PM set to announce new visa rules to 'tighten up' migration system
Sir Keir Starmer will promise to 'tighten up' all elements of the system as ministers look to bring down net figures, but are facing pushback against plans to stop foreign recruitment of care workers.
The Prime Minister is expected to say that 'enforcement will be tougher than ever and migration numbers will fall' as a result of the policies in the Immigration White Paper, set to be unveiled on Monday.
Meanwhile, the Home Secretary has been warned that plans to stop overseas recruitment for care worker visas are 'cruel', and the head of a nursing union is expected to accuse the Government of 'pandering and scapegoating' with the policy.
Yvette Cooper said on Sunday that the overseas recruitment for care worker visas will be stopped, as part of plans to reduce 'lower-skilled' visas by 'up to 50,000' in the next year.
Sir Keir has also hinted at a tightening up of the rules around the right to a family life for foreign offenders looking to evade deportation, telling The Sun newspaper 'if you break British law, you give up your right to be here'.
Under the white paper proposals, migrants will have to spend 10 years in the UK before being able to apply for citizenship, but so-called 'high-contributing' individuals such as doctors and nurses could be fast-tracked through the system.
Language requirements will be increased for all immigration routes to ensure a higher level of English.
Rules will also be laid out for adult dependants, meaning that they will have to demonstrate a basic understanding of the language.
Meanwhile skilled worker visas will require a university degree, and there will be tighter restrictions on recruitment for jobs with skills shortages.
Ministers are looking to bring down net migration figures, which stood at 728,000 in the year to mid-2024.
'Every area of the immigration system, including work, family and study, will be tightened up so we have more control,' the Prime Minister is expected to say on Monday.
'Enforcement will be tougher than ever and migration numbers will fall.'
He will say that the system under the reforms will be 'controlled, selective and fair', and will recognise 'those who genuinely contribute to Britain's growth and society, while restoring common sense and control to our borders'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper speaks during the Organised Immigration Crime Summit in London in March. / Credit: AP
Ms Cooper told Sky News On Sunday that 'we will be closing the care worker visa for overseas recruitment'.
Under current rules, to qualify for a care worker visa a person must have a certificate of sponsorship from their employer with information about the role they have been offered in the UK.
The Home Secretary told the BBC the rules around the system will change to 'prevent' it being used 'to recruit from abroad' but 'we will allow them to continue to extend visas and also to recruit from more than 10,000 people who came on a care worker visa, where the sponsorship visa was cancelled'.
The head of a nursing union is expected to criticise the decision in a keynote speech on Monday.
Prof Nicola Ranger, the general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing will tell its annual congress that the Government's plans are about 'pandering and scapegoating'.
'The UK is so reliant on overseas colleagues, especially in social care.
'The Government has no plan to grow a domestic workforce.
'This is about politics – pandering and scapegoating.
'It should be about people,' she will say.
'We need an immigration system that works for care staff, nurses and the people who rely on them.'
Care England's chief executive Martin Green earlier labelled the Government's plans as 'cruel'.
The plans come less than a fortnight after Reform UK surged to victory in local council elections across England, a result that deputy leader Richard Tice has said was 'because people are raging, furious, about the levels of both legal and illegal immigration'.
The Conservatives have said that the Prime Minister is 'trying to take steal credit for recent substantial reductions in visa numbers that resulted from Conservative reforms in April 2024'.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp added: 'Starmer is the same man who wrote letters protesting against deporting dangerous foreign criminals and has overseen the worst ever start to a year for illegal immigrants crossing the channel.
'The idea that Starmer is tough on immigration is a joke.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
3 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data. – How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK? The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. – How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers? It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210. – Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation. – Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement? Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier. Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers. The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'. – What is the Government saying since the legal ruling? Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'. She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels. – What options does the Home Office have now? Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex. The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis. The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September. – Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel? The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August. After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels. But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors. The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Politicians making mischief over asylum hotels are in for an unwelcome surprise
The High Court's ruling that asylum seekers must be moved out of the Bell Hotel in Epping leaves Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, with a nasty headache. The small boats keep on coming, and, under the law, asylum seekers must be housed somewhere while their cases are assessed. The Home Office was behind the curve on the legal action by Tory-led Epping Forest District Council, issuing a last-minute plea to no avail. There is gloom among ministers, who fear a dangerous precedent has been set; they are privately bemused that the ruling was based on the hotel owner's failure to obtain a change of use permission under planning regulations. Ministers fear the ruling will encourage more protests outside other asylum hotels, creating an opening for the far right. The ruling shines an unwelcome spotlight on the small boats crisis. In fact, the government has had a reasonable run on this nightmarish issue in recent weeks, announcing a raft of initiatives in the fallow summer period, including the potentially game-changing "one in, one out" returns agreement with France. Today, Dan Jarvis, the security minister, hoped to highlight a returns deal with Iraq, but his media round was dominated by asylum hotels. He struggled to spell out what his 'other more appropriate accommodation' for migrants might be if more have to leave them. The Conservatives and Reform UK are making mischief, encouraging other local authorities to take legal action aimed at closing asylum hotels in their areas. Tory-run Broxbourne is already following Epping Forest's lead. The 10 authorities run by Reform will doubtless do the same. Nigel Farage has called for 'peaceful protests' outside the hotels to 'put pressure' on councils to go to law. This is divisive and irresponsible: if the far right again exploits such demonstrations, it will be nothing to do with Farage, of course. The Tories are enjoying the government's embarrassment, and their hypocrisy knows no bounds. The number of asylum hotels peaked at 402 under the Sunak government, when up to 56,000 people were housed in them. Today, 210 of the hotels house 32,000 people at a cost of about £5m a day. Labour has pledged to close them all by 2029, but the short-term pressures have now suddenly got worse. Sensible Tories know their party is guilty of double standards. A revealing WhatsApp exchange leaked to ConservativeHome shows that some Tory MPs complained about their party's anti-Labour attack ad criticising the 'huge list of freebies and perks' allegedly enjoyed by people in asylum hotels – because asylum seekers enjoyed the same standards under the Tory government. Lewis Cocking, the new MP for Broxbourne, wrote: 'This makes us look silly as we gave them all this too, which is why we are in the mess we are in today.' Kevin Hollinrake, the Tory chair, agreed with the criticism but didn't withdraw the ad. This goes to the heart of an intense Tory debate about how far the party should apologise for its mistakes in power on issues like immigration and the economy. Some party figures think the Tories will not get a hearing from voters until Kemi Badenoch makes a big bang mea culpa. But Rachel Maclean, the party's director of strategy, claims: 'We've done the mea culpas, we've done the apologies, we've done all that.' I hadn't noticed, and, more importantly, neither has the public. There is little sign the Tories have learnt lessons. Incredibly, Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, responded to the Epping ruling by calling on Labour to bring back the Tories' discredited Rwanda scheme. He is flogging a dead horse that would never have run even if last year's general election had not intervened. It's not easy for Badenoch. A messy tit-for-tat dispute ensued after she distanced her party from the Liz Truss mini-Budget by claiming Labour was making 'even bigger mistakes.' This half-hearted apology didn't stop the ever-unrepentant Truss from accusing Badenoch of repeating 'spurious narratives' to 'divert from the real failures of 14 years of Conservative government in which her supporters are particularly implicated.' Badenoch herself was not entirely absent from the scene of the crime: at the time, s he praised the Truss mini-Budget. I don't think the Tory leader will be taken seriously by voters until she makes a fuller admission of the party's mistakes in 14 years in office. Saying ad nauseam that her party is 'under new leadership' won't cut it. Nor can the Tories rely on an anti-Labour tide to sweep them back to power because voters have somewhere else to go – to Farage.
STV News
4 minutes ago
- STV News
Glasgow facing £80m financial black hole even with 10% council tax rise
Glasgow City Council is facing a significant £110m budget gap by 2028. Even if the local authority increases council tax by 5% for the next two years, it would still face an £80m black hole. More than £65m of the shortfall is from pressure associated with homelessness, the council's latest financial outlook report said. It comes amid weak economic growth and a downturn in business across the UK and 'significant challenges' in public funding for the Scottish Government. Glasgow's finance director, Robert Emmott, said housing and homelessness remains one of the council's biggest expenses. It was previously reported that Glasgow houses around 4,000 asylum seekers, which the council warned in April is putting too much pressure on the city's services. It was also reported that a decision by the previous UK Government to speed up the processing of asylum claims had led to more people presenting as homeless in Glasgow. Nevertheless, councillors agreed in March to cover the cost of a UK Government decision to speed up the processing of asylum claims for another year. Unless policy changes, the costs of that decision will rise to £43m in 2025/26 and £66m in 2026/27. Mr Emmott's latest report said a 'pause' in both asylum dispersal to Glasgow and the requirement to house asylum applicants from outwith Scotland would reduce estimated costs to £36m in 2025/26 and then to £13m in 2026/27, if implemented from October 2025. Glasgow's city administration committee report will recommend seeking more money and further help from the UK and Scottish Government's on the impact of homelessness within the city. Glasgow City Council has been asked for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
