Man, 76, charged with child cruelty offences over summer camp ‘poisoning'
Eight children, all boys aged between eight and 11, and an adult, who were taken to hospital as a precaution, have all since been discharged.
Jonathon Ruben, of Landmere Lane, Ruddington, Nottingham, will be charged with three counts of wilful ill treatment relating to three boys at the summer camp between July 25 and July 29, the Crown Prosecution Service said on Friday.
He was remanded into custody and will appear at Leicester Magistrates' Court on Saturday.
Ruben, 76, was originally arrested on Monday evening at a pub on suspicion of administering poison or a noxious thing with intent to injure, aggrieve or annoy.
Sentencing Council guidelines state that ill treatment of a child can result in a maximum sentence of 14 years' imprisonment under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933.
Leicestershire Police has referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) over its handling of the incident.
The force originally said the incident happened on Monday, before amending it to Sunday, and it is still unclear whether officers only responded on Monday, and whether that is why the force has referred itself to the IOPC.
Janine McKinney, chief crown prosecutor for CPS East Midlands, said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service has authorised the prosecution of a 76-year-old man with child cruelty offences following a police investigation into a summer camp held at Stathern Lodge, Leicestershire.
'This decision has been made after reviewing a file of evidence from Leicestershire Police.
'Jonathon Ruben will be charged with three offences of wilful ill treatment of a child relating to three boys.
'This has been an extremely upsetting and shocking moment for the community, and especially for the children and parents most directly affected.
'We would like to remind all concerned that there are now active criminal proceedings against Mr Ruben, and he has the right to a fair trial.
'There must be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online that may in any way prejudice these proceedings.'
Leicestershire Police said the 'owners and operators of Stathern Lodge are independent from those people who use or hire the lodge and are not connected to the incident'.
The IOPC said: 'Our assessment team has examined all available evidence and concluded the matter should be independently investigated by the IOPC.
'The investigation will look at whether there were any breaches of professional behaviour – namely a failure to carry out duties and responsibilities – that resulted in a delay in Leicestershire Police's response to what was later declared a critical incident.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK drivers could face £200 fines for come action under little-known Highway Code rule
As traffic enforcement becomes stricter and roads more heavily monitored, motorists are being cautioned against making this potentially costly mistake that many drivers believe is just good manners An expert has warned Brit drivers who flash their headlights at road users that they could be fined — or face even stiffer penalties — under a little-known rule in the Highway Code. Highway Code Rule 110 expressly states: "Only flash your headlights to let other road users know that you are there." A great many motorists see flashing their headlights as a way of saying 'thank you', warning other drivers about speed cameras, or indicating that you are giving way at a junction. But according to Rule 110, these actions are technically illegal and could result in fines and penalty points on your licence. It comes after UK drivers were warned over 'avoiding' road instead of having to follow new rule. It further warns drivers not to flash headlights to convey any other message or intimidate other road users. Virtually every common use of flashing headlights, beyond alerting one's presence, is therefore against the rules. Penalties depend on the reason behind the flashing. For general misuse like giving way or signalling thanks, motorists risk fines between £100 and £200 plus three to six penalty points for careless driving. However, flashing headlights to warn others about police presence or speed traps carries a much heavier risk. This can be prosecuted as "wilfully obstructing a constable" under Section 89 of the Police Act 1996, with fines reaching up to £1,000. Car finance expert from Simple PCP Claims, Tom Riley, said: "Most drivers flash their lights with good intentions, thinking they're being helpful. But the law is crystal clear, you can only flash your headlights to alert others to your presence. Anything else could technically land you in hot water." This legal framework comes from the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989, and although breaking the Highway Code itself is not always a criminal offence, police can issue penalties if misuse causes danger or obstructs law enforcement. The Crown Prosecution Service specifically highlights that "giving a warning to other motorists of a police speed trap ahead" constitutes obstruction, making this practice a target for authorities. While prosecution for common "polite" flashing is rare, it's wiser to follow the rules and avoid the risk. Public confusion arises because flashing headlights has long been ingrained in British driving culture as a form of polite communication learned during driving lessons or from experienced drivers. However, the rules are explicit that such use is illegal. Rule 111 reinforces this by advising: "Never assume that flashing headlights is a signal inviting you to proceed. Use your own judgement and proceed carefully." Safety experts also warn against misuse of headlight flashing because it can lead to misunderstandings or accidents. Scams such as 'Flash-for-Cash' have been widely reported, where criminals flash lights to trick drivers into pulling out at junctions, only to deliberately cause collisions and claim fraudulent insurance payouts. The legal consequences of improper flashing can be significant. Tom Riley explained: "The £200 fine might not sound enormous, but add penalty points and you're looking at a serious hit to your driving record. For drivers who warn others about speed traps, that £1,000 maximum penalty could be financially devastating. The safest approach is simple, only flash when you genuinely need to alert someone to your presence."
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Police watchdog probing death of man in custody
The police watchdog has launched an investigation into the death of a man who was found unresponsive in police custody. Ellis Rocks was detained by Greater Manchester Police (GMP) officers at the Britannia Hotel in Almond Brook Road, Standish, Wigan, at about 8.35pm on Thursday, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said. Officers had responded to a call reporting that a man was trying to deal drugs at a premises in the town, and an arrest was made on suspicion of a drug offence, and also for an assault in London, GMP said. Information indicates Mr Rocks, 26, was handcuffed and searched by officers at the scene before being transferred to custody, the watchdog added. Mr Rocks remained in custody overnight and an ambulance was called by detention officers at about 2.30am on Friday after he was seen to be unresponsive and lying on the floor of a cell. After paramedics arrived, he was taken to hospital but he suffered a cardiac arrest en route and resuscitation was commenced. Mr Rocks died in hospital at 7.20am on Sunday. After a mandatory referral from GMP, IOPC investigators were deployed in the early hours of Friday and an independent investigation was declared at 10.18am on Sunday. The watchdog has reviewed CCTV from the custody suite and body-worn video footage from officers involved in the arrest, it said. It has also been in touch with the force about receiving initial accounts from the officers. An IOPC spokesperson said: 'This was a tragic incident in which Mr Rocks has sadly died and our thoughts are with his family and loved ones. 'GMP referred this matter to us, and as he was in the custody of police at the time he became unwell, it is important there is a thorough and independent investigation. We will examine all relevant matters including the interaction officers had with Mr Rocks during his detention and what happened after he arrived at the custody suite. 'We have made contact with his family to explain our role and will update them as our inquiries progress.' Assistant Chief Constable Chris Sykes said: 'Our thoughts are with the family of Ellis who have endured the most heartbreaking last few days. What is most important is that they get all the answers to what has led to his death. We will fully co-operate with the IOPC's inquiries. 'Incidents where someone sadly dies following police contact are rare but are nevertheless deeply impactful for that person's loved ones. It is important following a death in our custody that a thorough and independent investigation takes place, and I urge people to not rush to judgment before the full facts are established.'
Rhyl Journal
6 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Two more men charged over Epping migrant hotel disorder
It brings the total number of people charged by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) after protests in Epping, Essex, to 11. Charlie Land, 23, has been charged with violent disorder and criminal damage. Luke Fleming, 21, has been charged with violent disorder. Both will appear at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Monday. Nine others have already been charged by the CPS. Shaun Thompson, 37, is charged with violent disorder and criminal damage; Lee Gower, 43, is charged with violent disorder and assault on an emergency worker; Aaron Elles, 28, Jonathan Glover, 47, Stuart Williams, 36, and Dean Smith, 51, are charged with violent disorder; Keith Silk, 33, is charged with violent disorder and criminal damage; and Phillip Curson, 52, is charged with violent disorder. Martin Peagram, 33, has been found guilty of violent disorder. The charges came after weeks of protests outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, which is used to house asylum seekers. Demonstrations began on July 13 after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. Essex Police had recently put dispersal orders in place ahead of some protests, giving officers powers to direct anyone suspected of committing anti-social behaviour to leave the area. The force has also used Section 60AA orders to prevent people from wearing face coverings.
