
South Floridians spend more on transportation than almost anyone else in U.S.
Roughly 20% of what people residing in Greater Miami spend each year goes toward getting around, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On average, that's more than $14,400 per household in the tri-county area of Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach.
Americans in general are spending more on cars now than almost ever before. According to Kelley Blue Book, new car buyers paid almost $50,000 per purchase at the end of 2024, just under 2022 highs, when supply chain disruptions led to shortages of new vehicles on the market.
And that number doesn't yet take into account the Trump administration's 15% tariffs on auto imports from Japan and the European Union, said Debt.com Chairman Howard Dvorkin.
Those costs hit especially hard in Greater Miami, where residents generally earn less than their counterparts across the country.
Tri-county residents' net automobile expenditures — the difference between what they paid for their cars and what they recouped by selling their old ones — accounted for nearly half of Miamians' transportation costs and 9% of their total annual expenses, again tying Houston, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Necessity explains part of that expenditure, said Cathy Dos Santos, director of Transit Alliance Miami, a local nonprofit promoting walkability, bikeability and better public transit. Greater Miami, she noted, offers few practical alternatives to driving.
'We're asking people to choose between paying really high costs for transportation by having to own or lease their car,' Dos Santos said, 'versus spending sometimes twice as long using public transit to get around.'
Unsurprisingly, most stick to their cars. And given how far many South Floridians have to travel to get to work, it's hard to blame them.
Census data shows that more than half of tri-county workers commute at least 10 miles to get to work. Nearly 15% have a 50-plus mile commute. Compounding those distances is often-grinding traffic. According to INRIX, a traffic-data analytics company, Miami is the 14th most car-congested city on Earth, with local drivers spending the equivalent of nearly three days a year stuck in traffic.
And those cars, whether they're actually moving or idling, need fuel — another big line-item for locals. Gas eats up roughly 4% of Greater Miamians' annual household spending, one of the highest shares among major U.S. metro areas, according to the Census Bureau.
They also need to be insured. Due largely to the higher risk of severe weather conditions and rates of uninsured drivers, Floridians pay more than $3,200 in car insurance premiums — the second most in the country behind Louisianians — according to MarketWatch.
But beyond necessity, culture can explain some of those high costs, says Dvorkin. 'A lot has to do with image,' he said, observing that South Floridians tend to 'like fancy cars,' even if their checking accounts are dwindling.
Fancy or not, South Floridians need cars to get around because much of where they live is built for and around automobiles, said Dos Santos. That's something local governments can take steps to correct. Low-density, sprawling housing — a large portion of the tri-county's housing stock — makes it difficult for people to live within walking or biking distance of work, or even regular errands, she said.
Denser, multi-use zoning can make it easier for people to meet their needs within a walk or short public transit commute of where they live, Dos Santos noted. That, along with investment in capital projects that can improve public transit across South Florida, could ultimately reduce what residents pay.
But they're longer-term projects.
In the immediate future, Dos Santos said, local governments can invest in cheaper, high-impact 'small infrastructure' — bike lanes, sidewalks and improved pedestrian street crossings to make non-car transit, which is the cheapest way to get around, more attractive, especially for short trips.
But for those who drive dozens of miles just to get to work, as many South Floridians do, their employers can play an important role in reducing transportation costs, said United Way of Florida CEO Melissa Nelson.
By providing gas or bus cards — if employees have convenient access to mass transit — for example, employers can help ease their workers' transportation cost burdens.
For workers receiving government assistance, those perks can help offset costs without increasing their taxable income.
That distinction is crucial. Sometimes, slight increases in income can cost assistance recipients thousands of dollars in lost benefits by pushing them over eligibility thresholds — a phenomenon known as a 'benefits cliff.'
But perhaps most critically, offering flexibility — especially for work that doesn't necessarily need to be done in person or at a specific time — is key to reducing time and money spent on transportation, Nelson said. Such adaptability is especially invaluable for families with children that need to be picked up from childcare or school.
Ultimately, she said, helping workers remove transportation barriers opens doors to personal and professional development.
'People who are stuck in their car for three hours a day' can't invest in themselves, said Nelson. 'They're not doing any continuing education, which means they're not training for the job that you might like them to move into.'
This story was produced with financial support from supporters including The Green Family Foundation Trust and Ken O'Keefe, in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. The Miami Herald maintains full editorial control of this work.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Sydney Sweeney ad uproar revives meme-stock ‘squeeze' play
American Eagle's stock meteoric rise after showcasing actress Sydney Sweeney's best assets in its jeans ad has put the company at risk of a dreaded short squeeze, On The Money has learned. Yes, the uproar over the spicy campaign featuring the blonde honeypot – which the 'woke' mob has branded as racist – has breathed new life into the meme-stock phenomenon of torching short seller-professional investors who bet shares will tank by 'squeezing' American Eagle's stock to new heights, sources who follow the money said. During its pandemic-induced craze days in 2021, a massive squeeze put a hedge fund out of business – to the delight of millions of retail traders who banded together to drive stocks like GameStop and AMC to the moon. 3 The uproar of American Eagle's ad campaign with Sydney Sweeney has breathed new life into the meme-stock phenomenon of torching short seller-professional investors who bet shares will tank by 'squeezing' American Eagle's stock to new heights. Donald Pearsall/NY Post Design The odd cultural moment involving American Eagle could make it ripe for a similar buying frenzy. So-called short interest in the stock (an indicator of how many negative bets are being placed) was at an already dangerously high level of 31% before the ad for the 'Euphoria' star touted her good 'jeans' and 'genes,' according to S3 Partners, which follows shorting by professional traders. Then, when Sweeney flashed her all-denim look in July, shares began to tick up. Massive publicity, first positive, that the sultry starlet generates got people once again talking about the fading jeans company. Even when the looney lefties began to attack the ad for promoting white nationalism – because the commercial for the blonde and blue-eyed beauty played with the word 'genes' – shares held their ground. Sales of American Eagle jeans didn't falter because let's face it, most Americans aren't idiotically woke. 3 Massive publicity, first positive, that the sultry starlet generates got people once again talking about the fading jeans company. American Eagle Enter Donald Trump. Our president is an expert at reading the mood of the country and he's not bad at finance either. As the controversy swirled, and knowing that his voters and most Americans have had it with woke, he pounced. First, it was at a press conference Monday when he was told that the actress – better known for her cleavage than her politics – is a registered Republican. He quipped 'Oh, now I love her ad.' A bit later, after he was probably given a full briefing on the contretemps, he followed with a Truth Social Post: 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there. It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Go get 'em Sydney! …The tide has seriously turned — Being WOKE is for losers, being Republican is what you want to be. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Shares responded, soaring by a whopping 30% in just a few hours to close Monday at $13.08. 3 Sales of American Eagle jeans didn't falter because let's face it, most Americans aren't idiotically woke, Charles Gasparino writes. Getty Images Bob Sloan, the CEO of S3 and my partner in the 'Risk and Return' podcast, is the godfather of deciphering short and long-holding stock data. He tells me shorts are now breaking even with their bets but the stock is 'getting squeezier,' which means it's entering dangerous territory for negative trading bets. Another Trump tweet, and some improving fundamentals like a spike in jeans sales based on the controversy could easily put it in squeeze land, Sloan added. The stock's surge is a rare win for a company that reported sub-par performance in the latest quarter, even showing a loss as sales slipped from a host of headwinds – from higher tariff-related costs to increases in promotional expenses. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters But it also might bring us back to the 'squeeze days' when sharp increases in the price of a handful of beaten-down and heavily-shorted stocks became national news. In a short sale a trader borrows a stock, sells it, and hopes to make money repaying the borrow at a lower price. The borrower loses money if the stock rises – and wads of it if he's 'squeezed' by ever high prices— which is what happened during the meme craze. Stay tuned to see if that cycle repeats itself.


New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump backers finally reap rewards after years of debanking, black-listing
The business of MAGA is booming. There's crypto, and of course The Donald's signature country clubs and golf courses that people are willing to pay big bucks to get into. There's also a quieter but increasingly lucrative business of consulting corporate America on how best to deal with Trumpers who control the vast administrative state, On The Money has learned. Yes, knowing President Trump and the people he has appointed is a good thing these days, four years ago not so much. 3 Knowing President Trump and the people he has appointed is a good thing these days, four years ago not so much. Donald Pearsall/NY Post Design In fact, being associated with Trump for many people who served during his first term was for a time the employment version of catching leprosy, former Trump officials tell me. Their comments came following my scoop that JPMorgan and Bank of America 'debanked' Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee. It followed pressure from the Biden administration, people at the banks say, to steer clear of Trump and his family's business interests after he lost the 2020 presidential campaign. You can be like me and not condone the January 6 upheaval and still shudder at the thought that Trump's actions that day means he can't have a private business life, which is what the Biden administrative state working with the nation's two largest banks appeared to have tried to do, people at the banks confirm. But the blackballing apparently didn't stop at the banking business – it spanned across corporate America, sources told On The Money. It included major corporations throwing away the resumes of very capable people, being excommunicated from teaching posts at major universities. It meant being kicked off the speaking circuit, and no book deals, all for working for a time with Trump during his first term, former officials said. Here's how one former top Trump economic aide put it: 'The entire weight of government came out against Trump and people who worked for him including yours truly. It went beyond banking. People couldn't get hired. People couldn't get speaking gigs. It was really, really bad all fueled by the Biden administration.' 3 JPMorgan and Bank of America 'debanked' Trump for his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill melee. It followed pressure from the Biden administration, people at the banks say, to steer clear of Trump and his family's business interests after he lost the 2020 presidential campaign. AFP/Getty Images How it was communicated by the Biden people to big companies to blacklist Trump and his people isn't quite known. Big business, however, is highly regulated. You can see how having a former Trumper in a top role at a major corporation, or Trump's businesses holding accounts at JPMorgan or Bank of America, could bring scrutiny or worse. So why take the risk? Most major companies and banks didn't, my reporting shows. The people from Trump who did land not long after January 6 and Trump's first term ended did so in safe spaces for conservative voices, such as my employer, Fox News (which shares corporate ownership with The Post) and right-of-center think tanks. Of course, many Americans rebelled against Sleepy Joe's various economic policies – from high taxes to inflation-inducing overspending – coupled with high regulation, not to mention its embrace of woke culture. 3 Many Americans rebelled against Sleepy Joe's various economic policies – from high taxes to inflation-inducing overspending – coupled with high regulation. REUTERS Trump was re-elected president in 2024 and corporate America began to open up to former Trump acolytes, But until recently, when Trump actually got back into the White House for Round 2, their job prospects never matched what those who served in the Obama administration experienced. They immediately snapped up jobs on corporate boards, and landed plum assignments in public policy and public affairs the minute Barack left office. Gary Goldstein, CEO of Whitney Partners, an executive search firm, said part of the problem with being associated with Trump wasn't just his deeds during January 6, or even his election denialism after he lost to Biden in 2020. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Rather, it stems from the fact that businesses hate controversy and before he was president, Trump was a polarizing figure in New York, known more for his brash persona and reality TV show, Goldstein tells Fox Business's Teuta Dedvukaj. 'Anyone who is in business and gets involved in politics is putting themselves in harm's way,' Goldstein said. 'It's better to be agnostic. Once you cross that line, especially with someone like Trump, you can't un-ring that bell.' Well, being elected president a second time has done a lot for un-ringing. JPM and BofA will now gladly take The Donald's money, and the banks are all hiring consultants and flacks to deal with MAGA 2.0. Finally it's getting profitable to be MAGA.


Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
Report: Tariffs could drive up Utah car insurance rates by year's end
Car insurance rates in Utah could rise more by the end of the year thanks to tariffs, a new projection finds. Why it matters: The analysis illustrates just one more way Americans pay for higher tariffs. Driving the news: The nationwide average annual cost of full-coverage car insurance could rise 7% between June and December if tariffs stay in effect, compared to 4% otherwise, per a new report from insurance-comparison platform Insurify. In raw terms, the average cost could hit $2,472 with tariffs, compared to $2,402 without them. For Utahns, rates are expected to climb about 7.6% with tariffs to $2,006 or 4.6% to $1,950 without. Between the lines: That's based on the tariff picture as of Aug. 1, reflecting the Trump administration's recently lowered rates on cars and auto parts from Japan, South Korea and Europe. By the numbers: Utahns typically pay about $1,978 for full coverage auto insurance annually, or nearly $165 a month, which is about 17% lower than the national average. Between the lines: Tariffs affect insurance rates by increasing the costs of imported parts needed for repairs. Inflation, accident frequency, and claims due to extreme weather also impact rates, among other factors. What they're saying: "Initially, car insurance companies looked at 2025 as a year to keep insurance rates stable, or even cut them," per Insurify's report. Claims volume could also fall, and insurance regulators could fight price hikes.