PM Modi flags off Namma Metro Yellow line from Bengaluru's Ragigudda, takes first ride to Electronic City
After flagging off ceremony of Bengaluru's yellow line, the metro network will become operational for public and will increase connectivity to over 96 kilometres.
The inauguration of the Bangalore Metro Phase-3 project worth over ₹ 15,610 crore will also take place.
Earlier in the day, he inaugurated 3 Vande Bharat Express trains from Bengaluru. The 3 Vande Bharat Express trains in focus are high-speed trains from Bengaluru to Belagavi, Amritsar to Sri Mata Vaishno Devi Katra and Nagpur (Ajni) to Pune.
The Prime Minister is scheduled to inaugurate and lay the foundation stone of urban connectivity projects in the IT hub of India, as per August 9 press release of the Prime Minister's Office.
As per the itinerary, PM Modi will participate in a total of three events during his nearly four-hour visit to the city, including a public address scheduled later in the day.
The Prime Minister is set to lay the foundation stone of Bangalore Metro Phase-3 project. Worth over ₹ 15,610 crore, the Phase-3 project encompasses a total route length of more than 44 kilometres, featuring 31 elevated stations. Aimed at addressing the growing transportation needs of the metropolitan city, this infrastructure project will cater to residential, industrial, commercial and educational areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
ONGC Q1 net profit drops 10 pc on lower oil prices
New Delhi, Aug 13 (PTI) State-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) has reported a 10 per cent decline in its June quarter net profit on lower oil prices and stagnant production from its aging fields. The company reported a net profit of ₹ 8,024 crore in the first quarter of 2025-26 fiscal year, compared to ₹ 8,938 crore earning in the same period last year, a company statement said. The firm realised USD 67.87 for every barrel of crude oil it pumped out of ground and below seabed from sale to refiners, who convert it into fuels like petrol and diesel, as compared to USD 80.64 per barrel realisation in April-June 2024. Price of natural gas, which is used to generate electricity, produce fertiliser or turned into CNG and piped cooking gas, marginally rose to USD 6.64 per million British thermal units in Q1 from USD 6.5 in last year. ONGC said gas from new wells it drills is eligible for a 20 per cent premium over the government set price, called APM. "ONGC is actively working to boost output from such wells. In Q1 of 2025-26 (FY'26), revenue from new well gas stood at ₹ 1,703 crore, delivering an additional ₹ 333 crore compared to the APM gas price," the statement said. The company produced 4.683 million tonnes of crude oil in Q1, almost the same as last year's 4.629 million tonnes. Gas output too was almost unchanged at 4.846 billion cubic meters in the quarter. During the quarter, the firm made two discoveries of hydrocarbons in the Mumbai offshore. Other highlights of the quarter included commencement of production from the PY-3 field -- a joint venture of ONGC, Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc, and Invenire Petrodyne Ltd located offshore in the Cauvery Basin on the east coast of India. The field is producing 4,000 barrels of oil per day and 88,000 standard cubic meters a day of gas. Also, North Karanpura CBM block was put on production. "ONGC commenced the supply of treated natural gas from its newly established gas treatment facility at Palatana, Tripura on June 9. 2025. The gas is being supplied to the city gas distribution (CGD) network in the Gomati through GAIL, enhancing the region's access to cleaner fuel," the statement said. The firm said it has got special dispensation from the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas for selling gas to Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd (RRVUNL) at USD 6.5 per mmBtu from Jodhpur. RRVUNL conveyed their consent for offtake of around 0.1 million standard cubic meters per day of gas using the existing GAIL gas pipeline. ONGC and its overseas subsidiary, ONGC Videsh signed an MOU for coordinated marketing functions. "This MoU is the first step towards enhancing operational synergy and optimizing marketing efficiencies for ONGC and its group companies."
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
No final call made on PM's participation in UN General Assembly in September
India is yet to take a final call on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's participation in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in late September, and people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday that a decision should be expected closer to the holding of the session in New York. The debate will open on September 23 and conclude on September 29. (Narendra Modi |Official Facebook) The inclusion of the Prime Minister's name in the schedule for heads of state and government expected to address the UN General Assembly and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's remarks about a possible meeting with Modi on the margins of session in New York triggered speculation about a possible visit to the US. The provisional list of speakers for the high-level debate at the upcoming session of the General Assembly states India's head of government is expected to address the session on the morning of September 26. The debate will open on September 23 and conclude on September 29. The US head of state is slated to speak on September 23. Also Read: Guest Column| PM Modi's farmers first stand transcends politics However, the people cited above said the Indian side was nowhere close to a final decision on the level of participation in the UN General Assembly. 'It has not yet been decided if the PM would be going to the UN General Assembly or not,' a person said, adding that such a visit appeared 'very unlikely' at the current juncture. The provisional list of speakers is prepared by the UN in August, well in advance of the session, with heads of state and government being given slots before foreign ministers or other representatives of a country. It is not rare for a head of state or government to drop out after their name is placed in the provisional list, the people said. After making a phone call to Modi on Monday, Ukrainian President Zelensky had said on social media that the two leaders planned to meet during the UN General Assembly in September. This was one of the factors behind the speciation about a possible visit to the US by the PM, which could have paved the way for a potential meeting with Trump. However, significant differences remain between the two sides on a trade deal, especially after Trump imposed a 25% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods and slapped another penalty of 25% on India for Russian oil purchases. In recent days, Trump has repeatedly criticised India over its tariff policies and for fuelling the 'Russian war machine' by buying Russian crude. Trump's repeated insistence that he brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan to end four days of hostilities too hasn't gone down well at the highest levels in New Delhi.
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lesson for India in the China-EU freeze: Proceed with caution
The 50 per cent tariff shock on Indian exports to the United States has rattled exporters and policymakers alike. Garment manufacturers are scouting for alternative markets, while jewellery exporters are checking if their orders still stand. Meanwhile, the government plans credit measures to support SMEs and exporters who now potentially face a loss of their largest market. India now finds itself in a strategic bind. These developments come barely weeks before Prime Minister Narendra Modi's maiden visit to China since the Galwan clashes of 2020. The outreach aims to stabilise supply chains and secure critical technologies. Yet it coincides with Washington, India's key trading partner, tightening the screws over Delhi's Russia links, leaving India little room to manoeuvre. This is not dissimilar to the position the European Union finds itself in, vis-à-vis China and the United States. A summit marking 50 years of diplomatic ties in July ended in disappointment for Brussels. EU leaders raised concerns over China subsidising its EVs, market access issues, industrial overcapacity, and Beijing's support for Russia. On the other hand, President Xi Jinping warned against EU interference and criticised its de-risking policies. The EU-China diplomatic freeze has lessons for India. Only months earlier, with Donald Trump threatening sweeping tariffs on both the EU and China, Brussels and Beijing looked poised for closer ties. But that changed quickly when Trump paused tariffs on Chinese goods and Washington and Beijing agreed to resume cooperation on AI and critical minerals. The promise of renewed access to the US market dulled Beijing's appetite for compromise with Europe. Once China secured breathing space with Washington, it turned up the pressure on Brussels. It implemented anti-dumping tariffs on European brandy and expanded procurement restrictions on European medical equipment. The Chinese Commerce Minister called for the removal of EU sanctions on two Chinese banks alleged to have assisted Russia. Chinese export controls on rare earths were strengthened, and data localisation requirements affecting EU cloud and fintech companies were enforced. The EU and the US could have coordinated their leverage against China. Instead, the EU is under pressure from both sides, following the signing of a trade deal that imposes a 15 per cent tariff on its exports to the US. After years of border tensions and curbs on Chinese investment, New Delhi appears to be testing a modest thaw in relations. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's visit to Beijing in July coincided with the reopening of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, the resumption of direct flights, and the reinstatement of tourist visas for Chinese citizens. This revival is driven less by breakthroughs on the border and more by economic reality. The bilateral trade deficit reached a record $99.2 billion in FY25. Imports of solar components, lithium-ion batteries, electronics, and critical intermediaries surged by more than 25 per cent year-on-year. China's dominance in key sectors, such as EV components, green tech, APIs, and telecom equipment, keeps it entrenched in India's efforts to develop its own ecosystem. India is also exploring ways to ease curbs on Chinese investment, particularly in high-tech sectors. But this re-engagement is happening in the context of unresolved strategic issues. Despite an agreement last October, de-escalation along the LAC remains incomplete. Confidence-building measures are still minimal. And public sentiment remains wary. In this context, China may interpret India's opening as a sign of constraint rather than strength. If Beijing could pivot so quickly against the EU once Washington reopened its doors, it could just as easily do the same with India. India's best opportunity to avoid Europe's fate lies in direct negotiations with Chinese firms, ensuring a durable channel of communication, even when geopolitics turn cold. This does not necessarily mean filling out the calendar with high-level dialogues or offering joint ventures with Indian firms, to which Chinese companies may not freely transfer the latest technologies. Instead, India should identify critical supply chains integral to achieving its goals of economic growth, such as EV batteries, displays, EMS and connectors, solar wafers, precision machinery, and tooling. Subsequently, it should engage in dialogue with Chinese brands that have a strong global presence and established connections with upstream players in these fields. With strategic plans spanning two to three decades, these organisations are likely to assess commercial opportunities in India pragmatically and navigate political considerations in both countries as needed. India needs to establish a dedicated, multi-agency team to engage directly with key Chinese firms essential to its industrial goals. This team should comprise supply chain experts, Indian OEMs, state government representatives, and embassy staff, rather than general-purpose investment promotion bodies. Their focus should be on building strong, ongoing relationships with 25-30 major companies through private discussions and practical collaboration, rather than public initiatives. Currently, there is no coordinated outreach with these firms, and policies regarding Chinese companies in India are so unclear that only intermediaries can profit. To attract long-term investment, India needs to offer transparent and predictable guidelines that specify permitted activities, sectors, compliance requirements, and incentives. This clarity will encourage companies to invest, localise, and train for the future, resulting in knowledge and technology transfer. Not because it is mandated, but because companies will need to build for the long term. The Chinese establishment is likely to continue viewing India primarily from a strategic perspective. But when its firms and their shareholders stand to lose money by pulling out, the resistance to weaponising market access or regulatory tools will come from within. In a relationship marked by asymmetry, impassive commercial engagement may be India's strongest safeguard. The writer is Director, Geopolitics and Policy, at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. These are his personal views
