logo
TRAC Applauds Minister For Ignoring Treasury Advice

TRAC Applauds Minister For Ignoring Treasury Advice

Scoop10 hours ago

TRAC applauds the Minister of Rail, Winston Peters for standing up to Treasury's blinkered anti-rail view. Treasury appears to be colluding with the road transport industry in some theoretical belief that road transport is cheap, and, therefore, good for the New Zealand economy.
Gareth Dennis, a UK rail engineer and rail advocate says in his book, 'How the Railways Will Fix the Future', '…two strips steel rail, - remain our most powerful yet under utilised tool for societal transformation.' Dennis goes on to say, that there are achievable goals of increasing rail's share of passenger transport to 25% and freight to 40%.
TRAC national coordinator, Niall Robertson says, 'Currently, the so-called cheap road transport vehicles weighing over 3.5 tonnes which cause 93% of all road damage pay just 14% of the cost of building and maintaining roads, and get boosts of $4b for pothole repairs and $5b for resurfacing work'. Robertson adds that most Roads of National Significance have benefit cost ratios of about 21c which is very low. Robertson says, 'This is technically a significant loss in transport investment'.
TRAC chair, Guy Wellwood feels that Treasury has a myopic, short term view of what is economically good for the country and just look at what is cheap in the short term with little thought for the long term value to the economy. Wellwood says, 'There was a time when New Zealand needed to change its economy to a liberal free market one, but things have changed in the last forty years'.
Robertson says, 'We now have an economic system that frets about the 'fiscal deficit', but this is to the detriment of the infrastructure and social deficits which are chronically ignored.' Robertson adds that this short term approach has meant that New Zealand's productivity is continuing to go backwards and wages and salaries are getting lower by world standards'.
Wellwood says New Zealand needs to lift its game. He says, 'Rail infrastructure is cheaper than roading infrastructure and a railway from Levin directly to Marton via Foxton and Greatfod would cost $950m with a BCA of $1.57, which compares with the Otaki to north of Levin motorway at a cost of $1.5b with a BCA of just 21c!'
Rail should be moving 40% of the freight task, but is doing barely 10% currently. That is fine for treasury as KiwiRail in their trimmed down form offer the Treasury a reasonable return as an SOE, but Robertson says, 'There needs to be a rethink of land transport funding, starting with the removal of the below wheel infrastructure from KiwiRail and that part of the industry be funded through the National Land Transport Fund (NLTF), then offering open access to other railway organisations to offer services that KiwiRail can't or won't offer such as a line to Gisborne'. There is a list of bouquets for rail which are brickbats for road transport that will incentivise motorists to prefer more funding to go to rail and these include; road safety, road congestion, road damage, CO2 emissions, road particulate matter from tyres, brakes and road dust that pollute the air, waterways and oceans, small land footprint as rail can move people and freight using a lot less land, improved green credentials with our trading partners and the fact the 30% of the population require public transport as they are young, elderly, disabled or on low incomes'.
Gareth Dennis who regularly speaks on sustainable transport matters, skills and strategy, as well as more specialist engineering subjects and makes a compelling case that railways, 'are capable of carrying tens of thousands of people per hour or tens of millions of tonnes of freight per year on just two strips steel rail'. Robertson adds, 'More road safety, less congestion, smaller road bills, less pollution, better land utilisation, greater green standing with our trading partners and more transport equity and connectivity'.
Dennis says, 'Rail is both the past and the future of mass transit. Anyone who suggests otherwise probably doesn't have your best interests at heart'. Dennis also says that we need to,'…counter those generous party donations from the roading lobbies and the trucking companies and put pressure on the Treasury away from short-termism in financial planning'.
The Minister of Rail appears to have a profound and insightful grasp of these flaws and has made a very nuanced decision in the interests of the New Zealand people to buy rail enabled ferries.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should superannuation be means-tested?
Should superannuation be means-tested?

RNZ News

time9 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Should superannuation be means-tested?

Retirement commissioner Jane Wrightson believes the government should be considering means testing what is currently a universal benefit, an idea she concedes is unpopular. Data from the 2023 census shows more than 9000 people aged over 65 earn more than $200,000 a year. Another 33,000 earn between $100,000 and $200,000. Treasury estimates superannuation costs the government about 18 cents of every dollar it collects in tax, or more than 24 billion dollars this year. Honorary Associate Professor of Economics at Auckland University, Susan St John, spoke to Lisa Owen. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

TRAC Applauds Minister For Ignoring Treasury Advice
TRAC Applauds Minister For Ignoring Treasury Advice

Scoop

time10 hours ago

  • Scoop

TRAC Applauds Minister For Ignoring Treasury Advice

TRAC applauds the Minister of Rail, Winston Peters for standing up to Treasury's blinkered anti-rail view. Treasury appears to be colluding with the road transport industry in some theoretical belief that road transport is cheap, and, therefore, good for the New Zealand economy. Gareth Dennis, a UK rail engineer and rail advocate says in his book, 'How the Railways Will Fix the Future', '…two strips steel rail, - remain our most powerful yet under utilised tool for societal transformation.' Dennis goes on to say, that there are achievable goals of increasing rail's share of passenger transport to 25% and freight to 40%. TRAC national coordinator, Niall Robertson says, 'Currently, the so-called cheap road transport vehicles weighing over 3.5 tonnes which cause 93% of all road damage pay just 14% of the cost of building and maintaining roads, and get boosts of $4b for pothole repairs and $5b for resurfacing work'. Robertson adds that most Roads of National Significance have benefit cost ratios of about 21c which is very low. Robertson says, 'This is technically a significant loss in transport investment'. TRAC chair, Guy Wellwood feels that Treasury has a myopic, short term view of what is economically good for the country and just look at what is cheap in the short term with little thought for the long term value to the economy. Wellwood says, 'There was a time when New Zealand needed to change its economy to a liberal free market one, but things have changed in the last forty years'. Robertson says, 'We now have an economic system that frets about the 'fiscal deficit', but this is to the detriment of the infrastructure and social deficits which are chronically ignored.' Robertson adds that this short term approach has meant that New Zealand's productivity is continuing to go backwards and wages and salaries are getting lower by world standards'. Wellwood says New Zealand needs to lift its game. He says, 'Rail infrastructure is cheaper than roading infrastructure and a railway from Levin directly to Marton via Foxton and Greatfod would cost $950m with a BCA of $1.57, which compares with the Otaki to north of Levin motorway at a cost of $1.5b with a BCA of just 21c!' Rail should be moving 40% of the freight task, but is doing barely 10% currently. That is fine for treasury as KiwiRail in their trimmed down form offer the Treasury a reasonable return as an SOE, but Robertson says, 'There needs to be a rethink of land transport funding, starting with the removal of the below wheel infrastructure from KiwiRail and that part of the industry be funded through the National Land Transport Fund (NLTF), then offering open access to other railway organisations to offer services that KiwiRail can't or won't offer such as a line to Gisborne'. There is a list of bouquets for rail which are brickbats for road transport that will incentivise motorists to prefer more funding to go to rail and these include; road safety, road congestion, road damage, CO2 emissions, road particulate matter from tyres, brakes and road dust that pollute the air, waterways and oceans, small land footprint as rail can move people and freight using a lot less land, improved green credentials with our trading partners and the fact the 30% of the population require public transport as they are young, elderly, disabled or on low incomes'. Gareth Dennis who regularly speaks on sustainable transport matters, skills and strategy, as well as more specialist engineering subjects and makes a compelling case that railways, 'are capable of carrying tens of thousands of people per hour or tens of millions of tonnes of freight per year on just two strips steel rail'. Robertson adds, 'More road safety, less congestion, smaller road bills, less pollution, better land utilisation, greater green standing with our trading partners and more transport equity and connectivity'. Dennis says, 'Rail is both the past and the future of mass transit. Anyone who suggests otherwise probably doesn't have your best interests at heart'. Dennis also says that we need to,'…counter those generous party donations from the roading lobbies and the trucking companies and put pressure on the Treasury away from short-termism in financial planning'. The Minister of Rail appears to have a profound and insightful grasp of these flaws and has made a very nuanced decision in the interests of the New Zealand people to buy rail enabled ferries.

Otago Regional Council Adopts Annual Plan – 5.5% Rates Increase
Otago Regional Council Adopts Annual Plan – 5.5% Rates Increase

Scoop

time11 hours ago

  • Scoop

Otago Regional Council Adopts Annual Plan – 5.5% Rates Increase

Delivering value for money was key in Otago Regional Council decision-making for the council's work in the year ahead. Councillors today adopted the Annual Plan 2025-26 which will see ORC rates increase 5.5% overall in the year ahead - a significant drop from the 13.8% originally forecast in the Long-Term Plan. ORC Chairperson Gretchen Robertson says contributing to the less than forecast rates increase were cuts to some planned public transport upgrades, reprioritisation of environmental implementation funding, reduced inflation costs and work to gain efficiencies. The annual plan focused on finding efficiencies in the work programme while continuing the council's vital work that underpins resilient and well supported communities. 'Port Otago's dividend has been increased $2 million which benefits all ratepayers, as it helps to offset costs that would otherwise need to be paid by rates. 'Also benefitting ratepayers, $2 million of Council reserves will be used to pay for the first year of a new environmental fund,' Cr Robertson says. 'Alongside our core responsibilities, key changes in the year ahead include some targeted upgrades to public transport, increased environmental funding, and further work on natural hazards and engineering. 'A rates increase is still required to help fund this work. This includes the investment in climate change and biodiversity strategies, as well as rising costs in areas like insurance, depreciation, and property rentals.' Cr Robertson says, 'Improving bus services remains a priority. Queenstown will see upgrades with Government co-funding, but planned improvements for Dunedin did not receive funding, so current services will remain unchanged there. Fare changes are also planned. A business case to assess Wanaka public transport options attracted strong public support and will go ahead. Some regional upgrades will not happen due to co-funding gaps, but we're committed to finding ways to improve connectivity options for Ōamaru, Balclutha and Central Otago.' Large scale environmental work will get an extra boost in the 2025-26 year with a new $2 million a year large-scale environmental fund; from Council reserves in the first year. 'This fund invests in large, community-led initiatives that deliver enduring environmental outcomes and excellent value for money,' says Cr Robertson. Planned work in the year ahead includes investigations looking at hazards in Middlemarch and for Lindsay Creek (North Dunedin), resilience work for the Kaikorai Stream near Green Island, and river mouth monitoring technology installation in key areas. The overall rates increase for 2025/26 is 5.5% but the rates impact for individual properties is different and can be influenced by a range of things including location and the services provided. Less than half of ORC's funding comes from rates — the rest is from fees and charges, grants, reserves, dividends from Port Otago and investment income. Rates examples for median value residential properties

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store