9 people plead not guilty in a Texas elections probe involving 'vote harvesting'
The nine people appeared either in person or by Zoom during a court hearing in Pearsall, Texas, before state District Judge Sid Harle.
All of the nine people, who were indicted in late June, have been charged with what is known in Texas as vote harvesting, a felony that often involves payment for collecting and dropping off other people's absentee ballots.
In May, six other people, including Frio County Judge Rochelle Camacho, the top elected official in the county, were indicted as part of Paxton's investigation.
One of the individuals who pleaded not guilty on Wednesday was Juan Manuel Medina, who is the chief of staff for state Rep. Elizabeth Campos. Medina is also former chairman of the Democratic Party of Bexar County, where San Antonio is located.
Medina's lawyer, Gerry Goldstein, declined to comment on Wednesday. 'I'm going to do my talking in the courtroom,' Goldstein said.
On Wednesday, Goldstein filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against Medina, who is accused of providing compensation as a third party to two people for vote harvesting in February 2024.
In the motion to dismiss, Goldstein said the vote-harvesting statute is overbroad, vague and 'restricts Constitutionally protected rights to speech and to participate in the election and voting process in violation of the First Amendment.'
Goldstein said in the motion that the vote-harvesting statute 'would appear to punish a broad range of protected speech, including non-coercive voter assistance and core political expression, without requiring any actual voter fraud, coercion, or intimidation.'
'This indictment charges Medina in a capacity that is not a crime and the indictment should be dismissed,' Goldstein said in his 20-page motion.
The vote-harvesting charges are third-degree felonies and carry up to 10 years in prison. The other people who were indicted in June are: Cecilia Castellano, a former candidate for state representative; Frio County Commissioner Raul Carrizales; former Dilley Mayor Mary Ann Obregon; former Dilley City Council member Inelda Rodriguez; Petra Davina Trevino, a former candidate for Pearsall city council; Pearsall school district trustee Mari Benavides; Susanna Carrizales; and Rachel Leal.
Attorneys for Raul Carrizales, Susanna Carrizales, Castellano, Obregon and Rodriguez did not immediately return calls seeking comment. Attorneys for Benavides, Leal and Trevino could not immediately be reached for comment.
Paxton's office and 81st Judicial District Attorney Audrey Gossett Louis, whose office presented the case to a grand jury with the Texas Attorney General's Office, did not return a call or email seeking comment.
Last month, Paxton said that any elected official 'trying to cheat the system will have to answer for it.'
'Under my watch, attempts to rig elections and silence the will of the voters will be met with the full force of the law. I will continue to fight to ensure Texas has free and fair elections,' Paxton said in a statement.
The indictments were the latest development in an investigation that Paxton started after the 2020 election to root out voter fraud, which is rare and typically occurs in isolated instances. Texas has tightened its voter laws in recent years and increased penalties that Democrats and opponents say are attempts to suppress turnout among Black and Latino voters.
A federal appeals court last year upheld the state's law that tightened voter restrictions and increased penalties for vote harvesting.
___
Follow Juan A. Lozano: https://twitter.com/juanlozano70
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Mark Hamill reveals he planned to leave the US when Donald Trump was re-elected
Get the latest entertainment news, reviews and star-studded interviews with our Independent Culture email Get the latest entertainment news with our free Culture newsletter Get the latest entertainment news with our free Culture newsletter Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice Star Wars actor Mark Hamill has revealed he planned to leave the United States when Donald Trump was re-elected as president in 2024. The 73-year-old, known for his role as Luke Skywalker in the iconic sci-fi franchise, gave his wife Marilou Tork – whom he married in 1978 – the choice between relocating to 'London or Ireland'. Hamill's wife, who worked as a dental hygienist and met Hamill while cleaning his teeth, ingeniously convinced her husband not to move countries by suggesting Trump was pushing them out of the US. 'She's very clever. She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country,'' Hamill, a lifelong Democrat, told The Times. ''That son of a b****', I thought. I'm not leaving.' When asked about the political landscape in the United States, Hamill expressed exasperation over 'the bullying, the incompetence, the people in place' in the Trump administration. The actor added that the only way he could 'deal' with the his country's politics without becoming suicidal was to look at the situation 'like a thick, sprawling political novel' instead of reality. open image in gallery Actor Mark Hamill has revealed he planned to leave the United States after Donald Trump was re-elected in 2024 ( Getty ) Despite his horror, Hamill added that he 'still believes' there are 'more honest, decent people' in the country than there are those in a Maga crowd. 'If I didn't, I'd move back to England,' he said. Elsewhere in the interview, Hamill revealed his dislike of US gun culture is such that he almost didn't accept his role in a forthcoming adaptation of Stephen King's horror novel The Long Walk. Hamill will play The Major, a man who runs an annual walking contest in a dystopian version of America that sees 100 young men walk continuously at a pace of four miles an hour – or they'll be shot to death. 'Francis Lawrence, the director, understood what was troubling me,' he said of his initial reluctance to take on the role. open image in gallery Hamill as The Major in 'The Long Walk' ( Lionsgate/YouTube ) 'American society is gun violence and it's hard to get past that, but as I spoke to him I realised this is just the guy. He said he would have been surprised if I wasn't troubled by it.' The actor went on to compare the film to recent ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] arrests in the country, saying agents wearing masks, with no identification, had been 'pulling people out of their cars'. 'They were just brutalising people, kneeling on their necks,' he said. 'When I made the movie I wasn't thinking in terms of it being timely but it's proven to be just that.' Hamill led the three original Star Wars movies – Star Wars (1977), The Empire Strikes Back (1980), and Return of the Jedi (1983) – as Luke Skywalker alongside Carrie Fisher as Princess Leira and Harrison Ford as Han Solo. He reprised the role in all three films of the sequel trilogy: The Force Awakens (2015), The Last Jedi (2017), and The Rise of Skywalker (2019), as well as in numerous TV spin offs, including The Clone Wars and The Mandalorian.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Zelensky accuses Russia of 'complicating' end to war as embattled Ukrainian leader is summoned to the White House - amid fears he will be 'trapped in Trump and Putin vice' and forced to give up land for peace
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of 'complicating' efforts to end the war by refusing a ceasefire as he prepares to meet Donald Trump. Mr Zelensky will visit the White House tomorrow for a one-on-one which the US President believes could pave the way for a three-way meeting with Vladimir Putin. The Russian and American leaders shook hands on Friday at a military base at Anchorage in Alaska for a superpower summit to broker an end to the war in Ukraine. But Ukraine's future as a sovereign nation is now hanging in the balance following the crunch talks, with critics warning other world leaders were powerless to prevent Mr Zelensky from being caught 'with his head in a vice' by Mr Trump and Mr Putin. President Zelensky wrote on X last night: 'We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. 'This complicates the situation. If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater - peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades. 'But together we are working for peace and security. Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war.' He also said he was 'grateful for the invitation' from Mr Trump, and it was 'important that everyone agrees there needs to be a conversation at the level of leaders to clarify all the details and determine which steps are necessary and will work'. Mr Zelensky additionally welcomed the 'principled statement' and 'very significant assistance' of the Nordic-Baltic Eight (NB8) – a regional co-operation group made up of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden. The NB8 had issued a statement saying Mr Putin 'cannot be trusted' and it remained 'steadfast in our support to Ukraine', adding that it would 'continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressures on Russia's war economy'. Diplomatic sources have said Friday's summit in Alaska paved the way for a deal in which Ukraine would be expected to surrender large swathes of the Donbas region in the east of the country, including areas currently controlled by Kyiv. In return, President Zelensky would receive 'Nato-style' protection from Western countries for what remained of his territory. He is preparing to fly to Washington for a showdown with Mr Trump, at which he is expected to be told to retreat from the battlegrounds. Mr Zelensky is understood to have said that he will refuse to surrender Donetsk, which has been at the centre of conflict with Moscow since 2014, but is more broadly 'open to discussing the issue of territory'. Last night, Boris Johnson called for Sir Keir Starmer to lead international efforts to protect Ukraine from being carved up as a result of what he described as a 'vomit-inducing' meeting in Alaska. Mr Trump has told Mr Zelensky and EU leaders that as part of the negotiations they would have to drop their demands for a ceasefire: it means Putin can continue his attacks on the country until a deal is signed. Mr Zelensky reposted this statement by the Nordic-Baltic Eight (NB8) – a regional co-operation group made up of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden Sir Keir will hold a so-called 'coalition of the willing' telephone meeting with French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz this afternoon to discuss the role of European peacekeepers in a post-conflict Ukraine. Yesterday, President Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'The best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up. 'President Zelensky will be coming to [Washington] DC, the Oval Office, on Monday afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin.' And in an interview with Fox News, Mr Trump signalled that he and Mr Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had 'largely agreed'. 'I think we're pretty close to a deal,' he said, adding: 'Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'.' Asked what he would advise Mr Zelensky to do, Trump said: 'Gotta make a deal.' 'Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not,' he added. Last night, former British defence minister Tobias Ellwood told The Mail on Sunday that he feared Mr Zelensky was walking into a trap in the White House. He said: 'He will be asked to put his head in a vice, with Vladimir Putin pushing from one side and Donald Trump from the other. 'The Ukrainian president will be presented with a 'take it or leave it' deal: surrender territory to Russia or face the blame for wrecking peace. 'And if Mr Zelensky refuses, Trump will walk away, declaring that America is done with the talks. It's the classic gangster deal – one you can't refuse. Except he must.' Mr Johnson, writing in today's Mail on Sunday, describes the summit as 'the most vomit-inducing episode in all the tawdry history of international diplomacy'. He says: 'Imagine how it felt to be one of those embattled heroes in a dug-out near Pokrovsk, fighting for your country's freedom, and to hear the President of the United States – the ex officio team captain of the Free World – refer to Vladimir Putin as 'the boss'. Retch. 'Think of the tens of thousands of Ukrainian widows and orphans. 'Think of the maimed and mutilated; think of the Ukrainian civilians living in daily and nightly terror of Putin's bombs and missiles still raining down, even though the so-called negotiations were taking place in Alaska.' But he adds: 'Like so many of the most objectionable pieces of historic diplomacy, that meeting was also, of course, justifiable and even essential. 'Puke-making though it was, Trump was right to try. He was right to meet Putin, because if millions of Ukrainians were watching with horror at the red-carpet rehabilitation of the Russian tyrant, they were also watching with hope... 'One day this war will end with a peace that protects Ukrainian freedom; but as Trump said in Alaska, the Europeans – led by Britain – will have to step up.' The proposed deal was greeted with dismay in Ukraine. Volodymyr Dubovyk, a professor of international relations in Odesa, described it as 'a nothing-burger with a sour aftertaste'. He said: 'As a Ukrainian, it was pretty disgusting to see what was going on, all this red carpet, all this clapping and smiles and being chummy.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, a long-time ally of Mr Trump, said of the US President: 'At least he is trying to find peace.' But former Tory defence secretary Ben Wallace hit out at the 1980s-style 'pantomime' of the summit between the two leaders. He said: 'Putin got what he wanted and I think President Trump got a trip to Alaska.' Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months. The war - the deadliest in Europe for 80 years - has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts.
The Sun
43 minutes ago
- The Sun
Melania Trump pens ‘peace letter' to Putin urging tyrant to ‘serve humanity'… & it's hand-delivered by US president
MELANIA Trump has written a "peace letter" to Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin, urging him to protect future generations around the world. The US First Lady's passionate plea was hand-delivered to the warmongering despot at Friday's Alaska summit. 8 8 8 The letter, which was obtained by Fox News Digital, was read by Putin as the American and Russian delegations looked on. It reads: "Dear President Putin. Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. "They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger. "As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. "As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. "Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all—so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded. "A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity—an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology." The First Lady further wrote that "in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them—a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future." "Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter. "In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone—you serve humanity itself." What's going on with Putin's jelly legs? Vlad's mad twitching feet at Trump talks spark speculation he was wearing LIFTS It comes as Friday's peace summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin ended with no deal being reached. Trump told reporters after the meeting that "some great progress" had been made, but that there's "no deal until there's a deal". He said: "There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say. "A couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway." Putin also described the talks as "very frank and substantive" - amplifying fears that Ukraine will be forced to surrender territory to Moscow in exchange for peace. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is expected to meet with Trump in Washington tomorrow to further discuss the peace process. In a post on X, he wrote: "We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. "This complicates the situation… But together we are working for peace and security." Zelensky trip to the White House tomorrow will be his first since a fiery showdown with with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February that horrified Ukraine's European allies. It is understood that Putin has demanded the eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk - together know as Donbas - in their entirety. He has reportedly pledged to halt further advances in the southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions in exchange for land in Donetsk not currently occupied by Russia. But President Zelensky have so far refused to cede Donbas to Russia, saying such a move would allow Putin to "start a third war" in Ukraine. The US has also reportedly proposed a framework that would not see Ukraine join NATO, but would be given protections similar to the Article 5 mutual defence clause. Ukraine has long sought NATO membership for protection against Moscow, but this is vehemently opposed by Russia. Has the Alaska summit helped broker a peace deal? AS Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin both flew out of Alaska on Friday it appeared as though the summit was an utter failure in the eyes of Ukraine. There had been no agreements on a peace deal as Trump appeared to be hesitant to truly reveal what demands Putin was making. But a few hours after the meeting ended Trump took to social media to reveal the meeting was a success in his eyes. Trump said Russia and Ukraine both believe a full peace deal is "the best way" to end the war - rather than a short term ceasefire. Now diplomatic sources have revealed some of the initial details of the potential agreement, according to news agency AFP. The US has reportedly proposed an agreement that would see Ukraine not join Nato - but instead be offered Nato-esque protections similar to Article 5. Article 5 on Nato's founding treaty agrees collective defense - meaning allies see an attack on one as an attack on all of them. Trump reportedly floated the plan with Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders during a call after his meeting with Putin. The US President is set to discuss the terms of an agreement with Zelensky on Monday when he travels to the White House. Zelensky did not directly address any potential plan but he did say on X: "We discussed positive signals from the American side regarding participation in guaranteeing security for Ukraine." 8 8 8 8
