Carlisle man caught drug-driving twice in three weeks... on the same stretch of road
Rhys Ponting, aged 26, of Linton Street, has been handed a 16-month ban following two incidents in successive months earlier this year.
At Carlisle Magistrates' Court, prosecutor George Shelley told how Ponting was first stopped on Eden Bridge, just after 3.30am, on February 13.
He was riding a Honda MSX 125.
Ponting was found to have only a provisional driving licence and was unable to prove his riding competence by showing a valid CBT (compulsory basic training) certificate, as required.
A roadside drug wipe proved positive for cannabis. And a subsequent evidential specimen revealed the level of a drug breakdown product in Ponting's bloodstream was above the legal driving limit.
The court heard Ponting did not know further action would be taken against him at the time he was stopped for a second time, just 19 days later.
On March 4, two police officers undertaking static observations identified a motorcycle — Ponting's Honda — which appeared to be speeding over Eden Bridge.
They followed the bike on to Kingstown Road where Ponting was given reasons for the stop. Officers detected the smell of cannabis. 'He had reddening around the eyes and slow speech,' said Mr Shelley.
Another roadside test proved positive for cannabis and a further evidential reading showed he was again over the legal driving limit.
In court Ponting admitted two drug driving charges; plus driving otherwise than in accordance with a licence on February 13; and failing to produce a motorcycle training course certificate of competence.
Mitigation was advance on his behalf by defence solicitor Duncan Campbell, who told how Ponting used cannabis on a therapeutic basis.
Consumption of the drug had been 'long before' each of the two incidents and not immediately prior, stressed Mr Campbell.
Ponting worked night shift for a waste recycling company.
Magistrates imposed £400 fines for each of the drug-driving offences which, with other court costs, left Ponting with a court bill totalling £1,290.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oxford Street rough sleepers were ‘evicted from homeless encampment'
Members of a group of rough sleepers recently evicted from an encampment on Park Lane are believed to have relocated to locations on Oxford Street. Video footage recently shared online showed a long line of people outside John Lewis, with another group also known to be sleeping by the M&S. Westminster City Council, the local authority, has confirmed it believes some of them were among those in the Park Lane encampment dismantled by Transport for London (TfL) earlier this summer. A spokesperson for the council said its rough sleeping teams are out speaking with people across the city seven days a week, and that when they are prepared to engage with officers, 'we can offer routes to hostel accommodation and help with addiction and mental health issues'. The Park Lane encampment, which was established on a patch of land opposite the Hilton hotel by Hyde Park Corner, mirrored a similar site set up last summer closer to Marble Arch. This was also taken down after TfL was granted a possession order by the court. The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) recently revealed TfL had spent nearly £37,000 on court fees and instructing bailiffs and legal counsel over the last two years removing people from Park Lane. Further costs are expected from the court this month. The LDRS visited the Park Lane encampments both this year and last and spoke to several local businesses who raised concerns. One person who runs a nearby restaurant said: 'The problem is we try to push them away and they won't budge out. All I want to do is get rid of them because of the customers. And it's not good for the area.' Following the dismantling of the encampment this year, a TfL spokesperson said those sleeping rough at Park Lane 'have been made aware that returning to the site is not an option and that they will be removed. As there is no safe option for people to sleep rough at this site, we have also arranged for security staff to patrol the area to discourage people from returning.' People have been sleeping rough on Oxford Street for years, and it is understood some have been gathering by John Lewis and M&S for at least a few months. Upon seeing the footage shared online showing the line of makeshift beds, the LDRS asked Westminster City Council if it included any of those previously at Park Lane. The local authority confirmed it believed this to be the case. The LDRS visited Oxford Street one evening last week, by which point the two groups had begun gathering outside the stores. Several workers at businesses along Oxford Street said they had experienced no issues with the groups themselves though claimed they were aware of issues such as pickpocketing affecting the shopping district. The Met Police was approached for comment. Conservative West End councillors Paul Fisher and Tim Barnes have previously called for TfL and Westminster to 'provide a lasting solution to illegal camps, otherwise we will be back at square one. This is unacceptable at the centre of our capital.' Commenting on those sleeping on Oxford Street, Cllr Barnes said the issue pre-dates the removal of the tents on Park Lane and that TfL and Westminster City Council should know the groups were linked. He also claimed it is part of a wider problem which has gotten 'dramatically worse' over the last couple of years. He said: 'We know that the vast majority of the rough sleepers in the area are part of organised criminal begging gangs but too little joined up action has taken place to put their illicit trade to an end.' A Westminster City Council spokesperson said: 'As a local authority we have more rough sleepers than any other part of the country and we spend more than any other local authority – around £8 million a year – to offer rough sleepers a route off the streets. 'The streets of Westminster are not a viable place to live. Across the city, our rough sleeping teams are out seven days a week talking to people living rough. Where they are prepared to engage with us, we can offer routes to hostel accommodation and help with addiction and mental health issues. 'We have more than 380 hostel beds to help those sleeping rough and 100 emergency beds on standby, so the reality is nobody needs to be sleeping on the streets. Those who sleep rough are often characterised with complex needs who, for whatever reason, feel unable to engage with a comprehensive and supportive offer to leave the streets. 'Over the years, we have witnessed those who have been human trafficked, those who are being exploited for criminal behaviour and those with complex mental health or other complex social needs. We work with colleagues across the public sector, including police, social care and health to ensure the right support and interventions are co-ordinated.' Westminster is by some way the local authority area with the highest number of people sleeping rough. According to Government data, on a single autumn night in 2024 Westminster recorded 388 people on the streets, a rise of 40% compared to 2023. This compared to 132 people in Camden in second and 86 in the City of London.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's how much it costs to house asylum seekers in UK hotels
Councils across England may take legal action to remove asylum seekers from hotels after a court injunction A landmark court judgment that has temporarily blocked asylum seekers from being housed at a hotel in Essex has left many councils considering similar court actions. On Tuesday (19 August) the High Court granted Epping Forest District Council an interim injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at The Bell Hotel. The judge in the case ruled in favour of the council when it argued the hotel had become a public safety risk and had breached planning law. The hotel must stop housing asylum seekers by 4pm on 12 September. In response Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' to perhaps take similar legal action. And Reform UK has stated that all 12 councils controlled by the party will "do everything in their power to follow Epping's lead", according to leader Nigel Farage. Why does this matter? The injunction poses a huge problem for the UK government who may now battle the court decision at the Court of Appeal and face the prospect of rehousing thousands. Home Office lawyers had argued during the hearing that the case had a "substantial impact" on the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, in performing her legal duties to asylum seekers. The Labour government's attempt to delay the application was rejected by Mr Justice Eyre. The Bell Hotel has become the focus of ongoing protests in recent weeks following allegations involving individuals residing there under the asylum system. The demonstrations began after Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, an asylum seeker staying at the hotel, was charged with the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl. He has denied these charges. In a separate case, another resident of the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has been charged with seven offences, which he denies. Additionally, several other men have been charged in connection with disorder that took place outside the premises. How many asylum seekers are placed in hotels? Since around 2020, there has been increased use of hotels for contingency asylum accommodation. The rise has been attributed to several factors, such as the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent public health measures; an increase in the number of migrants crossing the Channel in small boats; and a backlog in unresolved asylum cases. Home Office data states that a total of 109,343 people claimed asylum in the UK in the year ending March 2025. This was 17% more than in the year ending March 2024 and 6% more than the previous peak of 103,081 in 2002. The Migration Observatory, an independent research project focused on analysing migration and migrants in the UK, said that at the end of March there were 32,345 asylum seekers in hotels. This represents 30% of all supported asylum seekers in this period and has dropped from 34,530 last year and 47,518 in 2023. The peak number of asylum seekers housed was 56,042 at the end of September 2023. The majority of asylum seekers being housed in hotels are in London. In March 12,024 60% of asylum seekers living in hotels, were housed in the capital. A written parliamentary response in February 2025 confirmed 218 hotels were being used to house asylum seekers, with seven due to close in April. How much does it cost? Analysis by the Migration Observatory across 2024-25 states the average daily cost of housing an asylum seeker in a hotel was estimated to be £170 per person. This has decreased slightly in the financial year 2024/25 falling from the equivalent of £176 per person last year. The three-month average nightly rate in asylum hotels has also declined from £162 in April 2024 to £119 in March 2025, as the number of hotels being used also dropping. This reduction in cost is likely due to several factors, including the Home Office closing some hotels, accommodating more people in each hotel, implementing room-sharing policies, and possibly choosing hotels with cheaper nightly rates. The cost of using a hotel is more than six times more expensive than using other types of accommodation, with a rate of £27 being the average for other types of accommodation. When you multiply the three-month average rate of £119 per night, by the number of housed asylum seekers, it costs the UK government around £3,849,055 per night. Arguing for the Bell Hotels owner's Somani Hotels, Piers Riley-Smith, said during the court hearing that asylum seekers a "financial lifeline" to the hotel. He added it was only 1% full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers. Why hotel court ruling creates such a problem The Home Office has been attempting to come to grips with a growing number of asylum seekers attempting to find alternatives to costly hotels. Labour has said it plans to empty the hotels housing asylum seekers by 2029, although some contracts run beyond this. The judge ruled against Somani Hotels, after Epping Forest District Council cited alleged breaches of planning laws. The government will likely challenge the decision, as they did on Tuesday, believing the ruling "substantially impact" the government's ability to house asylum seekers. If other local councils follow Epping's lead, and are successful, this could mean the mass rehousing of thousands of migrants. Dan Jarvis, Minister of State for Security, said Labour has "never thought that hotels were an appropriate source of accommodation for asylum seekers" and the government was looking at "alternative accommodation arrangements". In June, a Home Affairs Committee heard how the government was looking at buying tower blocks and former student accommodation to house migrants. Another possible alternative is for the government to house asylum seekers in flats or houses that have been rented from private landlords or social housing providers. These plans can be resisted locally, as when in October this year more than 1,000 people protested in Waterlooville, Hampshire, when plans were announced accommodate 35 families in flats above shops. The removal of migrants from hotels to private accommodation is likely to save the UK government money, as hotels are the most expensive way to house asylum seekers. This would also mean many would be relocated to housing in 'cheaper areas' of the UK, according to former Conservative MP Damian Green, who served as a minster under Theresa May. Subsequent governments have failed to establish large accommodation sites in buildings such as disused military barracks. One site, Wethersfield, a former Ministry of Defence site in Braintree, Essex, may increase its capacity to house single adult male asylum seekers. But creating large-scale sites like this can be costly. In 2024, the National Audit Office (NAO), published a report which revealed the initial set-up costs for Wethersfield were initially estimated at about £5m, but had ballooned to around £49m. Mr Green said the government should use purpose-built housing, like the Nightingale hospitals used during Covid to "toughen up" the accommodation to use as a deterrent so as not seen as 'offensively luxurious'. In 2022 the Conservative government said it would use 'large sites', such as former military facilities, barges, ferries, and cruise ships. One such site was The Bibby Stockholm, a converted barge moored in Dorset which was subsequently decommissioned by the Labour government in November 2024 amid safety concerns. The barge, which provided accommodation for up to 400 single male asylum seekers a night at maximum occupancy, had cost the taxpayer at least £34.8m, according to the National Audit Office. Another site that could be adapted for use is the Napier Barracks in Kent, which is set to be closed in September 2025. In June 2021 it was found that the site provided inadequate accommodation for asylum seekers, that the Home Office's process for selecting people to be accommodated at the Barracks was flawed and unlawful, and that residents of Napier Barracks were unlawfully detained.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ex-police officer pleads guilty to stalking woman
A former police officer made a woman feel vulnerable and unsafe by repeatedly approaching and asking her out, a court has heard. Ex-Devon and Cornwall Police Constable Kevin Davis, 41, of Seaton, pleaded guilty to stalking and misconduct in public office charges during a hearing at Exeter Magistrates' Court. The court was told David repeatedly messaged the woman, approached her at the gym and searched for her 24 times on systems at work over a three-month period, including while on annual leave. District Judge Stuart Smith said Davis would be sentenced on 17 September. Devon and Cornwall Police said the force was not making any comments at this time. 'Spy on her' Prosecuting, Warjinder Bains said Davis made "repeated unwanted comments" on social media posts to the victim and asked her out several times in January. She added Davis then turned up at the woman's gym to try and speak to her. "The defendant used his position as a police officer to look her up on the police system to, in effect, spy on her, accessing the system also on his off-duty periods, including when he was on annual leave," she said. The judge said the offences were "very serious" and ordered a pre-sentence report to be written ahead of sentencing. Davis was granted bail with a condition not to contact the complainant. More news stories for Devon Listen to the latest news for Devon Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@ More on this story Ex-PC facing stalking and misconduct charges Related internet links Devon and Cornwall Police Exeter Law Courts
