logo
2006 Mumbai train blasts: It started in a jail cell. Now, it fights to free those wrongfully jailed

2006 Mumbai train blasts: It started in a jail cell. Now, it fights to free those wrongfully jailed

Time of India27-07-2025
LONG BATTLE: Wahid Shaikh, who helped found the network, was acquitted in the case in 2015. Soon, his role shifted from accused to advocate
Besides its work on the 11/7 case, the Innocence Network India is helping other terror accused with legal aid
A narrow, rain-soaked lane in Mumbai's Vikhroli leads to a small ground-floor room.
Inside, a few chairs, a chatai, shelves of books, and maps of India and the world hang on the wall.
This unassuming space is the 'secretariat' of Innocence Network India, a coalition of lawyers, prison-rights activists and civil society groups who work for 'the rights of those wrongfully prosecuted or convicted, especially under terrorism charges.'
On July 21, when the Bombay high court acquitted all 12 men convicted of the
2006 Mumbai train blasts
— also known as the 11/7 bombings — some credit was due to this little-known coalition that kept the pressure alive, along with the efforts of the Maharashtra unit office of Jamiatul Ulema-e-Hind.
Wahid Shaikh, who helped found the network, is visibly happy, and yet combative, seated in his two-room tenement. It's where Shaikh, a school teacher in Nagpada, central Mumbai, spends most of his after-school hours running Acquit Undertrial, his one-man YouTube channel that amplifies cases of alleged wrongful prosecution and demands compensation for acquitted convicts. It was here that he recorded a congratulatory message for the accused and their families the night before the verdict.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Start planning your next adventure today
Hotel Deals | Search Ads
Browse Now
Undo
'I was 100% sure HC would exonerate them. I recorded it before the order was pronounced,' says Shaikh. He should know. He was one of 13 men arrested under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for the train blasts. He spent nine years in Arthur Road jail before being acquitted in 2015. The only one to walk free at the time.
Soon after, his role shifted from accused to advocate. On the day the prosecution sought death for eight and life terms for four, Shaikh was in court filing applications to allow two of the accused — Ehtesham Siddiqui and Sajid Ansari — to appear for their LLB exams.
That day, he said, 'This is not the end of the road. There are more doors to knock on, and a longer way to go.' In the decade since, that road became his life's work. Outside of his teaching job at a school in Nagpada, Shaikh has devoted himself to helping undertrials and families left waiting as years passed.
His journey from accused to advocate began in jail. Inside the anda cell, he read 10 newspapers a day in four languages, filed dozens of RTIs, and helped other inmates prepare their defence.
He earned an LLB, an MA in English, and wrote 'Begunah Qaidi', a 400-page Urdu memoir that was later translated into Hindi and English and adapted into a film.
By 2016, less than two years after his own acquittal, Shaikh had formalised his work by founding the Innocence Network, a coalition of lawyers, retired judges, activists, and filmmakers committed to fighting wrongful arrests and prolonged incarceration. The collective organises seminars, people's tribunals, and public campaigns for those caught in the crosshairs of terror cases.
'Innocence Network is an NGO for the exonerees, by the exonerees and of the exonerees,' explains Shaikh, 48.
He adds that many of the RTIs he filed from prison helped him and the other accused during trial.
'We had to build our case from the inside,' he says. 'That became the foundation for everything that followed.' The idea came from innocence projects across the globe. 'Such networks by civil society groups exist in different countries.
When we saw how many men were wrongly framed in terror cases and later acquitted by the courts as state failed to prove their culpability, we realised the need for such a network in India too,' says Sharib Aqleem Ali, co-founder and scholar-activist.
Over the past eight years, Innocence Network has run mobile legal-aid clinics and awareness drives. But one of its most visible tools has been People's Tribunal, a citizen-led public hearing that highlights stories the courts often overlook.
At the first such tribunal in Delhi on Oct 2, 2016, chaired by retired Delhi high court Chief Justice A P Shah, around 15 acquitted individuals shared testimonies and filmmaker Saeed Mirza was among the eight-member jury whose recommendations later informed Law Commission's Report No. 277.
'One of those recommendations was that India ratify UN Convention Against Torture, which it has signed but never formally adopted,' says Delhi-based lawyer and network facilitator Fawaz Shaheen.
Another key recommendation was repeal of Section 18 of MCOCA, which allows confessions made in police custody to be admissible, an issue central to the 11/7 trial.
A second tribunal, held in Kolkata in 2017, heard testimonies from 20 more acquitted in terror cases. The network has also compiled a dossier based on letters written by the 11/7 accused from prison, and continues to file RTIs to uncover procedural lapses and custodial irregularities. Regular meetings are held by the coalition that runs on pro bono support with mentors like retired Bombay HC judge B G Kolse Patil.
As for the blasts case, the legal fight isn't over yet. Bombay HC order acquitting all 12 has been stayed by Supreme Court. And from this tiny room in Vikhroli, the battle continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘France is not as safe as India': Woman reveals why she relocated to Gujarat
‘France is not as safe as India': Woman reveals why she relocated to Gujarat

Hindustan Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘France is not as safe as India': Woman reveals why she relocated to Gujarat

A conversation between a Nigerian YouTuber and a French woman about safety in India has sparked mixed reactions on social media. In a video, the French woman who relocated to India called the country safer than France, adding that foreigners often don't realise the truth due to the various stereotypes. A French woman who relocated to India two years ago. (YouTube/Pascal Olaleye) 'She Left France for India… here's why,' YouTuber Pascal Olaleye, who shifted to India three years ago and now runs a business with his friends, wrote on Instagram. In a YouTube post, Olaleye shared that the woman, a teacher by profession, has been living in India for the past two years. In the YouTube video, she shared what being a foreigner in India is like. During the conversation, she mentioned that she was in Rajkot, Gujarat. She shares that she likes India but would not stay forever. She plans to move after some time, adding that she doesn't want to be bound by geography. At one point, Olaleye asks her about misconceptions foreigners have about India. The woman says that people in France think India is unsafe, adding that it is not. Olaleye then asks, 'Are you saying France is not as safe as India? India is safer than France?' The woman replies, 'Yes.' However, she also shares that she has a love-hate relationship with India, citing some of the instances she faced in her daily life. She says that the reason she loves India sometimes also becomes the reason she hates it. What did social media say? The video sparked varied reactions on social media. While some agreed with the woman, others labelled her as delusional. An individual commented, 'I'm fine in India. Safer than Canada.' Another remarked, 'As an Indian living in France, I don't agree with her. Yes, incidents like pickpocketing, snatching etc are very common in France and can happen even in a crowded place in broad daylight but that's nothing as compared to the eve teasing incidents, being touched inappropriately publicly, people staring at you all the time, moral polices everywhere judging and telling you what to do, that constant fear is no way comparable to anything. I love my country but the truth is the truth.' A third remarked, 'It's not absolutely true. It depends on who you meet and who you have to deal with!' A fourth wrote, 'As an Indian American, the whole 'India is unsafe' is definitely not solely a French thing. Seems trendy these days to stereotype and demonise India as such.

PM Modi says ready to pay 'heavy price' for welfare of farmers as trade war with US continues
PM Modi says ready to pay 'heavy price' for welfare of farmers as trade war with US continues

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

PM Modi says ready to pay 'heavy price' for welfare of farmers as trade war with US continues

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday said he is prepared to bear the cost of protecting India's agricultural interests , as the country faces escalating trade tensions with the United States, further facing tariffs from Washington, as high as 50%. Speaking at the MS Swaminathan Centenary International Conference, PM Modi said, 'India will never compromise on interest of farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers." Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Acknowledging the possible consequences of standing firm on domestic priorities, he added, 'Will have to pay a heavy price for this, but I am ready.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo The remarks come amid a widening trade standoff after US President Trump imposed additional duties on Indian imports, citing India's continued oil trade with Russia. India has, for long, kept a toughened stance on extending duty concessions on agri products, dairy and GM foods in the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the US.

US-India trade war: What triggered Donald Trump's tariff attack on India over Russian oil
US-India trade war: What triggered Donald Trump's tariff attack on India over Russian oil

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US-India trade war: What triggered Donald Trump's tariff attack on India over Russian oil

NEW DELHI: Is President Donald Trump punishing India for buying Russian oil or is there more behind the sudden flare-up in Washington's tone? A 25 percent tariff bombshell, threats of further penalties, and caustic rhetoric from the US President have pushed US-India ties into an uneasy zone. Beginning August 1, Indian goods entering the US will be hit with heavy duties, and the White House has cited India's defence and energy ties with Russia as the trigger. Now, in a significant escalation, President Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order to impose an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, citing continued purchases of Russian oil -- a key revenue source for Moscow's war in Ukraine. This second wave of duties is set to take effect in three weeks and will be stacked on top of the 25 percent tariff already entering force Thursday. Also read: But the timing, the tone, and the tangled web of political subplots suggest a more complicated motive -- one that mixes strategic pressure with personal politics. At the heart of this diplomatic storm are three converging factors: a stalled trade deal, India's refusal to toe Washington's line on Russia, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's dismissal in Parliament of any ceasefire claim which Trump says he brokered between India and Pakistan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find your car's value online in minutes. Spinny Click Here Undo What began as a trade grievance has now evolved into a multidimensional standoff, as both nations weigh how far they're willing to bend before relations snap. A tariff bombshell amid stalled trade talks Trump's latest salvo was delivered on his social media platform, Truth Social, where he announced a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods, effective August 1, and threatened to raise it even further. He linked the move directly to India-Russia energy imports and military purchases. 'India has not been a good trading partner,' Trump told CNBC. 'They do a lot of business with us, but we don't do business with them... They are buying Russian oil and fuelling the Russian war machine.' Trump further claimed, 'India has the highest tariffs of anybody. We do very little business with India.' Trade discussions between the two countries have stalled after five rounds of negotiations failed to produce an interim agreement. Indian officials insist a sixth round is planned for the end of August, and that talks are still ongoing. A statement from the Ministry of Commerce & Industry emphasised that the government would take 'all steps necessary to secure our national interest.' A Reuters report quoting Indian trade officials said the tariffs may be temporary and could be revised if a deal is struck later this year. Trump's Russia fixation and the Epstein distraction The timing of Trump's aggressive posturing on India has also drawn attention to a parallel controversy in Washington: dissatisfaction among Trump's core MAGA base over the lack of action on the Jeffrey Epstein files. While campaigning in 2024, Trump had pledged to release Epstein-related records. However, that promise has not materialised, with the Justice Department and FBI denying the existence of a 'client list.' A Wall Street Journal report claimed Trump had been briefed in May that his name appears in documents related to Epstein, though the White House called it 'a fake news story.' In light of this domestic pressure, critics argue that Trump may be using India as a convenient geopolitical scapegoat. 'This is classic Trump,' said a US-India analyst quoted in a BBC report. 'Deflect from domestic failures by creating an external enemy. And India's ties with Russia offer just enough substance to justify a punitive campaign.' The 'Operation Sindoor' fallout Adding to the tension was PM Modi's address in the Lok Sabha on July 30, in which he categorically denied any foreign mediation during Operation Sindoor -- India's limited military operation against Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack. 'No world leader asked for suspension of Operation Sindoor,' Modi said, responding to opposition leader Rahul Gandhi's challenge to clarify the extent of US involvement. From Busting Trump's Ceasefire Claim To Bursting Cong's Pak 'Sympathy'- PM Modi's Full Speech in LS This statement ran counter to Trump's long-standing claim that he helped de-escalate tensions between India and Pakistan. Earlier, the US President had said on Truth Social, 'I settled a war a month. India-Pakistan was one of them.' Indian officials confirmed that the only contact from the US came via Vice President J D Vance, who warned India that Pakistan may launch an offensive. PM Modi reportedly told Vance that India would retaliate forcefully: 'Each bullet would be met with a shell.' While some saw PM Modi's statement as a necessary correction, others believe it may have added fuel to Trump's wrath. 'It's not about Epstein or PM Modi's speech — it's strategy' Professor Rajan Kumar of the School of International Relations at Jawaharlal Nehru University believes the tariff hike has less to do with Trump's bruised ego and more to do with calculated strategy. 'No, Trump is not doing this because of the Epstein file. And he's also not doing it because of what Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in Parliament,' Prof Kumar told The Times of India. 'The reason he's doing it is strategic -- he's doing it for all countries, not just allies, and not necessarily in response to unfriendly nations either.' 'President Trump may not even be aware of what PM Modi said in Parliament. Essentially, Trump thinks he can put pressure on India, and that India will accept the terms -- including very high tariffs, somewhere around 25 percent or more.' According to Kumar, Trump's broader goal is to exert pressure on nations to fall in line with Washington's geopolitical goals -- primarily isolating Russia. 'He's trying to gain a negotiation advantage by putting multiple charges on countries, and also sending a message to Russia. If Russia doesn't go for a ceasefire in Ukraine, then secondary tariffs would hit a number of countries, including India,' he said. Bonhomie with Pakistan and a bluff on oil Trump's tactics also include posturing on Pakistan, a nation he has historically criticised. But recently, he has praised Islamabad for nominating him for a Nobel Peace Prize and reportedly offered support for Pakistan's entry into the energy export market -- including potential sales to India. 'Trump is also trying to show some bonhomie with Pakistan,' Prof. Kumar said. 'But let me tell you, that's a bluff. Pakistan is in bad shape. No major investor is looking at Pakistan right now. It doesn't have reliable reserves, and companies have burnt their fingers there before.' India, meanwhile, has brushed off the suggestion that it might buy oil from Pakistan. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters, 'I have no comments to offer in this matter.' Strategic autonomy and calculated caution Despite the aggressive rhetoric from Washington, India has remained measured. The MEA has reiterated its commitment to a multi-aligned foreign policy. 'Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country,' said Jaiswal. 'India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership,' he added, pointing out that India's defence and energy purchases are guided by national security and economic needs. Russia remains India's top oil supplier, accounting for nearly 40 percent of crude imports -- a major shift from just 0.2 percent before the Ukraine war. Indian oil companies have shown no signs of halting imports despite the tariff threats from Washington. Commerce minister Piyush Goyal , addressing Parliament, said: 'The government gives utmost priority to safeguarding the welfare of farmers, labourers, exporters, MSMEs, and industrialists.' Pressure versus principle Trump's assertion that India's purchases are prolonging the Ukraine conflict has been met with scepticism in New Delhi. Indian officials have quietly pointed to the hypocrisy of Western nations, including members of the EU, which continue to conduct substantial trade with Russia. 'India, so far, hasn't reacted strongly,' said Prof. Kumar. 'The statement that came from the ministry recently was measured and cautious. It tried to show a mirror to both Europe and Pakistan, pointing out that the European Union still has billions in trade with Russia, and even the US continues some imports.' Still, Kumar warns that Trump's tactics may escalate further. 'If there's no deal, Trump won't stop at 25 percent tariffs. He might go higher and add penalties for BRICS membership or trade with Russia. India expects any negotiated deal to cap tariffs between 20 to 25 percent.' He added that India must also push back on energy realities. 'India should convey to the US that if we shift our oil imports away from Russia, and buy from the same market as Europe, oil prices will shoot up by $15 to $20 a barrel. That will hurt everyone — including the US and Europe.' A narrow window for diplomacy India is bracing for the upcoming visit of a US trade delegation later this month. New Delhi hopes that the talks will lead to a mutually acceptable deal on tariffs, even as it makes clear that foreign policy decisions -- especially on Russia -- will not be dictated from outside. 'NSA has already reached Moscow. The external affairs minister is also expected to visit. These visits send a message that India will pursue an independent foreign policy based on national interest,' Kumar said. 'India should be ready for a deal -- but only on trade and tariffs. On strategic autonomy and foreign policy, especially with Russia, India should stand firm.' Despite the looming deadline, India's official stance remains open to negotiation. 'India believes negotiations are still possible. A US team is expected later this month. India would rather have a bad deal than no deal,' Kumar noted. But he cautioned against retaliatory tariffs as a diplomatic strategy. 'Even if India raises tariffs on US imports in retaliation, it won't change Trump's behaviour. In fact, it might provoke him to go even harder. That's not good advice at this point.' A test for the relationship President Trump has made it clear -- through tariffs, penalties, and strong words -- that he views India's energy policy and trade practices as incompatible with US interests. But whether this coercive approach results in diplomatic breakthrough or deeper strain remains to be seen. 'The August First deadline is the August First deadline — it stands strong, and will not be extended. A big day for America!!!' Trump declared on Truth Social. For now, India appears unwilling to compromise on its strategic autonomy. With economic stakes rising, the coming weeks will reveal whether the world's largest democracies can navigate this impasse, or whether Trump's hardline tactics will deepen the divide.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store