Des Moines Bishop comments on new pope
DES MOINES, Iowa — Bishop William Joensen with the Des Moines Diocese shared his reaction to the selection of a new pope at a meeting Thursday afternoon.
Joensen said that Pope Leo XIV will bring unity to the catholic church.
'And so may be that unifying figure that I know Pope Francis and his predecessors aspired to be. But maybe now, as one from the Midwest, we like to think that we kind of can carry that balance between the coasts and now, you know, on a global perspective that Pope Leo will bring that charism to the church, unity within the church, larger unity and a social and, God willing, peace on a geopolitical scale as well to be an ambassador of peace,' Joensen said.
Beloved urban garden prepares for more crops, crowds in 2025
Joensen hopes that Pope Leo XIV's American roots will help attract young people to the church.
'We would certainly hope that it would light a fire as we were looking for, you know, to, again, appeal to our young people in particular. But to, I think, capture their imaginations and their intention that though we are a universal church, is very much a church that is presented as one of the nations who the faithful are among the world's most populous Catholic countries,' Joensen said.
Joensen also hopes that Pope Leo XIV will visit Iowa.
'Oh, absolutely. You know, we want to bring him here as soon as we can. You know, I think that would just be electric and you know that it'll be interesting. What would be his emphasis as he comes here and what would he care to do? But may he make a visit to Chicago?' Joensen said.
Metro News:
Des Moines Bishop comments on new pope
Beloved urban garden prepares for more crops, crowds in 2025
West Des Moines planning a bridge to the future
1 hospitalized after Des Moines shooting Thursday night
Iowans react to first ever American pope
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What to know about bunker-buster bombs and Iran's Fordo nuclear facility
BANGKOK (AP) — If the U.S. decides to support Israel more directly in its attack on Iran, one option for Washington would be to provide the 'bunker-buster' bombs believed necessary to significantly damage the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, built deeply into a mountain. Such a bomb would have to be dropped from an American aircraft, which could have wide-ranging ramifications, including jeopardizing any chance of Iran engaging in Trump's desired talks on its nuclear program. Israeli officials have also suggested that there are other options for it to attack Fordo as it seeks to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities . But aside from a commando attack on the ground or a nuclear strike, the bunker buster bomb seems the most likely option. What is the bunker-buster bomb? 'Bunker buster' is a broad term used to describe bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding. In this case, it refers to the latest GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb in the American arsenal. The roughly 30,000 pound (13,600 kilogram) precision-guided bomb is designed to attack deeply buried and hardened bunkers and tunnels, according to the U.S. Air Force. It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, but the International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. However, Israeli strikes at another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, on a centrifuge site have caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA has said. How tough a target is Fordo? Fordo is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility. So far, Israeli strikes aren't known to have damaged Natanz's underground enrichment hall , nor have the Israelis targeted tunnels the Iranians are digging nearby. Fordo is smaller than Natanz, and is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, about 60 miles (95 kilometers) southwest of Tehran. Construction is believed to have started around 2006 and it became first operational in 2009 — the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. In addition to being an estimated 80 meters (260 feet) under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Those air defenses, however, likely have already been struck in the Israeli campaign. Still, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel , and officials have said Fordo was part of that plan. 'This entire operation ... really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordo,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the U.S., told Fox News on Friday. Why does the U.S. need to be involved? In theory, the GBU-57 A/B could be dropped by any bomber capable of carrying the weight, but at the moment the U.S. has only configured and programed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman. According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds (18,000 kilograms) but the U.S. Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters — a total weight of some 60,000 pounds (27,200 kilograms). The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 7,000 miles (11,000 kilometers) without refueling and 11,500 miles (18,500 kilometers) with one refueling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman. Whether the U.S. would get involved is another matter. At the G7 meeting in Canada, Trump was asked what it would take for Washington to become involved militarily and he said: 'I don't want to talk about that.' In a weekend interview with ABC News, Israeli Ambassador Leiter was asked about the possibility of the U.S. helping attack Fordo and he emphasized Israel has only asked the U.S. for defensive help. 'We have a number of contingencies ... which will enable us to deal with Fordo,' he said. 'Not everything is a matter of, you know, taking to the skies and bombing from afar.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
I'm Mexican American — and I'm done watching radicals disgrace both flags
Across cities in California, we have witnessed something deeply disturbing: American citizens, many of Mexican descent, setting fire to vehicles, waving foreign flags, and claiming to protest 'injustice.' But let's call it what it really is — an orchestrated campaign of disrespect, disorder, and destruction. This isn't civil disobedience. It's lawlessness masquerading as activism. These protestors — many of whom were born in the U.S., speak little Spanish and have visited Mexico only a handful of times if at all — are now using the Mexican flag to fuel their rage. As someone proud of my Mexican heritage and deeply patriotic about my American identity, I find it offensive on both fronts. You do not honor either country by burning down communities and waving a flag you barely understand. Even Mexico's own president has extended an open invitation for these individuals who apparently despise America so much to return. Yet they refuse. They shout '¡Viva México!' in the streets of America while rejecting the very idea of living in the country they claim to love. That's not patriotism — it's performance. It would be absurd to go to Mexico, riot in the streets, and wave the American flag in protest. It would be seen as disrespectful, and rightfully so. The same principle applies here. If you truly respect your roots, you honor both countries. You don't burn one down while pretending to praise the other. This is not about peaceful protest or the right to speak freely. This is about people—some of whom are in this country illegally—tearing apart our cities and then hiding behind identity politics to escape consequences. If you're here illegally, what exactly are you protesting? The laws you broke? The country that gave you opportunity? President Trump is doing what any responsible leader would: enforcing the laws already on the books. He hasn't created any sweeping new immigration policy — he's simply making sure existing laws are applied fairly and firmly. Yet the Democratic Party is treating this as political theater, using chaos to raise money and gin up outrage. It's all grandstanding, and it will fail. Let's be clear: California is not representative of America or the Hispanic community. The culture there, particularly among certain activist circles, is fundamentally different from what we live and breathe in South Texas. I come from a community that respects both its heritage and this country. Many of our migrants are newer, more grateful, and eager to work. In California, what we're seeing is the product of years of indoctrination — people raised to believe that loving America is somehow shameful. We cannot allow rogue states and sanctuary cities to trample the rule of law. This is precisely why Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act must be passed by Congress immediately. Too many Americans, especially in working-class neighborhoods, pay the price when things spiral out of control. It is their cars that are set on fire, their businesses that are looted, their communities that are shattered. The Democratic Party doesn't want you to see this clearly. They deliberately blur the line between legal and illegal immigrants so they can demean Republicans as 'anti-immigrant' or 'xenophobic.' For purposes of political theater, they want to lump us all together so that criminals and patriots alike share the same label. But let me tell you something: I came here legally. My great-grandfather was even born in Texas. I am an American, and my family has deep roots in this country. Like millions of others, we are not the problem. The overwhelming majority of immigrants come here to work, contribute, and live in peace. But thanks to the Democrats' relentless pandering and political manipulation, even those of us who follow the law are constantly vilified. The actions of a few radicals now tarnish entire communities. We have to build a generation that loves this country again. If we can't even inspire native-born citizens to respect our flag and our freedoms, how can we expect new arrivals to do so? In fact, many Mexicans show more patriotism than some of our own people. That should concern all of us. This isn't about hate. It's about accountability. If you commit crimes on American soil—whether you're a citizen or not—you should face consequences. If you're here illegally and riot in our streets, not only should you be deported for entering illegally, but you should be banned from ever returning. If you're an American, burning cars and waving a foreign flag to mock our values, you deserve to be arrested and prosecuted. We are a nation of immigrants, yes — but more importantly, we are a nation of laws. And if we want to preserve that nation for future generations, we must stand up now and demand accountability — for America, for the flag, for all of us. Myra Flores, a Republican, represents Texas's 34th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Former congressional candidate seeks third match against Miller-Meeks
The Democrat who's faced off against Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa) twice and came within 1,000 voters of ousting her last year has announced she'll try to defeat the incumbent a third time. Christina Bohannan, who formerly served in the Iowa State House, launched her third straight campaign for Iowa's 1st Congressional District on Tuesday, seeking to build on her 2024 performance in which she nearly pulled off an upset. Bohannan said Miller-Meeks has had 'three chances to do right by the people of Iowa' in her three House times but accused her of putting 'partisan politics over Iowans.' 'From cutting Medicaid, to siding with DOGE's devastating cuts to Social Security, to enabling unelected, unaccountable billionaires like Elon Musk – Miller-Meeks has forgotten about us,' Bohannan said. 'It's time someone put Iowa first.' Bohannan first ran for the House in 2022 but lost to Miller-Meeks by 7 points. But she ran in one of the closest races of the 2024 cycle last year in a rematch, losing by less than two tenths of a point in a contest that went to a recount. Her campaign noted that she outraised Miller-Meeks by $1.4 million last cycle and outperformed the Democratic presidential ticket by 8.2 points, more than any other candidate facing an incumbent Republican that the national party targeted. It argued her performance forced Cook Political Report and other election analysts to consider the race a toss-up heading into next year. The seat could be key as Democrats seek to win back control of the House, where they currently have a narrow minority.
