India ‘umpired' down but victory for Test cricket
Simply put the third India-England showdown had all the elements that typify a glorious Test match- superlative drama, display of grit and courage, the never-say-die spirit to stay in the hunt staring at adversity and an anti-climax finish but respect intact for the losing side's display of extraordinary courage when the chips seemed down. Incidentally, till the very end it seemed like the writing was on the wall for both the hosts and the visiting team. The Lord's Test symbolized the traditionally held notion-no match is won till the last ball is bowled. On that count, it makes for a classic testimonial for Test cricket.
However, caught in this celebratory euphoria one should not forget that the match also brought back the darker and murkier side of the game because of which cricket was in the news for all the wrong reasons before the advent of technology-the dreaded umpiring that was forever biased towards the host team. It is shameful that umpiring raised its ugly head during the third India-England Test and that too in the game's most revered headquarters. Umpiring was not just shoddy or bizarre but one in which the umpire's came up with decisions that were hugely condemnable and severely punishable.
Alas, it made for an unsporting cut of a match that should have entered the record books as one of most closely fought Test battles with players from neither side budging or buckling under pressure. It was anybody's game before tea on the final day. With their dubious decisions, umpires played spoilsport, especially Australian umpire Paul Reiffel, whose contentious decisions not only changed the script of the final day proceedings but also took the match away from India. Questionable LBW verdicts added to India's frustration even on the fourth day, while the situation worsened on the deciding day, a day when a series of calls went against the visitors.
It blew into a full-fledged controversy after K L Rahul was adjudged not out and the subsequent DRS review overturned the call, a decision that was ridiculed by Sunil Gavaskar. Ravichandran Ashwin was equally furious when earlier Reiffel declared Shubman Gill out caught behind off a delivery that missed the bat by a 'mile'.
There were several such umpiring goof-ups that turned the tables against India. These will take old-timers back to the pre-third umpire days when biased umpiring invariably destroyed the winning prospects of visiting teams and some decisions almost destroyed the 'gentleman' image of the great game and led to international chaos. Hopefully, umpiring blues will be a thing of the past as India heads to Manchester for the furth Test, slated to commence on July 23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
Mohammed Siraj Eyes Historic Milestone As India Look To Level Series At The Oval
Indian pacer Mohammed Siraj is just one wicket away from completing 200 wickets in international cricket. He achieved this milestone during the fifth and final Test against England at The Oval in London. After a hard-fought draw at Old Trafford, Team India will be looking to level the series 2-2 and end the tour on a high. Siraj, one of the side's most reliable workhorse bowlers, will be key to India's chances. Recent Form In the fourth Test at Old Trafford, Siraj endured a challenging outing. He conceded 140 runs in 30 overs and managed just one wicket, the dismissal of Chris Woakes, at an economy rate of 4.70. Despite this setback, Siraj has been among India's best bowlers in the series. With 14 wickets at an average of 39.71, he is the joint-second-highest wicket-taker alongside Jasprit Bumrah. His standout performance came at Edgbaston, where he picked up a six-wicket haul. Career Highlights International Matches: 100 Wickets: 199 at an average of 29.09 Five-Wicket Hauls: 5 Best Figures: 6/15 Siraj has particularly excelled in the longest format. In 40 Tests, he has claimed 114 wickets at an average of 31.84, including four five-wicket hauls, all of which came outside Asia, one each in Australia, England, the West Indies, and South Africa. His record in England is impressive, with 37 wickets in 10 matches at an average of 36.16, and a best of 6/70. Can Siraj Work His 'Miyan Magic' Again at The Oval? The Oval holds good memories for Siraj. During the ICC World Test Championship final against Australia at the same venue, he bagged five wickets, including a crucial four-wicket haul in the first innings. As India looks to square the series, all eyes will be on Siraj to see if he can deliver another match-winning spell and bring up his 200th international wicket in style.
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The Oval Test preview: No Stokes, Archer for England; question mark over Bumrah – a strange series set for intriguing climax
It's been a somewhat strange series. Some in these parts consider it a thrilling affair, almost similar to the epic Ashes series of 2005 and offer as proof the denouement at Lord's in the third Test when Ravindra Jadeja watched in agony the ball trickling from the middle of Mohammed Siraj's bat onto the stumps. They also point out India's great fighting effort to get a draw in Manchester from 0/2 in their second innings, against all odds. Or the first Test in Leeds when England chased down a huge total on the last day. Or how India won the second Test without Jasprit Bumrah. Essentially, all four games have been propped up as proof of greatness for this series. And yet, it can also be argued the other way. Because of the flat pitches and middling quality of both bowling units, the games at times have tended to move along on predictable lines until bursting open on the final day near the finish line. At the core of this issue is England's Bazball approach. It dictates placid tracks to accommodate their attacking style of play; barring Joe Root, none of their top order can be confidently backed to do well against seaming balls with pace. Or against quality spin. But again, this has been a strange series of last-minute twists, turns, and drama. On Tuesday, it was the Indian head coach Gautam Gambhir versus the curator at The Oval. On Wednesday, when England named their playing XI, missing from the list was Ben Stokes. The captain had run too many extra miles during the series, and the body had finally given up – the shoulder strain he suffered at Old Trafford made his Oval outing risky and thus he'd be sitting out. There was another surprise. Everyone who saw the pitch, starting with Stokes and India captain Shubman Gill, vouched that the Test would be played on a lively track. From a distance, the wicket had a uniform shade of green, the kind that makes captains pile their carts with pacers. India would be tempted to play the world's No 1 pacer for the game. He would be an ideal weapon to intimidate a subdued England team after Manchester, playing under a new captain in Ollie Pope. But skipper Gill gave only a short answer when asked about Bumrah. 'The wicket looks pretty green so we will see how it turns out.' Though it was pre-decided before the series that workload compulsions would see Bumrah play just 3 Tests in England, the extra game would be a tricky call. India can claim that they have worthy replacements – since the only Test they have won was without him – but England can't say the same about their larger-than-life captain Stokes. He has been the heart, soul – also the legs and shoulders – of this team. Without him on the field, England will either have to change their philosophy or play a diet Bazball. Like it happens with most personality cults, teams struggle when the man deciding everything for everyone isn't around. Stokes's captaincy approach is not replicable. He is known for bizarre and aggressive field positions. To take them from the drawing board to the field of play needs unflinching conviction. Will Pope do the same or come up with his own Bazball methods? The energy Stokes brings to the field is impossible to match. This England team is used to their captain clapping wildly when leading them on the field. A hyper-active cricketer, he is all over the central square talking to players, shuffling fielders, conversing with umpires and asking batsmen to shake hands even when the game isn't over. Stokes has aura and authority. Like it happened at Lord's. Jofra Archer wanted the cover to go deep, the skipper didn't think so and he prevailed without any discussion. There is a certain buzz around Stokes, he keeps the team on its toes. Pope will have a tough time being Stokes. Plus who will England lean on when the shoulders are dropping? Stokes would take the ball in his hand and bowl those inspired 10-over spells in search of breakthroughs. In most games, he has been able to do so. Pope can't do the same. But wants to have a mind of his own, and not be Stokes. Will England then be playing Bazball? Indeed, this has been a strange series. Both teams think that this is a series they should have won by now. England come to The Oval with the trauma of not winning a game that they seemed to have sealed around lunch on Day 4 in Manchester. India also have the angst of letting their advantage slip in Leeds and being so near to win at Lord's, adrift by a mere 22 runs. England's wounds are fresh and the turnaround between the fourth and fifth Test too is very short. Under Pope, they have to regroup, readjust and recalibrate their plan. For India things are easier. They finally look like a settled side. After the draw in Manchester, there were too few questions to Gill about India's obsession with playing all-rounders. Briefly the perennial question of Kuldeep Yadav too cropped up. But again it was not an urgent inquiry and sounded like a formality that had to be completed. On what is set to be the first green pitch of the tour, the meanest pacers – Bumrah and Archer – are unlikely to be in the playing XI. This is a strange series. England seems to be groping in the dark, and India sees light at the end of the long tunnel.
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
England vs India: ‘Can understand why Ravindra Jadeja & Washington Sundar wanted to stay there,' Ben Stokes's peace offer after being ruled out of final Test
The final dramatic moments of the Manchester Test have now taken on a different hue. England, led by mercurial captain Ben Stokes, had perhaps let the frustration at not closing out the game get to them and had a spray at Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar for not accepting their offer of a draw. Now their worst fears have come true. Stokes has been ruled out of the final Test due to a shoulder injury and England have chosen not to risk Jofra Archer either. Had they won at Manchester, England would have pocketed the series 3-1, and not worried about not having their captain and the strike bowler on a pitch that reportedly has more live grass than any other track this series. The post-game injury developments help in understanding their late-evening actions at Old Trafford a tad better. On Wednesday, there was a conciliatory line from Stokes about understanding the Indian batsmen's decision to bat on. Asked if he had any regrets about the final day of the Old Trafford Test, Stokes tried to put matters in perspective. 'No regrets, but I think it's one of those where when you've not been there in the field for 250 overs, you do have a bit more of an understanding towards both sides. Two lads, Jadeja and Washington, played incredibly well up until that point, so you sort of understand why they wanted to stay out there and get the hundreds,' Stokes said. 'We're over it. I think India are over that whole thing.' Time will tell, but in the here and now, England have to grapple with Stokes's absence. 'Disappointed to not be able to finish the series. I've got a decent tear in one of the muscles … Obviously, a bit of emotion goes into this kind of stuff when you find out what you've done.' Stokes had bowled through pain during the final day of the last Test, often clutching his shoulder in between deliveries. 'I came down here this morning to give myself every chance. Obviously, just to play as a batter, bowling was ruled out as soon as we got the scan results.' The England captain had a chat with head coach Brendon McCullum, and spent another 20 minutes ruminating over the decision, he said. 'It's one of those where you're weighing up the risk and reward. The risk was way too high for damaging this any further than it currently is. I wouldn't expect to put anyone else, any of my other players, at risk with an injury like this. 'So I'll start rehabbing now and focus on what we've got coming up in the winter (The Ashes in Australia). Once this series was done, I was feet up anyway, so it doesn't make too much difference.' But in the here and now, it has the potential to make a huge difference. Not just because of Stokes's leadership, but for his outstanding bowling through the series. In the last game, he had also returned to batting form with a hundred. Not just Stokes, England have other worries to deal with for the final game. Besides Stokes, Archer, Liam Dawson and Brydon Carse will also miss the series-decider. Their replacements are Jacob Bethell – set to bat at No. 6 – Jamie Overton, Gus Atkinson and Josh Tongue with Ollie Pope captaining the team. Stokes tried to put a positive spin on the changes. 'That's the benefit of having a very strong squad and some pretty good cricketers to be able to choose from when we find ourselves in a situation like this. That's going to give us a very good chance of winning this game and winning the series,' he said. 'We're very confident that we've got the ability to be able to win this game and hopefully win the series. Jacob Bethel comes in, bats down at six. There's been a lot of talk about him, a lot of hype about him.'
