It is where the ball finally comes to rest.
