
India ‘umpired' down but victory for Test cricket
Simply put the third India-England showdown had all the elements that typify a glorious Test match- superlative drama, display of grit and courage, the never-say-die spirit to stay in the hunt staring at adversity and an anti-climax finish but respect intact for the losing side's display of extraordinary courage when the chips seemed down. Incidentally, till the very end it seemed like the writing was on the wall for both the hosts and the visiting team. The Lord's Test symbolized the traditionally held notion-no match is won till the last ball is bowled. On that count, it makes for a classic testimonial for Test cricket.
However, caught in this celebratory euphoria one should not forget that the match also brought back the darker and murkier side of the game because of which cricket was in the news for all the wrong reasons before the advent of technology-the dreaded umpiring that was forever biased towards the host team. It is shameful that umpiring raised its ugly head during the third India-England Test and that too in the game's most revered headquarters. Umpiring was not just shoddy or bizarre but one in which the umpire's came up with decisions that were hugely condemnable and severely punishable.
Alas, it made for an unsporting cut of a match that should have entered the record books as one of most closely fought Test battles with players from neither side budging or buckling under pressure. It was anybody's game before tea on the final day. With their dubious decisions, umpires played spoilsport, especially Australian umpire Paul Reiffel, whose contentious decisions not only changed the script of the final day proceedings but also took the match away from India. Questionable LBW verdicts added to India's frustration even on the fourth day, while the situation worsened on the deciding day, a day when a series of calls went against the visitors.
It blew into a full-fledged controversy after K L Rahul was adjudged not out and the subsequent DRS review overturned the call, a decision that was ridiculed by Sunil Gavaskar. Ravichandran Ashwin was equally furious when earlier Reiffel declared Shubman Gill out caught behind off a delivery that missed the bat by a 'mile'.
There were several such umpiring goof-ups that turned the tables against India. These will take old-timers back to the pre-third umpire days when biased umpiring invariably destroyed the winning prospects of visiting teams and some decisions almost destroyed the 'gentleman' image of the great game and led to international chaos. Hopefully, umpiring blues will be a thing of the past as India heads to Manchester for the furth Test, slated to commence on July 23.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Make It Worse': Oscar Piastri Not Regretting Refusal Of McLaren's 'New Component'
Last Updated: Oscar Piastri has tested McLaren's new suspension but didn't adopt it, unlike teammate Lando Norris who won two races with it. Star Australian racing driver Oscar Piastri has said that he tested McLaren's new alternative front suspension layout on the simulator, but, not having felt great, he decided not to adopt it in his car. Notably, his teammate Lando Norris did and has won the last two races. With rain on the radar and Norris just eight points behind him, Piastri has arrived at Spa this week defending not just his top rank but the choice to not adopt the front suspension as well. McLaren revised upright mounting points that altered steering to address Norris' early-season discomfort with front-end precision. While he took to it, his teammate Piastri didn't and across three races since, the former has two victories. The Aussie driver has none. 'It's not an update. It's just a different component. I tested it on the simulator. We've more updates coming. I want to have the clearest possible picture of the situation. It's a minor change," Piastri was quoted as saying by While the Aussie driver has called the change minor, the impact of that decision has been major. But to Piastri, this is not a performance upgrade in the traditional sense. 'There are some things that make it worse. So, if it were simply a performance benefit, I'd add it without question, but that's not the case," Piastri said. Team principal Andrea Stella and the McLaren technical group now face the extra thought of producing and managing two different car specs. In a title run this close, similar car steps would make logistics easy, simplify data correlation and reduce working hours in the factory. What began as a slight change to help balance McLaren's internal performance is now coinciding with a swing in Norris' favour. He has cut Piastri's championship lead to only eight points. As Formula One resumes after a mini-break, McLaren duo Piastri and Norris intensify their duel to succeed Max Verstappen as world champion. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Zak Crawley hits back at Shubman Gill's 90 seconds claim: It wasn't intentional
England opener Zak Crawley has responded calmly to Shubman Gill's claim that he and fellow batter Ben Duckett arrived 90 seconds late to the crease in the third Test at Lord's, clarifying that any delay was the media after the second day of the fourth Test in Manchester, Crawley explained that he remained in the dressing room until he saw the umpires walk out, following what he believed to be standard acknowledging Gill's concerns, Crawley maintained that the situation was a misunderstanding rather than a breach of protocol. He reaffirmed his respect for the match officials and the spirit of the game. ENG vs IND, 4th TEST DAY 2 SCORECARD | HIGHLIGHTS"No, it wasn't intentional. I sit in my spot until the umpires go out. I walked out when I saw them go. I wasn't aware we were 90 seconds late, but fair enough,' Crawley said. 'I love batting with Ben Duckett'Day 2 saw England seize the momentum at Old Trafford, thanks to a rapid-fire opening stand of 166 runs between Ben Duckett (94) and Crawley (84). The pair scored at over five runs per over across just 32 overs, putting India on the back foot century opening partnership was only the fifth for Duckett and Crawley in 53 Test innings together. Duckett blazed his way to 94 off around 100 balls, while Crawley impressed with a composed 84, handling the seaming conditions with confidence and their partnership, Crawley said, "I love batting with him. He's a phenomenal player. He scores effortlessly — today, almost a run-a-ball — and that takes pressure off me. We communicate well in the middle, and with our left-right combo and height difference, I'm sure it's tricky for bowlers when we're both going.'By the close of play, England had reached 225 for two, narrowing the gap to just 133 runs behind India's first-innings total of 358.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'India "handed" Rishabh Pant's runs back to England': Ex-England captain questions Shubman Gill's captaincy
Rishabh Pant (Getty Images) NEW DELHI: England asserted their dominance on Day 2 of the fourth Test against India at Old Trafford, Manchester, ending Thursday's play at 225/2. A commanding 166-run opening stand between Ben Duckett and Zak Crawley laid the foundation, helping England close in on India's first innings total of 358. The deficit now stands at just 133 runs, despite Rishabh Pant 's earlier half-century. Duckett and Crawley resumed the final session at 77 without loss and continued to pile on the runs. Duckett reached his fifty with a boundary off Shardul Thakur, which also took England past the 100-run mark. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Crawley wasn't far behind, bringing up his own half-century by driving Thakur to the boundary in the 21st over. England crossed 150 in the 29th over, courtesy of another Duckett boundary—this time off Mohammed Siraj. Former England skipper Nasser Hussain didn't hold back in his criticism of India's bowling and captaincy. "Slightly changing conditions, but they bowled very poorly. A change in overhead conditions doesn't make you bowl both sides of the wicket. Too many balls on the pads. Captain's decisions... didn't quite agree with, to be honest. Kamboj wasn't in the squad a week ago, to bring him into the team and give him a new ball ahead of Siraj. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo .. seems odd," Hussain said on Sky Sports. He continued: "I would've gone for Siraj for a short burst, then switched him to the other end to follow Bumrah. We've all been talking about the green channel on the strip across... this is the end where Stokes bowled and got his fifer, and got uneven bounce and sideways movement. Everything that could go wrong has gone wrong." How and why Rishabh Pant's England tour could come to an abrupt end due to toe fracture The former captain added: "Rishabh Pant went out there on one leg, and got valuable runs today. They've just handed those runs back to England." The breakthrough finally came in the 32nd over when Ravindra Jadeja dismissed Crawley for 84 off 113 balls, breaking the opening stand at 166. England lost their second wicket at 197, with debutant Anshul Kamboj claiming his first Test scalp by removing Duckett for 94 from 100 deliveries. England crossed 200 in the 39th over, with Ollie Pope finding the boundary off Kamboj. At stumps, Pope and Joe Root had added an unbeaten 28-run partnership. For India, Kamboj returned figures of 1/48 from 10 overs, while Jadeja ended the day with 1/37 in 8 overs. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!