
Consumers pull back on spending amid trade war concerns, new data shows
Consumers are continuing to pull back on their spending amid the uncertainty of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, according to a new report from TD Economics.
'Canadian consumers hit pause in the second quarter of 2025, reacting to escalating trade tensions … unlikely to splurge on large purchases when they're worried about losing their jobs,' the report says.
'Said plainly: the damage is done.'
What does the data show?
The report, based on the latest credit and debit card spending data in the second quarter (April to June), showed that although the total amount spent increased by 1.5 per cent compared to last year, that is a decline from 5.4 per cent in the first three months of the year.
Story continues below advertisement
On top of this, TD says it is lowering its forecast for the remainder of the year as it expects this trend to continue with 'some recovery toward the end of the year.'
The trend is also consistent with the latest numbers from Statistics Canada, which showed most recently that in April, retail sales increased by 0.3 per cent compared to March. That's down from a 0.8 per cent increase in March compared to February.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'With the elimination of carbon tax, spending at gas stations declined. So basically cheaper spending at gas stations,' says economist Maria Solovieva at TD Bank Group.
At the start of April, Prime Minister Mark Carney removed the consumer carbon price, which may have contributed to the overall decline in card spending, as the amounts tracked as being spent at places like gas stations declined.
When looking beyond the headline reading, there are more specifics in the report which show where consumers may be cutting back.
'We can break it down by high-level categories like furniture spending declining, for example, grocery spending, that suggests that we are, as Canadians, we're a little bit more cautious potentially,' says Solovieva.
'Similarly with services spending, like air travel, for example … we also saw the slowdowns in those types of spending, or a complete contraction.'
Story continues below advertisement
4:15
NerdWallet Consumer Credit Card Report
Although the impact of Trump's tariffs may not be fully reflected yet in higher prices for goods and services, the uncertain outlook for household budgets and the labour market may be leading many consumers to take a cautious approach when opening their wallets.
What are Canadian consumers most concerned about?
Trump's tariffs have long been expected to lead to job cuts as higher costs could weigh on business expansion budgets on top of those of consumers.
Story continues below advertisement
A separate TD report warned that on the current trajectory, the trade war could lead to 100,000 additional job cuts by the third quarter depending on how governments respond.
'Some of us are, especially who are maybe working in the sectors that are tied to U.S. trade, potentially expecting some reduction in their hours, working hours, or potentially layoffs,' says Solovieva.
'So that uncertainty created this environment where consumers just decided to be a little bit more cautious and perhaps not to spend on those items.'
The latest labour market data from Statistics Canada showed unemployment increased to seven per cent in May, led by job losses in manufacturing. The trend is forecast to continue as the trade war evolves, and many workers in vulnerable sectors may be bracing for challenging times ahead.
'We actually are seeing that in the data already, and some are already saying, you know what, I need to be a little bit more careful with what I'm buying in this period of time. So we are expecting still a little bit of an increase in unemployment. We're currently at seven per cent unemployment rate. We're expecting it to rise to 7.2 per cent,' says Solovieva.
'We'll see how the numbers play out, but consumption will probably be flat for Q2 and potentially with negative momentum into Q3. So we expect the contraction in the third quarter.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

National Observer
29 minutes ago
- National Observer
Carney's controversial major projects bill becomes law
Prime Minister Mark Carney's Bill C-5 is now law after the Senate passed the bill without any changes. Along with removing federal barriers to internal trade, the legislation allows the federal cabinet to conditionally approve projects it deems 'in the national interest' before regulatory processes take place and enable cabinet to exempt those projects from many laws and regulations. The projects that will be fast-tracked under the new law have not yet been chosen. Carney solicited 'wish lists' of projects from the premiers at the recent federal-provincial gathering in Saskatoon, Sask. For the next five years, cabinet can designate projects as 'in the national interest' but after that, the list will close. As long as a project is on the list before the sunset clause kicks in, it can be exempted from laws. A coalition of environmental groups quickly condemned the passage of the controversial major projects bill, saying it erodes democratic principles, runs roughshod over Indigenous rights, shuts Canadians out of decisions that could affect them and puts the environment at risk. 'Bill C-5 is an assault on science and democracy,' Anna Johnston, a staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law Association, said in a statement. 'For more than half a century, we have made decisions according to the basic principle that we should look before we leap. Bill C-5 throws that principle out the window.' Some senators did attempt to amend the government bill, which authorizes cabinet to override many environmental laws and regulations to build major projects like port infrastructure, pipelines and electricity infrastructure. But their efforts were in vain. 'Bill C-5 is an assault on science and democracy,' said Anna Johnston, a staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law. On Thursday the Senate passed the controversial major projects bill with no amendments and it received Royal Assent soon after Sen. Paul Prosper tried to change the bill to force cabinet to always consider specific factors when deciding which projects to designate for fast-tracking. As written, the factors — including considering clean growth and Canada's climate change commitments — are just a suggestion and can be ignored. Along with making the factors mandatory, Prosper sought to add the requirement of 'obtaining the free, prior and informed consent' of Indigenous Peoples to the factors. His amendment and several others were all defeated. The government's decision to force the bill through before summer and limit study and debate has damaged relationships with First Nation, Inuit and Metis communities, Sen. Paula Simons said on Tuesday. The Chiefs of Ontario held a rally at Parliament Hill last week and about 350 people turned out to oppose the legislation. Prosper, a Mi'kmaq lawyer and regional chief for Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, said 'by investing a few more months into this bill and ensuring that rights holders had an opportunity to share their thoughts and offer revisions, we would've seen this bill pass with overwhelming support.' In his speech, he quoted Chief Shelley Moore-Frappier of Temagami First Nation who called bill C-5 a 'betrayal' of reconciliation. Prosper used much of his time to highlight the many concerns raised by First Nations leaders, enshrining their quotes into the record. 'Canada continues to speak about nation-to-nation relationships and reconciliation; this legislation does the opposite,' he said, quoting Moore-Frappier. 'It asserts power over First Peoples — over our resources and rights. It was developed without us. It vaguely addresses our constitutional and treaty protections. And if passed, it will further entrench unilateralism as the default method of governing First peoples.' Many senators, including Sen. Brian Francis, lamented that they had so little time to study the bill's substance and impact. Francis called it a 'potentially dangerous bill' that risks undermining public trust. Others, including Sen. Leo Housakos still had criticisms of the bill, calling it a 'poor piece of legislative crafting' put together 'without any real thinking and strategic planning' that is 'highly aspirational.' But he ultimately supported the bill and the decision to fast-track it. Sen. Hassan Yussuff repeatedly urged the senators to pass the bill without amendments. He said opposition MPs made amendments that addressed some concerns and strengthened the bill. He also reiterated Carney's argument that the government was elected on a clear mandate to move quickly in response to the trade war with US President Donald Trump's administration. In the House of Commons, Senate and among the Canadian public, there is overwhelming support for building big, nationally beneficial infrastructure projects. A new Angus Reid survey found 74 per cent of Canadians support 'fast-tracking' major projects. But the consensus starts to fracture when it comes to the specifics like provincial jurisdiction, environmental protection and Indigenous rights. Forty-nine per cent of Canadians, in the same survey, said they oppose bypassing environmental reviews to speed things up. The online survey took place from June 20 to 23, among a randomized sample of 1,619 Canadian adults who are members of Angus Reid Forum. Environment and climate groups, labour organizations, Indigenous leaders and legal experts tried (in the limited time available) to get MPs to change the law. Last week, Conservative and Bloc Québécois MPs made some changes to ensure cabinet won't be able to override a list of laws, including the Criminal Code, Canada Labour Code and Indian Act. The changes help curtail the expansive powers the legislation affords cabinet, but it can still override most environmental laws and regulations, including the Species at Risk Act, Fisheries Act and Impact Assessment Act. A briefing prepared by West Coast Environmental Law warned that bad impact assessments lead to major problems, like the collapse of the Mount Polley tailings dam in 2014. It is still the biggest environmental disaster in Canada's history, authors Anna Johnston and Kristen Theriault wrote. Approximately 25 billion litres of wastewater and tailings from the copper and gold mine — including 134.1 tonnes of lead, 2.8 tonnes of cadmium and 2.1 tonnes of arsenic — spilled into the environment and nearby bodies of water. A 2016 investigation by the Auditor General of British Columbia found that the BC Ministry of Energy and Mines did not ensure that the tailings dams were designed or operated in accordance with the approved plan or original project certificate, the briefing noted. The project never went through an independent, public environmental assessment, according to the briefing. On the flip side, a strong impact assessment can have positive impacts. For example, in 1997, the federal and provincial government, the Labrador Inuit Association and the Innu Nation worked together on an assessment for the Voisey's Bay nickel-copper-cobalt mine in northern Labrador. To avoid the boom-bust cycle that leaves the next generation in the lurch, the panel recommended the company decrease production so the mine can operate for longer and keep community members employed. The company agreed to produce only 6,000 tonnes per day compared to its original proposal of 20,000 tonnes per day and it is still operating. In her speech on Wednesday, Sen. Paula Simons said she worries Bill C-5 is 'overcorrecting in expediting mega projects that may not be of local interest, even if they are of national interest.'


CBC
31 minutes ago
- CBC
Classified briefing leaves U.S. Senators split over damage done by strikes on Iran
Social Sharing American Senators emerged from a classified briefing Thursday with sharply diverging assessments of U.S. President Donald Trump's bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, with Republicans calling the mission a clear success and Democrats expressing deep skepticism. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, came to Capitol Hill to give the classified briefings, which were originally scheduled for Tuesday. Many Republicans left satisfied, though their assessments of how much Iran's nuclear program was set back by the bombing varied. Sen. Tom Cotton said a "major blow" and "catastrophic damage" had been dealt to Iran's facilities. "Their operational capability was obliterated. There is nobody working there tonight. It was highly effective. There's no reason to hit those sites anytime soon," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican. Democrats remained doubtful and criticized Trump for not giving Congress more information. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said the briefing "raised more questions than it answered." Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy said the strike appears to "have only set back the Iranian nuclear program by a handful of months." "There's no doubt there was damage done to the program," said Murphy, but "allegations that we have obliterated their program just don't seem to stand up to reason." "I just do not think the president was telling the truth when he said this program was obliterated," he added. WATCH | Hegseth defends damage to Iranian nuclear facilities: Hegseth defends U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, citing 'resounding success' 7 hours ago Duration 6:05 U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said Thursday that U.S. President Donald Trump's 'decisive military action' ended the '12-day war' between Israel and Iran. The conference follows reports suggesting the damage was not as extensive as the Trump administration had been claiming. The session came as senators weighed their support for a resolution affirming that Trump should seek authorization from Congress before launching more military action against Iran. A vote on that resolution could come as soon as Thursday. Democrats and some Republicans have said the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress. They also want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorized the attacks. A similar briefing for House members will be held Friday. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. They were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. "You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated — choose your word. This was an historically successful attack," Hegseth said at a Pentagon briefing Thursday. Trump pushes back on leaked report saying U.S. strikes did not destroy Iran nuclear sites 1 day ago Duration 5:33 U.S. President Donald Trump is doubling down on his assertion that Iran's nuclear program was destroyed by U.S. strikes. 'I believe it was total obliteration,' he said. His comments followed reports on Tuesday that the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months. On Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were "completely and fully obliterated." Gabbard posted on social media that "new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed." She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would "likely take years to do." Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear program has been "severely damaged." He cited new intelligence "from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years." Most Republicans have defended Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. "The bottom line is the commander-in-chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president," Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans, including some of Trump's staunchest supporters, are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for U.S. involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. "I think the Speaker needs to review the Constitution," said Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican. "And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war." While Trump did not seek approval, he sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, which occurred Saturday between 6:40 p.m. and 7:05 p.m. ET, or roughly 2:10 a.m. on Sunday in Iran.


Cision Canada
an hour ago
- Cision Canada
Pendopharm® and KalVista® Partner to Bring First Oral On-Demand HAE Treatment to Canada Français
MONTREAL, June 26, 2025 /CNW/ - Pendopharm®, a division of Pharmascience Inc., has entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: KALV), a global biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of novel oral treatments for rare diseases. This agreement grants Pendopharm® the rights to manage regulatory approval and commercialization of sebetralstat, an investigational oral therapy for Hereditary Angioedema (HAE), developed by KalVista® in Canada. Financial details of the agreement remain confidential. Sebetralstat is poised to become the first oral on-demand treatment for hereditary angioedema in Canada. This treatment addresses a critical need for patients living with HAE - a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disorder marked by unpredictable episodes of severe swelling. ¹ "HAE can significantly disrupt patients' lives due to sudden, severe and potentially life threatening attacks of swelling" said Dr. Stephen Betschel, Chair of the Canadian Hereditary Angioedema Network. "This potential new therapeutic option would be welcomed, and would represent a significant advancement in the treatment of HAE in Canada". Jad Isber, Vice President & General Manager of Pendopharm®, emphasized the company's dedication to patient care: "This collaboration reflects our mission to deliver therapies that address unmet medical needs. We look forward to working with healthcare providers across Canada to ensure access to sebetralstat for those who need it." "We are pleased to partner with Pendopharm®, whose expertise in the Canadian healthcare landscape and established success in pharmaceutical commercialization make them a well-suited collaborator," said Ben Palleiko, CEO of KalVista®. "This agreement advances our mission to make sebetralstat accessible worldwide as the first and only oral on-demand treatment with the potential to change the way HAE is managed." About Sebetralstat Sebetralstat is an investigational oral therapy developed for the on-demand treatment of acute HAE attacks. It is currently under regulatory review in several countries as a potential oral therapy for hereditary angioedema (HAE). ¹ About Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) HAE is severe swelling (angioedema) in various parts of the body, including the hands, feet, genitals, stomach, face and/or throat. Swelling in the airway can restrict breathing and be fatal. The vast majority of people with HAE have a genetic defect that causes a deficiency in the plasma protein called C1-Inhibitor. HAE is also seen in people who have normal levels of C1-Inhibitor, however, genetic defects in other genes cause their angioedema. ² About Pendopharm Pendopharm®, a division of Pharmascience Inc., is a Canadian specialty pharmaceutical company that partners with various companies to bring treatments in areas such as rare diseases, gastroenterology, sports medicine, neurology, and cardiology to the Canadian market. For more information about Pendopharm®, please visit Please do not further distribute this press release. © 2025 Pendopharm®, division of Pharmascience Inc. All rights reserved. Pendopharm® is a registered trademark owned by Finchley Research and Development Inc., used under license by Pharmascience Inc. Kalvista® is a registered trademark owned by Kalvista Pharmaceuticals Limited. About Pharmascience Inc. Headquartered in Montreal, Pharmascience Inc. is one of Canada's largest pharmaceutical manufacturers, supplying high-quality medicines to over 50 countries. Its global reach and agile development model ensure timely responses to patient needs worldwide. About KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc., is a global biopharmaceutical company dedicated to developing and delivering life-changing oral therapies for individuals affected by rare diseases with significant unmet needs. Our lead investigational product is sebetralstat, a novel, oral, on-demand treatment for hereditary angioedema (HAE). Sebetralstat is under regulatory review by the U.S. FDA. In addition, we have completed Marketing Authorization Applications for sebetralstat to the European Medicines Agency and multiple other global regulatory authorities.