logo
Climate Crisis 'Evil Twin' Is Coming for Marine Life

Climate Crisis 'Evil Twin' Is Coming for Marine Life

Newsweek16-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Scientists have warned that the planet crossed the global boundary for ocean acidification around the year 2020, according to a new study.
Published in Global Change Biology, the study from Plymouth Marine Laboratory, NOAA and Oregon State University concludes that a key chemical threshold—set to prevent widespread harm to marine life—has already been exceeded.
The planetary boundary for ocean acidification is defined as a 20% decline from the pre-industrial aragonite saturation state, a measure of ocean water's ability to support calcifying organisms such as corals and shellfish.
March 3 2017, Great Barrier Reef, Cairns Australia. A diver swims over bleached staghorn coral, acropora, during the 2017 coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef. Picture was taken on Pixie Reef.
March 3 2017, Great Barrier Reef, Cairns Australia. A diver swims over bleached staghorn coral, acropora, during the 2017 coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef. Picture was taken on Pixie Reef.
Photo by Brett Monroe Garner / Getty Images
"The original boundary was characterized by two criteria: [First] that the polar regions do not reach undersaturation, and [second] that warm-water coral reefs do not fall below the marginal growth threshold," study author Helen Findlay told Newsweek in an email.
"We felt that neither of these things could be really assessed using a surface ocean global average figure without considering natural seasonal and regional variability, and so our study made the reassessment based also on regional changes."
Underestimating the Pace
Using updated models, the study found that the global average surface ocean had entered the boundary's uncertainty zone by 2020.
In deeper layers of the ocean, the findings are even more severe. At depths of 200 meters, 60% of the ocean had surpassed the acidification threshold.
Previous planetary boundary assessments, including those as recent as 2023, had judged ocean acidification to be nearing its critical limit but not yet beyond it.
The new analysis suggests that the original boundary may have underestimated the pace and reach of acidification.
It also reveals that the most affected regions include polar waters and the tropical zones that support the bulk of the world's coral reef systems.
'Now is the time'
"In our lifetimes (and by year 2100) we are committed to the ocean acidification that has already taken place," Findlay told Newsweek. "We cannot reverse that in the short term.
"Even if we were to stop emitting CO2 today, the ocean would remain at this level of ocean acidification for thousands of years."
However, Findlay noted that carbon dioxide removal and fewer emissions could speed the process up.
"Our models tell us that this is the decade for decisions," she told Newsweek. "For ocean acidification, the emissions pathways diverge around the year 2030, which means that now is the time to make the choice about how we minimize further damage."
How Ocean Acidification Happens
Ocean acidification occurs when carbon dioxide from the atmosphere dissolves into the ocean, changing the water's chemistry.
This process lowers the pH of seawater and reduces the amount of carbonate ions, which are essential building blocks for many marine creatures.
Animals like corals, oysters, clams and some types of plankton need carbonate to build their shells and skeletons. As acidification increases, it becomes harder for these organisms to grow and survive.
Findlay added that there has been misreporting that "all shellfish will die in the next 5-10 years".
"This is not the case," Findlay said. "Organisms are resilient when they are given the chance, but it is the rate of change that is important, and more likely that some local populations will survive and some may not."
Wide-Ranging Negative Effects
According to the researchers, habitat degradation has already become evident.
The study reports that suitable conditions for tropical coral reefs have shrunk by 43%, and for polar pteropods by up to 61%. Coastal regions vital for shellfish like oysters and mussels are also increasingly at risk.
Researchers propose redefining the ocean acidification boundary to a 10% decline from the pre-industrial saturation state to better protect marine biodiversity.
'Stick to the Paris Agreement targets'
When Newsweek asked about meaningful ways to combat acidification, Findlay explained, "Stop CO2 emissions! Stick to the Paris Agreement targets. Protect and restore ocean habitats and ecosystems. Minimize damage to the seafloor.
"Prevent the addition of nutrients and pollution in the coastal regions that can cause local acidification and therefore add to the overall global problem. Fund and support local communities to protect their local environment in a way that has sustainable benefits to them."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Foods Linked to Short-Sightedness in Kids—and What to Eat Instead
The Foods Linked to Short-Sightedness in Kids—and What to Eat Instead

Newsweek

time6 hours ago

  • Newsweek

The Foods Linked to Short-Sightedness in Kids—and What to Eat Instead

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids may help protect children from developing short-sightedness, new research suggests. The study examined more than 1,000 Chinese children aged 6 to 8, drawing participants from the ongoing Hong Kong Children Eye Study. Researchers tracked the children's eye health and analyzed their diets through a detailed food frequency questionnaire covering 280 different food items categorized into 10 groups. These included breads, cereals, pasta, rice and noodles, vegetables and legumes, fruits; meats, fish and eggs, milk and other dairy products, drinks, snacks including dim sum, fats and oils, and soups. Children's hands eating fish with creamy sauce and broccoli in white plate, top view. Children's hands eating fish with creamy sauce and broccoli in white plate, top view. vaaseenaa Roughly 27.5 percent of the children studied had myopia or short-sightedness. Those with higher dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids—commonly found in fish oils—had a lower risk of the condition, while children with the highest intake of saturated fats—found in foods such as butter, red meat and palm oil—were more likely to show signs of the disorder. Measurements of axial length (the distance from the front to the back of the eye, a key marker of myopia progression) revealed that eyes were longest in children with the lowest intake of omega-3 fatty acids, and shortest in those with the highest intake. Similarly, measures of refractive error were most severe in children consuming the least omega-3s. The reverse pattern was seen among those with the highest saturated fat consumption. No other nutrients were associated with the development of myopia. While the study is observational and cannot prove cause and effect, the authors suggest that omega-3 fatty acids may suppress myopia by boosting blood flow through the choroid—a vascular layer in the eye that delivers oxygen and nutrients—thereby preventing oxygen deficiency in the sclera, a key factor in the onset of short-sightedness. The prevalence of myopia is increasing worldwide and is expected to affect half of the global population by 2050, with East Asia experiencing particularly high rates. Risk factors are believed to include excessive screen time, limited outdoor activity and genetic susceptibility. "This study provides the human evidence that higher dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake is associated with shorter axial length and less myopic refraction, highlighting omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a potential protective dietary factor against myopia development," the authors wrote in their paper. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about eye diseases? Let us know via health@ Reference Zhang, X. J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y. J., Yu, J., Tang, F. Y., Li, Y., Yeung, S., Kam, K. W., Agrawal, K., Loh, N. C., Ip, P., Wong, I. C. K., Zhang, W., Young, A. L., Tham, C. C., Pang, C. P., Chen, L. J., & Yam, J. C. (2025). Dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a protective factor of myopia: The Hong Kong Children Eye Study. British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Top Scientist Issues Stark mRNA Vaccine Warning to U.S.
Top Scientist Issues Stark mRNA Vaccine Warning to U.S.

Newsweek

time13 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Top Scientist Issues Stark mRNA Vaccine Warning to U.S.

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Rick Bright, the former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) has warned that Department of Health and Human Services' decision to cut funding for mRNA vaccine development could threaten American national security. "BARDA wasn't the only government agency making early investments in mRNA research," Bright wrote in an opinion piece for The New York Times. "The Department of Defense and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency had already recognized mRNA's potential for swift action against emerging biological threats, including those that might be weaponized." It comes after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the termination of 22 mRNA development investments and the reallocation of roughly $500 million at the beginning of this month. Why it Matters Bright said the mRNA platform had been central to the fast response to COVID-19 and that abandoning the technology would undermine the nation's ability to respond quickly to future biological threats. Multiple scientists and doctors have spoken out against this decision, including infectious diseases expert Dr. Thomas A. Russo, who told Newsweek that mRNA vaccines "will be critical when the next, inevitable infectious diseases crisis rears its ugly head." What To Know On August 5, the HHS confirmed it would cancel $500 million in mRNA vaccine development contracts, impacting research teams and proposals—including those from Emory University, Tiba Biotech, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur and others. The projects reportedly targeted respiratory viruses including seasonal influenza, COVID-19, RSV and H5N1 and included work by major industry and academic teams. Secretary Kennedy argued that the data showed mRNA vaccines had not met expectations for preventing upper respiratory infections and that HHS would shift funding toward other vaccine platforms. But Bright praised mRNA technology, saying that the "unprecedented speed" with which a COVID-19 vaccine was developed in 2020 "was possible only because years earlier, the United States had invested" in it. "This decision undercuts one of the most significant medical advances in decades, technology that could protect millions more people from the threats ahead," Bright said. "I know the stakes because I was BARDA's director when the United States made the decision to invest heavily in mRNA," he said. "That investment did not begin with Covid-19. It began in 2016, when we faced the Zika virus outbreak." "We needed a way to design a vaccine in days, not years, to protect pregnant women and their babies from devastating birth defects. Older vaccine approaches were too slow," Bright continued. "The solution was mRNA: a flexible, rapid-response technology that could be reprogrammed for any virus once its genetic sequence was known. That early investment laid the groundwork for the lightning-fast Covid-19 response four years later." Kennedy said in a post on X the time: "We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted. BARDA is terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu," Kennedy said in a post on X. "We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate." Newsweek has contacted the HHS, via online inquiry form, for a response to Bright's comments. File photo of an employee of the Bavarian Red Cross (BRK) preparing the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 for vaccination in a vaccination center, taken in Bavaria, Germany, in January 2021. File photo of an employee of the Bavarian Red Cross (BRK) preparing the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 for vaccination in a vaccination center, taken in Bavaria, Germany, in January 2021. AP What People Are Saying Former BARDA director Rick Bright said in his NYT op-ed: "Like every technology, mRNA has limitations. Vaccines meant to protect against respiratory infections, whether developed through mRNA or older technologies, are generally better at averting severe disease than preventing infection. It is a scientific challenge we can address with next-generation vaccines. The answer to limitations is improvement, not abandonment. "Political narratives about mRNA have fueled confusion, which leads to mistrust, yet the scientific evidence consistently shows that this technology is safe and effective and holds enormous potential for future vaccines and treatments." Children's Health Defense, an anti-vax nonprofit founded by Kennedy Jr. which focuses on childhood health epidemics, said in a post on X: "CHD applauds this most recent announcement to defund 22 mRNA vaccine projects under BARDA. While we believe that the mRNA shots on the market are unsafe and should be off the market, this is a welcome step in the right direction. The pandemic preparedness industry as it exists today is a threat to human welfare." What Happens Next HHS said it would shift funding toward other vaccine platforms but did not provide detailed timelines or specify which programs would receive redirected support. Scientific organizations, industry groups and public-health leaders said they would assess the impact and consider next steps, while some public-health advocates announced initiatives to defend vaccine science and provide public information.

How Airplane Toilets Could Help Track 'Silent Pandemic'
How Airplane Toilets Could Help Track 'Silent Pandemic'

Newsweek

time14 hours ago

  • Newsweek

How Airplane Toilets Could Help Track 'Silent Pandemic'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Aircraft toilets could become a powerful early warning tool in the fight against antimicrobial resistant super-bugs, a growing health crisis that threatens to kill more people than cancer by 2050. This is the conclusion of an international team of researchers who analyzed lavatory wastewater from 44 international flights arriving in Australia from nine different countries. The findings are both alarming and promising. Using advanced molecular techniques, the researchers detected nine high-priority pathogens and super-bugs, including some that are acquired in hospitals and resistant to multiple drugs. Five of the nine super-bugs were found in all 44 flight samples, and a gene conferring resistance to last-resort antibiotics was detected on 17 flights. This gene was absent in Australia's urban wastewater during the same period, suggesting its was likely introduced via international travel. A stock image shows a plane lavatory sign. A stock image shows a plane lavatory sign. getty images Because it hosts so many pathogens, aircraft wastewater offers scientists a snapshot of emerging health risks before they reach local communities. "Aircraft wastewater captures microbial signatures from passengers across different continents, offering a non-invasive, cost-effective way to monitor threats like AMR," said paper author Warish Ahmed, a principal research scientist from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), in a statement. Significant Geographic Variations The wastewater samples also revealed significant geographic variations, according to paper co-author and University of South Australia (UniSA) microbiologist professor Nicholas Ashbolt. "Flights from Asia, particularly India, showed higher concentrations of antibiotic resistance genes, compared to flights from Europe and the UK," Ashbolt said in a statement. Of the 44 international flights sampled, 18 originated from India, 14 from the United Kingdom, six from Germany and the rest from France, UAE, Türkiye, South Africa, Japan and Indonesia. According to study author Yawen Liu, a visiting scientist from Xiamen University in China, these disparities could reflect differences in antibiotic use, water sanitation, population density and public health policies across regions. Do disinfectants affect genetic material? The team also tested whether disinfectants used in aircraft toilets degrade genetic material. They found that nucleic acids remained stable for up to 24 hours, even when exposed to strong disinfectants—confirming the reliability of aircraft wastewater for surveillance purposes. "International travel is one of the major drivers of AMR spread," said Liu. "By monitoring aircraft wastewater, we can potentially detect and track antibiotic resistance genes before they become established in local environments." This study builds on previous CSIRO research carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic, which successfully detected the virus in wastewater from long-haul flights of returning Australians. With AMR projected to cause more than 39 million deaths globally by 2050, Ashbolt emphasizes the urgency of developing innovative surveillance tools to contrast it. "Aircraft wastewater monitoring could complement existing public health systems, providing early warnings of emerging super-bug threats", he said. Ahmed added: "This is a proof-of-concept with real-world potential. We now have the tools to turn aircraft toilets into an early-warning disease system to better manage public health." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about super-bugs? Let us know via health@ Reference Liu, Y., Smith, W. J. M., Gebrewold, M., Ashbolt, N. J., Keenum, I., Simpson, S. L., Wang, X., & Ahmed, W. (2025). Aircraft lavatory wastewater surveillance for movement of antimicrobial resistance genes: A proof-of-concept study. Microbiology Spectrum.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store